Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:15, 12 November 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neil deGrasse Tyson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15: 30 days

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Q1: Why doesn't this article discuss the accusations against Tyson that he fabricated a quote by George W. Bush?

A1: An RFC was held about whether this should be mentioned in September–October 2014 (see the archived discussion here) and it was closed as "do not include on the basis of WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE."^[1]

References

^ Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson/Archive 7

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Jonathan H. Adler (September 24, 2014). "What makes an accusation Wiki-worthy?". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 7, 2018. Wikipedia aspires to be a neutral source of verifiable information about just about everything of import. The problem is that sometimes people disagree about what information is relevant or credible.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:Banner/ Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Physics: Biographies C‑class Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:Banner/ Physicsphysics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Astronomy C‑class

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:Banner/ AstronomyAstronomy articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

New York City C‑class Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:Banner/ New York CityNew York City articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Columbia University C‑class Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:Banner/ New York (state)New York (state) articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Mid-importance).

Skepticism C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:Banner/ SkepticismSkepticism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neil deGrasse Tyson received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Template:Vital article

Semi-protected edit request on 26 Nov 2019

Missing citation source in section "Media appearances" for film appearance: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2975590/fullcredits/?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Height 1.88M 2A02:C7C:D66D:D800:883:DEC5:AD3C:B9D7 (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Needs a source, and is completely immaterial to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My reverted edit

It's stated in Solar eclipse of June 30, 1973 that he was in the plane. What I wrote here was just writing the same information. Aminabzz (talk) 17:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aminabzz, it doesn't say that. It says he was on the commercial cruise of the S.S. Canberra. Adding that information to this article also requires citing the source for that information, and other Wikipedia articles can never be sources. Schazjmd (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. I will write it again with the true information Aminabzz (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aminabzz, be sure you include a reliable source for it. Schazjmd (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Aminabzz (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see the information exists on the article. Was it there even before that wrong edition by me? I don't recall the information was there. If it was there then the re-reversion of my recent correct edit makes a point. But if that wasn't there before then why was my edition again reverted and someone else wrote the information from scratch? Aminabzz (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aminabzz, you can look at the edit history of the article to see what happened. You added content with a source. It was not reverted. I rewrote it per the source to give it more context. I then moved it to a more appropriate place in that section. Schazjmd (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks Aminabzz (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Nothing about criticism in this article. Looks like a PR~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.156.61 (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning: The Black Brane

Of all the specialists in the field to debut a new study, this article should very well be nominated as expert content material. There is an article on English Wikipedia that addresses "Brane", it elaborates on universalism and the cosmos of things, but no reference of contemporary authors or cohorts. Should there be inclusion? Habatchii (talk) 05:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson/Archive 7

[1]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 == Criticism ==
 Nothing about criticism in this article. Looks like a PR~  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.188.156.61|24.188.156.61]] ([[User talk:24.188.156.61#top|talk]]) 12:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Concerning: The Black Brane ==
+Of all the specialists in the field to debut a new study, this article should very well be nominated as expert content material. There is an article on English Wikipedia that addresses "[[Brane]]", it elaborates on universalism and the cosmos of things, but no reference of contemporary authors or cohorts. Should there be inclusion? [[User:Habatchii|Habatchii]] ([[User talk:Habatchii|talk]]) 05:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)