User talk:JJMC89: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:53, 8 January 2023

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89.

Bot-related queries:

About media copyright or non-free media: ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
About category deletions/merges/moves: ask the discussion closer or the admin who listed the implementation instruction at WP:CFD/W.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Please throttle the bot draftification tagger

Can you add a built in delay of a day or so to the draftification tagger task of the bot? I made an error in a round-robin move and moved the article instead of the redirect to draft space. It was fixed within a short time, but by then the bot had already tagged it. I only discovered the {{Drafts moved from mainspace}} tag in the article (after it was in mainspace again) by accident. It's just a tracking tag to populate a report, right? It doesn't seem like something that needs to be tagged immediately. Mathglot (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I could, it is not a trivial change to do so. (Delayed tagging means it needs to figure out when it was moved instead of just using the current date.) It was intentionally written and approved to tag draftifications rapidly. The template doesn't do anything in mainspace, and it would have automatically been removed at the end of the day. I'm not sure who is using the categories or for what. @BD2412: any thoughts? — JJMC89 22:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The basic idea is that generally, when a draft is moved from mainspace, it is for a good reason, and AFC reviewers should be aware that the draft was moved from mainspace when asked to put it back there. We have sometimes seen a draftified article immediately and without change submitted for restoration to mainspace, or moved back by an editor who is not a regular AFC reviewer (typically one involved in the creating the draftified article in the first place, or a precocious low-participation new editor). In short, it is useful to tag these quickly to avoid shenanigans. BD2412 T 23:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any harm from having the tag "moved to Draftspace" present even when it's back in mainspace? If not, then I guess it really doesn't matter. Mathglot (talk) 09:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, there isn't. The template only adds a category if it is the draft namespace. — JJMC89 23:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well then I guess it doesn't matter. Thanks for the responses. Mathglot (talk) 02:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This bot is pretty impressive

Thanks to this bot I discovered that you can make one like this Dave1285 (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JJMC89 bot deleted the official Bangladesh Football Federation logo from their all National Football Team pages

Dear Wikipedia administrator, I seek your highly serious attention to the matter that JJMC89 bot deleted the official Bangladesh Football Federation logo from their all National Football Team pages including under 17, under 20, under 23 & national teams (both men & women).

Reason showing: Removed WP:NFCC violation(s). No valid non-free use rationale for this page. See WP:NFC#Implementation. Questions? Ask here.

Why am I disobeying this? - Because every national football team is showing their respective National football Federation to represent your country except Bangladesh (the reason I am appealing for) - I neither made any changes to that image nor re-uploaded. I just put a line (Bangladesh Football Federation.svg) on the Badge section of the template of all Bangladesh National Football Team pages including under 17, under 20, under 23 & national teams.

Please revert the action of that bot.

Because that image represents Bangladesh national football teams and gives better understanding to the audience. HridoyKundu (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will not. It was removed in accordance with the non-free content policy, with which you are obligated to comply. Also, see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 14#File:Bangladesh Football Federation.svg. — JJMC89 21:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FORGET to mention THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT, this exact same picture is currently using on Bengali Wikipedia Bangladesh national football team pages including under 17, under 20, under 23 and the national teams (both men and women). HridoyKundu (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is done on the Bengali Wikipedia is irrelevant. — JJMC89 21:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 19:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, JJMC89!

Happy New Year!

JJMC89,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 02:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 02:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Fourth Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing JJMC89 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, JJMC89!

Happy New Year!

JJMC89,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello JJMC89: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Category:Recipients of the National Order of the Lion

Hi @JJMC89 A WP:DRV process is going on here about the categories that you have recently deleted FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I notified of desysopping by your bot?

Hi, your bot recently warned me about being desysopped based on having "fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period", but I have 100 edits in the last 30 months. By my math, I'd need to go completely inactive for 2.5 years to be at risk from the policy. Is there a bug in the bot, or am I actually at risk? —dgies^t_c 18:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The reason you received the reminder is the second sentence. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years. — JJMC89 20:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for clarifying. —dgies^t_c 22:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for File:Squirrel Plush Toy.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Squirrel Plush Toy.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 23:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 June 20#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg

You probably weren't aware of Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 June 20#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg, but it did establish a consensus in favor of also using File:Brazilian Football Confederation logo.svg in the men's national team article; so, another FFD is probably needed to overturn than discussion. In addition, you might want to take a look at c:User talk:Explicit#File:Brazil National Football Team (no stars).svg because if File:Brazil National Football Team (no stars).svg turns out to be OK for Commons, then the same logo with stars most likely would also be OK. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't. While similar, File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg and File:Brazilian Football Confederation logo.svg are not the same logo. — JJMC89 05:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop adding deletion notices now!

Can you please stop adding deletion notices now! 93.41.126.48 (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 You probably weren't aware of [[:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 June 20#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg]], but it did establish a consensus in favor of also using [[:File:Brazilian Football Confederation logo.svg]] in the men's national team article; so, another FFD is probably needed to overturn than discussion. In addition, you might want to take a look at [[:c:User talk:Explicit#File:Brazil National Football Team (no stars).svg]] because if [[:File:Brazil National Football Team (no stars).svg]] turns out to be OK for Commons, then the same logo with stars most likely would also be OK. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 05:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 : I wasn't. While similar, [[:File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg]] and [[:File:Brazilian Football Confederation logo.svg]] are not the same logo. —&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]] 05:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
+== Can you please stop adding deletion notices now! ==
+Can you please stop adding deletion notices now! [[Special:Contributions/93.41.126.48|93.41.126.48]] ([[User talk:93.41.126.48|talk]]) 05:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)