User talk:Glebushko0703: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:18, 5 February 2024

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Glebushko0703! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

In one of your recent edits, you cited https://wfneurology.org/private/downloads/aiCLirG2FuedshzLRg_7tw/wn_jun09_row.pdf as your source. I'm getting a 404 error when I try to retrieve it. Deb (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mike Jeffries (painter)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Mike Jeffries (painter) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from http://transportartist.co.uk/biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I restore that page and fix all mistakes? Glebushko0703 (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Jeffries (painter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mike Jeffries (painter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://transportartist.co.uk/biography/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JJP_{Mas_ter} 02:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 07:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, the source from which you copied your wording was a primary source and clearly intended to be promotional. Please don't do this again, or you could end up being blocked. Deb (talk) 07:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What source I can use then if that's the only one available? Glebushko0703 (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will it be okay to paste link via web.arhive like this: * Mike Jeffries biography

Or will it still count as promotion? Glebushko0703 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it still counts as promotion. If the only source available is a primary source, then the subject clearly does not meet the notability criteria and there will be no Wikipedia article about him until this changes. Deb (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. I'll be more carefull nest time. Glebushko0703 (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One more question: If I add primary and side trustable source. will it still count as promo?

For example, let's say I add this source

Mike Jeffries - Bio, Artworks, Exhibitions and more - Artland

with the

[Biography » Transport Artist (archive.org) Mike Jeffries biography]

on the page. Will it be ok? Glebushko0703 (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of G. S. Cooper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on G. S. Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.cooperline.com/gs-cooper-biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of automotive artists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of automotive artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of automotive artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DOY edit reversions

Hi there, myself and @Mr.choppers have reverted a few of your edits to DOY articles relating to car launches and sales. Although the cars may be notable in themselves, these events certainly aren't. As per WP:EVENTDOY, there has to be a wiki article specifically about the event in order for it to be eligible for inclusion in the Events section of DOY articles. Please take the time to familiarise yourself with this requirement. Please also feel free to reach out for support. Cheers, Kiwipete (talk) 05:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why there are events in this section about related to Ford Model T and VW Beetle?

Cars I added are first of their kind and not less significant then those two.

I think they deserve to be mentioned. Glebushko0703 (talk) 12:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Model T and the Beetle are probably the only two cars to merit inclusion. And the Benz Patentwagen, of course. Unless a number of other editors agree with you, you don't get to make the decisions all by yourself; see WP:BRD. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 23:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then give them time to agree with me, instead of deleting all my edits right away. Glebushko0703 (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cars introduced in October

A tag has been placed on Category:Cars introduced in October indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

a place for your list

https://list.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page you can copy over your list there and work on it without fear of deletion. You can also perhaps look at https://automobile.fandom.com/wiki/Autopedia Dream Focus 07:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I prefer this list to stay on wiki, where it would be much easier to find or stumble upon.

I just don't understand admin logic. Complaining about "significance", while there are such things as List of sexually active popes

Sometimes I really think contamination of information here depends purely on the mood of admins. Glebushko0703 (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Admins might delete pages but it's typically regular editors that tag articles for speedy deletion or AFD deletion discussions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:December 25, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User Kiwipete made this post on purpose to shame me publically, instead of using my Talk Page.

I take it's existence as personal attack, and they are not allowed here.

I insist on that message to be removed from public.Glebushko0703 (talk) 11:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They started a discussion about why they reverted your edits which is the recommended process as per WP:BRD and you called· them lazy and incompetent so I don't think you should be accusing other editors of personally attacking you. Every editor has edits reverted at some point or other and the discussion regarding reverted edits often happens on the talk page of the article these edits were made. It's easier to get WP:CONSENSUS if other editors are involved. Suonii180 (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understood that already and I'm sorry, my case was closed.

Can that discussion be closed too, or should my name remain on that talk page as an example of "how not to do" and "whom not to be" forever? Glebushko0703 (talk) 12:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can WP:REDACT your own messages by striking through them but you can't remove someone's talk page message just because it means other people can see that they've disagreed with you. Any further discussion about removal of messages should tak place at the articles talk page with the editors who were involved. Suonii180 (talk) 14:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So if I get the permission from the original author of that discussion - Kiwipete

You will allow to delete that topic about me? Gigman (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just between you and @Kiwipete: if it's on an article talk page. The discussions are for other folks too and they stay if they have been responded to. Toddst1 (talk) 23:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

www.onthisday.com

It's not listed as a reliable source, and there's a good reason for that - it takes all its information from Wikipedia articles. You can tell just by looking at it. Deb (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too at first.

But after using the source for a while, I found out that it contains infromation that wiki doesn't.

So it's definetely cant take "all" from the Wikipedia.

Also, althrough it's not always 100% accurate, I saw many DOY pages citating it and nobody undid this changes. Thus I and the other users believe, that source can be trustworthy in most of the cases.

P.S. You undid only my recent edit, that source was used on that and other pages before.

If you are interested in that topic, better start a public discussion on Talk page, my edit hasn't got much to do with it. Gigman (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 133: / Line 133: @@
 ==www.onthisday.com==
 It's not listed as a reliable source, and there's a good reason for that - it takes all its information from Wikipedia articles. You can tell just by looking at it. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 16:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
+:I thought so too at first.
+:But after using the source for a while, I found out that it contains infromation that wiki doesn't.
+:So it's definetely cant take "all" from the Wikipedia.
+:Also, althrough it's not always 100% accurate, I saw many DOY pages citating it and nobody undid this changes. Thus I and the other users believe, that source can be trustworthy in most of the cases.
+:P.S. You undid only my recent edit, that source was used on that and other pages before.
+:If you are interested in that topic, better start a public discussion on Talk page, my edit hasn't got much to do with it. [[User:Glebushko0703|Gigman]] ([[User talk:Glebushko0703#top|talk]]) 16:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)