User talk:Sourov0000

Sourov0000, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Sourov0000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

David Hawkes (Public Intellectual)

Thank you for your input and suggestion. I am currently working on your suggestions. Appreciatively, Xxxartxxx (talk) 17:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

• It was my pleasure. Sourov0000 (talk) 23:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sourov0000. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sourov0000. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by hajatvrc @ 16:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback

Hello, Sourov0000. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

WikiProject Wikify April Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.

• Hello there. I am up for it and am ready to join the Wikify Project. If information about the things that are needed to be done is available, then it would be a lot easier thing for me to join. Thank you.

Merge proposal

Hi, you might be interested in the merge proposal discussion over at American English. Regards. — Ƶ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 18:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hello, thank you for your proposal for merging the article American Accent with American English. American Accent is a part of American English but it is a totally different thing. As we all know that it is the way of talking and pronouncing, I think a different Article is necessary as a result of letting people know more elaborately about American Accent. So that people can talk and speak more fluently using American English. Because of the fact that people of other countries, who are not Native Speaker of American English try to follow American English in their day to day life for its simplicity. And American Accent is essential for the purpose of speaking and communicating with others. It is easier for the people to directly search for American Accent and have more knowledge about the Accent part only. More information will be added into this Article with the passage of time and if there is any mistake, then it will be edited. After your merging proposal was made, I have talked with few specialists of American Accent and they have also agreed that a different article is quite helpful and they have agreed to provide information and correction for making the article more appropriate and accurate. The rest is up to you. I hope you are understanding the point of view. You can help me in correcting things if you think are inappropriate in the Article. Will look forward to working together. Thank you.Sourov0000 (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you SigeBot. Sourov0000 (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest guidelines

Hi Sourov0000! I gather you may have been doing some work on Wikipedia where you have a conflict of interest. If that's the case it is not against policy, although best practise is to disclose situations where it applies, but I thought it would be worth raising Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation as somewhere where you might be able to get some assistance. :) There's an associated noticeboard where you can seek some advice if you need any, or where you can ask people to have a look at your work to make sure that it is neutral. - Bilby (talk) 03:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

• Comment: Hello, thank you for your concern and the message.
  • I am a normal Wikipedia editor who dreams of being an Administrator in future. That's why I keep working on Wikipedia. Everything of Wikipedia also attracts me. I really don't have a Conflict of Interest with any particular person or Article. I did some changes on a article a few days ago which had a COI template added on it (That was the first time where I have seen the COI Tag). Then I got a lot of curious and have done some research on the whole fact. That's when I got the urge to do some really good editing. In almost all of my writing, I try to be as much neutral as possible and follow all the instructions. I edited the Article but it was something like creating it newly. I enjoyed the work and then asked the person who added the COI tag to remove it on the Talk page. And now I am having your message in here. I have my interest on American Writers and their writings. So, doing some editing on almost all the Articles of that category. :) That's all from me. Again thanks a lot. Sourov0000 (talk) 23:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The short version is that we don't have a policy preventing people from editing with a conflict of interest, so as long as people stick within policy I don't see any need to push on this. But it was my intent simply to inform you that editing with a COI is something best declared, and that current best practice is to be open about your connection with the article subject. Anyway, I wish you well with your future editing, and hopefully a new editor will feel that the article is much improved through your work, and be happy to remove the tag. - Bilby (talk) 02:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I have read the COI policy yesterday. Thank you for your well wishing. Sourov0000 (talk) 02:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your re-adding the COI Tag Mr. Bilby. But how many days does an article takes to get checked? I really had no idea about it. A request on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard has been filled over a week ago but it had not been checked yet. Will look forward to having your instructions. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that it will remain unanswered for much longer, but if it does I can leave a request with a couple of editors who are more experienced at checking over articles and see if one of them is happy to remove the tag. - Bilby (talk) 14:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Sourov0000. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Evan Mandery.The discussion is about the topic Evan Mandery. Thank you. --Nick Levinson (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Lyrical SON

	Lyrical SON
	hey , how do you edit your page , PLEASE tell me ! LyricalSON (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

• Well, you can see, I have used some tables and meta tags on the user page. Just using the same way you have added the smiley. And about the article Tori Demaj, use the information of the article into your User Page. Wishing you a happy journey in Wikipedia. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 13:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Tikuko. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pierre LeBrun, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. TKK ^{bark !} 16:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

• Hello, Tikuko, thank you for your un-reviewing the article of Pierre LeBrun. The thing is that I have just added the unreferenced and uncategorized tag on the article with New Pages Feed and for some unknown reason, the Re-viewed tag appeared on the right side afted adding the two tags. I really had nothing to do with the Re-viewing. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 02:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• When you add tags using the page curation tool (aka the new pages feed) it automatically marks the page as reviewed. --TKK ^{bark !} 13:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sourov0000, I just got a similar message on my talk about you unreviewing Arun Shankar. I just PROD'd the article, it was marked as reviewed. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, Evano1van, I have un-reviewed that article because of the same reason. I was the one who added the tags on the article. Then the reviewed tag appeared. Then you added the Deletion Note. It would have been better if the new page curation tool would be a little more specific about the Reviewing part. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

I have a favor to ask to both of you Mr. Evano1van and Mr. Tikuko. I have created a Wikipedia article on 8 June, 2013 which hasn't been patrolled yet. Would you guys be kind enough to patrol the Wikipedia article. The article is Vasily Kafanov. If any edit is necessary, you can do that. And in the case of any major edits, you can leave a message on this Talk page. I will be really honored if you do so. Thanks a lot. Sourov0000 (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Stefan Brunnhuber.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Stefan Brunnhuber.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot Theo's Little Bot. I have added information on the File:Stefan Brunnhuber.jpg. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 08:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samara James

The article Samara James has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability concern: Subject does not appear to meet the WP:CORP requirement of having significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the topic. Instead, the references consist of: advertisements, a self-published opinion piece, company directories, association membership list, and numerous trivial mentions in non-relevant announcements and publications.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

A little heads-up....

After your request at WP:REFUND, I have been looking at some of your edits, especially regarding the sourcing of articles. I am sure you mean well, but I would strongly urge you to acquaint yourself with what we regard as reliable sources. As the nominations above might tell you....so: please be a little careful what you add as sources. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Please help me, Mr Lectonar. I am quite helpless in here and there is none to show me the correct path. The articles that I have created in Wikipedia so far are being nominated for deletion. It seems every work of mine in Wikipedia is at stake. I really don't know what should I do. Please, kindly help me to be on the correct path. Thanks a lot. Sourov0000 (talk) 09:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been around so long now, and editing away. I will link you to this: WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE, and would urge you to go over your articles, one by one, and work on them. All the information you need is there, and as you claim to have a professional level of English, you should have no problem understanding. Have a look at good articles, and try to compare, learn. Just do it slowly.....Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

I'll add only some of the articles you wrote are nominated for deletion. On most of them (particularly the ones about people), you did a good job.

The ones you wrote about companies, however, give the appearance of having multiple sources intended to mislead a reader into thinking that the company is notable, but the sources you provided aren't actually "coverage" of the company at all. I must say, those articles fit the profile of a paid editor trying to post articles for clients. If that's what you're doing, you need to be forthright about it.

The deletion notices above explain exactly what is wrong with the sourcing in each article. We need to see significant coverage from sources like Forbes, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, or other notable, major, nationally-circulated publications. See WP:CORP for more information. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Please participate in the discussion going on WikiProject BPL

Hey, Sourov0000. Hope your Wikipedia editing is going fine. You are receiving this message as you are a member of WkiProject Bangladesh Premier League. Currently there is a discussion going on the project's talk page. Your participation will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. .--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 14:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

VisualEditor newsletter for 06 August 2013

It's been almost two weeks since the last newsletter, and a lot of improvements have been made during that time. The main things that people have noticed are significant improvements to speed for typing into long pages (Template:Bug), scrolling (Template:Bug) and deleting (Template:Bug) on large pages. There have also been improvements to references, with the latest being support for list-defined references, which are <ref>s defined inside a <references> block (Template:Bug). Users of Opera 12 and higher have had their web browser removed from the browser black-list, mostly as a result of work by a volunteer developer (Template:Bug). Opera has not been fully white-listed yet, so these users will get an additional warning and request to report problems.

Significant changes were made to the user interface to de-emphasize VisualEditor. This has cut the use of VisualEditor by approximately one-third. You can read about these at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Updates/August 1, 2013, but they include:

• Re-ordering links to the editors to put "Edit source" first and VisualEditor second
• Renaming the link for VisualEditor to "Edit^beta"
• Disabling the animation for section editing.
• Changing all labels for the classic wikitext editor to say "Edit source", regardless of namespace.

There have also been many smaller fixes, including these:

• Horizontal alignment of images working correctly on more pages (Template:Bug)
• Categories with ':'s in their names (like Category:Wikipedia:Privacy) now work correctly (Template:Bug)
• Magic JavaScript gadgets and tools like sortable tables will now work once the page is saved (Template:Bug)
• Keyboard shortcut for "clear annotations" - now Control+\ or ⌘ Command+\ (Template:Bug)
• Fixed corruption bugs that led to duplicate categories (Template:Bug) and improper collapsing when multiple new references were added in a row (Template:Bug).
• Improvements to display elements: The save dialog in Monobook is restored to normal size (Template:Bug), pop-up notices on save now look the same in VisualEditor as in wikitext editor (Template:Bug), and the popup about using wikitext has a link to the definition of wikitext that now opens in a new window (Template:Bug)

Most of the Wikimedia Foundation staff is traveling this week and next, so no updates are expected until at least August 15th. If you're going to be in Hong Kong for Wikimania 2013, say hello to James Forrester, Philippe Beaudette, and the other members of the VisualEditor team.

As always, if you have questions or suggestions, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting problem reports at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback and ideas at Wikipedia talk:VisualEditor. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 23:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Since you have edited Wikipedia very heavily in the 11 months since you created this account, you are no doubt aware that Wikipedia policy is that editing for promotional purposes is unacceptable, and that doing so can lead to being blocked from editing. A large proportion of your editing looks very much indeed like an attempt to use Wikipedia as a free advertising service. You need to be careful to make sure that you are not using Wikipedia for promotion, and, if you aren't, to avoid giving the misleading impression that you are. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Tim Sanders (footballer)

Hi. Articles about living persons without references can be deleted (regardless of the notability of the subject), so I added a reference to Tim Sanders (footballer). Happy editing --Jaellee (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, I have seen that. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined

I have declined your speedy deletion request at Club Deportivo San Andrés Basquet as the claim to have made the finals of a tournament that is notable enough to have a WP article is a sufficient "claim of importance" to meet WP:CSD#A7. However, it's possible that it's not enough for the group to be notable, so feel free to nominate it for deletion via AfD if you do a WP:BEFORE check and can't turn up any reliable sources that discuss it in detail. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Contest your suggestion for speedy deletion of Vanja Stanišić

For reasons enumerated here: Talk:Vanja_Stanišić the page should stay and possibly be expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annabelleigh (talk • contribs) 14:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• I have added a message on the talk page of the article. If you want to improve the article, I will suggest you to read the Wikipedia:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Columbia Sertoma Club

Hello Sourov0000. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Columbia Sertoma Club, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mihail Aleksandrov (painter)

The article Mihail Aleksandrov (painter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No source of notability. Failed to meet both WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. References are self published books and profiles on Zoominfo.com and askart.com

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iniciativass (talk) 20:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

speedy

If it is possible to tell what the subject of an article is, context is clear enough, and A7 only applies to real people. For fictional characters, you need to use PROD , or redirect to the article on the fiction. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, I was getting a little confused about the matter. What about using tag for Test Pages (G2)? I think I should have used the PROD in this case. I will keep in mind and act accordingly in future. Thanks a lot, DGG - Sourov0000 (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

G2 is for something like: ABCDEF, or Look, I made an article. or other playing around that doesn't amount to vandalism. DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I will keep in mind. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sourov0000

I will try editing the article to meet the needed criteria....may i know the things i need to change to meet the requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiJuggernaut (talk • contribs) 08:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• WikiJuggernaut, I have seen that you have removed the Deletion Tag. But you haven't mentioned your reason of removing the Tag either on the Edit Summary or on the Talk Page of the article. The article is lagging reference (External Links are not Reference). And most important thing, the article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. So, the thing you must do is finding references of independent source and adding them. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Reason for deletion?

Hi, you have deleted my page about Longulf. You stated that it was due to it being promotional. However, I don't believe this to be the case. I haven't included anything that isn't based on fact. Could you please let me know what you found to be particularly promotional (for future reference).

Thanks.

• Hello and welcome to Wikipedia, Amnorge. As you have seen, I had nominated your page for deletion as it was full of advertising and promotional content. Don't get confused with biography or portfolio and encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a place where you sign up and create a biography about any people or any organization. Everything in Wikipedia has to be done from Neutral Point of View. If you are creating an article about an organization that you like or you work in there or have any kind of relation with the subject of the article, then being neutral is almost impossible. Again, if you are a paid editor, you may find it difficult to be neutral. You have mentioned about fact. Facts can be written in two ways (in neutral way and in promotional way). There were many promotional words on the article. The article was speedily deleted by following rule: G11. I will invite you to read the WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE before creating any further article. Have a nice journey in Wikipedia. Thank you. --Sourov0000 (talk) 16:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

References added

Hello Sourov0000, I've added references to the Jafar al-Hakim page as you indicated. Thanks for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahatman (talk • contribs) 14:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stefan Brunnhuber concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stefan Brunnhuber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

VisualEditor newsletter for 21 August 2013

Both VisualEditor and MediaWiki were upgraded recently. For VisualEditor, this is the long-awaited post-Wikimania update with many bug fixes and enhancements. Work also continues on speed at opening and during use, as well as on the bugs reported here and at other Wikipedias. The full report is at Mediawiki.

References are displaying properly, even when nested (Template:Bug) or in image captions (Template:Bug. Reference lists are now always fully populated with references (bug 50094). Firefox users can insert an existing reference in the first paragraph (Template:Bug). Opera users no longer see corruption of categories when a reference was added (bug 50385).

Stray spaces are being stripped from the start of paragraphs to end one of the common <nowiki> problems (Template:Bug). We also fixed a round-tripping bug that caused desirable whitespace in templates (used to make templates more legible, e.g., by putting each parameter in an infobox on a separate line) to get corrupted (bug 51150).

Wikilink handling was improved. Users are not allowed to create internal links to invalid titles (titles that are actually impossible due to limits on acceptable character combinations in titles, not redlinks) (Template:Bug). You can extend wikilinks, but it won't do so over a wordbreak (like a space) (bugs 49931 and 51463).

A handful of fixes to the user interface were made. The toolbar doesn't float over personal tools after opening a dialog or the inspector (Template:Bug). Toolbars were also re-written to be collapsible/expandable, with room for more icons. Buttons in dialogs can now be activated using the Tab ↹ and ⇧ Shift+Tab ↹ key commands (bug 50047). This saves time for editors, because you don't need to take your hands off the keyboard to click a button. We fixed a handful of bugs that affected only certain articles or certain browsers, including toolbar buttons in Firefox (bug 51986) and dialog panels that didn't always scroll correctly (bug 51739). Bugs with undo/redo getting confused have been fixed (Template:Bug).

Images, in addition to getting references displaying correctly, also saw improvements with a set-empty |link= parameter no longer corrupted (51963). We corrected thumbnail images' display so that they look don't wrong in some contexts (bug 51995). Inserted images no longer explicitly set their alignment, but instead inherit the default position in compliance with the Manual of Style (bug 51851).

More edit notices, warnings, and metadata like information about Pending Changes on an article now appear as appropriate (bug 49699). When new articles are created, users are now shown the <newarticletext> message (bug 51459). VisualEditor now handles templates that set "meta" items (like a category) and nothing else better (bug 51322). If the database is locked when a user tries to save with VisualEditor, they now get a message telling them as such and an opportunity to try again, rather than a silent failure (bug 51636).

When you save the page, having the default preference set to "mark all my edits as minor by default" no longer overrides the setting in the save dialog (bug 51515). If you open VisualEditor from a section edit link, the section's title will be pre-filled in in the edit summary box when you go to save it (bug 50872). The size of the save dialog box in the Monobook skin has been fixed (bug 50058). Also, wikipage content handlers like sortable tables are re-run automatically after saving (Template:Bug).

A very early version of the mathematics equation editor is now available for testing on mw:Mediawiki. If you would like to help improve the user interface for math editor, please test out the extension at mw:Mediawiki:Sandbox and leave your comments directly at the discussion page for the Math Node User Interface at Mediawiki. You should be able to use your regular username and password should to login to Mediawiki.

For other questions or suggestions, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting problem reports at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback and other ideas at Wikipedia talk:VisualEditor. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

hallo

	hallo
	I have changed, titel, not eny more "biography" but "Early life and education", is it correct now? I would like to make everything in the correct way. Is this the correct way to send you a message? Jade Jadevlietstra (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

• Well, you could have created a New Section and communicated with me. But there are some lines in Early Life and Education, Work and Lectures section which are promotional. It will be better if you re-write them. And there is no citation (reference) for many statements in the article. You should provide the references on those statements as well. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, The Esan Language, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. EuroCarGT 01:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Samara James for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samara James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samara James until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

why did you remove my page uttar of mahabharat as he was crucial to story of mahabharat and I logged to my account after long time. there was no mention of him on net clearly so I made a small yet useful contribution. secondly there are many pages of celebs . this celeb Madalasa sharma is mentioned in many articles of wikipedia but there is no info so I created a page for her and I am trying to improve it but was not able to add pic and other info which I will . There are so many useless pages on wikipedia but you delete Uttar the first hero of Indian epic Mahabharat Piousspirit (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

• Well, I am not the one who nominated the page of Uttar of Mahabarat for deletion and neither did I delete it. I had nominated the article of Madalasa Sharma for deletion because there was no significance of importance in that article. If you are creating an article about a person, it must have references from independent source. Secondly, the article must not be promotional and it has to be written from a neutral point of view. You can read the WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE for having a better idea about creating article. Thanks. Sourov0000 (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Question About Article on Hbmdb

Hi i wrote an article on a website by keeping in view of the page Bollywod hungama but my article was tagged A7 although it was much more informative then this one. Any suggestions?

• Okay Zrt1992, first of all, I have nominated your first article of Hbmdb with A7. I have seen that you have created another article and that also got deleted for the same reason. First of all, A7 is tagged when an article about a Living person, organization, Musician, band, club, company, website or web-content is not significant. Many articles may have significance. But they got deleted because of not having proper coverage from Independent Sources. You can read the article concerning Independent Sources to have more details about it. And I will invite you to read WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE before you create any more articles. Have a nice journey in Wikipedia. Thanks. Sourov0000 (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

S.Masood Hashmi

The reference to the medal appears to be sufficient to satisfy my declining the BLPPROD, though I can see why you nominated the article. I am not opposed to your raising it at AfD. It appears promotional in tone, and he may only be borderline notable. Fiddle Faddle 10:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. Thanks. Sourov0000 (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Yesus Islam

Hi, Sourov0000, i am from indonesia, i am sorry, i has writing Kitab Injil in en.wikipedia, i don't know how to writing in id.wikipedia, it's to difficult (wikipedia's form didn't use indonesian language correctly)

• Well, Yesus islam you can create the article on [1] as it is the Wikipedia for Indonesian language. The writing process is all the same. You can follow the same process that you have followed on the English Wikipedia. You can read the [2] for having better knowledge of creating the article. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphan

Hi Sourov0000, I've seen the ORPHAN tag on the page and I'm currently adding the proper internal link to the other pages that are related to it. Since I'm not sure how to proceed, once I've added the link do I have to remove the Orphan tag or is better if it is you to do that?

Many many thanks and good work!

• My pleasure. And you can remove the orphan tag yourself after adding the link to the other pages. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for you kind response, I've insert the links to Tancredi srl, hope everything is correct. Again, good work and an happy weekend!

Mahamaya irrigation project

Hi Sourov0000, I am glad to see another Bangladeshi wikipedian! Thanks for tagging the Mahamaya irrigation project with orphan tag. I have remove that tag as I resolved it by interlinking to two other articles. thank again :)--FreemesM ^(talk) 18:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)