Jump to content

Talk:Jessica Feshbach: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cirt (talk | contribs)
199,086 edits
fmt talkpg, add proj
m →‎Remove: informational
Line 59: Line 59:
Wikipedia is not the place for your hollywood drama, nobody will care or need this info in 100 years[[User:Thanatos465|Thanatos465]] ([[User talk:Thanatos465|talk]]) 04:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the place for your hollywood drama, nobody will care or need this info in 100 years[[User:Thanatos465|Thanatos465]] ([[User talk:Thanatos465|talk]]) 04:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
:Actually she has received a bit more coverage recently, as an influential figure within Scientology management. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 04:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
:Actually she has received a bit more coverage recently, as an influential figure within Scientology management. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 04:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

==Equity investing==
An article, many years ago by "Adam Smith" pointed out, in a Senate hearing, that picking stocks by throwing darts, while blindfolded, at the NYXE list was as accurate as any other method and generally bore better returns that those of some Wall
Street "gurus" of that era! Again, so much, therefore, for Scientology, Ron H and all the other weak charactered ****. [[User:Semperlibre|Semperlibre]] ([[User talk:Semperlibre|talk]]) 10:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


== Additional sources ==
== Additional sources ==

Revision as of 10:00, 28 October 2010

Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 19, 2006Articles for deletionNo consensus
December 1, 2008Articles for deletionKept
October 18, 2010Articles for deletionKept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 28, 2010.

Remove

Wikipedia is not the place for your hollywood drama, nobody will care or need this info in 100 yearsThanatos465 (talk) 04:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually she has received a bit more coverage recently, as an influential figure within Scientology management. Cirt (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Equity investing

An article, many years ago by "Adam Smith" pointed out, in a Senate hearing, that picking stocks by throwing darts, while blindfolded, at the NYXE list was as accurate as any other method and generally bore better returns that those of some Wall Street "gurus" of that era! Again, so much, therefore, for Scientology, Ron H and all the other weak charactered ****. Semperlibre (talk) 10:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources

Additional sources, in above listed searches. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 01:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these have since been used, however - still doing some additional research. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 06:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note, added text from an FA quality article

Note, added text from WP:FA quality article, Katie Holmes, to this page [1]. -- Cirt (talk) 02:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This all relates to her passing mentions in the flurry of news coverage about Cruise and Holmes. None of the articles do more that give a tiny bit of background information about her as they describe her appearances with Holmes. She was not the focus of the story, no real effort was made to do a story about her that provide information for a biographical encyclopedia article. As you noted, the material was in the Katie Holmes article so it does not need to be repeated here. Since she is known for her appearances with Holmes, then this article could redirect to Holmes article. FloNight♥♥♥♥ 03:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can we please keep the notability-related comments to the AFD page? Gets confusing to discuss the same topic in multiple locations. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Reliable Sources (yet )for status as Scientology high official

I looked for sources under several names prior to the Afd, and nothing I saw had reliable sources for background information that would substantiate an official position beyond spokesperson. For example, the FoxNews article makes a vague mention of her status in Scientology by quoting unnamed groups that monitor the Church of Scientology. This is hardly a reliable source for an encyclopedia article. If we don't find something else more reliable than we need to remove the bit about her status as an official. FloNight♥♥♥♥ 02:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still in the process of doing more research. Please bear with it, as it is ongoing. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Feshbach

Some additional searches for research. -- Cirt (talk) 07:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Still have to do additional research on these, multiple terms above are definitely more than notable enough for separate independent articles. Will probably get to that at some point in the future. -- Cirt (talk) 06:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jessica_Feshbach&oldid=393393457"