User talk:Ruwaym: Difference between revisions

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Ruwaym, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iranian Arabic poets

A tag has been placed on Category:Iranian Arabic poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Category_talk:Iranian_Arabic_poets, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I warned you on AN, you know better than to continue such incivility as this. Cease or be blocked, your choice. Killer Chihuahua 12:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Category talk:Iranian Arabic poets. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Killer Chihuahua 15:16, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for where to post a notice of a discussion (without naming any editors by name!!!): Open an Rfa; post a notice on a parent article, category, or project, such as Wikiproject Poetry. Make sure the discussion is somewhere it won't be deleted - you could start the category discussion on Talk:Wikiproject Poetry, and then link to it from the talk pages of the contested categories and articles. But don't ask individual editors by name to help you; that's canvassing. Use the template Please see; for example {{subst:Please see | Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetrys#Arabic and Iranian poets categories}} placed on the talk pages of the categories and articles, and link to the discussion on whatever page you put it on - my example has it at the Poetry project talk page. Killer Chihuahua 15:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know pinging users is wrong. and called canvassing. I am actually a new user, editing on articles not involved in talks.--Ruwaym (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I warned you. Now you know. But the category changes you want to make are controversial, as is obvious by the edit wars. So you need to either stop trying to add them, or get community consensus that they're needed and appropriate. So you need to start a discussion. Remember that the consensus may be that the categories you want are not needed or appropriate, and in that case, you will need to stop trying to add them altogether. Wikipedia is run by consensus, not edit warring. Killer Chihuahua 15:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hijri Dede, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iraqi and Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

See this. [1] --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revising history

Mesopotamia and other historical regions may have included modern-day Iraq, but calling figures from that time period "Iraqi" is revising history in a manner which contravenes Wikipedia policy. You need to stop, immediately, or you will be restricted from making further edits. El_C 06:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi El_C, plz give me a list of years of establishments for all Arab countries, that would help me much. --Ruwaym (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello El_C ? why you blocked me when you don't answered me? if you want me to STOP i said u just up, give me a LIST OF YEARS OF ESTABLISHMENTS of ARABIC COUNTRIES then ask me to stop. so simple.I am just categorizing, i am not historian. --Ruwaym (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to learn history if you want to make such edits — I don't have time to teach you history. Your competence is required in advance. El_C 21:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical revionism

STOP these edits. There were no 'Lebanese' [2] or 'Iraqi' people so long ago. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HistoryofIran like Baylik of Tunis ? Ottoman Iraq? Ottoman Lebanon? Plz read history-related article of countries first. I am just categorizing by century, if there was not Tunisia, Iraq, Lebanon, etc plz empty Category:Tunisian poets and then ask me to STOP! --Ruwaym (talk) 20:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read El Cid's comment up above;" Mesopotamia and other historical regions may have included modern-day Iraq, but calling figures from that time period "Iraqi" is revising history in a manner which contravenes Wikipedia policy. You need to stop, immediately, or you will be restricted from making further edits". The same applies to other areas. Keep this up and you will be blocked, if not banned. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit Conflict) HistoryofIran That is right. There was no country named "Iraq" in that time, but the name of Iraq for a region, country, government, etc used at least from 7th-century, I am ok with you for not naming Lakhmids people as "Iraqi", Like Category:6th-century Iraqi poets. Btw, I don't categorized a Mesopotamian figure as Iraqi. I just categorizing every person under category poets by century, if they was not Tunisian, Iraqi, Lebanese etc. plz move them out from the category, then ask me to STOP, immediately now! clean up the categorizes, Or move my new categorizies to better name, like 17th-Century Baylik Tunisian poets! --Ruwaym (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We don't name people after historical regions, but after ethnicity/nationality. An Arab/Persian living in say, 10th-century Mesopotamia, would not be called Iraqi, but after their ethnicity, which is quite apparent in scholarship as well - this is basic history. I'm not gonna aid you in your revisionistic efforts. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HistoryofIran ok then, move the categories to better name then, but you just revert. This is an agressive action not helping, and as u said you are not helping me, a Wikipedian, then how you can help wikipedia?--Ruwaym (talk) 20:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no better name. Me stopping your revising of history is not aggressive at all, and it is in fact helping Wikipedia. You should consider yourself lucky that you haven't been blocked. WP:COMPETENCE is required. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HistoryofIran I am sure you don't recognize even 21-st century poets of Arab countries too. most of my edits actually are for modern history, I don't made Jordanian poets in 16th century, but Iraq, Egypt and Tunisia, Morccoo are historical nations. and You like must iranians don't recognize Arabs at all, You first stoped my edits on Iranian Arab poets, why? is there no Arab Iranian wrote poets?!! then, you say stop "Nationalizing" which is not my job at all. I said my point, plz move or clean up arab poets and arabic lag poets categorizes first, then ask me stop categorizing them by century. also i asked El Cid to give me a list of years from when we can someone "Iraqi" or "Tunisian" or any Arabic country. Done. --Ruwaym (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not cleaning up after you, and I've reported you for more personal attacks. Have a nice day. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for competence issues and repeated personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

El_C Thank you. --Ruwaym (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruwaym (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am just reported by a user wrongly. And i don't attacked a user personally. Ruwaym (talk) 21:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Are you trying to claim that you didn't actually create a category, Category:16th-century Lebanese poets? Are you saying all of the concerns raised above are invalid? They appear to be valid to me. Yamla (talk) 21:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For god's sake Yamla just look what is wrong with

Category:Iraqi science writers

Category:Iraqi multilingual poets

Category:Iraqi hadith scholars

Category:Iraqi biographers

and also List of Iraqi poets

This all not related to what el cid said! many things is deleted just by a wrong report and User El Cid actually missued his sysob acces. and i aksed El Cid to give me list of years, he refused. I am clearly asked him to give me list of years, they be sure i will stop ethno-national categorizing. --Ruwaym (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not modify a declined unblock request, please. You are welcome to make a new request. However, you will want to read WP:GAB before doing so, if you want to have a chance of success. --Yamla (talk) 21:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:16th century in Iraq

A tag has been placed on Category:16th century in Iraq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:9th-century people by nationality and occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:9th-century people by nationality and occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:8th-century people by nationality and occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:8th-century people by nationality and occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:7th-century people by nationality and occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:7th-century people by nationality and occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:6th-century people by nationality and occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:6th-century people by nationality and occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:11th-century Tunisian poets

A tag has been placed on Category:11th-century Tunisian poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:10th-century Tunisian poets

A tag has been placed on Category:10th-century Tunisian poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:12th-century Moroccan poets

A tag has been placed on Category:12th-century Moroccan poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:10th-century Moroccan poets

A tag has been placed on Category:10th-century Moroccan poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:17th century in Iraq

A tag has been placed on Category:17th century in Iraq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:18th century in Iraq

A tag has been placed on Category:18th century in Iraq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:17th-century Lebanese poets

A tag has been placed on Category:17th-century Lebanese poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Arab people of Hejazi descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Arab people of Hejazi descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iraqi people of Saudi Arabian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Iraqi people of Saudi Arabian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:16th-century Lebanese writers

A tag has been placed on Category:16th-century Lebanese writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:10th-century Tunisian writers

A tag has been placed on Category:10th-century Tunisian writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:11th-century Tunisian writers

A tag has been placed on Category:11th-century Tunisian writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:11th-century Tunisian people by occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:11th-century Tunisian people by occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iraqi people of Persian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Iraqi people of Persian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Arab people of Persian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Arab people of Persian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:10th-century Tunisian people by occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:10th-century Tunisian people by occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:17th-century Lebanese writers

A tag has been placed on Category:17th-century Lebanese writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hejazi diaspora in the Arab world

A tag has been placed on Category:Hejazi diaspora in the Arab world requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People of Hejazi descent

A tag has been placed on Category:People of Hejazi descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hejazi diaspora

A tag has been placed on Category:Hejazi diaspora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hejazi poets

A tag has been placed on Category:Hejazi poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Najdi poets

A tag has been placed on Category:Najdi poets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hejazi people

A tag has been placed on Category:Hejazi people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:14, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hejazi society

A tag has been placed on Category:Hejazi society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:15, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock#2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruwaym (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because of the way I created some categories. I didn't think it would be an issue because the Spanish and Arabic Wikipedias use these exact categories and I didn't know it was considered controversial here. Every Wikipedia has the right to make its own rules. I plan to read RfCs and fully familiarize myself with the English Wikipedia process before attempting this again. Over the past month since being blocked I have carefully reviewed the rules about WP:CANVASSING and I am confident I can publicize an RfC in a manner consistent with the English Wikipedia's expectations. I like to notice that because I don't want to be misinterpreted, a friend who speaks English as a first language helped me write this request . Also, I acknowledge that the things I said to HistoryofIran are considered personal attacks here on the English Wikipedia and will express myself in other ways in the future .With Regards. --Ruwaym (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Ibn al-Kharrat al-Dawalibi

Hello Ruwaym,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ibn al-Kharrat al-Dawalibi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock#3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruwaym (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Same as Unblock#2. --Ruwaym (talk) 09:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While I guess that your best bet is the Standard Offer and you have made an attempt to use it, your unblock request does not properly address the block reason ("competence issues as well as repeated ethno-nationalist aggression and personal attacks"), and does not address the issue that led to the decline of the previous requests. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you have deliberately refused to reword your request despite being told to do so, I have revoked talk page access. If your current unblock request is refused, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 10:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request vis UTRS

@El C, Yamla, and ToBeFree: FWIW, User is requesting unblocking via UTRS appeal #37865. Cheers, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated talk page access so Ruwaym can make their request here. I believe they were never accused of violating WP:EVADE so I have not run a sock check. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked user to make their request here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Thank you. DFD, I have to put a Unblock template ?--Ruwaym (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Liza, I am blocked from more than one year ago, I pined Yamla and Deepfriedokra, not answered me. --Ruwaym (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iraqi salon-holders

A tag has been placed on Category:Iraqi salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Union of Iraqi Writers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Union of Iraqi Writers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock#4

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ruwaym (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

[Simple English] I joined EnWiki on 3 July 2019, And my account have been blocked since 30 September 2019 by El C under "Disruptive editing: competence issues as well as repeated ethno-nationalist aggression and personal attacks". Means me and User:HistoryofIran. I was newbie then, and that was my first block, and i had no idea about that policy. I was not so active here, I don't know English well, so my contributions included categorizing, and some minor edits. I can remember at that time, 2019–2021 Iraqi protests was ongonging and yeah, i been influenced by it's "Anti-Iranian sentiment" chants. I just don't get necessity of "expiration time of indefinite", i sent before three unblock reviews. I am not worst than User:HistoryofIran (who i "attacked" him), i checked his block log, you gave him a lot of chances. That is good. But how about me? check my global contributions: what is wrong with me exactly? A normal user, who works on biographies, and a New Citizen of Global Democracy (Ba'athist Iraq ended in 2003 and still there is many issues). You can't judge me just because some normal angry feelings. I don't want give you some links: yea see, he told X, i replied Y, I am not nationalist, he was rude, etc... I said enough in my past reviews, and this one too. Is there any admin who can give me a new chance? With Regards.Ruwaym (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Given your work on other projects, and (at least at first glance) the lack of behavior of the sort that got you blocked here, I've unblocked. I do strongly suggest that you keep your "normal angry feelings" to yourself around here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Can I have another chance? You gave the other guy another chance!" Does not address the reason for your block - nor does it provide any solid assurances that you will not repeat the behavior that led to your block. In order to be unblocked, you would need to make a convincing argument that you understand exactly the behavior that led to your block - and a plan going forth on how you would avoid that behavior. I would suggest reading the Guide to appealing blocks, particularly the section WP:NOTTHEM. I won't decline your request at this time. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If someone else reviews this, please note that Ruwaym has been constructively contributing on commons SQL ^{Query me!} 22:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: And ArWiki and ArWikiquote too. 602 days Indefinite block is enough for a newbie user to understand policies. But I'm an infp based on Myers–Briggs Type Indicator, so not into "logical reasoning" like the others. How can i prove I will not repeat the behavior that led to my block? and how can you generalize me based on that? I said in the reviewes a lot of times. very simple, as a very very normal user. I don't repeaet a same behavior, as an infp I am creative anyway! What i need to say exactly? I said all what you mentioned before in 4 unblock reviews, followed all guids and formal ways for unblocking, like : I am sorry, I understand , I read policies again, I will not repeat the behavior... but there is no new chance for me. --Ruwaym (talk) 22:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Al Ameer son:, I guess you can help me to solve my problem. Thanks you. Ruwaym (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon:, Thanks you again. --Ruwaym (talk) 00:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Taliban users has been nominated for deletion

Category:Anti-Taliban users has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for being a dedicated Wikimedian! You have made a lot of valuable contributions to the English Wikipedia and other projects. I know that you care a lot about Wikimedia, and I appreciate all the work that you have put into it. You may have had some troubles here, but don't let them drag you down. Persevere, learn from your mistakes, and keep trying to make things better :) Mysteryman blue 07:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 339: / Line 339: @@
 <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Category:Anti-Taliban users]]''' has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 June 23#Category:Anti-Taliban users|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 22:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
+== Thank you! ==
+Thank you for being a dedicated Wikimedian! You have made a lot of valuable contributions to the English Wikipedia and other projects. I know that you care a lot about Wikimedia, and I appreciate all the work that you have put into it. You may have had some troubles here, but don't let them drag you down. Persevere, learn from your mistakes, and keep trying to make things better :) <b style="line-height:1.2;display:inline-block;transform:skew(-14deg);border-radius:9Q;overflow:hidden;box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 1Q#04b">[[User:Mysterymanblue|<span style="color:#fff;background:#04b"> Mysteryman</span>]][[User talk:Mysterymanblue|blue ]]</b> 07:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)