Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Script) File renamed: File:Giorgi Saakaze the Grand Mouravi.jpg → File:Giorgi Saakadze the Grand Mouravi.jpg File renaming criterion #5: Correct obvious errors in file names (e.g. incorrect [[:en... |
||
Line 1,096: | Line 1,096: | ||
<gallery> |
<gallery> |
||
File:Giorgi |
File:Giorgi Saakadze the Grand Mouravi.jpg|[[Giorgi Saakadze]] |
||
File:Giorgi Saakadze the Grand Mouravi crop.jpg|Cropped version |
File:Giorgi Saakadze the Grand Mouravi crop.jpg|Cropped version |
||
</gallery> |
</gallery> |
Revision as of 22:45, 27 January 2014
The Graphics Lab is a project to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. Requests for image improvements can be added to the workshop pages: Illustrations, Photographs and Maps. For questions or suggestions one can use the talk pages: Talk:Graphics Lab, Talk:Illustrations, Talk:Photographs and Talk:Maps.
This specific page is the requests page for the photography workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved for a Wikipedia article. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
Advice to requesters |
---|
All requests:
SVG requests:
|
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
For graphists: |
Graphists and other visitors to the Graphics Lab may be interested in the RSS feed of changes to this page. You may find it here. |
Graphists, if you have completed work and have not received a reply from the requester, you may place the {{GL Photography reply}} template on their talk page. |
If you are looking for something to do, there are plenty of images with watermarks to be removed and files that need cleanup. See also our sister Photography workshop at Commons |
Photography workshop user requests
Irish Confederation
Article(s): Irish Confederation
Request:
- neutralize background... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done (Vectorization quite unnecessary) Centpacrr (talk) 20:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- I just think it would be better if this was just vectorised instead. --109.78.207.144 (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Centpacrr, this isn't the first time that you've left a background with a slightly pinkish hue. Either get your monitor properly calibrated, as has been suggested to you on several occasions, get a new monitor, or get your eyes tested! nagualdesign (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is intended to have an even beige background closely matching the paper it was derived from. Your version id filled with yellow blotches. Centpacrr (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should clean out your cache? My version was not 'filled with yellow blotches', it was greyscale! The reason I re-did the job from scratch was to preserve the details that had been lost in your edit. nagualdesign (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's not my cache. Look at the comment of the OP below which says "Can you fix the one above, which still has big chunks of yellow?" That's exactly what I saw too. When opened in Photoshop the mode of your version is NOT a "greyscale" file, it is an "RGB, 24 Bit, 8 Bit Padding, 16.7 million colors" file. Centpacrr (talk) 00:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kintetsubuffalo needs to clean out his/her cache too. Look at my edit. The evidence is there. And I'm fully aware of what filetypes are being used here, thanks. An RGB file can be desaturated (converted to greyscale) without converting the filetype. Again with the silly excuses. nagualdesign (talk) 00:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's not my cache. Look at the comment of the OP below which says "Can you fix the one above, which still has big chunks of yellow?" That's exactly what I saw too. When opened in Photoshop the mode of your version is NOT a "greyscale" file, it is an "RGB, 24 Bit, 8 Bit Padding, 16.7 million colors" file. Centpacrr (talk) 00:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should clean out your cache? My version was not 'filled with yellow blotches', it was greyscale! The reason I re-did the job from scratch was to preserve the details that had been lost in your edit. nagualdesign (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is intended to have an even beige background closely matching the paper it was derived from. Your version id filled with yellow blotches. Centpacrr (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Centpacrr, this isn't the first time that you've left a background with a slightly pinkish hue. Either get your monitor properly calibrated, as has been suggested to you on several occasions, get a new monitor, or get your eyes tested! nagualdesign (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- There it is, got it, thx.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- No worries. For future reference, to compare different versions of an image it's best to open each version in a different tab using the thumbs in the File history section, then refresh the tab that should be showing the latest version. You can then flip between tabs for a proper pixel peeping session. Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kintetubuffalo, I have converted both files to ACTUAL grayscale images and uploaded them. I also cleaned my cache and then redownloaded Nagualdesign's version of the crest and it is still filled with yellow blotches as you saw as well that were different from the original file. The color I had "introduced" was to as closely as I could match the base backgound color of the original files. Centpacrr (talk) 01:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps it's time you went to bed, Centpacrr. Maybe tomorrow, when your local Wiki server is re-cached (an issue which you're well aware of), you might be able to see my edit. Then I'd invite you to compare it to your latest version and see if you notice the loss of detail. (Hint: look at the cross hatching.) I don't expect that you'll concede though, and revert your own edit. Ownership appears to be your modus operandi around here. Night night. nagualdesign (talk) 01:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Nagualdesign, but your edit still displays with multiple yellow blotches, but I'm not going to argue with you over this anymore. As you suggested I have done a Photoshop eyedropper test on exactly how it appears on its host page and color checked the blotches in Photoshop. It shows the yellow blotches on your edit with the following color values: H: 63º, S: 7%, B: 99%, R: 252, G: 252, B: 235, L: 99, a: -3, b: 9, C: 1%, M: 0%, Y: 8%, K: 0%, Color code #fcfdeb. (If it were pure white as you claim the values would be H: 0º, S: 0%, B: 100%, R: 255, G: 255, B: 255, L: 100, a: 0, b: 0, C: 0%, M: 0%, Y: 0%, K: 0%, Color code #ffffff.) I have uploaded a screen capture of the test here so that you can see for yourself. If the OP is satisfied with the image with the yellow blotches then so be it. If he isn't, however, you can either redo it as a grayscale file for him or he can revert to my existing grayscale edit. It is up to him as I do not intend to make any further edits of this image. Centpacrr (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I think you're pulling the wool over your own eyes here, Scoop. I promise you, hand on heart, that it's a cache issue. I've triple checked it, and it's fine. Just as advertised. If you're receiving the wrong image then obviously it will be wrong however you look at it. All you've confirmed, by opening it up in Photoshop, is that the image you do have has yellow blotches on it, n'est pas? If I'd messed up I'd hold my hand up. Perhaps Kintetsubuffalo will be kind enough to confirm the upload for you? There's nothing more I can do. nagualdesign (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well I didn't create the image under discussion, and it is not the original image. As you are the only other individual to have uploaded a version of this image that leaves only you. The file history also says it is yours, and the OP is the one who originally pointed it out the yellow blotches, not me. I tested it using the Photoshop method you requested me to use, have visited the page on this machine (a 2011 Apple MacBook Pro) using three additional browsers besides Firefox (Safari, Chrome and Opera), and then visited the page on another computer (a 2009 Apple MacBook) which had never visited it before using the same four different browsers and got exactly the same result in all eight visits: an image with yellow blotches.
- I think you're pulling the wool over your own eyes here, Scoop. I promise you, hand on heart, that it's a cache issue. I've triple checked it, and it's fine. Just as advertised. If you're receiving the wrong image then obviously it will be wrong however you look at it. All you've confirmed, by opening it up in Photoshop, is that the image you do have has yellow blotches on it, n'est pas? If I'd messed up I'd hold my hand up. Perhaps Kintetsubuffalo will be kind enough to confirm the upload for you? There's nothing more I can do. nagualdesign (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Nagualdesign, but your edit still displays with multiple yellow blotches, but I'm not going to argue with you over this anymore. As you suggested I have done a Photoshop eyedropper test on exactly how it appears on its host page and color checked the blotches in Photoshop. It shows the yellow blotches on your edit with the following color values: H: 63º, S: 7%, B: 99%, R: 252, G: 252, B: 235, L: 99, a: -3, b: 9, C: 1%, M: 0%, Y: 8%, K: 0%, Color code #fcfdeb. (If it were pure white as you claim the values would be H: 0º, S: 0%, B: 100%, R: 255, G: 255, B: 255, L: 100, a: 0, b: 0, C: 0%, M: 0%, Y: 0%, K: 0%, Color code #ffffff.) I have uploaded a screen capture of the test here so that you can see for yourself. If the OP is satisfied with the image with the yellow blotches then so be it. If he isn't, however, you can either redo it as a grayscale file for him or he can revert to my existing grayscale edit. It is up to him as I do not intend to make any further edits of this image. Centpacrr (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps it's time you went to bed, Centpacrr. Maybe tomorrow, when your local Wiki server is re-cached (an issue which you're well aware of), you might be able to see my edit. Then I'd invite you to compare it to your latest version and see if you notice the loss of detail. (Hint: look at the cross hatching.) I don't expect that you'll concede though, and revert your own edit. Ownership appears to be your modus operandi around here. Night night. nagualdesign (talk) 01:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kintetubuffalo, I have converted both files to ACTUAL grayscale images and uploaded them. I also cleaned my cache and then redownloaded Nagualdesign's version of the crest and it is still filled with yellow blotches as you saw as well that were different from the original file. The color I had "introduced" was to as closely as I could match the base backgound color of the original files. Centpacrr (talk) 01:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- No worries. For future reference, to compare different versions of an image it's best to open each version in a different tab using the thumbs in the File history section, then refresh the tab that should be showing the latest version. You can then flip between tabs for a proper pixel peeping session. Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- There it is, got it, thx.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are not seeing the blotches because whatever type of monitor you are using is not responsive enough or is set too high. The blotches are also much more pronounced when viewed at an oblique angle (at least on an LCD type display) so try looking at the image that way. However when they appear to the naked eye on four different browsers on two different, unrelated machines, and the blotches are also objectively demonstrable using the Photoshop eyedropper test you suggested, I am left with absolutely no other possible conclusion that the blotches in fact exist in the image file you created and uploaded, and are not a "cache" issue because they do not appear in this form in any other version of this image. This is not a case my "pulling the wool over my eyes" but of subjecting the image file to every objective test I can come up with in order to eliminate every other possible explanation. They all point, however, to just one thing: the image file you uploaded in fact has the yellow blotches and that it is not a cache issue either in my two different machines or in Wikipedia's servers. The ball is thus in your court to prove otherwise. (Also "Scoop" is not a name I ever use in here or anyplace else other than in the world of professional ice hockey in which I have worked for 43 years.) Centpacrr (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's okay Scoop, I'm just winding you up. There was some horrible jpg compression on my upload, and I've been having a good ol' giggle at your expense. It's because I find you so belligerent at times (pretty much whenever anyone tries to discuss anything with you) that when you gave me all the usual bullshit excuses for leaving your edit with a pink background I thought I'd treat you in kind for a while, and see how tightly I could get your panties bunched up. My latest upload was converted to Greyscale mode and saved at 100%, although as a jpeg it'll still open as an RGB of course. Well it was fun having the shoe on my foot for a while. I can see why you might like being so contrary all of the time. Merry Chrismas, Mister Cooper. nagualdesign (talk) 05:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are not seeing the blotches because whatever type of monitor you are using is not responsive enough or is set too high. The blotches are also much more pronounced when viewed at an oblique angle (at least on an LCD type display) so try looking at the image that way. However when they appear to the naked eye on four different browsers on two different, unrelated machines, and the blotches are also objectively demonstrable using the Photoshop eyedropper test you suggested, I am left with absolutely no other possible conclusion that the blotches in fact exist in the image file you created and uploaded, and are not a "cache" issue because they do not appear in this form in any other version of this image. This is not a case my "pulling the wool over my eyes" but of subjecting the image file to every objective test I can come up with in order to eliminate every other possible explanation. They all point, however, to just one thing: the image file you uploaded in fact has the yellow blotches and that it is not a cache issue either in my two different machines or in Wikipedia's servers. The ball is thus in your court to prove otherwise. (Also "Scoop" is not a name I ever use in here or anyplace else other than in the world of professional ice hockey in which I have worked for 43 years.) Centpacrr (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well I am pleased to see that you now apparently agree that the blotches actually do exist in your previous file as I had proved above and now acknowledge this by having made a new grayscale file (as I had previously suggested) which you uploaded exactly one minute before I posted the above comment. It really would have been helpful, however, if you had just done that in the first place. Centpacrr (talk) 05:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it would rather. (Hmm.. helpful.. Now there's a thought!) nagualdesign (talk) 05:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well I guess I am supposed to be pleased that I supplied you with a way to entertain yourself at both my and the OP's expense. While that is not why I contribute to Wikipedia, I will take that into account and try to avoid that in the future. Centpacrr (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I've done here was thoroughly childish. Thankfully I'm aware of that, and it won't continue. I normally try very hard to treat others as I would like to be treated. If I make mistakes and have them pointed out to me I appreciate it, especially if I learn something new in the process, so I often point out other people's mistakes too. I don't have much time for egos, especially my own, (they only get in the way) and that can grate on some people. Thankfully I'm aware of that too, and out of kindness I keep grating. Did we learn anything? I'm f***ed if I know. Peace. nagualdesign (talk) 06:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes that was certainly childish and unhelpful, but I will take you at your word that you have gotten this out of your system and will not engage in this sort of unproductive behavior with me or any other contributors again. Centpacrr (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I've done here was thoroughly childish. Thankfully I'm aware of that, and it won't continue. I normally try very hard to treat others as I would like to be treated. If I make mistakes and have them pointed out to me I appreciate it, especially if I learn something new in the process, so I often point out other people's mistakes too. I don't have much time for egos, especially my own, (they only get in the way) and that can grate on some people. Thankfully I'm aware of that too, and out of kindness I keep grating. Did we learn anything? I'm f***ed if I know. Peace. nagualdesign (talk) 06:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well I guess I am supposed to be pleased that I supplied you with a way to entertain yourself at both my and the OP's expense. While that is not why I contribute to Wikipedia, I will take that into account and try to avoid that in the future. Centpacrr (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it would rather. (Hmm.. helpful.. Now there's a thought!) nagualdesign (talk) 05:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Hair on the lens
-
Cropped version,
for the infobox.
Article(s): Rene Auberjonois
Request: There appears to have been a hair on the camera lens, which is now showing up on the subject's collar. Could this be removed? Thanks! J Milburn (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 20:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks; I appreciate that a slight lightening may be a good thing, but I think you've gone too far; it now looks incredibly washed-out. J Milburn (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've darkened it a bit and increased the saturation. I think making it much darken than this, however, would make it essentially unusable for for an infobox image. Centpacrr (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- *Sigh* Here we go again.. Not content to leave an image alone you (Centpacrr) did your usual agma adjustment, which left it looking worse. You were gently admonished by the uploader for your unnecessary meddling, so you took your crappy edit (instead of starting from scratch) and darkened it. You discovered in the process that lightening the image too much, uploading it, then attempting to darken it again had messed the colour up, so you fiddled with the saturation to try and fix it, because you couldn't be bothered re-doing the hard part again, which was removing the hair. That about right? (You don't have to answer that. I know that in your many years of pissing around with images you've developed 'a number of proprietary techniques' that you don't wish to share.) Well, here's a tip for you, free of charge: Caucasian skin should not look orange with green fringes, and grey hair should not look yellow.
- So anyway, I did the job as you'd requested, J Milburn, and uploaded it. (See the File history.) You may wish to revert to that edit. Then I did a little subtle lightening, being careful to preserve the photograph, and uploaded that. Again, if you like that edit then feel free to revert to that. And don't worry, being the original uploader and requestor should keep Centpacrr from starting a revert battle with you. He listens to requestors most of the time (even the ones that make naïve, flawed requests - which you didn't). He does have a point in that photographic portraits on Wikipedia don't usually have artistic vignetting, but it's still a good quality photograph just as it is. Or should I say was. nagualdesign (talk) 03:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nagualdesign I can really do without both the condescension and amateur psychiatry. You've made a version so dark (and the skin tome unnaturally pinkish) as to be virtually useless as an infobox image. Why don't you check the calibration of your monitor? (Mine is set to Apple Color LCD (LED) gamma of 2.2.) I'll leave this up to the OP to decide what he/she likes and leave it at that. No further comments from you directed at me are necessary in this matter. Centpacrr (talk) 04:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm right though, aren't I? Go on, admit it, you big girl's blouse! *tickles Centpacrr into submission* ..Seriously though; I didn't take the photograph. I didn't make it dark, I lightened it. And I didn't do anything to the colour. You're kinda right about the infobox though (see below). The problem is that one cannot undo a vignette. nagualdesign (talk) 05:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nagualdesign I can really do without both the condescension and amateur psychiatry. You've made a version so dark (and the skin tome unnaturally pinkish) as to be virtually useless as an infobox image. Why don't you check the calibration of your monitor? (Mine is set to Apple Color LCD (LED) gamma of 2.2.) I'll leave this up to the OP to decide what he/she likes and leave it at that. No further comments from you directed at me are necessary in this matter. Centpacrr (talk) 04:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've darkened it a bit and increased the saturation. I think making it much darken than this, however, would make it essentially unusable for for an infobox image. Centpacrr (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Soo.. I had an idea to get around the infobox issue that Centpacrr raised. Although I don't think the exposure is the issue. (I won't bore you with the technical details as to what constitutes good exposure.) The issue, I think, is that the vignette makes the whole image look dark, even though the face is fine. So I took my second edit ("Subtly lightened.") and made a tight crop. Try it in the infobox and see how it looks. Hope that helps. Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 05:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have carefully reworked this image from the original. Colour balanced so that hair is grey, pupil of eye is black, shadows aren't bright red, skin tone is natural, details remain in highlights. (Hohum @) 17:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- A bit better, colour-wise, but he looks a little ashen and the hair is still there. nagualdesign (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- I removed a hair higher on his collar which looked like a print issue, the lower hair seems to come from his chest, so I have left it. (Hohum @) 00:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- A bit better, colour-wise, but he looks a little ashen and the hair is still there. nagualdesign (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Pliny the elder
Article(s): Pliny the elder
Request:
- oval-cut png, please. whatever text is at the bottom is too small to be legible... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done. Also uploaded transparent version. nagualdesign (talk) 04:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Perfect! Much bueno-er!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Crooked covered bridge
-
Parks Covered Bridge in Ohio, USA
Article(s): National Register of Historic Places listings in Perry County, Ohio
Request:
- Unfortunately, I've never gotten a program that can do lossless image rotation. Nyttend (talk) 06:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done multiple changes, including rotation. FYI, there's no such thing as lossless image rotation, only good and bad algorithms (and of course sloppy and careful execution). Generally speaking, rotation causes loss of acutance/blurring, which can be remedied via careful sharpening. Hope that helps. Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 07:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Legislature of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1886
Article(s): Paul P. Kanoa
Request:
- Crop and create as derivative commons:File:Legislature of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1886 (crop).jpg and clean if need be Thanks.-- KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Can you crop a picture of John Smith Walker, Luther Aholo and Paul P. Kanoa to use on Ministry of Finance (Hawaii), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Hawaii) and Ministry of the Interior (Hawaii)?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Cropped and uploaded, ready for cleaning. I didn't straighten this image as it would have likely cut through the gentleman on the far right (Hana Kaai). It can be done though, I'm sure, but I'll let someone else have a go. nagualdesign (talk) 08:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done - Straightened and cleaned. nagualdesign (talk) 10:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done - Straightened and cleaned. nagualdesign (talk) 10:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Can you crop a picture of John Smith Walker, Luther Aholo and Paul P. Kanoa to use on Ministry of Finance (Hawaii), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Hawaii) and Ministry of the Interior (Hawaii)?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- From this image? I think the individuals are a little too small for any crops to be useful. Sorry. Perhaps you could use the whole image, and copy the text that was cropped (from the original) into the file page description, so everyone can see who's who, then on the thumbnail you could use the caption, "Back row, 3rd from left", or whatever. nagualdesign (talk) 04:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- ..Better yet, you could add annotations to the image file page. nagualdesign (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Maximilian I and Charles VII
-
Maximilian I
-
Charles VII
Article(s): Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, Holy Roman Emperor
Request:
- Could someone possibly improve the quality of the above portrait (Maximilian I), to look like this one please, many thanks. TRAJAN 117 (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please also improve the quality of Charles VII,s portrait as well, many thanks. TRAJAN 117 (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- I made an attempt to adjust Maximilian I. In all honesty I'm not really happy with it. Although the image is larger, it has less tonal detail than the smaller image, particularly in the shadows. Attempting to match the two left the blacks looking milky. Perhaps someone else will have more success. Failing that, I'd suggest ignoring the smaller image and giving free rein to improve the image in whatever way possible. nagualdesign (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Note: Download the original upload (6.73MB) before editing!
- Unless you have some reliable evidence that these two images do NOT accurately reflect what these two paintings look like I think the best choice is to do nothing to them at all as any changes may result in a material misrepresentation of the original artworks. Centpacrr (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, they can't both be accurate can they. One or both of them are definitely wrong, right? nagualdesign (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- I would revert the current images of both portraits to the original uploads, but I am not the OP so it is not my call. What this section asks for is "Graphist opinion(s)" and so that what this is. Sorry if it was not made clear enough to anyone that what I meant by doing "nothing at all" was to use the original files. Centpacrr (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, they can't both be accurate can they. One or both of them are definitely wrong, right? nagualdesign (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Shevardnadze
Article(s): Eduard Shevardnadze and many other articles
Request:
- Please clear the noise. -- Երևանցի talk 01:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): The noise you are talking about is really just the grain of the film and only really visible at full resolution. I've softened the background just a bit but left the face and hands alone to retain detail. I don't think it really needs anything else as the grain is not even really noticeable at normal web viewing size in the article. This to me is a case where "less is more". Centpacrr (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- I guess you're right. Thanks. --Երևանցի talk 21:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Charles Ezra Sprague
Article(s): Charles Ezra Sprague
Request:
- remove left shading from (presumably) book spine... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 16:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Back, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- ps, can you trim off a bit of that unneeded background now that the shading is gone? Thanks.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Seal of Berengar I
-
Seal of Berengar I
Article(s): Berengar I of Italy
Request:
- Crop, and remove the excess around the seal. TRAJAN 117 (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 16:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Looks great, many thanks! TRAJAN 117 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
1890s photo
-
Sir Charles Kennedy c. 1894
Article(s): Charles Kennedy (diplomat)
Request:
- Very old and faded photograph, can anything be done to restore/improve it? -- January (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Done Cropped, greyscale, cleanup - mostly face, contrast adjustments for detail. (Hohum @) 17:33, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Cropped a little further and did much more complete cleanup and restoration. Centpacrr (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Seals of German monarchs
-
Seal of Charles the Great
Done -
Seal of Charles the Bald
Done -
Seal of Charles the Bald
Done -
Seal of Otto I
Done -
Seal of Otto III
Done -
Seal of Henry II
Done -
Seal of Conrad II
Done -
Seal of Henry III
Done -
Seal of Henry IV
Done -
Seal of Henry V
Done -
Seal of Lothair III
Done
Article(s): Holy Roman Emperor
Request:
- Crop restore, and remove backgrounds where necessary. TRAJAN 117 (talk) 23:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Abdullah Azzam Brigades
File:Abdullah Azzam Brigades Logo.jpg
Article(s): Abdullah Azzam Brigades
Request:
- remove background, trim to circle... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 16:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Great, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Francis_Bacon
Article(s): Francis_Bacon
Request:
- trim a little closer oval, there's a bippy at the top and you can make out pixels... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done - Kind regards, Fallschirmjäger ✉ 15:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fantastic, that's much smoother!Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Confederate Memorial (Romney, West Virginia)
-
Confederate Memorial's inscription
Article(s): Confederate Memorial (Romney, West Virginia)
Request:
- To the phenomenally gifted graphists, would it be possible to rotate this image slightly to the left and crop it so that it focuses more closely on the memorial's inscription? I'd also like to see if it's possible to sharpen the text so that it is more legible. Thank you! -- Caponer (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Rotated 2.5º CCW, cropped & slightly sharpened as requested. Centpacrr (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you Centpacrr! Job well done! -- Caponer (talk) 19:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Confederate Memorial (Romney, West Virginia) [2]
-
Confederate Memorial in Romney, West Virginia
Article(s): Confederate Memorial (Romney, West Virginia)
Request:
- To the graphists, I apologize for not including this image with the one above. Would it also be possible to slightly rotate this image to the left and sharpen it so that the memorial is more clearly visible? The background light obscures the memorial's detailing. I'll leave any other edits to the discretion of the very talented graphists. -- Caponer (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Rotated 2.5ºCCW, agma, crop, increase contrast of inscription to make it more readable. Centpacrr (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- As always, terrific job Centpacrr! -- Caponer (talk) 20:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Adam Levine
-
vignetting removed
Article(s): Adam Levine
Request:
- Remove vignetting and upload separately. I haven't been able to do it, sadly.-- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Red Fort
-
also remove the two golden stickers(?)
Article(s): Red Fort
Request:
- I cannot remove the reflection at the edges. Is it possible to smooth these parts out without cropping. Feel free to use the source material if it helps. On the second one also please remove these two golden stickers, I am not quite sure what they are, but the painting underneath shimmers slightly through. -- Gryffindor (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Could you also please smoothe the edges a little bit without cutting any of the picture itself, I wasn't able to crop properly with the circle and the edges still look rather rough. Gryffindor (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Perfect, thank you very much. Gryffindor (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Could you also please smoothe the edges a little bit without cutting any of the picture itself, I wasn't able to crop properly with the circle and the edges still look rather rough. Gryffindor (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Coat of arms
-
Coat of Arms of Jaqeli family
Article(s): House of Jaqeli
Request:
- Please remove that yellow outline around the wild goat and the banner. Jaqeli (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 18:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
HMS Phoebe (43)
Article: HMS Phoebe (43)
The picture of this ship arriving in Valetta, Malta, (at the beginning of the article), is marked in the summary as '1949', but in the Comment box '1939'.
Which is the correct year? The ship's article picture caption states her arriving, but it doesn't say when.
Clicking on the image only gives a talk page which says: "There are many things this page is NOT for"... one of them is:
"Requesting corrections to the image (try the talk page of an article that the image is used in, or contact the graphics lab.)"
So I've come here. RASAM (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- This page is not for historical investigation, sorry. Look at the other sections to see what sort of things are done here. Zerotalk 13:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Theodora
Article(s): Theodora
Request:
- make background white and/or pngify... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):I fixed the image for you but I am unable to upload because the host page for the image is locked. I have therefore uploaded it to my own server here from which you can access it and upload it whenever the WP image host page is unlocked. Sorry. Centpacrr (talk) 03:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'm going to be gone for a bit, the image will be unlocked when the mainpage flips to the new date.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Israel Druze Boy and Girl Scout Association
Article(s): Israel Druze Boy and Girl Scout Association
Request:
- fix warp-should be round... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done - Fallschirmjäger ✉ 16:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, much better!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Oscar Charleston
Article(s): Oscar Charleston
Request:
- um, wow, where to begin? this is terrible... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- I'm all for polishing turds if I think I can get a slight sheen, but there's another phrase that springs to mind here; If you start with sh*t, you end up with crap. This image is unworthy of article space, IMO. nagualdesign (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- There is not much to work with with this image but I have tweaked it a bit and think it at least slightly better. Keep it if you like, Kintetsubuffalo, or revert if not.Centpacrr (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Centpacrr. You have introduced light pink areas in the background. (Hohum @) 15:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Corrected. Centpacrr (talk) 16:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Centpacrr. You have introduced light pink areas in the background. (Hohum @) 15:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- There is not much to work with with this image but I have tweaked it a bit and think it at least slightly better. Keep it if you like, Kintetsubuffalo, or revert if not.Centpacrr (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's a shame, as there are 7 really nice images at http://badassoftheweek.com/index.cgi?id=76256892766 Since he's long deceased, can we make a case for uploading a better one?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Any image published before 1923 with or without ©, or any image published before 1978 without © is public domain. If one of those qualifies then it can be used. Centpacrr (talk) 04:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Romney Depot
-
Romney Depot in 1886
Article(s): Valley, West Virginia
Request:
- To the multi-talented Wikipedia Graphists, could you please sharpen this black and white image, and if possible, could you "equalize" the image's color--it was taken with my iPhone, and there are multiple reflections of light within the photo. I'm not sure if this can be remedied, but if so, it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for all your amazing work! -- Caponer (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Tweaked as requested. Centpacrr (talk) 03:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, as always, Centpacrr! It looks better than it did in 1886! -- Caponer (talk) 07:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hans Lippershey
Article(s): Hans Lippershey
Request:
- trim, maybe new version?... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Tweaked as requested. Centpacrr (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Christiane Vulpius
Article(s): Christiane Vulpius
Request:
- remove yellowing and extra space... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 08:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's it, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Charles George Gordon
Article(s): Charles George Gordon
Request:
- rotate and crop... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Rotated 2.4ºCCW and croped. Centpacrr (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Statue of Plácido Domingo in Mexico City: pic taken against the light
-
Statue of Plácido Domingo in Mexico City
Article(s): Plácido Domingo
Request:
- I think this pic needs some light adjustment (first of all white balance), since it was taken against the light. The light in the background seems to be too bright. I tried with some GIMP filters, with poor results.-- Carnby (talk) 13:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Request taken by --Victor•talk 21:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC).
- Done --Victor•talk 11:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Carnby (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done --Victor•talk 11:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Office of the Polish President: remove fisheye
-
The office of the president at the Presidential Palace in Warsaw
Article(s): President_of_Poland
Request:
- Could you please try to remove fisheye effect, without deleting too much (e.g. the R. P. and the eagle in the upper right corner)?--Carnby (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Carnby (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- I had a go at it and worked from the original to reapply the lens correction, as Centpacrr's version was good but a little blurry. I also kept the same image width. Feel free to revert if you prefer Centpacrr's version. Cheers, Fallschirmjäger ✉ 22:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- I understand, probaly your version is slightly better but you have partially cut off the R. P. and the eagle in the upper right corner...--Carnby (talk) 07:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Readjusted image from original being sure to not cut off any portion of the Eagle and R P. Centpacrr (talk) 08:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now it looks good. Thanks a lot!--Carnby (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- I understand, probaly your version is slightly better but you have partially cut off the R. P. and the eagle in the upper right corner...--Carnby (talk) 07:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- I had a go at it and worked from the original to reapply the lens correction, as Centpacrr's version was good but a little blurry. I also kept the same image width. Feel free to revert if you prefer Centpacrr's version. Cheers, Fallschirmjäger ✉ 22:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
First train from Sialkot
-
Photo
Article(s): Jammu-Sialkot Line
Request:
- Can you try to enhance the image, and remove the flash reflection on the glass? Thanks -- RaviC (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Centpacrr (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC). Done Removed flash and other reflections; agma; crp. Centpacrr (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Thanks! --RaviC (talk) 00:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Brightening needed
Article(s): Carl Yastrzemski
Request:
- Hi, I uploaded this image a while ago, but when I attempted to crop it, as you can see in the image above, it became completely darkened. Could someone attempt to do the same crop, but without the darkening? Thanks.-- Delaywaves • talk 03:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Request taken. --Victor•talk 03:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Done Centpacrr (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Re-cropped from the original at File:Carl Yastrzemski at Fenway Park.jpg without jpg pixelation in dark areas. (Hohum @) 01:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Krikor Torosyan
-
Krikor Torosyan
Article(s): Krikor Torosyan (Future article)
Request:
- If there's anyway we can reduce the blur that would be great. Also, I think the picture needs a little straightening to meet a better vertical position. The outer black circle frame needs to be more solid. Any other general improvements to the pic would be great. Thanks in advance. Etienne Dolet (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Centpacrr (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC). Done Centpacrr (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Massacres in Le Petit Journal
-
Armenian Genocide in the Petit Journal
Article(s): Press coverage during the Armenian Genocide
Request:
- Very very valuable photograph that I have just uploaded. The quality is not too good. I am hoping to make it like this...[1]. If it's too big of a task, no worries. Any general improvements to this valuable photograph will do. Etienne Dolet (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! Aren't the colors a bit harsh though? I was hoping it can come out like this...[2]. Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):I have desaturated the colors a bit. The smaller image, however, appears to be of a painting while this image looks like a reproduction of a hand colored engraving of that painting to me so it will not have nearly the range of colors of the original art work. Centpacrr (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Negoro-ji
Article(s): Negoro-ji
Request:
- fix seam and warp... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 09:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, except it doesn't have a black frame all around it, that was residual from being copied from a book.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's it, thank you guys!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Ilia Chavchavadze
-
Transparent png
Article(s): Ilia Chavchavadze
Request:
- Please crop it in an oval form by making it transparent with PNG/SVG around it. Jaqeli (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done - Cropped to transparent oval and converted to black & white. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 21:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Fallschirmjäger: Thank you. Jaqeli (talk) 10:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Valley View (Romney, West Virginia)
-
Valley View
Article(s): Valley View (Romney, West Virginia)
Request:
- To the talented and creative graphists, I am requesting that the above image be lightened, perhaps by modifying the article's light contrast. I'm open to other suggestions to enhance this image. Thank you for all your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia! -- Caponer (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Centpacrr (talk) 05:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC). Adjusted gamma to show detail of area in shadow. Centpacrr (talk) 05:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Centpacrr, thank you as always for your brilliant work! -- Caponer (talk) 01:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Article(s): Heraclius I of Kakheti and Teimuraz II of Georgia
Request:
- Please remove and crop the text out from the first pic and if possible colorize the picture of King Heraclius.
- Please crop the second pic of King Teimuraz in an oval form by making it transparent with PNG/SVG around it.
Thank you. Jaqeli (talk) 12:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Request taken by Carnby (talk) 18:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC). Do you need separate versions of the cropped images?
- @Carnby: Yes it would be better if they're seperate versions. Jaqeli (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done--Carnby (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Carnby: Thanks a lot. Jaqeli (talk) 21:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done--Carnby (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Carnby: Yes it would be better if they're seperate versions. Jaqeli (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Logo of Tbilisi Metro
-
Logo
Article(s): Tbilisi Metro
Request:
- Please vectorize and make the logo transparent PNG/SVG by removing the white around "M" Jaqeli (talk) 13:56, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done?--Carnby (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Carnby: Thanks for the logo as well. Jaqeli (talk) 21:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Signatures
-
Signature
-
Vector version
-
Signature
-
Vector version
Article(s): Teimuraz II of Georgia and Archil of Imereti
Request:
- Please vectorize these signatures by making them PNG/SVG transparent. Thank you. Jaqeli (talk) 22:30, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done I would like to know if they look good.--Carnby (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- They're perfect. Thanks a lot again. Jaqeli (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Signatures of Kings George, David, Tamar and Vakhtang
-
Signature of George V of Georgia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of David IV of Georgia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of Tamar of Georgia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of Vakhtang VI of Kartli
-
Vector version
Article(s): Articles presented above.
Request:
- Please vectorize these signatures into SVG format. Jaqeli (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done Are they good?--Carnby (talk) 22:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Carnby: Thank you Carnby a lot. Can you please if you can vectorize in SVG these 4 more signatures? Jaqeli (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Signature of George VII of Georgia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of George VIII of Georgia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of George IV of Georgia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of Alexander I of Georgia
-
Vector version
Done?--Carnby (talk) 18:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Carnby: Thank you. They are all perfect. Jaqeli (talk) 09:24, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thai election poster
-
Campaign poster
Article(s): Thai general election, 2014
Request:
- I uploaded this picture verticall from here, but it turned horizontal upon upload. Can someone please flip it?Lihaas (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done - Regards, Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- ThanksLihaas (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Albert Dubois-Pillet
-
Albert Dubois-Pillet
Article(s): Albert Dubois-Pillet
Request:
- Can the frame be removed? -- MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 02:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Wow! That was fast. Thanks! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 03:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Matthew Phipps Shiel
-
Crop/cut to oval
-
Attempt to repair
Article(s): Matthew Phipps Shiel
Request:
- cut to oval... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done Two versions: a simple crop and an attempt to repair/improve the image.--Carnby (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Richmann
Article(s): Richmann
Request:
- trim closer-snippets left at bottom and right... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 08:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Signatures of President Gamsakhurdia and King Luarsab II
-
Signature of Zviad Gamsakhurdia
-
Vector version
-
Signature of Luarsab II of Kartli
-
Vector version
Article(s): Articles presented above.
Request:
- Please SVG vectorize the signatures of President Gamsakhurdia and King Luarsab II. Thank you. Jaqeli (talk) 10:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done Are they OK (especially King Luarsab II one)?--Carnby (talk) 14:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Again, they are perfect! Thanks a lot Carnby. If you can and have time can you please vectorize this also? Jaqeli (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Signature of Pyotr Bagration
-
Vector version
Done The signature was in bad conditions especially in the final part, I tried to restore Cyrillic script, but corrections are welcome.--Carnby (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your work. His cyrillic signature is well done. Jaqeli (talk) 15:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Just looked at the first letter and it should have a circle at little "B" just like it has here . Can you please update it if possible? Jaqeli (talk) 17:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now?--Carnby (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Circle of little "B" needs to be bolder and as in the original picture there was no connection between the letters "B" and "a" so their connection update is wrong and needs to be removed. Please just make circle of "b" bold and remove the connection of "b" to "a". Jaqeli (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now?--Carnby (talk) 21:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Can you make the circle bolder and can you please close the circle to seem one letter? Jaqeli (talk) 21:56, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now?--Carnby (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now that is golden. Perfect. Thanks a lot. If you have time can you make these also? Jaqeli (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Request taken by Carnby (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC). Yep, but remember to give me some feedback after all these vectorizations :-)
- Now that is golden. Perfect. Thanks a lot. If you have time can you make these also? Jaqeli (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now?--Carnby (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Can you make the circle bolder and can you please close the circle to seem one letter? Jaqeli (talk) 21:56, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now?--Carnby (talk) 21:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Circle of little "B" needs to be bolder and as in the original picture there was no connection between the letters "B" and "a" so their connection update is wrong and needs to be removed. Please just make circle of "b" bold and remove the connection of "b" to "a". Jaqeli (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Now?--Carnby (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Just looked at the first letter and it should have a circle at little "B" just like it has here . Can you please update it if possible? Jaqeli (talk) 17:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your work. His cyrillic signature is well done. Jaqeli (talk) 15:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Signature of Shota Rustaveli
-
Signature of Teimuraz I of Kakheti
-
Signature of Alexander II of Kakheti
Heinrich Marschner
-
Derived work
Article(s): Heinrich Marschner
Request:
- since we're doing signatures, can this one be split from the image?... -- Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done?--Carnby (talk) 10:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Ralph Richardson
Article(s): Ralph Richardson
Request: Could you talented people remove the watermark please? Many thanks -- Loeba (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Centpacrr (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC). Done Centpacrr (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fantastic job as always, thank you --Loeba (talk) 07:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Silver Cross Tavern sign
-
The Silver Cross Tavern pub sign
Article(s): Silver Cross Tavern
Request:
- I think the picture would be better if the colour of the sign could be cleaned up and brightened so the details on the sign can be easier to see. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Picture
Article(s): Teimuraz I of Kakheti
Request:
- Please remove the white text on the left. Jaqeli (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Request taken. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 12:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done - Fallschirmjäger ✉ 12:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Jaqeli (talk) 12:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Saakadze
-
Cropped version
Article(s): Giorgi Saakadze
Request:
- Please remove the text below and crop it a bit and if it is possible change the colours of a picture for the face to have a bit of a light as it is now too dark. And please upload that file seperately. Thanks. Jaqeli (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done?--Carnby (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)