User talk:Boing! said Zebedee: Difference between revisions
→Regarding Talk:Carla Medina: Adding to comment |
|||
Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
I would like to kindly request that page be undeleted and moved into the article space (at [[Carla Medina]]). Notability appeared to have been asserted, so that does not appear to be a problem. The other IP editor who created the page probably should have gone about the creation via the appropriate process, [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation]]. However, since this page appears to be legitimate, I figured this request was worthwhile. Please get back to me. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/76.254.122.124|76.254.122.124]] ([[User talk:76.254.122.124|talk]]) 19:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
I would like to kindly request that page be undeleted and moved into the article space (at [[Carla Medina]]). Notability appeared to have been asserted, so that does not appear to be a problem. The other IP editor who created the page probably should have gone about the creation via the appropriate process, [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation]]. However, since this page appears to be legitimate, I figured this request was worthwhile. Please get back to me. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/76.254.122.124|76.254.122.124]] ([[User talk:76.254.122.124|talk]]) 19:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Hi. I have restored it to [[Carla Medina]], but there are some problems with it. Firstly, I don't think it contains a sufficient indication of importance, so someone might request [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] for reason A7. Next, it has no sources, and all [[WP:BLP|biographical]] articles must have at least one source or they can be deleted according to [[:WP:BLPPROD]]. So you'll really need to do a little work on it to prevent its deletion. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 20:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
:Hi. I have restored it to [[Carla Medina]], but there are some problems with it. Firstly, I don't think it contains a sufficient indication of importance, so someone might request [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] for reason A7. Next, it has no sources, and all [[WP:BLP|biographical]] articles must have at least one source or they can be deleted according to [[:WP:BLPPROD]]. So you'll really need to do a little work on it to prevent its deletion. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 20:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
::There appears to be some evidence of notability. There is an article about her at [[es:Carla Medina]]. I know that there is a template that tells editors to expand with material from the corresponding article at the other wiki, however, I do not know what the name of that template is. If you could insert it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/76.254.122.124|76.254.122.124]] ([[User talk:76.254.122.124|talk]]) 00:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
::There appears to be some evidence of notability. There is an article about her at [[es:Carla Medina]]. I know that there is a template that tells editors to expand with material from the corresponding article at the other wiki (and to translate it if they have knowledge in the other language), however, I do not know what the name of that template is. If you could insert it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/76.254.122.124|76.254.122.124]] ([[User talk:76.254.122.124|talk]]) 00:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC), modified 00:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Again...this time in "Jerash Governorate" article == |
== Again...this time in "Jerash Governorate" article == |
Revision as of 00:50, 20 May 2012
User:Boing! said Zebedee/Userboxes/Topblurb
April 2012Your assistance is requestedIt has moved to my talk page, after I closed the ANI [1] as being a content dispute for No Country for Old Men (film). Ring Cinema and JTBX, both of which have multiple blocks for warring in their past, RC in particular. There may be others involved indirectly. There are a couple things in the histories that bug me, RC has a lot of activity reverting on the article, maybe ownish, maybe just protecive. I will let you draw you own conclusions on J. I tried to get them to go to DR, and have it at a low to medium boil, but something is setting off my Spidey sense, but I don't know what I'm missing. I also invited a 3rd party they both seem to like to the article talk page, but too soon for a reply. Maybe it does need to go back to ANI, maybe I was right and DR should handle it (even though they seem more interested in bickering). I'm not sure. They have also involved EdJohnston on his talk page, which has been about as ineffective. They are both badgering each other in talk and reverting, carefully staying under the threshold. RC seems to have a friend or two, but I'm not sure if that is because his points are more valid or just been around more. I'm not expecting you to jump in, just asking advice. Then again, if you think the best solution IS to jump in, I will not be offended in anyway, and would welcome it. You aren't going to hurt my pride, I just want a solution, and we are reaching the limits of my previous experience, so it is time to learn instead. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 00:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
May 2012I have been here for a while and want to improve myself. Though I try my best to do the right thing, I may do something wrong. As you have seen me work, can you please leave me a review as I want to know where I stand so far and what should I improve to be a good editor. Your opinion has always been valuable and your review can help. Thanks :) Yasht101 08:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Redaloes, againIt is less than 24 hours since you took a look at the Redaloes problem. The issues regarding that contributor are continuing and they appear not to want to respond to guidance etc. In fact, more often than not they are just reinstating citations etc which were removed for reasons that have been explained to them. Do you think that they might respond to you? We need to get some dialogue going here, even if that means a short block in an attempt to get their attention. - Sitush (talk) 10:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Historyfeelings sockpuppetryCould you please investigate Historyfeelings for sockpuppetry. Please the contributions made to the articles "Jordan" and "Jerash" for using different IP addresses. Historyfeelings is involved in IP sockpuppetry using not only two, but three IP addresses in addition to his/her user account. The first IP address is 46.185.160.11, which he used in the edit war in "Jerash" article and the IP address 46.185.138.244 in the edit war on "Jordan" article to evade his/her account blocking. These two different IP addressees in addition, to a third IP address 94.249.93.242, which he used to communicate with you, while he was blocked. please see the changes to the two articles made in during the edit war. Here are the details: In "Jerash" article:
In "Jordan" article:
Regards Banimustafa (talk) 16:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
HelpHey, I was wondering if you could help sort these Stooshe page moves/cut and paste jobs - [2]? The pages just needed moving to the correct name (lowercase 's' on the 'she' bit), but User:AlligatorSky created new articles, copy and pasted the contents of the original articles to them and then redirected the original articles. - JuneGloom Talk 16:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank youI just wanted to leave a note to thank you for your help and for giving me the benefit of the doubt. I've archived my talk page (I think I did it right) and am looking forward being a productive member of the community. 214.13.69.132 (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Ending Edit War In Jerash and Jordan ArticlesAs I am trying to avoid edit waring with Historyfeelings (H.F), do you suggest a mechanism, where a third party can check the references used in the article and validates the claims made by the two parties based on the references cited in the article. From my side, I am happy to provide additional verifiable references upon request to prove my point of view. In "Jordan" article I think the issue is much simpler, I do not mind if Historyfeelings add his own picture "A mountain in Sakib" provided that he/she stop deleting the picture which I added about "olive farms in Souf". However, I suggest that his/her picture to be added to more relevant section in the article as the section is about agriculture, while his picture is more sensible to be added to nature or tourism. Thank you for your attention. Banimustafa (talk) 23:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Review of edit war on Nambudiri, pleaseHi Boing!; I'm asking you and Salvio giuliano, as admins who sometimes handle India caste-related issues, to review an edit war at Nambudiri. Two users, one of whom I have a well known on-wiki relationship with, were edit warring. I fully protected the article for 24 hours to stop the edit warring, but it may be that blocks are appropriate (both editors crossed 3RR). While I felt that protecting the article was safe under WP:INVOLVED, I don't think I can make a fair blocking decision. Thanks for your assistance. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
WP:TLDR time, sorry, but you did ask ... The problems relate to both sources but are most significant regarding Pullapilly. For example, the first insertion includeswhilst Pullapilly says (p. 28) The same edit also says whilst Pullapilly says (p. 29)
Some of the other bits are close paraphrases. The stuff is reinstated here, along with Indic scripts that had also been previously removed for reasons explained to AshLey. I could have fixed the copyvio but there was no point: a piece based on Pullapilly already existed at Caste system in Kerala, which I subsequently introduced and modified to suit, starting with this edit. AshLey then removed that & inserted some close paraphrasing as a replacement, with a quite bizarre edit summary of "weasel removed, exact copy of texts from copy righted source removed". And so it carried on ... The close paraphrasing additions were better than the outright copyvio but completely unnecessary given the copy/paste from Caste system in Kerala. I think that probably AshLey was just determined "not to lose" by this stage. I had templated them and then posted several further messages at User_talk:Ashley_thomas80#May_2012 before getting a response there, although AshLey did take a pop on my talk page with an inappropriate warning etc. - Sitush (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation EdJohnston and thanks for the guidance Qwyrxian. First of all, I admit that the phrasing of my contributions, closely followed the source, at least in one sentence, but I have observed the same practice with many established writers. For example, in the book of Harold Coward (Hindu Christian Dialogue), a few important points are almost the same in text and phrase as in the book of Duncan Forrester. Let'us analyse the present version of Wikipedia article Nambudiri:
Hello, Boing! said Zebedee. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Sorry forgot to sign this Faendalimas talk 20:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
RajputSince you protected the thing, just a note to let you know that I have absolutely ripped into Rajput during the last few minutes. The problems (few footnotes/big and obscure list of sources) had been tagged since July 2010 and I tried to move things along a little between July and December by tagging for specific cites/unreferenced sections etc. Nothing changed, so I've binned the tagged stuff and we'll have to start over. Amazingly, this crock of crap currently shows ratings ranging from 4.3 to 4.7. Clear evidence, in my mind, that this satisfied the vanity of a readership even though it was hopeless as an encyclopedic article. It still is, in many respects. - Sitush (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
OrunimWhy did you delete my page Orunim. Can you please explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isfarahmad (talk • contribs) 06:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Stho002I've answered your request on my talk page. I hope what I have said is helpful. Let me know if you have any other questions or requests related to it. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Hi there BOING, VASCO here, lost for words, the vandal from Montenegro (User:Steadyfingers or User:Aciyokrocky) continues to attack the page, gluing all the sentences (that's vandalism no?) and remove stuff in BOX (that's vandalism FOR SURE), shall we take page protection up a notch? Also, disgruntled that we don't let him use the copyrighted image he uploads, he takes revenge by removing the other (and please note it was not i who uploaded the current one)! Attentively, happy week and thanks in advance - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
noteHello, can you please revert this edit you've blocked the person but you haven't revert the edit. references for my point of view: at this article (the second paragraph in one of the most famous newspaper in Jordan called:Addustour) here and at this book Here shows that the name of Jerash abandoned for Sakib. thanks a lot --HF► 00:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Well deserved praise.Just in case you aren't stalking my talk page, I thought I would call your attention to this edit. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
GOCE May mid-drive newsletter
NairGlad you spotted that: it is the second there in a pretty short space of time. - Sitush (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Can you have a word, pleaseThis edit is the latest insertion by User:Chauhan1192, despite an ongoing discussion, despite being reverted by others and despite quite a lengthy series of messages on their talk page. I have some doubts about the "newness" of the contributor because the pattern rings a bell somewhere but, regardless of that, this needs input from someone other than me. - Sitush (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Banned User stho002 possibly attempting to influence Wikipedia.Hi, I recieved a rather long message on my talk page that I believe may be a result of stho002 emailing people on Wikipedia to give them his point of view on topics of interest to him. If I understand correectly this type of behavior may be in breach of his edit block. user:Dyanega is a specialist in insects and has never had any interest in turtles. He suddenly appears on this subject when stho002 has been banned. He has made many of the same unfounded accusations that stho002 made against me some 18 months ago, issues that were investigated at the time by admins and I was found to have done nothing wrong. At the time user:ZooPro gave me a precautionary warning to ensure I was careful about wp:NPOV. This was history though. I would appreciate it if this could be checked on. cheers, Faendalimas talk 23:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Karma KingdomHello Sir I have created here yesterday a page related karma kingdom.Karma kingdom is first game based on Indian Mythology and supports to charity.Here is my question that why have you deleted this page. I have not used there any wrong language or any wrong comment then what is the reason behind this.As i know Wikipedia this is the database about knowledge of any type.So why why why you deleted this.....waiting for your reply..You can play this game in Facebook and Ibibo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachans9 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Mark WadeHey, just saying, incase you didn't realise, I am the author of the page Mark Wade (rugby league). I am requesting that it be deleted as the player hasn't played first-grade & after leaving the Knights for a local club, won't ever be playing first-grade any time soon! Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 04:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
London's Anything and EverythingHello, you recently deleted my page 'London's Anything and Everything' Can you explain to me why? I included a real life person, myself, which is the owner of London's Anything and Everything... I await your reply Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrDjLucky (talk • contribs) 22:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Request to reverse decision to delete Garage Mahal PresentsHi Boing! said Zebedee, I'd like to request to reverse decision to delete the Garage Mahal Presents entry. I feel I gave proper reasoning as to the importance of the page and would like to hear an explanation of why you disagreed. Much thanks. Vishallllll (talk) 17:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Regarding Talk:Carla MedinaHello. I would like to kindly request that page be undeleted and moved into the article space (at Carla Medina). Notability appeared to have been asserted, so that does not appear to be a problem. The other IP editor who created the page probably should have gone about the creation via the appropriate process, Wikipedia:Articles for creation. However, since this page appears to be legitimate, I figured this request was worthwhile. Please get back to me. Thanks. 76.254.122.124 (talk) 19:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Again...this time in "Jerash Governorate" articleI have just noted that the user Historyfeelings is also trying to promote Sakib in the article "Jerash Governorate". on the same fashion as the article "Jerash" and "Jordan". Please notice the difference in the article before Historyfeelings changes and compare it to the version after Historyfeelings made his promotion campaign to sakib. The main picture in the article which was showing the map of the governorate is now replaced with a picture from sakib. The picture from Souf (as always) was replaced by a picture of Sakib (of course after deleting the legend which was describing that the picture was taken in Souf). Then, two pictures of sakib was added to take over the article after re-arranging other pictures in the article and make them less important....even the picture of Jerash which is the capital of the governorate was replaced with a picture from Sakib. This is what happened in "Jerash" article and also what happened in "Jordan" article .... and it is now happening in "Jerash Governorate" article for the same purpose. Banimustafa (talk) 19:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
DeletionYou deleted "the brotherhood of the table" page. It has great significance to four people of the world. I would like the page put back. It had only been on for 1 hour before it was deleted. It is planned that there shall be additions to its content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reybryce (talk • contribs) 22:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
|