Jump to content

User:Dawei20/SkS Draft: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
5,312,756 edits
Alter: title, isbn. Add: newspaper, date. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. Upgrade ISBN10 to 13. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine
 
Line 13: Line 13:


==Concept==
==Concept==
After hearing a 2007 speech by [[Jim Inhofe|US Senator James Inhofe]], John Cook created Skeptical Science to be an internet resource that examined the scientific support of the most common skeptic arguments.<ref name="Yale">{{Cite web| title=Skeptical Science Founder John Cook; Climate Science from ‘Basic … to Advanced’ |url=http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2010/12/skeptical-science-founder-john-cook/| work = The Yale Forum | author = Bud Ward | date = December 2, 2010}}</ref> The site currently maintains over 160 articles addressing common criticisms of the scientific consensus on [[global warming]], such as the claim that [[solar activity]] (rather than [[greenhouse gas]]es) is responsible for the majority of 20th century global warming. Each article, referred to as an "argument", first presents a quotation from a prominent figure who made a direct claim regarding global warming, then follows with a summary of "what the science says".
After hearing a 2007 speech by [[Jim Inhofe|US Senator James Inhofe]], John Cook created Skeptical Science to be an internet resource that examined the scientific support of the most common skeptic arguments.<ref name="Yale">{{Cite web| title=Skeptical Science Founder John Cook; Climate Science from 'Basic … to Advanced' |url=http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2010/12/skeptical-science-founder-john-cook/| work = The Yale Forum | author = Bud Ward | date = December 2, 2010}}</ref> The site currently maintains over 160 articles addressing common criticisms of the scientific consensus on [[global warming]], such as the claim that [[solar activity]] (rather than [[greenhouse gas]]es) is responsible for the majority of 20th century global warming. Each article, referred to as an "argument", first presents a quotation from a prominent figure who made a direct claim regarding global warming, then follows with a summary of "what the science says".


<p> Rather than fully qualifying each claim, the site focuses mainly on challenging it by citing [[counterexample]]s for why it is incorrect, and structuring these examples into an overall rebuttal of the original claim. The site primarily gains the content for these articles from relevant [[peer review]]ed scientific papers.<ref>{{Cite news| title=How climate change deniers led me to set up Skeptical Science website|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2011/apr/28/climate-change-denial-skeptical-science| work = [[The Guardian]] | date = April 28, 2011}}</ref> Many articles have been translated into several languages, and are split into up to three levels of technical depth.
<p> Rather than fully qualifying each claim, the site focuses mainly on challenging it by citing [[counterexample]]s for why it is incorrect, and structuring these examples into an overall rebuttal of the original claim. The site primarily gains the content for these articles from relevant [[peer review]]ed scientific papers.<ref>{{Cite news| title=How climate change deniers led me to set up Skeptical Science website|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2011/apr/28/climate-change-denial-skeptical-science| work = [[The Guardian]] | date = April 28, 2011}}</ref> Many articles have been translated into several languages, and are split into up to three levels of technical depth.
Line 25: Line 25:


The app is available for the [[iOS (Apple)|iPhone]], [[Android (Operating System)|Android]], and [[Nokia OS|Nokia]] systems.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.skepticalscience.com/Talkin-bout-the-Skeptical-Science-phone-apps.html | author = John Cook | title = Talkin bout the Skeptical Science phone apps | date = August 7, 2010 | work = Skeptical Science}}</ref> It is fully-contained, meaning it does not require internet connection to be used, although some features—such as news articles or the ability to tweet which arguments the user found most useful—do require a data or internet connection.
The app is available for the [[iOS (Apple)|iPhone]], [[Android (Operating System)|Android]], and [[Nokia OS|Nokia]] systems.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.skepticalscience.com/Talkin-bout-the-Skeptical-Science-phone-apps.html | author = John Cook | title = Talkin bout the Skeptical Science phone apps | date = August 7, 2010 | work = Skeptical Science}}</ref> It is fully-contained, meaning it does not require internet connection to be used, although some features—such as news articles or the ability to tweet which arguments the user found most useful—do require a data or internet connection.
<p>After 8 months on the market, the app had received 60,000 downloads.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://blogs.agu.org/sciencecommunication/2010/12/01/qa-with-john-cook/ | title = Communicating climate science with blogs and apps: Q&A with John Cook (Skeptical Science) | date = December 1, 2010 | work = [[American Geophysical Union]]}}</ref> The app was entered into the 2010 Calling All Innovators competition, finishing in the Top 10.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/free-app-to-counter-skepticsrsquo-arguments-on-climate-change-2048650.html | title = Free app to counter skeptics’ arguments on climate change | date = August 10, 2010 | work = [[The Independent]]}}</ref>
<p>After 8 months on the market, the app had received 60,000 downloads.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://blogs.agu.org/sciencecommunication/2010/12/01/qa-with-john-cook/ | title = Communicating climate science with blogs and apps: Q&A with John Cook (Skeptical Science) | date = December 1, 2010 | work = [[American Geophysical Union]]}}</ref> The app was entered into the 2010 Calling All Innovators competition, finishing in the Top 10.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/free-app-to-counter-skepticsrsquo-arguments-on-climate-change-2048650.html | title = Free app to counter skeptics' arguments on climate change | date = August 10, 2010 | work = [[The Independent]]}}</ref>


==Projects==
==Projects==
Line 32: Line 32:
<P> In 2010, a comprehensive report called [http://www.skepticalscience.com/docs/Guide_to_Skepticism.pdf/ The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism] was made available for download from the site homepage.<ref>{{Cite news| title= For New Year's Resolution: Climate Change Perspective| url=http://news.discovery.com/earth/for-new-years-resolution-climate-change-perspective.html|author =Kieran Mulvaney |work = [[Discovery Channel|Discovery Channel News]] |date = December 31, 2010}}</ref> Written by Cook and other authors on the site, the report draws from many of the rebuttals published and serves as a non-technical, easy to understand summary outlining the evidence for global warming and the flaws in many of the criticisms of anthropogenic global warming theory.<ref>{{Cite news| title= Human-Caused Climate Change Based on Consensus of Evidence, Not Just Consensus of Scientists| url=http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/12/human-caused-climate-change-consensus-of-evidence.php|author =Matthew McDermott |work = [[TreeHugger]] |date = December 27, 2010}}</ref>
<P> In 2010, a comprehensive report called [http://www.skepticalscience.com/docs/Guide_to_Skepticism.pdf/ The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism] was made available for download from the site homepage.<ref>{{Cite news| title= For New Year's Resolution: Climate Change Perspective| url=http://news.discovery.com/earth/for-new-years-resolution-climate-change-perspective.html|author =Kieran Mulvaney |work = [[Discovery Channel|Discovery Channel News]] |date = December 31, 2010}}</ref> Written by Cook and other authors on the site, the report draws from many of the rebuttals published and serves as a non-technical, easy to understand summary outlining the evidence for global warming and the flaws in many of the criticisms of anthropogenic global warming theory.<ref>{{Cite news| title= Human-Caused Climate Change Based on Consensus of Evidence, Not Just Consensus of Scientists| url=http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/12/human-caused-climate-change-consensus-of-evidence.php|author =Matthew McDermott |work = [[TreeHugger]] |date = December 27, 2010}}</ref>


<P> In 2011 the book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand, co-authored by Cook and Haydn Washington, was published by UK publisher [[Earthscan]].<ref>{{cite book |last= Cook |first= John |coauthors= Haydn Washington|title= Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand |publisher= [[Earthscan]] |year= 2011 |month= April |isbn= 1-8497-1336-7}}</ref> The book serves to examine the ways in which denial of anthropogenic global warming is manifested through governments and the public.
<P> In 2011 the book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand, co-authored by Cook and Haydn Washington, was published by UK publisher [[Earthscan]].<ref>{{cite book |last= Cook |first= John |coauthors= Haydn Washington|title= Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand |publisher= [[Earthscan]] |year= 2011 |date= April 2011 |isbn= 978-1-8497-1336-8}}</ref> The book serves to examine the ways in which denial of anthropogenic global warming is manifested through governments and the public.


==Reception==
==Reception==
Skeptical Science has become a well-known resource for people seeking to understand or debate climate change, and has been praised for its straightforwardness.<ref>{{Cite web| title = A Physics Maven’s Take on Skeptical Science |url = http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/a-physics-mavens-take-on-skeptical-science/| author = [[Andrew Revkin]] | work = [[The New York Times]] | date = March 24, 2010}}</ref> Rather than active advertising or media relationships, Cook has focused on structuring the site primarily for optimization in search engine results.<ref name ="Yale" /> Climate expert [[Joseph Romm]] has described it as an "excellent, well-organized site to send convincible people for a shredding of the standard, long-debunked denier talking points."<ref>{{Cite news| title = Skeptical Science explains how we know global warming is happening: It’s the oceans, stupid!| url=http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2009/10/10/204783/skeptical-science-global-warming-not-cooling-is-still-happening-ocean-heat-content/ |work = [[Climate Progress]] |date = October 10, 2009}}</ref> Marine biologist [[Ove Hoegh-Guldberg]] has described it as "the most prominent knowledge-based website dealing with climate change in the world",<ref>{{Cite web| title = What scientists are saying about Skeptical Science| url=http://www.skepticalscience.com/endorsements.shtml |work = Skeptical Science |date = May 9, 2011}}</ref> and [[The Washington Post]] has praised it as the "most prominent and detailed" website to counter arguments by global warming skeptics.<ref>{{Cite news| title = Scientists launch climate science counterattacks| url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2010/11/climate_scientists_to_push_bac.html |author = Andrew Freedman |work = [[The Washington Post]] |date = November 8, 2010}}</ref>
Skeptical Science has become a well-known resource for people seeking to understand or debate climate change, and has been praised for its straightforwardness.<ref>{{Cite web| title = A Physics Maven's Take on Skeptical Science |url = http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/a-physics-mavens-take-on-skeptical-science/| author = [[Andrew Revkin]] | work = [[The New York Times]] | date = March 24, 2010}}</ref> Rather than active advertising or media relationships, Cook has focused on structuring the site primarily for optimization in search engine results.<ref name ="Yale" /> Climate expert [[Joseph Romm]] has described it as an "excellent, well-organized site to send convincible people for a shredding of the standard, long-debunked denier talking points."<ref>{{Cite news| title = Skeptical Science explains how we know global warming is happening: It's the oceans, stupid!| url=http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2009/10/10/204783/skeptical-science-global-warming-not-cooling-is-still-happening-ocean-heat-content/ |work = [[Climate Progress]] |date = October 10, 2009}}</ref> Marine biologist [[Ove Hoegh-Guldberg]] has described it as "the most prominent knowledge-based website dealing with climate change in the world",<ref>{{Cite web| title = What scientists are saying about Skeptical Science| url=http://www.skepticalscience.com/endorsements.shtml |work = Skeptical Science |date = May 9, 2011}}</ref> and [[The Washington Post]] has praised it as the "most prominent and detailed" website to counter arguments by global warming skeptics.<ref>{{Cite news| title = Scientists launch climate science counterattacks| url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2010/11/climate_scientists_to_push_bac.html |author = Andrew Freedman |newspaper = [[The Washington Post]] |date = November 8, 2010}}</ref>


Climate skeptic and blogger [[Anthony Watts]] is frequently critical of the site’s accuracy and bias,<ref>{{Cite web| title = Pielke Senior: Misinformation on the Website “Skeptical Science – Getting Skeptical About Global Warming Skepticism”| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/11/pielke-senior-misinformation-on-the-website-%E2%80%9Cskeptical-science-%E2%80%93-getting-skeptical-about-global-warming-skepticism%E2%80%9D/ | author = [[Roger Pielke Sr.]] |coauthor = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = September 11, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| title = Rebuttal to the Skeptical Science “Crux of a Core”| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/01/rebuttal-to-the-skeptical-science-crux-of-a-core/ | author = [[J. Storrs Hall]] |coauthor = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = March 1, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| title = The Worst “Cook”book Interview Ever?| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/28/the-worst-%E2%80%9Ccook%E2%80%9Dbook-interview-ever/| author = Bob Fernley-Jones |coauthor = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = May 28, 2011}}</ref> although he has commended Cook's "scholarly demeanor".<ref>{{Cite web| title = Skeptical Science? John Cook – embarrassing himself| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/27/skeptical-science-john-cook-embarrassing-himself/| author = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = September 27, 2010}}</ref> Climate skeptic [[Stephen McIntyre|Steve McIntyre]] has been critical of Cook’s explanation of the “nature trick” regarding [[Proxy (climate) | temperature proxies]], a central talking point during the 2010 [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy|Climategate]] controversy.<ref>{{Cite web| title = Keith’s Science Trick, Mike’s Nature Trick and Phil’s Combo| url=http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/29/keiths-science-trick-mikes-nature-trick-and-phils-combo/| author = [[Stephen McIntyre|Steve McIntyre]] | work = [[Climate Audit]] |date = March 29, 2011}}</ref> In April 2010, physicist [[Luboš Motl]] wrote a 28-page report that was subsequently picked up by the [[Science and Public Policy Institute]]. The report contains point-by-point counter-arguments of all arguments present on the Skeptical Science website.<ref>{{Cite web| title = John Cook: Skeptical Science| url=http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/John_Cook_Skeptical_Science.pdf| author = [[Luboš Motl]] | work = [[Science and Public Policy Institute]] |date = April 2, 2010}}</ref>
Climate skeptic and blogger [[Anthony Watts]] is frequently critical of the site’s accuracy and bias,<ref>{{Cite web| title = Pielke Senior: Misinformation on the Website "Skeptical Science – Getting Skeptical About Global Warming Skepticism"| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/11/pielke-senior-misinformation-on-the-website-%E2%80%9Cskeptical-science-%E2%80%93-getting-skeptical-about-global-warming-skepticism%E2%80%9D/ | author = [[Roger Pielke Sr.]] |coauthors = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = September 11, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| title = Rebuttal to the Skeptical Science "Crux of a Core"| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/01/rebuttal-to-the-skeptical-science-crux-of-a-core/ | author = [[J. Storrs Hall]] |coauthors = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = March 1, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| title = The Worst "Cook"book Interview Ever?| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/28/the-worst-%E2%80%9Ccook%E2%80%9Dbook-interview-ever/| author = Bob Fernley-Jones |coauthors = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = May 28, 2011}}</ref> although he has commended Cook's "scholarly demeanor".<ref>{{Cite web| title = Skeptical Science? John Cook – embarrassing himself| url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/27/skeptical-science-john-cook-embarrassing-himself/| author = [[Anthony Watts]] | work = [[Watts Up With That?]] |date = September 27, 2010}}</ref> Climate skeptic [[Stephen McIntyre|Steve McIntyre]] has been critical of Cook’s explanation of the “nature trick” regarding [[Proxy (climate) | temperature proxies]], a central talking point during the 2010 [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy|Climategate]] controversy.<ref>{{Cite web| title = Keith's Science Trick, Mike's Nature Trick and Phil's Combo| url=http://climateaudit.org/2011/03/29/keiths-science-trick-mikes-nature-trick-and-phils-combo/| author = [[Stephen McIntyre|Steve McIntyre]] | work = [[Climate Audit]] |date = March 29, 2011}}</ref> In April 2010, physicist [[Luboš Motl]] wrote a 28-page report that was subsequently picked up by the [[Science and Public Policy Institute]]. The report contains point-by-point counter-arguments of all arguments present on the Skeptical Science website.<ref>{{Cite web| title = John Cook: Skeptical Science| url=http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/John_Cook_Skeptical_Science.pdf| author = [[Luboš Motl]] | work = [[Science and Public Policy Institute]] |date = April 2, 2010}}</ref>


Cook has also been recognized for his conservative [[Christian]] [[evangelical]] beliefs while maintaining his stance on anthropogenic global warming,<ref>{{Cite news| title=Why would a solar physicist embrace the non-rationality of religion?|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/aug/25/solar-physicist-religion| author = Graham Wayne | work = [[The Guardian]] | date = August 25, 2010}}</ref> two positions that some people would consider conflicting.<ref>{{Cite news| title=Scientist proves conservatism and belief in climate change aren't incompatible|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/05/nation/la-na-scientist-climate-20110105| author = Neela Banerjee | work = [[Los Angeles Times]] | date = January 05, 2011}}</ref>
Cook has also been recognized for his conservative [[Christian]] [[evangelical]] beliefs while maintaining his stance on anthropogenic global warming,<ref>{{Cite news| title=Why would a solar physicist embrace the non-rationality of religion?|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/aug/25/solar-physicist-religion| author = Graham Wayne | work = [[The Guardian]] | date = August 25, 2010}}</ref> two positions that some people would consider conflicting.<ref>{{Cite news| title=Scientist proves conservatism and belief in climate change aren't incompatible|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/05/nation/la-na-scientist-climate-20110105| author = Neela Banerjee | work = [[Los Angeles Times]] | date = January 05, 2011}}</ref>

Latest revision as of 13:47, 2 August 2023

Skeptical Science
Type of site
Blog
Available inEnglish, Czech, Finnish, Spanish, German, Danish, Icelandic, Polish, Portuguese, Japanese, Dutch, Chinese, French, Italian, Thai, Slovak, Russian, Hebrew, Slovene, Norwegian
Created byJohn Cook
URLhttp://skepticalscience.com
LaunchedJune 25, 2007

Skeptical Science (occasionally abbreviated SkS) is a climate science blog and information resource created in 2007 by Australian blogger and author John Cook. In addition to publishing articles on current events relating to climate science and climate policy, the site maintains a large database of articles analyzing the merit of arguments commonly put forth by those who are skeptical of the mainstream scientific opinion on global warming.

Concept

[edit]

After hearing a 2007 speech by US Senator James Inhofe, John Cook created Skeptical Science to be an internet resource that examined the scientific support of the most common skeptic arguments.[1] The site currently maintains over 160 articles addressing common criticisms of the scientific consensus on global warming, such as the claim that solar activity (rather than greenhouse gases) is responsible for the majority of 20th century global warming. Each article, referred to as an "argument", first presents a quotation from a prominent figure who made a direct claim regarding global warming, then follows with a summary of "what the science says".

Rather than fully qualifying each claim, the site focuses mainly on challenging it by citing counterexamples for why it is incorrect, and structuring these examples into an overall rebuttal of the original claim. The site primarily gains the content for these articles from relevant peer reviewed scientific papers.[2] Many articles have been translated into several languages, and are split into up to three levels of technical depth.

The home page of the site also features blog posts by a number of regular and guest contributors, which may be new rebuttals of a certain argument or simply the blogger's take on a relevant climate news item. Like the rebuttals, the blog entries tend to hold a consistent tone that the scientific opinion on anthropogenic global warming is generally accurate.

Smartphone App

[edit]
Skeptical Science app on the Android operating system

Along with software development company Shine Technologies, in February 2010 the site launched a free smartphone application that includes condensed summaries of the majority of rebuttals featured on the site.[3] Shine Technologies offered to develop the application completely free of charge for Cook.[4] The app is available for the iPhone, Android, and Nokia systems.[5] It is fully-contained, meaning it does not require internet connection to be used, although some features—such as news articles or the ability to tweet which arguments the user found most useful—do require a data or internet connection.

After 8 months on the market, the app had received 60,000 downloads.[6] The app was entered into the 2010 Calling All Innovators competition, finishing in the Top 10.[7]

Projects

[edit]

In addition to uncategorized blog posts, the site has published numerous multi-week features that serve to give a more in-depth analysis of a particular topic. Topics which have received special intention include a feature exposing climate 'myths' purported by numerous US politicians, a feature examining the accuracy of past predictions made by scientists studying global warming, as well as individual features to evaluate the claims made by the most prominent global warming skeptics, including Richard Lindzen, John Christy, and Christopher Monckton.

In 2010, a comprehensive report called The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism was made available for download from the site homepage.[8] Written by Cook and other authors on the site, the report draws from many of the rebuttals published and serves as a non-technical, easy to understand summary outlining the evidence for global warming and the flaws in many of the criticisms of anthropogenic global warming theory.[9]

In 2011 the book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand, co-authored by Cook and Haydn Washington, was published by UK publisher Earthscan.[10] The book serves to examine the ways in which denial of anthropogenic global warming is manifested through governments and the public.

Reception

[edit]

Skeptical Science has become a well-known resource for people seeking to understand or debate climate change, and has been praised for its straightforwardness.[11] Rather than active advertising or media relationships, Cook has focused on structuring the site primarily for optimization in search engine results.[1] Climate expert Joseph Romm has described it as an "excellent, well-organized site to send convincible people for a shredding of the standard, long-debunked denier talking points."[12] Marine biologist Ove Hoegh-Guldberg has described it as "the most prominent knowledge-based website dealing with climate change in the world",[13] and The Washington Post has praised it as the "most prominent and detailed" website to counter arguments by global warming skeptics.[14]

Climate skeptic and blogger Anthony Watts is frequently critical of the site’s accuracy and bias,[15][16][17] although he has commended Cook's "scholarly demeanor".[18] Climate skeptic Steve McIntyre has been critical of Cook’s explanation of the “nature trick” regarding temperature proxies, a central talking point during the 2010 Climategate controversy.[19] In April 2010, physicist Luboš Motl wrote a 28-page report that was subsequently picked up by the Science and Public Policy Institute. The report contains point-by-point counter-arguments of all arguments present on the Skeptical Science website.[20]

Cook has also been recognized for his conservative Christian evangelical beliefs while maintaining his stance on anthropogenic global warming,[21] two positions that some people would consider conflicting.[22]

Funding

[edit]

Skeptical Science is not affiliated with any political, business, or charitable entity.[23] The site does not contain banner ads and is funded entirely by Cook himself, along with reader donations.[1] All regular and guest authors contribute on a strictly voluntary basis.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Bud Ward (December 2, 2010). "Skeptical Science Founder John Cook; Climate Science from 'Basic … to Advanced'". The Yale Forum.
  2. ^ "How climate change deniers led me to set up Skeptical Science website". The Guardian. April 28, 2011.
  3. ^ "Skeptical Science iPhone App: Knocking Out Climate Skepticism, One Argument At A Time". Huffington Post. February 17, 2010.
  4. ^ Mark Johnson (February 11, 2010). "Shine builds Skeptical Science iPhone App". Shine Technologies.
  5. ^ John Cook (August 7, 2010). "Talkin bout the Skeptical Science phone apps". Skeptical Science.
  6. ^ "Communicating climate science with blogs and apps: Q&A with John Cook (Skeptical Science)". American Geophysical Union. December 1, 2010.
  7. ^ "Free app to counter skeptics' arguments on climate change". The Independent. August 10, 2010.
  8. ^ Kieran Mulvaney (December 31, 2010). "For New Year's Resolution: Climate Change Perspective". Discovery Channel News.
  9. ^ Matthew McDermott (December 27, 2010). "Human-Caused Climate Change Based on Consensus of Evidence, Not Just Consensus of Scientists". TreeHugger.
  10. ^ Cook, John (April 2011). Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand. Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-8497-1336-8. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  11. ^ Andrew Revkin (March 24, 2010). "A Physics Maven's Take on Skeptical Science". The New York Times.
  12. ^ "Skeptical Science explains how we know global warming is happening: It's the oceans, stupid!". Climate Progress. October 10, 2009.
  13. ^ "What scientists are saying about Skeptical Science". Skeptical Science. May 9, 2011.
  14. ^ Andrew Freedman (November 8, 2010). "Scientists launch climate science counterattacks". The Washington Post.
  15. ^ Roger Pielke Sr. (September 11, 2010). "Pielke Senior: Misinformation on the Website "Skeptical Science – Getting Skeptical About Global Warming Skepticism"". Watts Up With That?. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ J. Storrs Hall (March 1, 2011). "Rebuttal to the Skeptical Science "Crux of a Core"". Watts Up With That?. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ Bob Fernley-Jones (May 28, 2011). "The Worst "Cook"book Interview Ever?". Watts Up With That?. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ Anthony Watts (September 27, 2010). "Skeptical Science? John Cook – embarrassing himself". Watts Up With That?.
  19. ^ Steve McIntyre (March 29, 2011). "Keith's Science Trick, Mike's Nature Trick and Phil's Combo". Climate Audit.
  20. ^ Luboš Motl (April 2, 2010). "John Cook: Skeptical Science" (PDF). Science and Public Policy Institute.
  21. ^ Graham Wayne (August 25, 2010). "Why would a solar physicist embrace the non-rationality of religion?". The Guardian.
  22. ^ Neela Banerjee (January 05, 2011). "Scientist proves conservatism and belief in climate change aren't incompatible". Los Angeles Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ Cook, John. "About Skeptical Science". Skeptical Science.
[edit]

Skeptical Science home page

Skeptical Science app (for Android and Apple)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dawei20/SkS_Draft&oldid=1168390040"