User talk:Bejnar: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:38, 24 November 2010

Bottom of Page

Things to remember

Nazoo Anaa

You listed Nazoo Anaa for deletion and I re-wrote the article.--Khostafg (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rioni of the City of Rome

There is a discussion on whether articles on the rioni of the City of Rome should follow the naming convention for Italy, or should be treated differently. I have notified you as you were previously involved in the discussion on a Naming convention for Italian cities. Please feel free to add your comments at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)/Archives/2010/July#Italy: rioni of Rome. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Homs/Hims

The more important article is Hims itself; my article title was based off of that. I was following some consensus there from when I did copyediting work on that article, but you may want to talk to User talk:Al Ameer son or User talk:Zozo2kx, as I believe they may be able to give you an explanation. I wanted continuity in the place names throughout the encyclopedia as a whole, but I don't have an opinion on either name. Spencer^T♦C 01:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You recently participated in a discussion at Talk:Hims Gap. You might be interested in a move proposal at Talk:Hims. — AjaxSmack 01:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chihuahuaa

This is purely a personal view but there are a few things I notice: 1) you're right about the old template being lerss easy to read, but it is the standard form used by other states (see Template:Durango and Template:Coahuila; 2) it does allow for more items about the state to be added in, as in the case of Coahuila; 3) the new template needs its redlinks fixed and is very big, but it is more easily read; 4) it looks good as part of the Chihuahua article. What I'd suggest is that the old template should be kept for the individual municipalities, but that the format of the new one should be used within each state article as a section of the article. That would mean converting from a template into a single section, since single-use templates aren't really liked on WP. Finally, whatever happens, it should be discussed with WP:MX first. Grutness...wha? 23:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Ronald Ivelaw-Chapman

Hi Bejnar, I have undone your changes, as Sir Ronald was very definitely co-author of the book Wings over Kabul. See reference http://openlibrary.org/books/OL4940251M/Wings_over_Kabul for bona fides. I am his grandson, and took part with my father during the books authoring and publishing. Sir Ronald is co-write and author of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allegrilover (talk • contribs) 18:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response at User talk:Allegrilover#book Wings over Kabul. --Bejnar (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bejnar apologies for the the errata and for overlooking your other edits, I will use the compare option more efficiently next time. best (Allegrilover (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Anwar al-Awlaki

Your edit undid at least 39 revisions (perhaps more since the newest matching rev was a revert). Were you using a buggy script that loaded the old version of the page? The script may need fixing. Also, the ABC news link works for me -- it's definitely not dead as you indicated. Thundermaker (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Singkaling Hkamti

HI. I'm currently doing a drive to cleanup Burmese towns and townships and get some info.references written into them. As you did a good job with Singkaling Hkamti wondered if you could help out?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. One thing though. If you are adding infoboxes to towns please copy the shortened "clean" infobox you now see in Budalin (click edit page to view it). Most of the infoboxes at the moment are unnecessrily long. It would be nice to get some district locator maps at least.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently starting the villages in Hkamti Township. If you can google book search any title at random and try to find some mention in a British gazetteer with some info to add to any one of the stubs like Allagappa this would be great. I'm gradually working through each township of Burma. I hope eventually most can be expanded if the village is mentioned in google books and maybe in a few years there will be an increasing amount of content available online....♦ Dr. Blofeld

Region

Nothing to do with that. I changed the name back to Division so I could edit the template. The name= field part of the template has to match the name of the nav box name in the header, otherwise you can edit it directly. If you change the name of the template to Template:Sagaing Region then the template name can be Sagaing Region.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Featured List Criteria section 3b

Hello. You are receiving this message as you previously posted in the ongoing RfC on whether Featured List Criteria section 3b should be modified or eliminated. Based on feedback and commentary received during the section-by-section analysis of the current criteria, I have proposed a new version of the criteria here. I would like your input on ways to improve and refine this proposal, in hopes of reaching consensus to implement this change to the criteria. Thank you for your attention. –Grondemar 17:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The pits

Very possible it isn't properly cat'd. (TBH, I thought it'd been merged & dealt with long ago. :( I'm in no way qualified to merge it, myself.) TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 14:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

excellent

good to see someone else trying to clear out the mess at Navajo Nation... do you think "administrative divisions" might be better in the "geography"-sections? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yepp, point taken, I was just wondering.

As for the list, I would rather not include off-reservation towns. My ideal would be to treat this along the model of country-articles. My main contention before I re-arranged it was that it was a muddle between the geographic/political entity and the ethnicity. I would like to see this one cover the political entity as much as possible.

And yes, geographical features and such should be there (with refs!); what you see is basically just a preliminary re-arrangement to get the overall structure going. I will now dig up some stuff to fill it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Palauk Subtownship

Hi can you merge this into the Township article? Its just it will start to get unmanageable if we have articles on the sub townships too!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have access to subtownships if you could list them in the township articles this would be great. Eventually I want to have articles on all of them and of course villages organized in subtownships but priority is making the township articles more comprhensive I think.. Did you see my article on Kutkai?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Keep up the great work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Can you find out the seat town for Taninthayi Township. It can't be Dawei... Is Taninthayi a town as well as region. I thought that was Dawei?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it seems Dawei Township in Dawei District are seperate. Taninthayi is given as in Myeik District.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you fill out an article in Tanintharyi and add a hat note syaing this about the toqn see Tanintharyi Region for region? Odd that we don't have an article on it.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. The other one is Kiyttsu Township which is red linked in the nav box as Kyunsu Township. Which name is correct?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect and mention former name then? I will look into expanding the town of Tanintharyi and the Great Tenasserim River this week. Both have a wealth of sources from the British period..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:43, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Can you find the coordinates for Kyunsu Township, I can't seem to find them under that name.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't think so, Mergui is Myeik. The map I have of Burma shows that the Kyunsu Township neighbors Myeik Township to the south.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah welldone. Actually if you match up the maps you'll see Kyunsu is actually the new name for Kanmaw which is indeed in the Mergui islands but you had the wrong island in your coordinates. Look at the google map now in Kyunsu Township see here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you list the subtownships?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I started Kyunsu. Looks right on the map I made too.. AH. looks like we had an article already on the island Kanmaw Kyun. Which name is better? You decide, you;ve done a great job tonight.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kyun

Thanks for letting me know. Appreciate it. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apalon

Hello - you moved article about Apalon company from Apalon to Apalon (company). The new article is about a village in Burma. Don't you think it will be appropriate to create a page called Apalon (village) for it? Please try typing Apalon into Google and see what is more relevant to this particular name -- --Billystut (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you look in Google Scholar, you will find more for the place in Burma. --Bejnar (talk) 19:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't able to find much info about the place in Burma in Google Scholar. But google news archives retured more articles about Apalon as a company. Updated the page with some more links from media such as Cnet and others.

User:Trans-Dniestr, User:Transnistriei

You have got a reply. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have got a reply. Hope it helps and the "perceived problem" can be solved. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 20:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have got a reply. I wouldn't like to answer the last question, the thing is, it would be OR, I wouldn't have reliable sources to prove any answer. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have got a reply. :-) Si recuerdo bien has editado articulos de estados de Mejico? Pienso que pasaron 5 anos mas o menos. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And we had a little problem. But we solved it. And you know what: My first blocks ever I received for creating stubs for Mexican states, some was under IP and some got deleted. They were really stubby, almost only had the ISO 3166-2 code. Yeah, country subdivisions, I still like it. :-) Interesting to see the Burma improvements. BTW Blofeld just got blocked. It's very easy to receive blocks. Trans-Dniestr (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bejnar. You have new messages at Talk:The_Office_(U.S._TV_series)_season_1#Requested_move.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Kanmaw Kyun

On 23 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kanmaw Kyun, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the economy of the Kanmaw Kyun in the Mergui Archipelago is dependent on rubber plantations? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Money Island

Hello, while I understand making a disambiguation page, the name Money Island, Long Island Sound is not descriptive enough. Could you please rename it to Money Island (Connecticut)? An example would be Peacock Island (Connecticut). Thanks. Markvs88 (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 Hello - you moved article about Apalon company from [[Apalon]] to [[Apalon (company)]]. The new article is about a village in Burma. Don't you think it will be appropriate to create a page called Apalon (village) for it? Please try typing Apalon into Google and see what is more relevant to this particular name --   --[[User:Billystut|Billystut]] ([[User talk:Billystut|talk]]) 14:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 :If you look in Google Scholar, you will find more for the place in Burma. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar#top|talk]]) 19:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
+:I wasn't able to find much info about the place in Burma in Google Scholar. But google news archives retured more articles about Apalon as a company. Updated the page with some more links from media such as Cnet and others.
 == User:Trans-Dniestr, User:Transnistriei ==