Jump to content

User talk:Snigbrook/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RandomXYZb (talk | contribs)
Line 168: Line 168:
On {{user|My little halo}}. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
On {{user|My little halo}}. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
:After I reported it I looked at the logs and found a few page move vandal accounts created at the same time, unfortunately I kept getting edit conflicts when trying to add this to the AIV report. —[[User talk:Snigbrook|<span style="font-weight: 400; color:blue">Snigbrook</span>]] 17:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
:After I reported it I looked at the logs and found a few page move vandal accounts created at the same time, unfortunately I kept getting edit conflicts when trying to add this to the AIV report. —[[User talk:Snigbrook|<span style="font-weight: 400; color:blue">Snigbrook</span>]] 17:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
::Pass the salt, my humble pie is just coming to the boil. <sub>[[User:Gb|Gb]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb|c]]</sup> 17:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:36, 12 February 2009

This user is the owner of multiple Wikipedia accounts in a manner permitted by policy.
(My alternative accounts are User:Snydale which I have used on shared computers, and User:User3aaaaa created as a test)
User subpages
User:Snigbrook/Lists
Talk archives
/Archive 1 (2007–2008)
/Archive 2 (2008)


Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Kashmir

thanks for reverting my edits and the vandals edits some editors i.e that opinion dude only seem to see one side of the coin thank god there are proper editors like yourself cheers again freind 86.158.237.235 (talk) 13:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't know much about the subject, although I could see that some of the recent edits (both by you and by Wikireader41) were not neutral - but if you add your own point of view, even if it is only replacing the point of view of another editor, it will often result in you being reverted and blocked. —Snigbrook 13:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting the db-nonsense on this page. I only though to look in the Japanese wiki after putting it up for deletion. So thanks! -Yupik (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

OJ Borg?

Are you radio and TV "personality" OJ Borg?83.244.197.164 (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Carnforth

Thanks for the edit - I missed deleting that old data Ronhjones (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I've commented on this AFD and would like your feedback.- Mgm|(talk) 15:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Verifiable Sources

Get a life.

Leyland Trucks information

Hi. My name is Steve Whelan and I was responsible for adding the content to the LEYLAND TRUCKS section that was deleted by you. I work for Leyland Trucks and own the content of the Leylandtrucksltd.co.uk site. My reasons for updating the Wiki site is to ensure that people who want to research Leyland get the most up to date factual information that they can. I have written the content of the Leyland site and found it easier to use the same text when updating the Wiki site. I am not a technical person and could do with some help here as to what I can and can't put on the site. I will make some further updates bearing in mind your previous comments, but any guidance would be appreciated.

Kind Regards

Whelas (talk) 09:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Steve WhelanWhelas (talk) 09:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


Beanz

Beanz was the name of the virtual currency. Beanz.com was its website. Rarepleasures —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC).

Sama (Eyewear)

You know it's users like you who really put a damper on good articles from being added. Thank for reminding of why I left wiki. FrankWilliams (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

esanchez013 page

Ok, Esanchez013 wanted it blank, but could you please explain in more detail why he wanted it blank

I read the request but I do not understand

I'll read it again but it will be appreciated if you can explain.

SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk) 20:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

OK I understand and I am sorry if I have cause an inconvenience to you

Thank You,

SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Liver (album)

Thanks for moving it to the right place Bihco (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hartwood (Lancashire) railway station

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hartwood (Lancashire) railway station, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartwood (Lancashire) railway station. Thank you. TerriersFan (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Peter Lavelle

Hi! What is the point of an anodyne article about a journalist who would not be very notable at all if it weren't for the salient fact that he works and writes constantly in support of the Russian government and against Western governments and journalists (whom he calls the 'commentariat'). We don't need outside sources for this -- we only need to read the man's own website. Surely this is good enough. What do you mean in this case when you write 'Blogs are not reliable sources'? It is the man's own words we are talking about. Of course Wikipedia must not say that his activities are in any way bad, but it ought to be able to mention them. APW —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawebster (talkcontribs) 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

It should only be included if it is published in reliable sources, or if he has mentioned it himself. I can't see it anywhere on his blog, if it is there you could cite it, mentioning which post it is in. If this is just a perception based on reading it, it is original research. —Snigbrook 23:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


Hello, Snigbrook. You have new messages at Demortes's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Pain (2Pac/Tupac Shakur Song)

Hey there, I saw your username under the history of the edit page of the above article. I was just wondering if you could maybe check it out for me, considering you've revised bits & pieces over there, because I've submitted in new information in the discussion page I thought is worth noting on. Thanks. =] Kain tl (talk) 13:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

It's not a subject I know much about, I only edited the article to undo edits by a user who was adding dubious information and vandalism to various articles. You may need to find more references, as I don't think those you suggested on the talk page are reliable sources. —Snigbrook 18:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


Gareth Kirkham

I notice you are one of the main players in having the Gareth Kirkham article removed. I can assure you that all the content of the article was true. I am astounded that a google search did not show any results given his notoreity and controversialism. I did a yahoo search and found many hits. He is not on the Cornish Pirates website as he has only recently joined the club. The club website has simply not been updated recently. I will also be returning the article to its former state.

Regards

Dogtitmania (talk) 00:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Any content on Wikipedia should be verifiable. I had looked on Google and on the clubs' websites and could not find sources to verify anything mentioned in the article, so I nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth Kirkham. The references currently in the article are not specific enough to verify (see Wikipedia:Citing sources). —Snigbrook 00:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


Thanks!

Thanks for fixing my mistake, I appreciate it :-). Regards SoWhy 23:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Banana

Grrr... I made that mistake the other day too. Thanks for fixing it. :) Acalamari 22:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Smile!

This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions

Also, thanks for welcoming me! Filper01 (Chat, My contribs) 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

eepis

i wouldnt be suprised if it was a straight copvio in original form :( I am sorry I did not check first before modfiying the article - we get heaps of college websites directly copied to english wikipedia (in both english and indonesian) - part of the game it seems - thanks SatuSuro

Waverton, Cumbria

I am curious as to why Woodrow, Cumbria should redirect to Waverton, Cumbria. Kingturtle (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

It appeared as a red link in the box above "recent changes", and when I looked for information about it, I found it was a small hamlet with probably fewer than ten houses. It's probably not notable enough for a separate article so I redirected it to the parish it is in, as suggested by the guidelines at WP:UKCITIES, and added a sentence to Waverton, Cumbria mentioning Woodrow and other hamlets. —Snigbrook 01:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks


Thanks for protecting my talk page from vandalism. Have a kitten for your troubles Dougofborg (talk) 01:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


Talkback

Hello, Snigbrook. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BoiledCable.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

There is a request for additional information that requires your attention Mayalld (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:550s BC disestablishments]] to articles/categories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.


--Stepheng3 (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 204.81.202.103 (talk) 16:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

=KITTY FOR YOU

Amazing call

On My little halo (talk · contribs). Toddst1 (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

After I reported it I looked at the logs and found a few page move vandal accounts created at the same time, unfortunately I kept getting edit conflicts when trying to add this to the AIV report. —Snigbrook 17:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pass the salt, my humble pie is just coming to the boil. GbT/c 17:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)