User talk:TrangaBellam: Difference between revisions
TrangaBellam (talk | contribs) →WP:AE sectioning: Replying to Firefangledfeathers (using reply-link) |
vandal |
||
Line 393: | Line 393: | ||
Hi TrangaBellam! You should probably move your comment at [[WP:AE]] out of the results section and into a new ''Statement by TrangaBellam'' section. [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]]) 16:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
Hi TrangaBellam! You should probably move your comment at [[WP:AE]] out of the results section and into a new ''Statement by TrangaBellam'' section. [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]]) 16:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Oh, okay. I was just using the Wikipedia reply button. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam#top|talk]]) 16:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
:Oh, okay. I was just using the Wikipedia reply button. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam#top|talk]]) 16:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Vandal on Page == |
|||
Hello TrangaBellam - Once of the user is vandalizing [Third Battle of Panipat page]. His name is Noorullah21. He removed below content: |
|||
Multiple issues|POV|date=August 2021 and Unreliable sources|date=August 2021 which you added on the page. Also he added unsourced information such as Supported by Jats in the infobox and also added some Amb state which is unsourced as well. Can you take a look and revert these vandalism? |
Revision as of 10:31, 17 September 2021
Welcome
|
Persecution of Hindus discussion
Hi TrangaBellam, welcome to Wikipedia. At Talk:Persecution of Hindus, you are referring to citations by numbers. Without knowing which revision of the article you are speaking of, those numbers don't have any meaning. Can you go to the history page, pick out the revision that you are commenting on, and add a link to that revision at the top of the discussion? Thanks. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am sorry. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Done. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Do you plan to respond? Not sure how to proceed since two editors asked me to get consensus (by reversing my edits) via edit summaries but have not made any objections known over the talk-page. Joshua and Regents seem to be supportive, though. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Not really. It is not my page. Like you, I am also waiting for the other side to come back with a response.
- In general, I think some discussion is warranted regarding the Delhi Sultanate etc. it can't be removed entirely. There are issues like jizya, the prohibition of temple construction (even if it wasn't rigidly enforced) etc. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I agree completely and will prepare a rewrite. However, I do not find anything minimally salvageable from the current mess. Wait for a couple days or so? TrangaBellam (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Do you plan to respond? Not sure how to proceed since two editors asked me to get consensus (by reversing my edits) via edit summaries but have not made any objections known over the talk-page. Joshua and Regents seem to be supportive, though. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- TB, may I request you to kindly use your User:TrangaBellam/sandbox to draft the comment and only post on the talk page once you are done with corrections. As you can see here the talk page history is full of your name. It keeps coming on my watchlist. Hope you will understand. --Walrus Ji (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Sorry. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add reference sections
If you add a reference to an unreferenced article, you need to add a Reference section and put a Reflist template in it. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 16:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ty. Seems same like notelist. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Battle of Talikota
TrangaBellam, I have explained my edits on the page in a new section of the talk page of the article, here. I hope it clarifies your doubts. If you still have any issues, we can discuss it there; I request that you do not revert before that. 183.83.147.136 (talk) 08:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Priya Ramani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: can you help out? This user is not replying to talk-page messages, copying quotes from all sources and reverting me as a vandal, when reverted. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- That is because you forgot to tag the editor :-) And once you see that your content is being reverted it is better to pause before undoing the revert. Vikram 20:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also, you can't revert edits in quick succession and expect something to happen. You may need to give warning messages and write on their user talk pages for them to take notice. If you need to get more editors invoved, please use WT:INDIA. WP:CANVASSING editors like you did to me, won't help because the other editors won't generally listen to a canvassed editor. And we can't edit the main page in any case, having been cavassed. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- That is because you forgot to tag the editor :-) And once you see that your content is being reverted it is better to pause before undoing the revert. Vikram 20:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Priya Ramani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vikram 20:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- My suggestion is to close the 3RR complaint and discuss. Vikram 21:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
I read about canvassing now, okay. Sorry. I know about the notice board. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am closing the complaint. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks :-) BTW it might be better to make small changes to content rather than large ones. This way there is adequate scope for productive engagement. Vikram 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am closing the complaint. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Apologies
Sorry about that revert and warning. I had not fully caffeinated, and got your edit mixed up with that of Pakistan4ever. Possibly (talk) 19:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. No worries. Mistakes happen. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Audrey Truschke moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Audrey Truschke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- HitroMilanese, I will be moving the article back. Why did you delete it without discussion? If you believe the article do not pass our notable policies, convince the community in an deletion discussion. Which information was unsourced? TrangaBellam (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi there, the article is moved to draftspace so that you may demonstrate notability per WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. The current version is not suitable for mainspace as notability has not been demonstrated. Draftspace gives you opportunity to improve the article, but if you move it back to mainspace then I will have to take it to AfD where it is likely to be deleted. Thanks. Hitro talk 07:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:HitroMilanese if you wish, take it to AfD. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I guess you don't understand how Wikipedia works. There is difference between draftifying and deletion. The purpose of draftifying the articles is making them suitable for mainspace after required improvements. You improved a one-liner unsuitable stub within 58 minutes of draftifying. Great. See WP:NPPDRAFT. If it meant for AfD, I would have taken it on sight. Hitro talk 09:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:HitroMilanese if you wish, take it to AfD. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
TrangaBellam, HitroMilanese is a new page reviewer, and as such they would be experienced in deciding whether new pages qualify. Edit warring with them would not be a good practice. Rather, find out what is needed to make it a viable page and see if you can make it so. Is the author notable for anything other than the one book we are aware of? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:Kautilya3, I did not edit war and I am prepared to defend it at a deletion discussion. Have you checked the article? She has two works with multiple reviews. And, she won the John F. Richards Prize in South Asian History by AHA, a very reputed body. Also, her work on Aurangzeb is the poorest. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Things to watch
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Hindu+Holocaust%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=1&ns0=1
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Hindu+Genocide%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=1&ns0=1
- Stop receiving emails every-time I am pinged or thanked.
- (talk page stalker) See Preferences --> Notifications. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- thanks, kautilya3. solved! TrangaBellam (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) See Preferences --> Notifications. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks anyway for adding all this excellent content about the pre-Muslim dynasties of Kashmir, which were in great need of such attention. I didn't even suspect there was so much about them. That's great! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC) |
- That is nice. Congratulations TrangaBellam! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! TrangaBellam (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Rewrites
- Symptoms of COVID-19
- COVID-19 drug repurposing research
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
- List of Manipuri kings
- Template:rp TrangaBellam (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Sylheti language
Please do not revert without discussing this. Chaipau (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
I declined the prod. It's best to take this one to AFD for deletion input from the wider community. Best.4meter4 (talk) 14:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
For your reading pleasure
Comes with a cute edit summary as well. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- LOL. Quora would have appreciated his efforts better. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Turkmenportal, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!--Tautomers(T C) 04:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Welcome
redacted ds-alert message as I did not realize it was given before. LukeEmily (talk) 03:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have been notified less than a year ago. The relevant policy notes,
Editors issuing alerts are expected to ensure that no editor receives more than one alert per area of conflict per year. Any editor who issues alerts disruptively may be sanctioned.
Please be cautious. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)- Sorry, I missed it. I have redacted the alert.LukeEmily (talk) 11:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Bhonsale - warning - deletion of sources and quotes
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bhonsale, you may be blocked from editing. .LukeEmily (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Rathore deletion of sourced content
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rathore, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.
- @LukeEmily: If I see you abusing templates once again, I will be asking for a topic-ban. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Go ahead please, ask for a topic ban on me right now. You have been abusing caste pages and several users have been warning you. I will be asking for a topic ban shortly and will be reporting you to admins. Intentional deletion of sourced content is not acceptable.LukeEmily (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Go ahead please, ask for a topic ban on me right now. You have been abusing caste pages and several users have been warning you. I will be asking for a topic ban shortly and will be reporting you to admins. Intentional deletion of sourced content is not acceptable.LukeEmily (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
OUP
FYI: Wikipedia_talk:The_Wikipedia_Library#Oxford_bibliographies. –Austronesier (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar!
Glad you found the discussion amusing. Tewdar (talk) 20:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Notification of discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- Your edits/content removal from ZyCoV-D are clearly covered by discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19. They are not a part of WP:NOTNEWS here. They are compiled as per recommended structure followed for COVID-19 vaccines articles. Run n Fly (talk) 10:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at ZyCoV-D shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Run n Fly (talk) 11:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Have been here longer than you are. Please go a bit slow. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- TrangaBellam, I have been working on WP:COVID-19 since the beginning of my account. I am aware of WP:MEDRS and others. Also, see WP:SENIORITY. I will not add anything and wait for others to respond. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Happy 1st year anniversary
![]() |
Happy 1st year anniversary of your stay on wikipedia |
Congrats! Ratnahastin(t.c) 07:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC) |
Pr.
- Ruhnama - Low priority.
- Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia - Low priority.
- The Story of Civilization - High priority.
- R. C. Majumdar - Medium priority.
- Satish Chandra Mittal - Low priority.
Danish Siddiqui
You have reverted my edit in death section of Photojournalist Danish Siddiqui without giving the reason I have also provided the source of my edit. Thanks Bharat0078 (talk) 14:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
RX request -- An Indian Magazine
Regarding your request at WP:RX, you can check this link, the website of Punjab Digital Library. They have scanned some volumes of The Illustrated Weekly of India. I haven't checked if the volume you have requested is available there. Regards. --Gazal world (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hallow
Are you aware of the social system of Bengal? অভিরূপ দাশশর্মা (talk) 06:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Your name appears a series of boxes. I am aware to a certain extent, having read some secondary sources. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Mr.
Stop kayastha propaganda, maintain neutrality অভিরূপ দাশশর্মা (talk) 10:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Baidya article
Your sources are very hard to verify.In caste article why you are editing using those sources??? Safron710 (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
HelloTrangaBellam multiculturalism is the book, you gave aproval in the 'Dispute' Section of talk page. Thanks. Abhishek Sengupta 24 (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
See here Abhishek Sengupta 24 (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Raj's verson Saumyajit Ray in his book mentions that, "There are semi-Brahmin castes like Bhumihars (in Bihar and U.P) and Vaidyas (in west Bengal) who, like Brahmins, have access to the scriptures, the sacred thread, and the right to use the 'Sharma' caste surname.But neither Bhumihars nor Vaidyas have the right to conduct public Divine Service".Abhishek Sengupta 24 (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Danish Siddiqui. No source mentions that "BJP supporters reveled his death and called it karma". Kylo Ren III (talk ☎️) 10:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- KyloRen3, please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. The source was cited right after the line and I have quoted from the source at talk-page. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, thanks for clarifying. Kylo Ren III (talk ☎️) 12:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Bats in Wuhan Lab
HelloTrangaBellam, please explain your revert of my edit on Investigations into the origin of COVID-19. Thanks! Pakbelang (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Pakbelang, I will write a note at the talk-page, later. Check the archives - this has been probably discussed. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- TrangaBellam, thanks. I look forward to it and will respond there if needed. Cheers! --Pakbelang (talk) 13:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- cc:shibbolethink TrangaBellam (talk) 14:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- TrangaBellam, I've gone through the talk archives and I did find some inconclusive discussion of this topic w.r.t. DRASTIC a few weeks back. The article in The Australian that I cite was not mentioned at that time. I note that you added a citation to that same article on the DRASTIC page, which seems appropriate. Since you seem to have no specific issue with the wording or the source, would you please restore my edits? Cheers! --Pakbelang (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- I assume this is regarding this wiki-voice claim? [1]
- Pakbelang, an important thing to note about RSes: We must cite the original source, not the piped through source when something is syndicated or rebroadcast without any editorial reinterpretation or re-authorship. See WP:NEWSORG. In this case, the original source is actually Sherri Markson on Sky News [2][3] [4], not The Australian. For each use of a source like this (TV talk show), we must determine the reliability of the journalist and the accuracy of her reporting re: this topic. Is she an expert on this topic? Does she have a track record of high quality reporting on it? What do other say? The answer is that she is highly partisan and unreliable, having repeated demonstrated falsehoods on more than one occasion: [5] [6] [7] [8] [9].
- The next question we must ask, is what claim is this source supporting? It's relatively uncontroversial that there was once, several years ago, a small BSL2 bat colony at the WIV (all bat colonies would be at least BSL2 because we know these animals are wild and often carry BSL2 pathogens, for the same reason monkey colonies are kept at BSL2). There is a primary source demonstrating that a 12 animal colony existed in 2015 (relatively small by bat colony standards):[10]
- However, if the claim is, as in this revert, that this bat colony should be the focus of investigations for how the virus got into humans, that is a very different claim. Especially since it is a wiki-voice claim, not an attributed one. There are several claims wrapped up in there. By saying this is a potential source of infection, we are also saying that the PPE was not appropriate, that the laboratory was not appropriately screening its employees, that they were not reporting transmission-risk events, etc. etc.
- We would also be saying that this content is DUE for the article (i.e. that the sum total of reliable sources covering investigations also mention in a substantial way the existence of a bat colony). To my reviewing of the literature, that is not true. Only unreliable tabloid sources or repeated syndicated sources of the same say this.
- As an analogy, we don't use the fact that the Zoo in Wuhan had bats/cats/mustelids to support the claim that zoos may be the source of the outbreak, even though all of those animals can carry SARS-CoV-2. We do not say that the birds at the Hangzhou Zoo in Zhenjiang may be the source of the recent H10N3 case in that area.
- I believe this fails on both counts. We cannot simply repeat the claims of a TV talk show host who is described as unreliable about this topic by several of our most trusted sources. We cannot use those claims to source content that is UNDUE for inclusion, and which extremely few, if any of our reliable sources even mention. --Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 19:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Shibbolethink Thanks for the detailed reply. All solid points. I will reword the edit and find a better source.Pakbelang (talk) 01:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- TrangaBellam Shibbolethink I have reworded the edit, noting the presence of the bats in the lab but stating that reliable sources report that a lab leak was "extremely unlikely".Pakbelang (talk) 02:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- TrangaBellam, thanks. I look forward to it and will respond there if needed. Cheers! --Pakbelang (talk) 13:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Religion of the Indus Valley Civilization. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. LearnIndology (talk) 16:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- LearnIndology, do you wish a trip to WP:AE? TrangaBellam (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
"Ror dynasty" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ror dynasty. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 19#Ror dynasty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Map needed
Thank you for your response here. I somehow missed it.
I can find maps from 1907 in Wikipedia. Are the 1931 maps available here as well? I can see the maps in the UChicago website, but are they available here?
Chaipau (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
TrangaBellam, your review of this GA nomination is waiting for you to take the next step. Please stop by at your earliest opportunity to continue/conclude your review there.
I have also pinged you on your other GA review, Talk:Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu)/GA1, which has been open for just about two months without any response from the nominator and appears to have been abandoned by them—they haven't edited Wikipedia since before you opened your review. It should probably be closed as unsuccessful, either right away or by the end of August. Thank you very much, and thank you for your work reviewing GANs. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- TrangaBellam, it's been another three weeks, and you have yet to do anything about Talk:Vellar River (Northern Tamil Nadu)/GA1 even though you've been active elsewhere on Wikipedia. If you don't return to it in the next seven days, I'll have to assume you're no longer interested, and take action myself. Thank you for giving this your attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset, I was waiting for the nominator to reply. But that we don't have any, I will now mark it as failed. I apologize for any issues caused by this delay. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Edit warring notice for Sati (practice)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Sati (practice) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I invited you to the talk page to ask what your dispute is but you ignored and instead engaged in an edit war. I added modern, reliable references and removed the long quote and one unreferenced but neutral, verifiable sentence. If you continue this, both you and User:Fowler&fowler to the Admin Noticeboard; he will be reported for personal attacks and threats in edit summaries. Instead, I encourage you to engage in constructive discussions on how to improve the page. Cease blind, unexplained reverts immediately.--Trickipaedia (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
BLP violation
User:TrangaBellam is threatening to block and harassing me. I will request that you be blocked for WP:LIBEL and WP:BLP. And spreading biased opinions and racism. You spread hatred by only relying on cherry-picked sources.
Here is the reliable resources. You can easily reach out to Twitter too.
talk Chopra said that after this tweet, Twitter had initially locked @IndiaExplained, asking him to delete the tweet. “I deleted it only to access the IndiaExplained account to make a statement to my (nearly) 70,000 followers about Twitter’s hypocrisy and double standards,” Chopra said. This is from your favorite news source https://theprint.in/india/modi-critic-indiaexplained-claims-twitter-account-suspended-for-tweet-taking-on-pm/335541/
South Asia Scholar Activist Collective . Simran Jeet Singh Has members from https://www.sikhcoalition.org/. This is a private NGO. Please let me know what a private NGO is doing being part of an academic group? Reliable source here: https://goachronicle.com/george-soross-open-society-foundation-and-sikh-coalition-are-joined-at-the-hip/
Hrishirise (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Moved from User:TrangaBellam by — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 23:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Your recent revert on Audrey Truschke
Regarding this, I didn't get why you don't want the dead links to be removed. Is that because you're working on those drafts that'll be published soon, so you'll setup redirects? Or if there is a specific reason, let me know. —Wiki Linuz (Ping me!) 05:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Red link. Not a
dead
link. - WP:REDYES. Generally, it is unwise to remove red links unless you are certain that the article will fail WP:N. TrangaBellam (talk) 05:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks —Wiki Linuz (Ping me!) 05:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings,
Requesting your visit to Draft:Aurats (word) & Islamic advice literature and help expand the articles of topics interest you.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Not interested. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Reza Goodary
Dear TrangaBellam, Reza Goodary's article has credible sources approved by WP:News sources. Unfortunately, the article was not confirmed by one of the users yesterday. Please kindly help for approve.
(1), (2), (3), (4). IRIB, IRNA, ILNA are in the list. Also IPNA is Iran Pro Sport News Agency (5) and BORNA News Agency (Reputable news agency affiliated with the Ministry of Sports of Iran) (6). Also It is news from official website of Ministry of Sport Iran (7) (Link open only in Iran).
The Reza Goodary (رضا گودری) article already approved on The Persian Wikipedia.
Sincerely. MMA Kid (talk) 04:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- I will take a look. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. MMA Kid (talk) 02:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
The malicious deliberation of your edits on Raja Pratapaditya
I did not give any unreliable sources, sources like dinesh chandra sen , rama ram basu, jadunath sarkar are reputed sources. They went through the scrutiny of reputed academic institutions and hence selective quoting and deliberate obsecure edits on particular pages are unethical from the point of view of ethics regarding maintaining neutrality. I have my sources which are of reputed books and authors but deliberately ou have left a page underinformed because of your own biases. No body should deliberately edit a page, different point of views of reputed historians should be taken into account which you have not.I would request a topic ban on your account if these deliberations continue from your side.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Samx don (talk • contribs)
- Yamaguchi先生, is this a sock? TrangaBellam (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- It may be. If you have any behavioral evidence to consider, would you please consider submitting a formal report at WP:SPI for CheckUser assistance? It is striking that this account had been inactive for 5 months, then reactivated and began editing the Pratapaditya article immediately after it had been protected and several accounts had been blocked for disruption and/or socking. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Yamaguchi先生 (talk)Dear yamaguchi , I am do not possess any alternate accounts neither I ahve been socked even once . I have made edits about people of different leanings and individual frameworks and I am not interested in deliberations when we are giving proper source as a new editor disrupting that is a falacy. given from both of your side neutrality on this particular article is not on display.regards sam.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Samx don (talk • contribs)
TrangaBellam The neutrality policy of wikipedia is not maintained by your edits where you engaged on an edit war for days . I edited with references of artiles on reputed websites, government websites of west Bengal , The page was still reverted back by yourself .This could result in a topic ban on your account as you have chosen to edit a page according to your needs without providing citations from different reliable sources which have different opinions .— Preceding unsigned comment added by Samx don (talk • contribs)
- You have probably missed that Kuru reverted your edits. Government websites are not reliable sources for history. You can raise a proposal to TBan me at WP:AN or WP:AE. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
TrangaBellam (talk)That I have clarified to Kuru. You are forgettful of your continious edit war that you did for the last few days . The governemnt website concerned is asigned to maintain localized history of the people of the concerned istrict which is reliable and this institution is maintained by proffesionals and offcers at public service . There are many authentic sources which you have refused to cite which come from many ethnic and regional background.Third you have deliberately reduced a page to mere trivias , which is unjust and against the policy of neutrality and reliable souces as you have not cited much and have selectively quoted.regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samx don (talk • contribs)
Conversion of Jain basadis into hibdu temples
You idiots why did edit Dridhaprahara (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
Dear Tranga,
Thanks for the redirect that article seemed to be just a copy and paste pov for and unnecessary. Thanks again and take care. PremijAnans (talk) 07:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
WP:AE sectioning
Hi TrangaBellam! You should probably move your comment at WP:AE out of the results section and into a new Statement by TrangaBellam section. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I was just using the Wikipedia reply button. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Vandal on Page
Hello TrangaBellam - Once of the user is vandalizing [Third Battle of Panipat page]. His name is Noorullah21. He removed below content: Multiple issues|POV|date=August 2021 and Unreliable sources|date=August 2021 which you added on the page. Also he added unsourced information such as Supported by Jats in the infobox and also added some Amb state which is unsourced as well. Can you take a look and revert these vandalism?