User talk:Gokturklerrr

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Mansurah, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:43, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Krum’s Avar Campaign

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krum’s Avar Campaign requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ipark.bg/en-US/Age/Item/385?module=FirstBulgarianKingdom. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battle of Lake Van

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of Lake Van. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Lake Van#East Roman Empire. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Lake Van#East Roman Empire. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 08:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

I put a Battle. Gokturklerrr (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Nāblus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Nāblus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It also needs to be expanded further as there's not enough context given. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

The sources are good enough let it stay please. Gokturklerrr (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Mersivan 1101 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Mersivan 1101, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uricdivine^TalkToMe 14:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

I used sources, I putted it, also you can also put some sources , I made two pages it’s removed come on let it stay i didn’t a wrong thing. Gokturklerrr (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

You can help me ? Gokturklerrr (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Battles involving Suleiman the magnificent moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battles involving Suleiman the magnificent, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 08:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Gaza (1257) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Gaza (1257), is not suitable as written to remain published. The article needs and to be expanded further and needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battles involving Timurids

A tag has been placed on Category:Battles involving Timurids indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battle of Nasā (1221)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of Nasā (1221). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jalal al-Din Mangburni#Mongol invasion and accession. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jalal al-Din Mangburni#Mongol invasion and accession. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battle of Kandahar (1221)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of Kandahar (1221). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jalal al-Din Mangburni#Mongol campaigns. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jalal al-Din Mangburni#Mongol campaigns. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Important note

Thanks for your work. Verifiability—the principle that the truth of information can be verified by looking at an external source—is of key importance to Wikipedia. Your citations in Cilicia Campaign of Kayqubad the Great (1225) need to have more information on the source to uniquely identify it; at the very least we need the book title, author, and date. Please add this information. Ovinus (talk) 22:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Guidelines which you may wish to refer to

At Baibars, WP:LEADCITE, MOS:INTRO, WP:BETTER/GRAF1, and MOS:PEACOCK may prove helpful. If you wish to discuss further, please use the talk page of the article. Many thanks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Cilicia Campaign of Baybars (1276) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cilicia Campaign of Baybars (1276), is not suitable as written to remain published. The article is a very bad translation and the English makes no sense. It needs to be carefully rewritten. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Battle of Harput (1234). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. "The article is good" is not sufficient justification for vandalism. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Battle of Harput (1234). If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gokturklerrr. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Nāblus (1260), you may be blocked from editing. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Nāblus (1260) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Nāblus (1260) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Nāblus (1260) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Mersivan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Mersivan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) It also needs clearer detail regarding the existence of an actual battle - and likely should be moved to the correct spelling of Merzifon, although would likely be better added to the Merzifon page as a two-liner rather than treated as a battle in its own right. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

If u need more sources I will put. Gokturklerrr (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Merzifon (1101) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Merzifon (1101), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. "It is good" is not a valid reason. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Additionally, do not remove Articles for deletion notices while a discussion is active. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kumyk people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kumyk. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Turkic invasion of Armenia (628) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkic invasion of Armenia (628) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkic invasion of Armenia (628) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 04:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Pharwala

The article Battle of Pharwala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a reproduction of a Baburnama passage. References are either dead links, or trying to disguise the reliance on non WP:RS sources (for example, Rickard, J (14 May 2010), Battle of Pharwala, 15 March 1519 is actually a www.historyofwar.org page). Article subject is a minor skirmish with no indication of meeting WP:GNG. Article title inflated to create illusion of importance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Iduk Bash

The article Battle of Iduk Bash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of existence in WP:RS, thus failing WP:GNG. References are purposely vague, failing WP:V.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Battle of Damascus (1257)

Hello, Gokturklerrr,

Thank you for creating Battle of Damascus (1257).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I’m unable to find any reference to this battle in any other sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Pharwala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Pharwala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Pharwala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment, I chance the sources, I mentioned “in baburnama” babur said this, is that forbidden? I gave the source about the content while the other sources mentioned also these battle, the battle is real. But if I would write the battle the battle would had a bad content. So I took it from baburnama and wrote also that it cames from there were a source. I hope my page would stay my bad for the mistakes. Gokturklerrr (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your comment does not make sense in the English language. However, you might like to read WP:RS. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Damascus (1257) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Damascus (1257) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Damascus (1257) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Insertcleverphrasehere^{(or here)_{(or here)(or here)}} 00:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GedUK  13:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Beshogur that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Gokturklerrr,

I know that tempers can rise when editing some topics but it should never get to the point where you are attacking another editor or making unsubstantiated accusations against them. If you find yourself getting angry, it's probably to log off of the project for a while or work on a neutral article about another subject. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of First Battle of Laghman (988)

The article First Battle of Laghman (988) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. The Elphinstone citations provided have failed verification. Article title inflated to create illusion of notability, when in reality the article fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)