Jump to content

User talk:Oshwah: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has CheckUser privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
This user has oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has interface administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
General note: Removal of content, blanking. (TW)
Line 413: Line 413:
edit: After reading more wikipedia laws about how to invoke the deletion process, I see that I most definately broke one. Blanking an article is not allowed. I understand how it works a little better now.
edit: After reading more wikipedia laws about how to invoke the deletion process, I see that I most definately broke one. Blanking an article is not allowed. I understand how it works a little better now.
<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tothmetres|Tothmetres]] ([[User talk:Tothmetres|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tothmetres|contribs]]) 00:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tothmetres|Tothmetres]] ([[User talk:Tothmetres|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tothmetres|contribs]]) 00:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== October 2015 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Cubisticmage626|Cubisticmage626]]. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Cubisticmage626|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Cubisticmage626|Cubisticmage626]] ([[User talk:Cubisticmage626|talk]]) 01:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:15, 24 October 2015




Let's chat


Click here to message me. I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page.

Please create your message with a subject/headline and sign your message using four tildes (~~~~) at the end.


Experienced editors have my permission to talk page stalk and respond to any message or contribute to any thread here.


Thank you

Hey Oshwah, thanks.Just realised that it was wrong and was meant for something else. THX LivOrific — Preceding unsigned comment added by LivOrific (talk • contribs) 08:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THX

thanks for that. i just realised i am wrong. ooooppppss! thx LivOrific LivOrific (talk) 08:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO!

i am new to wikipedia. could you tell me how to see everyone?

purlease! thx LivOrific ℂℕ≠≤ℝℤ⌋ LivOrific (talk) 08:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THX

You helped me a lot. Thank you for changing my very very very wrong mistake.

LivOrific (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Subject

Oshwah: Just checking after Beetlebrox. At the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), Health and Human Services, Environment and Natural Resource Administration, and Budget and Finance. In 2016, to Personnel Management and Criminal Justice Sections. 24.59.153.150 (talk) 09:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)JARacino24.59.153.150 (talk) 09:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 24.59.153.150 - I'm confused; can you provide the article or the URL to the change that you're referring to? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Cleo of Alpha Chi

The new version of the page that I have submitted is substantially better presented and researched than previous instances. I would ask that you check it against Wikipedia's policies to see that it is definitely a legitimate page.

Soakthru (talk) 01:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Soakthru. Thanks for leaving me a message regarding this article. I noticed that this article has had two articles for deletion discussions where the last discussion led to a consensus that the article should be deleted, and with the main concerns being its notability and the sources found outside the article's official site. I tagged the article because it doesn't seem to address the issues discussed before. If you disagree, you can leave a message on the article's talk page and discuss your reasons. Administrators will read this page before making a decision to either proceed, or decline the nomination. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Subject

Go ahead and delete my page i tried! :):) bye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zombiehead552 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken edits

You have made a number of destructive edits because you have assumed bad intent. Please do assume good faith, as you seem so quick to throw irrelevant policies. The Pastafarian Church (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The Pastafarian Church. Thank you for leaving me a message with your concerns. I think you're referring to this edit? If so, I think I was viewing an old revision when I reverted to that article state; I see that I didn't revert what I thought I was. Thanks for fixing that. Please let me know if you have any more questions or concerns. Thanks again for taking the time to leave me a message. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're all dishonest weirdos on the English wiki : ( WHY??????!?!?!? ~ ~~ The Pastafarian Church (talk) The Pastafarian Church (talk) 02:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC) 02:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC) 02:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)~[reply]
SHOULD be 'I give my greetings to you, the Pastafarian Church'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Pastafarian Church (talk • contribs) 02:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting of the edit made to sri sairam engineering college

hey oshwah, i think it was a mistake that you reverted my edit, i wanted to update the details about the college. kindly apply the changes which was done. thankyou

Regarding Progressive enhancement edit

Hi Oshwah,

Indeed I am not familiar with the way Wikipedia is being edited. However what I noticed and deleted was information that was not in any ways shape or form helpful. The information provided via these sentences provides one's statement or arguments and not facts. In addition even if these argument held some truth, they are no longer relevant to the current technological reality of 2015 and are more appropriate to the pre smartphone prevalence era of 2008-2010.

To tell you the truth, for me to go so much out of my way and confort zone in order to delete something from Wikipedia of all places, is a testament of my shock and disbelief that such opinionated texts can exist. I firmly believe that without these texts, the article will not only not loose value but on the contrary will be more in line with the normal wikipedia information articles the users expect to see and read.

I understand that this might not be a basis of a final edit from your end, but I hope it will reach to someone who can create a better version and ultimately help Wikipedia be the place we all know and love.

Best Regards,

Martin Milanov

Digital Marketing Officer

Fair Point GmbH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.154.199.56 (talk) 07:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 90.154.199.5. You're more than welcome to remove that content. The reason that I reverted your removal is because you did not provide a reason for removing it in the edit summary of your change. As long as you do that, you should be fine. It helps explain to other editors the reason behind your edits, and it will lead to less people getting concerned when they review it. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for leaving me a message, expressing your concerns, and explaining what you were trying to do. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 07:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cleo of Alpha Chi

Hi Oshwah. I have declined the speedy deletion of Cleo of Alpha Chi as I thought it was different enough, and had enough additional sources, that CSD G4 doesn't apply. Feel free to take it to AfD again if you want. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sarahj2107. Ohhhh, you know what I did? For some reason, I thought that the article had only two references provided, that they were from the site itself, and the article creation didn't seem to address the issues mentioned in the article's last AfD; I was looking at the list of external links by accident. I hereby smack myself with a trout! You're absolutely right; the article clearly does not qualify for G4 now that I'm looking at the correct section :-) - Thanks for taking the time to leave me this message and for letting me know. Much appreciated. It's a pleasure to meet you, Sarahj2107. Happy editing :-D ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Oshwah. You have new messages at Ayub407's talk page.
Message added 10:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ayub407talk 10:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing tests

Hello there! I've come across your reversals at Internet of Things, of edits performed by user 59.160.16.225, and would like to note that these are not good faith edits. He/she's been vandalising the article since yesterday; they've been warned thrice. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Subject

Regarding the article titled Henry Hobart Nichols, I wanted to change the title to just Hobart Nichols and tried to move it but couldn't find the move tab so I moved it manually which did not preserve the edit history which is still in the Henry Hobart Nichols article. I'd like to move that also but don't know how. Wish I never started this. Grateful if you can make corrections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karen Novak, PhD (talk • contribs) 01:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Karen Novak, PhD. It's a pleasure to meet you and provide assistance. It looks like what you've done is sufficient enough. You manually created the page on the desired title, moved everything over, then changed the original article into a redirect. It's not the safest or the most optimal way of performing the move you wanted, but it does work. I've marked your creation as patrolled; I don't think there's anything more that you need to do or worry about. If the editing history is a big concern for someone else, they can delete the page you created, revert and move the original page, and then create another redirect. No big deal :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits to SiriusXM Patriot

Hello, I am responding to the reverting of my edit to the SiriusXM Patriot page. You said: "I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page SiriusXM Patriot because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia."

My change did not add an external link; instead it linked to the Wikipedia page for the business "Townhall.com" - that is the name of the organization.

My change in full was this:

Hourly news updates (aired at the top of each programming hour) is produced and operated by Townhall.com.

and this is 100% accurate.

Please reconsider, as I believe you saw the reference to "Townhall.com" and assumed it to be a link to their web page; instead it is a link to the Wikipedia page for the same organization.

Thank you - Steven

Chrissv (talk) 01:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Gudas

I was tying to compete his info box and the "played for" section would not appear upon submitting the edits, so I tried deleting the whole info box and re-inserting it. Still no luck. Any help would be appreciated.96.245.85.145 (talk) 05:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Irwin Schiff died

see https://www.facebook.com/FreeIrwin/posts/856634724452199 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.8.29 (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eddy Wally meme thing

It shouldn't of been reverted, it should of been edited more, as it IS a thing he did. 95.150.162.33 (talk) 10:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is right

I go there i know

188.223.255.132 - Adding content to articles that is original research is not allowed. All content must either be attributable or directly attributed to a reliable source. I highly recommend that you click on the blue text references in my response here and review these policies. Please let me know if you have any questions. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Oshwah

please respect the page that i started its not for business its for giving information about the great online writer Nani. if you have an objection, then I have a prove. her work first work is the poem "The White Tiger". please review it. please help me in expanding it and making it more larger. please contact me. Unfamouspublishermanager (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Subject

What happened — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegoldenenderegg (talk • contribs) 19:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've found it

I have found the source. <ref>http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/1510_summary.html</ref> 2602:30A:2E1D:A250:21F8:C8F5:921F:231 (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 2602:30A:2E1D:A250:21F8:C8F5:921F:231 - Awesome! I also saw that you included it in the article as a reference to your change. Thanks for doing that! Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of assistance to you. I'll be happy to help! Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 21:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

windcheater as important as windbreaker

The term windcheater is commonly used in many parts of the world (India, UK etc) for what is known as windbreaker in USA and Japan. The term windcheater redirects to the windbreaker page as both refers to the same thing. Due to this I think it is important that the term windcheater is mentioned along with term windbreaker in the first line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.99.13.150 (talk) 21:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It s not inappropriate, if people are looking for education on the ombre hair style people like me want to see pictures from a specialist so they don't walk into a location and get ripped off with something that is supposed to look a different way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonesLife2015 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!This is Ramezan and I amstudy in massage therapy course and sometime I try to use and fine my questions in google, and it referring me to many pages in many resources andmaybe it happened like this and nothing more!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.169.167.240 (talk) 17:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oshwah,

Thank you for your contributions at the recent longevity-related AfD's, and for taking your time to form a well-reasoned opinion.

Seeing as you're an experienced editor I'd like to ask for you advice about what to do regarding some editors who are involved in the World's Oldest People project. In short, what's happened is this: in the past, there were some issues involving editors with an interest in longevity who had effectively created a "walled garden" - that is, there were articles in the scope of the project full of original research and excessive trivia. This led a number editors to try and oppose this.

Now that's fine, but what seems to have ended up happening is that they've almost gone too far the other way - they're trying to delete articles on the basis that "longevity does not confer notability" - when clearly the amount of press coverage that the world's oldest people typically receive suggests otherwise. I also see WP:BLP1E frequently misquoted as a justification to delete such articles, when longevity clearly isn't one event. And I've seen ridiculous claims that being the oldest living person "isn't a record", even though it's listed in the Guinness Book of RECORDS. I think this discussion here accurately sums up the situation: bad arguments being used to justify the deletion of content (and WP:OWN being violated), and referring to those on the other side of the argument as "longevity fans" or "fanboys", again trying to justify what they're doing what they're doing.

I have an interest in longevity, and while I do want to see original research and trivia removed from longevity-related articles, I don't want to see content unfairly destroyed either. But unfortunately, I feel rather helpless when a group of editors seem more interested in making a point than improving the encylopedia. It's the same people who pop up in AfD's and RFC's all the time, which gives the impression that their opinions are reflective of widespread consensus, when in reality that isn't the case. Is there anything I can do about this?

Thank you for your time. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to join us but it's been a battleground for probably close to a decade on these articles. As I said, the AFDs swing wildly here so don't let that put you off and I don't take your changes in voting personally at all, it's not an easy issue to decide. This is nowhere as contentious as the fights over fictional characters that we had for years, eventually the consensus was that we shouldn't have articles on individual characters unless the character had separate notability and I feel that's the same basis we should use for these people but that's just me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ollie231213 and Ricky81682. Thanks for leaving me a message. I apologize for the delay returning your messages - I've been very busy. From what I am reading, it looks like some editors involved with the World's Oldest People project created an article, its content was removed due to original research and trivia, and they're now listing a bunch of those articles for deletion in order to prove a point. I do see that the deletions in the past for articles on longevity have been inconsistent. Some have resulted in the article's deletion while others were closed early as "Keep".
Looking at the discussion that Ollie231213 provided, I'm not seeing any ownership issues, and the discussion seems to be staying on-topic and civil - Am I missing something? Can you point me to where you saw the ownership issues? I think that the best option is to remain observant and continue discussing the project so that consensus is reached. If edit warring, ownership issues, or disruption to make a point continues and is clearly evident with diffs and changes, I would take the issue to dispute resolution or perhaps Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents if your number of attempts to resolve the issues have been unsuccessful and that involving the attention of others looks to be the only option.
I hope that my response helps and points you two in the correct direction. Again, I'm more than happy to assist with identifying problems and pointing you in the correct direction (it's what I'm here for) - please do not hesitate to respond with additional questions or requests for help. I think that this article subject isn't explicitly defined anywhere in our guidelines, and this is an example of articles that fall between the cracks into the "grey area"; I agree that, after reviewing the arguments on both sides, that longevity (provided reliable sources exist that discuss the person other than the his/her death like a birthday at age 114, etc.) is not a single event, but a series of many of them. However, if the death of a person is the only coverage that reliable sources found discuss and cover in-depth about him/her whatsoever, I would understand and perhaps support someone's argument for deleting the article - because while longevity isn't one event, that particular person is only known and made notable for one event - the person's death. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Thanks for replying. Sorry, I should have been clearer: please see [1] for what I mean about ownership issues. Edits like this, this, and this were made before consensus was reached, and in my opinion, based on a misinterpretation of the succession box guidelines. I understand WP:BOLD but it's not okay to make a large number of changes and THEN start a discussion, because if the consensus differs, then someone has to undo all the edits.
Personally, I think that editing to make a point is the biggest problem here, and the true consensus of the wider community being misrepresented. This AfD is a good example - four of the five "delete" votes came from people involved in the battleground, who typically vote to delete these kind of articles, even when the wider community disagrees. And then, the outcome of this AfD gets cited as a reason to delete a different article, while ignoring all the recent, similar AfD's that were closed as keep.
As you say, this topic is maybe something of a "grey area". Personally, I think that instead of having all of these individual AfD's, a more general discussion needs to take place about whether or not - for example - anyone who was the world's oldest person is automatically notable enough for a standalone article. For example, I believe I'm correcting in saying that consensus exists among Wikipedians that every UK member of parliament is automatically notable enough for an article (just based on their status as an MP alone) and that every golfer on the PGA tour is automatically notable. But if such a discussion takes place, I want to make sure we get plenty of input from uninvolved editors, so that we get an idea of what the wider community thinks, and not just those who are involved in a "battle". -- Ollie231213 (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ollie231213 - Sorry again for the delay responding to your last message. Thanks for keeping me in the loop, and no apologies are needed for the clarification - I appreciate it very much. I suspect that most of these AFD nominations are a result of WP:POINT, but that's really where it ends - suspicion; I can't find the origin that may have caused such a "WP:POINT", if any even exists. Maybe the past AfD's that resulted in deletion? Looking at the URLs that you provided, only one was a diff URL (the other was to an article, and the article's history). This diff shows DerbyCountyinNZ reverting an edit per WP:SBSGUIDE (I've pinged him so that he can help explain, if he wishes to) - but this doesn't constitute WP:OWN issues, or ownership. I may have some suspicions regarding WP:POINT, but I honestly think that this entire issue spans from the fact that the article subject area is a "grey area", and that deletions have spanned from different interpretations of policy. Regarding WP:BOLD - I agree that it's a good thing to ask for input or ask questions before doing something you're not sure about, and I will never discourage anyone from doing that. Doing so, however, is absolutely not required. So long as you don't edit war, 3RR, or cause disruption and you discuss any disputes and come to a consensus, there is absolutely nothing wrong with editing first and asking questions later. I understand (and agree) that the time spent towards undoing other editors' editing mistakes would be reduced if people would simply ask before editing, but it's an indirect consequence of allowing editors to be bold and one that we are willing to accept. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 17:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Hillary Clinton Email Controversy page

You reversed changes that made the article more accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.67.185.194 (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:K.belev

Hi, i'm the user and i want my user page to be deleted as i wont be on wikipedia again, so if you can help me i would be glad. 22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC) User:K.belev — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.10.112.86 (talk)

/Weak value

that page was a mistake. I intended to edit "Weak value". Please do delete "/Weak value" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yama jlac (talk • contribs) 23:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yama jlac - Done. I've nominated it for deletion under A10. No need to worry; we'll take care of it for you :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All taken care of :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAKE COLLECTIONS

Dear sir / Madam ,

Why are u supporting FAKE Collections . Because Rudrammadevi movie failed , even many of the theatres are empty , first day It has gained negative reviews . PLEASE don't support fake collections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.99.128.239 (talk) 01:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

revert

Yes, you made a mistake. Cuba is communist, not socialist.

College of the Ozarks

Dear Oshwah, I have provided solid references for the discrimination controversy. It appears you are reverting for no good reason. If you have a problem with the college's handbook link, please say so. Otherwise the information is solid. Please do your homework before reverting my edits. This college takes in millions in federal grants per year and does so while discriminating against students. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:4C9:8200:445:79A4:5ED8:1ADD (talk) 02:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the last edit I did was constructive.68.101.175.232 (talk) 02:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the last edit i did was constructive. 68.101.175.232 (talk) 02:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwe Dollar

I was including a useful tidbit of information that the readers might find interesting. 68.101.175.232 (talk) 02:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, Pramod here i create my own biography Page because of i want to publish my all film stories & Hindi & Marathi songs lyrics so please Co-operate

Thanks, Pramod Jadhav — Preceding unsigned comment added by PRAMOD26 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PRAMOD26. Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, this is not how Wikipedia works. You cannot create articles about anything you want :-). The articles you create must meet certain criteria, else it can be deleted per Wikipedia deletion guidelines. I highly recommend that you read Wikipedia:My first article in order to read and understand the aspect of article creation. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them and assist you. Again, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you enjoy your stay and that you take the time to learn about how it works and decide to stay with us. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your message about Magilla Loans

Hello! Thank you for your note about the Magilla Loans page. I very much appreciate your input. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koula gianulias (talk • contribs) 05:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A favor

Could you please expand Petra Thoren?—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 09:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eat me, I'm an azuki - you got it. I'll perform some research and do my best to expand the article. Do you have any draft content or sandbox pages that I can look at and see what you've done so far? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well fi:Petra Thoren would be useful as a source.—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 09:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate use of Greater India and

Hi Oshwah,

Please do not post nationalistic propaganda which lack proper academic credential. There is no academic term, such as Greater India. India Cultural Sphere is the correct term. "Greater India" implies political control extending beyond mainland India. This is not the case. 

Afghan, Tibet and most Philippines were not Indianized in any way.  The map posted is untruthful and offensive to the people of those countries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.102.141 (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fück off bǐtch, leave the man alone, he works hard!!!!!!! 95.141.29.39 (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

jame collins / the ginger Pele

I just wanted to add an accurate nickname Jack mitten 123 (talk) 11:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surabhi Hande page

I have created this page to inform about a famous actress in Maharashtra , India. A google search for her name will tell you more. ThaneFreedomScholar (talk) 11:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surabhi Hande Page

Template:Subust : db - notability - notice/Surabhi Hande/header=1ThaneFreedomScholar (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Oshwah you must be not know about Surabhi Hande. She is an Indian actress.You must search above her in google. ThaneFreedomScholar (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC) ThaneFreedomScholar (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no personal attack, you're wrong. I'm directly responding to a message the user made to me on an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XXEmoPunk911Xx (talk • contribs) 15:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?

Hey man well i made a page and i was making it and it was speedly deleted and it would have been good if within this week but i was just working on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lions654321 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Zaavi

Fun Only Zaaviranas (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[ [[|1212px|thumbnail]] ]]

  • Caption1
    Caption1
  • Caption2
    Caption2

No Subject

Hi, while I understand reverting some of the changes I made (on the Elite Daily page), I feel that many of my additions were relevant and useful and I would like to restore those changes that did nothing to "take away" from the page as I originally wrote it.

I've restored your content. After reviewing it further, it was made in good faith. I apologize for the mistake. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy J Hickey's Changes

Hi Oshwah,

I added the edit to Timothy J Hickey's article saying that he currently teaches computer graphics at Brandeis University. I am currently in the course, which is why I did not include the source. I suppose the correct source would be the Brandeis University's registrar page.

Best, Alison — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.64.140.226 (talk) 01:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, SwisterTwister. Thanks for buying the round of tea! I appreciate the wikilove; I'll make sure to buy us a round of beers when the time comes :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Subject

will you stop deleting my shit.

No Subject

Sir i just made a correction on that kesi yeh yariyan page What should i do to be a editor on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishabh mahajan (talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit war at Asterisk

You restored material [2] at Asterisk. There's currently an edit war among apparent NFL fans regarding this. I'm not sure how an opinion piece regarding an NFL team leads to a better understanding of the subject. Isn't the article better off without this paragraph? Your thoughts appreciated. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 78.26. Thanks for leaving me a message. I restored the content because the removal wasn't explained. After seeing your message and re-reading it within context of the article, I think that it should definitely be removed. I don't understand what the section involving Tom Brady and the New England Patriots even has to do with in regards to asterisks. If I missed it, please enlighten me :-). Please, feel free to remove that section. This looks to be the result of disruption, possible WP:POINT? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I thought. I've removed it. Thanks! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ali kiba

Looks like there is a possible sockpuppetry going on-also check Draft:Ali kiba-made by another user doing the same article even! Wgolf (talk) 20:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As well as Draft:Ali Kiba. Wgolf (talk) 20:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Wgolf. An SPI has been created. Please feel free to add any additional evidence to the report. Thanks for keeping so diligent and for volunteering your time to keeping Wikipedia in ship-shape :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 20:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C-H activation page

The work was done by Andrew Wee. It should be "Wee," not "We." Stop changing it back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.203.168.100 (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see now. I've expanded on your changes so that the person's full name (not discussed anywhere else in the article) is mentioned in order to provide context. Sorry for the confusion. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit on "Prostate Massage"

Greetings - My name is Jebuiz y'har. If my calculations are correct, you should be receiving this transmission in the year 2015 AD. It amuses me that you used to calculate your dates in relation to the life of an ancient man. You see, we have a slightly different timescale. But to make things simple, I am writing from the year 49,170 AD. 95.141.29.39 (talk) 23:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Find me now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.132.62.47 (talk) 23:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kushagra AsaTi

I think The page Kushagra Asati should be included in wikipedia. Because the person started a new company move on but he is not doing any type of advertisement through wikipedia . People are requesting me to know more about him who is he.{Kushagra AsaTi}. So i dont have any disruptive editing also. If u wish you remove the tag of speedy deletion. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.215.135.55 (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding article Ajitabh Bose

He is also a renowned film maker.[1][2]

Aries spears

Aries spears has a wife Elisa Larregui and they share 2 children Jordan and Jada — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaRaina09 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

8 year old boy talkin'

Are you the creator of Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.49.48.212 (talk) 07:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken revert

Hi, I changed the link to the English site for Kewet electric cars to the correct one, but you reverted my change. I think this was a mistake. This is the URL listed currently as their English home page: http://www.elbilnorge.no/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7&bakgrunn

This URL redirects to the following page, which is in Norwegian: http://www.buddyelectric.no/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7&bakgrunn=english

Kewet / Buddy's official site in English is here: http://www.buddyelectric.com/

AIV for VIP

In case this is something which needs updating at your end.[3][4] -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, zzuuzz. Umm... weird... I'm not sure how I managed to accidentally do that. I'm on mobile right now; I'll look into this further when I get home. Sorry to burn up your time like that. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 13:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harry S. Truman

The source is Wikipedia itself and I clearly provided that link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_members_in_United_States_politics

my edit is true. Please dont delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:B8C4:9E60:D1AB:DAF:B281:19DD (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit about old turkic language

Hello , in the page old turkic language was described as " a dialect of kurdish language " . Thats why I tried to change it . Obviously someone was trying to be funny . Have a good night — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.54.115.169 (talk) 23:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Subject

Hi Oshwah, I did not delete any content of the Santorini article I have just replaced it into another section, because I thought that there was the place for it. Wikipediauser993 (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)wikipediauser993[reply]

Hi, Wikipediauser993 - Perfect. Thanks for letting me know :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, regarding the article about virgin boy egss.

Thank you for your extremely prompt responce. wow, that was fast. I tried to read the articles about how to correctly flag an article that needs review. They were definately not helpful. The guy actually cited his own website as a source for what appears to be an obvious prank. Is there a "flag this article" button? or something like a /flag this article/ command?

edit: After reading more wikipedia laws about how to invoke the deletion process, I see that I most definately broke one. Blanking an article is not allowed. I understand how it works a little better now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tothmetres (talk • contribs) 00:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Cubisticmage626. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cubisticmage626 (talk) 01:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Being Filmy Behind The Lens- Ajitabha Bose;". indiacafe24.com. Retrieved 2014-07-11.
  2. ^ "Interview With Ajitabh Bose, a Famous Short Filmmaker And Writer". venturesden.com. Retrieved 2014-01-21.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oshwah&oldid=687210088"