Jump to content

Talk:Julie Christie: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Politics: new section
Line 17: Line 17:


:::There are reputable sources that give both dates, so in truth it could be either date. This issue is discussed further at [[User_talk:Betty_Logan#Julie_Christie]]. Until there is official confirmation one way or the other it's best that we retain both dates. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 19:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
:::There are reputable sources that give both dates, so in truth it could be either date. This issue is discussed further at [[User_talk:Betty_Logan#Julie_Christie]]. Until there is official confirmation one way or the other it's best that we retain both dates. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 19:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

It's tough being born in a foreign country like India, the acutal year may never be known. Joan Crawford has absolutely no confirmed birth year.


== Technical college in Brighton ==
== Technical college in Brighton ==

Revision as of 01:29, 2 February 2021

Template:Vital article

Birthdate

Some sources seem to say she was born in 1940, including the birthdays column in today's Guardian - anybody know for sure? sjorford →•← 13:52, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The New York Times has her being born in both years [1]! Thincat 14:35, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Telegraph has her age as 71, in a Today's Birthdays feature (dated 14 April 2011), that would mean she was born in 1940. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are reputable sources that give both dates, so in truth it could be either date. This issue is discussed further at User_talk:Betty_Logan#Julie_Christie. Until there is official confirmation one way or the other it's best that we retain both dates. Betty Logan (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's tough being born in a foreign country like India, the acutal year may never be known. Joan Crawford has absolutely no confirmed birth year.

Technical college in Brighton

The article City College Brighton And Hove lists her as an alumna. Any idea whether this can be sourced?Itsmejudith (talk)

Dame

I pretty sure Julie was knighted (damed?) at some point, but know none of the details. Adding "Dame" to the lead sentence for now. --jwandersTalk 09:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If she was made a Dame that would be a pretty big deal and should be easily established with a google check. I've tried and found no evidence. I'll remove it on this basis. If anyone can find anything on this, of course it should be put back. Rossrs (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article from the Daily Mail confirms that she was not honored before 2008 but there was speculation that she would be this year - [2]. That appears not to have happened. Rossrs (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Later work = Away From Her

Most of the "Later work" section is about "Away from her". I think it should either be split to 2 sections or shortened. Agreed? Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 00:40, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strange revert

It seems that some edits were reverted that were done by a sock. They seemed like good edits though. Is there a valid reason for the revert?--Canoe1967 (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nop. No edits by that sock is good edits. Also, Wikipedia:BAN#Edits_by_and_on_behalf_of_banned_editors. Nymf hideliho! 15:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that rule says that if an editor is pissed off at a sock then they are allowed to revert all edits, except for typos. Seems like a bullshit rule to me to remove edits that improve the article and are verified, but I guess we have to follow it like all the other bullshit rules here. I won't bother with it then.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo addition

Is there some reason why this good quality portrait was removed? As an actress, it seems much more relevant and better. If there's a consensus, I can add it. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that is a crappy image of her. If we could find her email her people may get us a better one to use. The last time I tried to replace a crappy blp image I got blocked so I would like to avoid an edit war on this one. Change it. If it is reverted than bring it up at blpn.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Memory Loss

I have removed this:

Christie suffers from a rare form of memory loss called autobiographic amnesia.[1] She said in 2002 that the condition became so severe that she's turned down offers from Hollywood producers and West End directors for fear of not being able to recall her lines.[1] "I'm not sure what [the condition] is, but it makes learning my lines very difficult, so I am happy to stay away from films and stage work. It's a bit sad. Now I can't remember any bad things, only the good things, if I can remember anything about my past at all."[2] Christie is quoted as saying that this story has been made up, invented on the basis of a jokey comment made in a radio interview.[3]

She has stated that her comments were misunderstood. Contrary to the implication of the original story, she has continued to act. In the absence of any other evidence, there doesn't seem to be any reason to give this story credence.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b "Julie Christie's Battle With Memory Loss", imdb.com, 22 April 2002.
  2. ^ I'm losing my memory says Julie Christie Daily Mail 22 April 2002
  3. ^ Tim Adams meets Julie Christie, theguardian.com, 1 April 2007.


Waterloo Sunset 'Terry and Julie'

By the Kinks is generally held to refer to Terence Stamp and Julie Christie, but I can't find a good reference.

86.187.162.7 (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Julie Christie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Julie Christie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Politics

Apart from the causes listed, she was certainly a member of one of the extreme left parties, either the Socialist Workers Party or another like it. Valetude (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Julie_Christie&oldid=1004321382"