Jump to content

Talk:ESPN: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 36: Line 36:
== Grammar improvement ==
== Grammar improvement ==


In the 3rd paragraph, the verb tense that should be used is 'owns', as in ESPN owns, not 'owning'.[[Special:Contributions/108.217.190.154|108.217.190.154]] ([[User talk:108.217.190.154|talk]]) 22:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
In the 3rd paragraph, the verb tense that should be used is 'owns', as in 'ESPN owns a 20% interest in', not 'owning'.[[Special:Contributions/108.217.190.154|108.217.190.154]] ([[User talk:108.217.190.154|talk]]) 22:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:25, 28 November 2014


Recent section on the fan's $10 million lawsuit

See WP:NOTNEWS. If anything, this section on this recent event should be moved to History of ESPN. By devoting an entire section to this one recent story without including all the other controversies makes this page heavily slanted to recent news. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kraft and his dance.

I am absolutely discussed by your ridicule of Kraft's dancing. He was being playful but he was being described as having a "stroke". I work with stroke patients on a daily basis. I don't care about Kraft but I think your comments reguarding "stroking out" were insensitive and uninformed. Go spend some time with Ray Rice. You are all goof balls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B106:8A90:EC68:7DBA:54FE:407B (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you mean "disgusted"?Wschart (talk) 13:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar improvement

In the 3rd paragraph, the verb tense that should be used is 'owns', as in 'ESPN owns a 20% interest in', not 'owning'.108.217.190.154 (talk) 22:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]