User talk:Thirdright

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs				Cleanup
		Cape Codder (cocktail)				Funeral Rule
		Stander (film)				Syria Education Channel
		1976 Boston Red Sox season				Weekend Now
		Ahmadiyya in Germany		Merge
		Prattville High School				Testator
		Magnolia Beach, Texas				United States Short Course Swimming Championships
		Tax amnesty				Ahmadiyya in India
		Zulfiya Chinshanlo		Add sources
		Balad al-Shaykh massacre				Probate
		1930 United States Census				Codicil (will)
		Kim Un-Guk				Open business
		Okariki Okaru		Wikify
		Bédouès				United States trust law
		1977 Boston Red Sox season				Expectancy theory
		Music 24				Invincible Armor
		Ispagnac		Expand
		Cognitive miser				Content of a business plan
		Gabriac, Lozère				The Borrible Trilogy
		Montbrun, Lozère				Dishonest assistance

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Macclesfield Bank

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Macclesfield Bank. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Thirdright. You have new messages at Fraggle81's talk page.
Message added 17:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Tgeairn, a message has been left on my talk page from Livebymyheart which is also addressed to you regarding the article Psalms. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tgeairn: Any toughts on the message I left for you and Fraggle two weeks ago? Steve Rosner Livebymyheart (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Srebrenica massacre

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Srebrenica massacre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

HOT T.V.

I removed your speedy delete template on HOT T.V. as another editor has added most of the content to the article. If you feel that it should be db-a7ed, please feel free to restore the tag without notifying me. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

I replaced is text with a redirect to HOT T.V. and told him to follow wp:moving articles See if he follows it. Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 19:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! That looks like what he was after (article move). Enjoy! --Tgeairn (talk) 19:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for deleting "Bad Acid Comix" None of the comix or publishers, listed in the article, ever existed. - Zonker 74.67.174.153 (talk) 19:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.174.153 (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 

Editorial judgment

In an article that we have worked together on recently, I have come across a source that notes the subject's mother took her own life when he was a boy. I'm reluctant to be that specific, particularly given the subject's involvement with the article. Seem OK to you? If you have no idea of what I'm talking about, let me know. Location (talk) 19:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, unless there's a reason related to the subject's notability to include then it doesn't seem necessary. I agree with leaving out. --Tgeairn (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Hehe thank you

That was just an amusing attack against me. "All who disagrees with my vandalism must be deported to Pakistan!" I didn't take offense to it though. I appreciate the revert. ViriiK (talk) 01:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

I hear ya... Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 01:58, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for minding my user/talk page. It is appreciated. Jschnur (talk) 07:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gulf War

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gulf War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Lifetime Benefits Trust (LBT)

Hi, i noticed you deleted the page i created because it didn't have a reference. I got the information form a text book. Can I just input the name of the text as a reference or do I have to photocopy it and put it online - i was just concerned about copyright infringement that's why i didn't do that. Let me know. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShannonAndrea (talk • contribs) 01:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello! No, the reference does not need to be available online. I added a welcome message to your talk page with some helpful links to placing references. Please check those out, and let me know if you still have any questions. To jump in quickly, see the guide to citing sources. It can look a little overwhelming at first, but you'll be citing like a pro in no time. Thanks for asking, and don't hesitate to ask me or others for help when you need it! --Tgeairn (talk) 01:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Registered Retirement Savings Plan Rollover

Hi, i noticed you proposed to delete the page Registered Retirement Savings Plan Rollover. Could you please do so? I realized it makes more sense to put the content in the Registered Retirement Savings Plan page, but i don't know how to delete pages. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShannonAndrea (talk • contribs) 01:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

For protecting my talk page. You're cool! Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 06:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Hello Tgeairn, just wanted to say thanks for the revert you did on my talk page Fraggle81 (talk) 13:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Questions about Wikipedia & SuggestBot

Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Stopping by with a small token of our gratitude for your time spent answering our questions, we greatly appreciate it! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Recent Invader Zim revert

Hi Tgeairn, an IP user 80.5.68.176 recently made a good-faith edit at Invader_Zim, which you reverted because their source was a Tumblr account for the "official" letter-writing campaign to bring back the Invader Zim cartoon. The user has taken their question to the Talk Page. I attempted to answer the question as best I could, but I was also wondering if you'd be willing to help guide them, since the user genuinely seems interested in understanding. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I have responded at the article talk page. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 01:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Much obliged! :D Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Five

Stop by for a tasty glass of wiki-iced tea at the Teahouse, today!

Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

• Guest activity increased in July. Questions are up from an average of 36 per week in June to 43 per week in July, and guest profile creation has also increased. This is likely a result of the automatic invite experiments we started near the end of month, which seeks to lessen the burden on hosts and other volunteers who manually invite editors. During the last week of July, questions doubled in the Teahouse! (But don't let that deter you from inviting editors to the Teahouse, please, there are still lots of new editors who haven't found Teahouse yet.)
• More Teahouse hosts than ever. We had 12 new hosts sign up to participate at the Teahouse! We now have 35 hosts volunteering at the Teahouse. Feel free to stop by and see them all here.
• Phase two update: Host sprint. In August, the Teahouse team plans to improve the host experience by developing a simpler new-host creation process, a better way of surfacing active hosts, and a host lounge renovation. Take a look at the plan and weigh in here.
• New Teahouse guest barnstar is awarded to first recipient: Charlie Inks. Using the Teahouse barnstar designed by Heatherawalls, hosts hajatvrc and Ryan Vesey created the new Teahouse Guest Barnstar. The first recipient is Charlie Inks, for her boldness in asking questions at the Teahouse. Check out the award in action here.
• Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania! The Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania this past month, where editor retention and interface design was heavily discussed. Sarah and Jonathan presented the Teahouse during the Wikimedia Fellowships panel. Slides can be viewed here. A lunch was also held at Wikimania for Teahouse hosts.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 08:38, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Cedar Creek/Belle Grove

I've moved the title back to the stable version. I have a strong suspicion that the accounts involved in the move war are either closely related or the same person: both were created at the same time and have parallel editing histories. I note that both made a rapid series of edits to become autoconfirmed. Under those circumstances I will take administrative action against the parties if warranted: this isn't a genuine content dispute in my opinion. Acroterion (talk) 02:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for putting things back in order. I had the same thought about the editors involved, and this has happened frequently in the past few days that older accounts suddenly move to autoconfirmed and then behave in a manner inconsistent with forwarding the project. Have a good one! --Tgeairn (talk) 06:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abortion

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Abortion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting on my Talk page. I guess I'll never know what was there but I appreciate you reverting it. Cheers! Wikipelli ^Talk 21:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for this information. Syrianview (talk) 00:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop reverting appropriate edits

Hello,

Today you reverted an edit I made to the Zynga page regarding their stock price stating: "This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Zynga. Tgeairn (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)" The edit I made was valid and appropriate. Please follow Wikipedia guidelines and refrain from being a disruptive editor. Truthbetold73 (talk) 00:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Your edit listed a stock price for Zynga for 13 August 2012. As today is either 11 August or 12 August depending on your time zone, I reverted your edit as a factual error and issued a final warning. I also assumed good faith and verified that neither the Friday close price nor the after-hours trading matched your given information. Please do not continue to disrupt Wikipedia and begin to focus on constructive edits that add to or improve the project. Thanks, and Happy Editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see now. The date was supposed to be Aug 3, not 13. I will make that edit now. Since we both assumed good faith please retract your warning. Thank you Truthbetold73 (talk) 00:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Makes sense... I didn't think to check the 3rd (I even checked July 13!). Removed the warning. Thanks for getting it worked out here. --Tgeairn (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Questions

First off, I'd like to know why I wasn't notified of the edit war report you made? I believe it's a rule to notify people. Second, if you payed attention to my edits you would see they're not blind reverts, almost every single one of them is different, including alterations and compromises in an attempt to fix the "faults" the other user found with the previous version of the page. There's a couple blind reverts in there, but the majority of them all include a compromise, which can be seen by viewing the changes from edit to edit. Fry1989 ^eh? 23:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for asking. I just responded at WP:ANEW. To be clear, I did not make the EW report. I only included the material that was missing from the original report (which only listed the page and editors involved). I thought you had been notified, and I was mistaken in that belief. I apologize. As for the actual edits, I included some of yours which were not you reverting but rather were edits you made that were reverted by the other involved editor. Since both of you were listed in the same report, I was attempting to show both sides in the report. I agree that it looks like you have been trying to reach a compromise. --Tgeairn (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't see you reply there for a while, that's why I posed here. Fry1989 ^eh? 23:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem, it took me a while to respond. --Tgeairn (talk) 23:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

RfC input needed

Hi. Your name was selected at random from Feedback Request Service as an editor that may be willing to comment on RfCs. There is an RfC about the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard that could use some input, if you are so inclined. Cheers. --Noleander (talk) 19:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

syobon action page

it doesnt need to be deleted, its just that a user vandalized it like crazy. look in the history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.191.151 (talk) 22:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I have rolled the page back to where it was a few days ago. Please take the time to provide reliable sources for the article though. I will likely propose its deletion in a community discussion in it's current form. Thanks for pointing out the history though, hopefully you and other editors can find sources and get the article up to Wikipedia standards. --Tgeairn (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

MARIAN RICHERO

You're welcome, and I disagreed with the reason for speedying it in the past, so I wasn't at all interested in speedying it now. I didn't feel like taking it to AFD because it's not something that really interests me, but I readily voted in the AFD that someone else created. Nyttend (talk) 01:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Mossad

i dont know how to talk to you on this, so i will try this way. I honestly dont care what you edit i did it to make a point i know its your job to re-edit what people change. Im not mad at you im mad at the lies people put up here sometimes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.167.229.213 (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I think? It can be easy to get upset when you find information in an article that is either inaccurate or appears to you to be inaccurate. As an encyclopedia, we contrain ourselves to material that is verifiable in reliable sources. If/when you come accross information that is inaccurate, go ahead and be bold and change it - IF you have and provide a reliable source for the new information. If you have a question about an article's content, discuss it on the article talk page. Thanks for your comments, but please don't continue to make disruptive edits. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I am not trying to be a pain

Please understand. I saw Jeret Peterson on live TV last night. It is not intended as vandalism. I am sorry I lost my temper about it. But, please, it is an injustice to report someone dead when they are alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.125.204.112 (talk) 02:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Iraq WMD Inspections, November 2002

Hi TGeairn,

     I posted a proposed addition to your page (copied below) and it was kicked-back as not verifiable or opinion-based.  I was wondering what type of reference material would suffice?  For instance, press reporting of the number of troops in Kuwait in Oct-Nov 2002?  The biggest problem I see with wikipedia is that if you have to rely on what someone else has said or written, then you will at times miss new perspectives and historic realities.  I'm not sure that I will find a reference document stating the below is true, but I think intuitively, most every non-partisan observer would agree with the comment. And, it provides valuable context...Saddam never would have allowed inspectors back on the ground without the imminent threat of military force.  He hadn't since 1998 and there's no logical reason to believe that he would have in 2002...it was all about military pressure.  Warm regards, Fred Smith / Fred.lyn

However, UN inspectors were only permitted to re-enter Iraq by Saddam in November 2002 due to the presence of several hundred thousand predominantly US and UK military troops, positioning in Kuwait near the Iraq border since the summer of 2002, preparing for non-compliance and a potential invasion. A strong case can be made that Saddam Hussein only complied with UN inspections, albeit in a limited manner, during this period due to the coercive effect of a large military presence on his border. Once removed, it is almost certain that Saddam's cooperation with future UN inspections would have ended.