User talk:SwisterTwister: Difference between revisions
→User:Engr33armalik: new section |
Doc4ucmore2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
{{Lafc|username=Jadis White|ts=01:31:05, 19 January 2017|declined=Draft:Arts_Project_Australia}} |
{{Lafc|username=Jadis White|ts=01:31:05, 19 January 2017|declined=Draft:Arts_Project_Australia}} |
||
Hi |
Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks for taking the time to have a look at the changes to the article. Just a quick question for clarification (so that I can get the next edit right): Is the problem that there are not enough external references? A bit confused, as the first reviewer indicated that the article was copied, so I removed all direct references to this (even though they were quoted/cited), but not that there weren't enough notable articles. Please let me know what I need to do to improve the article and have it accepted. Thanks again! |
||
== 02:55:39, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Frank Cianciullo == |
== 02:55:39, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Frank Cianciullo == |
||
Revision as of 09:23, 14 May 2017
Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).
PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.
New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.
Friday, 17/3/2017. Today you wrote on my Talk page that you had removed the template from the top of my new mainpage article William Nevin Tatlow Hurst. But I can still see the template. Sorry, but I don't understand the situation. Do I need to do something else? Thanks - I know you're busy. SurveyorMJF (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Sam Mangubat is a local internet celebrity who rose to fame in the Philippines by joining a local siging competition. His fate is just like America's Christina Grimmie and Sam Tsui who both have wiki bio. Do not be racist. If wiki is for Americans only please add disclaimer. Do your research well before declining the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkmaster12 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my article on Russian child model Kristina Pimenova! Unfortunately, you rejected my submission because you said I did not adequately prove notability. I disagree for several reasons. She is a prominent model and actress who has starred in a full length feature film with a famous costar. She has also posed for many high profile fashion companies. She has 4 million Facebook followers and 1.8 million Instagram followers. Many people believe she is a supermodel, and likely to become even more famous soon. I addressed these points in the article, and included several reputable sources to verify this information. Also, she is already the subject of many other Wikipedia articles in other languages, including Russian and Spanish. I was surprised to find that she has not been the subject of an English language article as well. My article included a similar amount of detail as the Spanish article. I am happy to expand my article further if you believe it will be accepted in the future. Thank you! Sincerely, Christopher Moore (Ctmuva2000) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctmuva2000 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The article for Dylan Collins isn't an advertisement at all. Why are you redirecting without a proper discussion? That seems very inappropriate. Please restore and propose redirect if you feel thisway . A unilateral decision is inappropriate Misterpottery (talk) 17:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
05:10:36, 16 January 2017 review of submission by Abic1991
I have included news articles from cyclingnews.com and cyclingtips.com, both of which are major sports news outlets. Are these sufficiently important outlets? If so, I can include more references from different articles on these sites
05:34:00, 16 January 2017 review of submission by Alexhaddad91
- Alexhaddad91 (talk · contribs)
Andrew Rothschild has invented the genre bluestronica. There is no published music that falls in this genre of bluestronica. Andrew Rothschild's music does not fit the blues, or electronica genre. Hence he has created a new genre. No artist has claimed their music to be apart of this genre. He has elements of both in his music. The sources are legitimate. This is not a scientific matter, he is an artist and his artwork has received notable attention.
13:22:24, 16 January 2017 review of submission by SHBCARE
Several new good citations, and more information was added to the draft by user SHBCARE; and I've made some tone and MOS changes. -- Jeandré, 2017-01-16t13:22z
- E.g. this Sydney Morning Herald article. -- Jeandré, 2017-01-16t13:36z
20:08:55, 16 January 2017 review of submission by 2601:681:4700:399C:3960:7026:53E9:AD9C
I was researching this company for work and was surprised that they didn't have an article in wikipedia. I wanted to know who they were and what their basic business model was. I had to go to an external source to find this. I thought it would be useful to have this info in wikipedia. I don't work for them, I don't have a vested interest in their success or failure, I just found it annoying that this info wasn't available here, and wanted to fix that.
17:42:21, 17 January 2017 review of submission by Travish212
- Travish212 (talk · contribs)
Thank you for your review of my draft. I have been through way too many drafts, re-writes, and deletions for this page. It has been shortened, condensed, and as many sources as are available have been cited. I have read all of the articles that have been linked. There are no other sources available on the internet, as it is a small company. There are no opinions reflected in the draft, only basic facts. I don't see how this can be changed any more. This latest draft is even a re-write from one of your moderators. Please advise.
21:27:43, 17 January 2017 review of submission by 86.142.251.238
Appreciate the comment regarding notability, however surely an amateur gym which produces a national finalist every five years; has a host of professional boxers at its platform and trained a world heavyweight contender is defined with some element of notability? References, both past and present, throughout the history of this establishment highlight its significance?
I'd very much appreciate your feedback as to how I can make this article more robust.
19:27:33, 18 January 2017 review of submission by 84.222.43.99
- 84.222.43.99 (talk · contribs)
Dear SwisterTwister, after your suggestions on 28th december 2017 about Enzo Minarelli draft, I have been working about and I have submitted a new draft following what you wrote, I think now it works, I will be very happy to know your opinion, with my best
22:12:40, 18 January 2017 review of submission by 124.157.106.97
Hello SwisterTwister, I understand your point of view and the publishing rules on Wikipedia. Really, I do! The reason I decided to send the article in Wikipedia (even it doesn't respect the rules) is because Ezi Car Rental is become the first 100% Kiwi own rental company in New Zealand. New Zealand is a small country. References are not like in Europe (where I come from) or another big country in the World. With the current rules of publication only the big companies can be on Wikipedia. Is it really the most relevant point of view for an online encyclopedia? I could be wrong but I don't think so. It is not an argumentation for publishing the article about Ezi Car Rental. Your decision respect the rules. It is just my point of view about this. Now, I will wait until someone else decide that Ezi Car Rental is enough relevant to be on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and for your participation to Wikipedia. Jeremy
22:33:57, 18 January 2017 review of submission by Evelynivy
The band "The Hot Place" fits your guideline as, "an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." The founding member and guitarist of The Hot Place, Jeff Calder, is a notable musician who is also currently active in the band "The Swimming Pool Q's". The Swimming Pool Q's are a national band, and have been recognized in Rolling Stone magazine, their most recent album "1984-1986:The A&M Years" was a Rolling Stone "Reissue of the Year", picked by David Fricke, on page 32 of the December 19-Jan 2 2014 print magazine. The Swimming Pool Q's have had five national/international album releases, on the major labels A&M, Capitol, and Bar None. The singer and other founding member of The Hot Place, Lisa King has has been a member of notable band The Glenn Phillips band, who have released albums on Virgin and Sony Records. King also played keyboards with The Swimming Pool Q's from 2003-2006. The Hot Place features guest guitarist Richard Lloyd of the band "Television", another member of a prominent 1970's band, with historical releases on Elektra records. The Hot Place has been featured in print, in significant North American publications "Georgia Music Magazine", "Stomp and Stammer", and "Creative Loafing."
23:02:39, 18 January 2017 review of submission by Evelynivy
The Hot Place is directly connected to two major musical artists. One of its founding members is Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's, and guest artist Richard Lloyd of Television, who already have Wikipedia Pages. Could you please clarify how to substantiate that more? I did connect The Hot Place to The Swimming Pool Q's via internal Wikipedia linking. The sources cited, if read in detail, are more than just announcements, interviews, and mentions. They directly discuss how Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's and Richard Lloyd of Television are connected to and/or are members of the Atlanta band The Hot Place. Many of the album reviews and mentions of the band are in analog print media, though I have found several digital places where the band's members are verified and substantiated. Thank you for your help!
This article in particular substantiates The Hot Place's history and verifies the notable musicians who are members. http://www.clatl.com/music/article/13080910/new-wavers-instudio-chemistry-ignites-the-hot-place. I'm not sure how this is not a substantial source. If you could clarify, I would so appreciate it! Thank you!
01:31:05, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Jadis White
- Jadis White (talk · contribs)
Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks for taking the time to have a look at the changes to the article. Just a quick question for clarification (so that I can get the next edit right): Is the problem that there are not enough external references? A bit confused, as the first reviewer indicated that the article was copied, so I removed all direct references to this (even though they were quoted/cited), but not that there weren't enough notable articles. Please let me know what I need to do to improve the article and have it accepted. Thanks again!
02:55:39, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Frank Cianciullo
Hi, I would respectfully appreciate a review. Melissa Del Pinto has been recognized as a Canadian artist by The National Gallery of Canada and her name was added to the “Government of Canada, Canadian Heritage Database of Canadian Artists”. I have added the link. In addition, to address the points used to refuse her submission, her paintings are in the collections of notable Canadian collectors. I added the name of Irwin and Claude Lande. Mr. Lande is a noted real-estate developer living in Westmount (Montreal).
19:51:49, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Evelynivy
I have worked on finding more sources for my citations. The first three reference citations, are from National, credible print and digital magazines, the state run publication "Georgia Music Magazine", and a newspaper which is owned by the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, "Creative Loafing." The References directly explain how The Hot Place contains two notable international musicians in its lineup, Jeff Calder of “The Swimming Pool Q's” and Richard Lloyd of “Television.” Especially notable is source #2, Georgia Music Magazine. This is a state-run print and digital publication. Source 1 and 3 are not merely announcements, they are also detailed articles which explain The Hot Place's debut, and the notable musicians that are involved in the historic project. I also added another source that I found this morning, “Arts Talk” on Blog Talk Radio, Episode #104 Lisa King. I have also looked at other Atlanta bands Wikipedia pages. Some of these are groups which are far less notable than The Hot Place, with no notable musicians involved, and cite less reliable sources. So, I'm curious as to why those articles were approved, and this one is being rejected. Please advise! My sources all verify the notable musicians involved in The Hot Place.
Added another cited source, from "The Recoup" magazine, by Joseph Kyle, in which Jeff Calder directly speaks about being a member and producer of The Hot Place band, with musician Lisa King. https://therecoup.com/2014/04/21/swimming-pool-qs-working-at-the-nut-factory/. The article quotes Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's, "We have about 2/3 of a new album mixed, and a few basic tracks standing by in the queue, waiting to be finished. I’ve co-produced them with Tim Delaney, a talented Atlanta musician and engineer we’ve worked with as far back as Royal Academy. It certainly helps that I’m friends with a number of great recording engineers, many of whom I was fortunate to be associated with at Atlanta’s legendary Southern Tracks studio, which I helped to manage for many years and where I was on the periphery of what seems like a hundred major rock albums produced by Brendan O’Brien.I like doing new things, having recently produced and played on an album by The Hot Place, Lisa King’s band based in Atlanta. It’s a pretty cool record that has a song called “Saturn Moved” on which Richard Lloyd of Television unleashes a wild solo."
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
02:12:43, 22 January 2017 review of submission by 63.92.245.105
we are requesting a review because the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jonathan_Aldridge page has great sources and the subject is notable
Benny Castillo managed the subject and his page has been approved.
Aldridge is just as notable as Castillo and should be approved
06:35:43, 23 January 2017 review of submission by Simonetech
- Simonetech (talk · contribs)
Hi SwisterTwiser,
We are contacting you because you have raised query regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjeev_Sharma page.
We would like to let you know that he is a famous personality that you can easily review from https://www.google.co.in/search?q=Sanjeev+Sharma&oq=Sanjeev+Sharma&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2j0l2j69i59.322j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&safe=active&q=Sanjeev+Sharma+Actor link.
I would like you to guide us to make it live.
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards, Simone.
18:14:28, 23 January 2017 review of submission by Skire913
I have resubmitted the article to incorporate all the changes suggested by yourself and other Wikipedia reviewers. I have made substantial changes throughout the document
to get rid of any extraneous or unnecessary language, with the effect of streamlining the article. The article now only contains direct and informative language with no self-promotional or journal-like language. I believe you will find the changes I have made to be much more in line with a Wikipedia article.
00:07:20, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Hoovbacca
Obviously trying very hard to conform this to meet the criteria, but wanted to clarify what was meant by focusing on all additional major news, there is a video interview from CNN, but most of the stories tend to refer mostly back to the Chicago Facebook page that I mentioned as a primary source, which to me makes the additional sources a bit moot, but I am willing to do what is needed to get this thing done :) Any further guidance/advice you can offer would be extremely appricated...thanks for the fast review!
08:18:54, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Dignan00
Thank you for your time. Rene Moreno meets the notability requirements when you look at it from the angle that he is a very significant person with Down syndrome. That's key here. His documentary is commonplace in collegiate special education curriculums across the country, and has been for 17 years. Up Syndrome has been on Netflix, Hulu amongst many other major streaming outlets for many years. His movies have been the subject of reviews in major trades such as Daily Variety (which is referenced), and he has won a very prestigious award from the National Down Syndrome Congress of the USA (also referenced), which is one of the largest organizations to promote the awareness of Down syndrome that exists in the world today. I think when you look at this person with the correct angle you will understand that he is indeed notable and worthy of inclusion.
15:39:12, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Terry Winston
hey this is my first time creating a wiki page but the information is true how can i validate these sources ?
16:29:55, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Sean Pollock
- Sean Pollock (talk · contribs)
Hi please can i create this page ? i can add it in a more Wiki style?
18:10:15, 24 January 2017 review of submission by 129.16.140.95
Please be more specific as to what should be improved. The sources are all reliable and independent of the subject. The amount of, the breadth and the character of the sources, as well as the notable award winners proof that the article is about a notable subject. So if this is not enough, please be specific about what should be improved.
07:03:34, 25 January 2017 review of submission by Robfarago
Thank you for your feedback. This is my first article. I have only ever made minor contributions to other article over the last 10 years or so. Before I wrote this article I read the pages that talk about notability and also needing independent credible sources from news/media publishers who have editors etc.. I believe the page I have drafted has merit based on the guidelines. The development of renewable energy in Australia has been significantly influenced by not for profit and grass roots groups such as Local Power. Not sure if you had a chance to read/view many of the references and if you did perhaps you are not familiar with the Australian media organisations in the references?
The TV coverage of this community initiative was made by the ABC TV network and the TEN TV network. The Australian ABC is a highly credible news organisation of journalistic integrity spanning radio, TV and online. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation The Australian TEN TV network is one of our 3 commercial news networks and comparable to perhaps NBC or CBS in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Ten Both of these TV broadcast news services thought this was a newsworthy community initiative which had not been done before. The youtube clips are recordings of the prime time TV news article which were broadcast to audiences of over 1 million people each.
Similarly the ATA is a very credible member based organisation and magazine publisher of ReNew magazine, which has been publishing since 1980 and is not up to it's 138th quarterly magazine https://www.ata.org.au/who/history They chose to write a feature article about the Local Power project because it was something new and novel.
Finally the City South News is a local community newspaper and part of the News Corporation stable of newspapers. While I am not a big fan or Rupert Murdoch (Fox News yuk!) he did get his starts running newspapers in Australia This chain of local papers are said to have 1 million readers weekly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest_Community_Newspapers
I would humbly ask you to take a closer look at the references, taking into account the above information about independence, and please reconsider this rejection.
thank you.
10:20:04, 25 January 2017 review of submission by Westy14
16:51:03, 25 January 2017 review of submission by Russianradio
- Russianradio (talk · contribs)
Thanks for you review! These are the references from Russian books. Can they be considered as external links? Thank you.
05:09:40, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Brn odisha
- Brn odisha (talk · contribs)
Please check the Government of India Website
http://www.padmaawards.gov.in/PDFS/PadmaAwards-2017_25012017.pdf
and http://www.sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/Awardees.php?section=aa
Please let me know what else do I need to add.
14:39:58, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Mexcorp1
The references site politics nigeria as a source of information. pls state in simple terms what makes a valid reference..please. thanks
18:06:50, 27 January 2017 review of submission by Carrie at The Fischer Group
Thanks for reviewing our article, I really appreciate it. I want to update the article so that it meets guidelines, but wanted to know which portion specifically doesn't conform to the guidelines so I can work with that. From what I can tell, the article if not very different from the following (in words / scope) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M/I_Homes or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulteGroup.
Fischer is in the same group as those two homebuilders (and many others already included in Wikipedia) and being in the top 50 in the nation (something that M/I mentions in their article as well) I would think that content is noteworthy as well.
The remainder of the article just lists out the areas of business (where they do business) as well as a small amount of history (founder etc...) for the company (something I see the other Homebuilders do as well.)
If you could give me a little more feedback on what is different from my article and those above (as initial examples) I would appreciate it so I can make the needed changes.
Thanks! I look forward to your help / further comments on the differences.
16:22:53, 29 January 2017 review of submission by Carrie at The Fischer Group
Ok, that makes sense. So what updates do I need to make to it for it to meet the new company guidelines? I don't see any specifics on that which we have not already covered here? I'm specifically looking for "doing this would make it meet the new guidelines" kind of information.
I've re-read the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Companies/Guidelines and it appears from what I can see there that the article, in its current state covers the areas mentioned.
Again, as far as companies go, and looking at the other homebuilders (as well as other companies) in the space, Fischer is certainly in line with those which are included. (They have been in the top 50 home builders for many years now, they operate in multiple states nationwide, they have plenty of press on them, they are are one of the big builders for the St. Jude's dream home giveaway (which benefits less fortunate people), and the list goes on.
When you get time, let me know what I can do in the way of edits to help get this article revised and into the article space. I appreciate the info so far. It is helpful.
Thanks.
14:27:34, 30 January 2017 review of submission by Chadyrm
Hello, first, thanks for taking time to being a Wikipedia curator.
There are 6 main sources cited, that are serious sources (in the Middle-East, and Lebanon). Text publications are rarely digitized, but I could recollect printed articles (Can/should we add them as references and provide scanned proof? What is the procedure for such cases).
The company had a social impact, which is why it is covered. As you might have now noticed, the digital ecosystem is nearly non-existent in this region, and having publicly accessible digital manufacturing service shop with industrial 3D printers in Lebanon is a big step. Not to mention the creation of new 3D printing materials! (2 materials) and several machines.
Additional projects may be appended: Rapidmanufactory has been invited to the St-Etienne Design Biennial this coming march to exhibit: https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/theobsessivedrafter/ . This would generate articles by "more known" media entities. A published book about manufacturing (especially digital fabrication), was created by the founder; An article in "L'Orient Le Jour", talks about it: https://www.lorientlejour.com/article/1030988/guillaume-credoz-et-son-robot.html
Looking forward to your assistance in having this article published.
Thank you, Chady
15:37:04, 30 January 2017 review of submission by L.schartner
- L.schartner (talk · contribs)
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the viennacontemporary header needs to be deleted (done).
Regarding additional articles: I added an article from the NY Times from 2015: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/arts/international/vienna-looks-east-for-fine-art.html?_r=0
But otherwise, I would like to argue that the most important English references are already included in the article (I guess I can’t add German publications where we have a lot of press, in all the major newspapers). I have included: Forbes, Vogue, and important publications from the artworld: Wallpaper Magazine, Blouin Artinfo, Artsy, Sotheby’s blog, The Art Newspaper, artnet News, Flash Art, artforum.com, Widewalls, Cultured Mag.
Would that be fine for you?
16:23:06, 30 January 2017 review of submission by Hamhaugh
Hi there,
many thanks for taking the time to review the page I created. I am new to Wikipedia so am finding my way through trial and error so would be grateful for any help to improve the chances of submission! I felt the subject worthy of an article, largely because of her role as ambassador for the Orange Tree theatre in London. The theatre is a theatre that produces new work of exceptional standard, most recently reviewed in Variety magazine Los Angeles, and acknowledged to be a forerunner in new writing. Heery was one of fourteen invited because they were considered to be 'leading figures in the Arts and beyond – who will champion the work of the Theatre.' She is also a member of the Davison/Tennant family who have a large fan base in the worldwide science fiction community, not only because of her work with Big Finish audio, but also because of her film work in the series The Tripods, and Life Force. Her son, David Tennant's step brother in law, Louis Davison, has just played Victor in Tim Burton's Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children made by Fox films. As an ambassador for theatre she is able to reach a wide audience through her body of work, regular TV work spanning twenty five years, and professional relationships within the literary world. Is any of this helpful as regards an edit?
Best Hamhaugh.
16:45:49, 1 February 2017 review of submission by Hazelwhicher
- Hazelwhicher (talk · contribs)
Hi there, I wasn't quite sure what you meant by 'merged to the local community's article' - could you clarify?
I thought given the school's history and relationship to other wiki articles, that it would be a good candidate for a page of it's own - I don't understand why it's not notable just because it's not a secondary school. Would you mind elaborating?
Thanks, Hazel
Request for assistance
I'm not sure how to ask, but you reviewed our page for the Hanna Boys Center last. I just found a reference to our non-profit in the United States COngressional Record at our 60th Anniversary in 2010. It's obviously old but maybe it can help as a non-local reference.
I am not sure what else I need to do here. I am happy to strip content out of my entry to get it to be non-advertising but I don't know what to remove.
This process is more than a little difficult.
Please help our non-profit do good work for at-risk teenagers!!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hanna_Boys_Center
Christy
07:58:40, 3 February 2017 review of submission by 88.95.141.156
Hi! Thanks for the review. Added references from a variety of news sources on multiple topics. Used other podcast pages as reference for how rigor this should be, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Screen_Savers
Hope that's enough for approval! Thanks
17:08:47, 4 February 2017 review of submission by Arshad.ppd
- Arshad.ppd (talk · contribs)
I would like to thanks for your review. Unfortunately my submitted article doesn't meet wiki's guideline for notable personality article. After your firs review I have added a few more references. I think it should meet your guideline.
Here I want to inform you that Bangladesh's news industry basically depends on Bengali language. A few English language Daily Newspaper or Online News portal available in here. So, Bangladeshi actress Misty Zannat's news are all around in Bengali language online and newspaper but a fewer in English newspaper and online. Before re-review my article please consider this fact.
18:37:41, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Marangros
Hi guys, thanks for the comments. I'm happy to add more reviews as there are many to choose from. Still, I'm surprised that Nick Kristoff's (arguably the most important reviewer at the NY Times) isn't alone sufficient. Is that all this needs? Just more reviews? Please advise and I will continue adding them. Thanks very much!
18:38:07, 5 February 2017 review of submission by 76.116.109.177
I believe the added television interviews and press accounts meet the standards for notability. Also if you look at the page for the Under Secretary of Treasury, there's a red link missing waiting for Jim's page to be added.
19:22:00, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Marangros
Thanks very much. I've just added a lot of reviews from very serious sources including multiple NYtimes, Forbes, BBC, Rolling Stone, the observer, Kirkus (major publishing industry reviewer) and quite a few more.
Hope that helps!
20:09:17, 6 February 2017 review of submission by Aubiaubidee
- Aubiaubidee (talk · contribs)
You declined this article with the reasoning "this is simply what they would advertise to clients and it's unconvincing regardless of anything or anyone" however, it is not clear what is 'unconvincing', much less who is 'anything or anyone'. Please state coherent grounds for declining it, so that the problem can be fixed.
Also, you stated "examining the sources find they're only announcements and mentions". This did not reflect the facts at the time of the original submission, and even less so now. In the original submission, two reliable, independent sources were cited (namely Cleveland Encyclopedia and ASME), both showing that the subject of this article is both notable and worthy of inclusion. In the meantime, a second more detailed reference by ASME (which has a national audience) as well as a reference from Heartland Science (created by the Ohio Academy of Science) have been added. Both of these also discuss how the subject of this article is notable and worthy of inclusion.
Please accept the submission. Thank you for your time.
19:28:14, 7 February 2017 review of submission by Nbcarder
I just need some suggestions on how to find better references. Especially on information such as his career and education. Is the LinkedIn reference the main issue? Of the references I had, which ones are acceptable?
22:38:53, 7 February 2017 review of submission by MichaelLeeStever
HI there Twisted Sister,
Many thanks for the re-review, this is Michael Stever, (filmmaker) I am NOT the person who created this initial draft, nor am I the one who has amended it the last couple times. There is no (Present) need for a re-review as my team has not had a change to make any changes/updates so clearly it's a mute point until then. I did have just a couple questions regarding the submission protocol and I've not been able to get a solid enough answer from the person doing this for me so am reaching out to you myself. I realize that you want more 'high profile' pieces added to to this draft, which I actually am in the process of providing. To date myself or my team have just not had the chance as we've been swamped with work, and other obligations.
In the meantime, if you don't mind me showing you the two pieces I'd planned on adding, it would be HUGELY helpful if you could give a heads up if you thought these two following write-ups could be helpful in pushing my listing through... Here are the two mentiones in two nationally circulated, high-profile publications. BOTH of the below write-ups are relatively new...
FEATURED MENTION IN 'ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY' http://ew.com/article/2016/09/14/fearnyc-new-york-horror-film-festival/
FEATURED WRITE-UP 'FANGORIA' magazine http://www.fangoria.com/new/winners-highlight-video-revealed-for-fearnyc-festival/
Finally, TwistedSister... if I may humbly ask, Why do the rejection notices constantly and repeatedly say that the submissions need to be ABOUT ME, not BY ME? Most of these links and such are to write-ups in noteworthy, legitimate online publications, so I (nor the person doing this for me) are clearly understanding the particulars of this important bullet point. Can you PLEASE expand on this, so I/we know? I have NEVER had the question adequately answered, and clearly we need to better understand so my team can fine tune the draft to a most acceptable level... Is it that I need to ensure ALL links to anythings tied to my own website, (MichaelStever.net) need to be fully omitted? Am also in the dark on what does, or does NOT constitute as worthy information from IMDB, as I see COUNTLESS other wiki pages that list/feature IMDB content.
ALSO, I'm worrying that this existing draft will somehow be deleted, or permenantly removed if it gets enough 'rejection' notices, so PLEASE is there any way to ensure it NOT get re-reviewed anymore until myself and my team have time regroup, and re-edit, it would be sincerely appreciated,
thank you for ANY clues you have TwistedSister..
My mom's also about to pass, so have to brace for that which leaves this pretty low on the priority list, but SO SINCERELY appreciate any help or input you could offer,
Sincerely,
Michael Stever
23:25:33, 7 February 2017 review of submission by MichaelLeeStever
Apologies for the type-o's on your name SwisterTwister... Clearly I either need glasses, or am dyslexic and didn't know it,..
thank you for any thoughts/suggestions you can impart..
Michael Stever
00:29:45, 8 February 2017 review of submission by Swallis2014
- Swallis2014 (talk · contribs)
I am curious about the "notability"
Just clarifying... our having an award winning article in a peer reviewed journal does not rise to the level of "notable?"
Request on 00:52:41, 8 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by ankeet2580
- ankeet2580 (talk · contribs)
I have included news articles from venturebeat.com and fortune.com, both of which are major press outlets. Are these sufficiently important outlets?
Instead of previous articles Source now I added articles from thehindu.com and Medianama.com.
01:06:34, 9 February 2017 review of submission by Odri567
I translated, from the english to the spanish, and expanded the article about Rebecca Solnit. There is no spanish article about Rebecca Solnit in the Wikipedia. My article was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Rebecca Solnit instead". In english you have an article, which I did not edited, but in spanish there is nothing about the author. I am new in wikipedia and I do not know what to do, how is the correct procedure when you are translating an article from a language to another? Could you give me some information about the steps I need to follow right now?
Many thanks in advance.
16:28:56, 9 February 2017 review of submission by Mafar Band
- Mafar Band (talk · contribs)
can you please please harry up with reviewing the page? we need it for media reasons. i hope to get it soon, wikipedia and your name will be much appreciated and thanked
00:24:39, 10 February 2017 review of submission by Jalicandri
- Jalicandri (talk · contribs)
I think we got it - I hope. I edited the subject's career section to introduce the connection with the subject's books. I also added hyperlinks within some of the sections and other small edits. I've studied the subject for a while, so I think it's important to keep the critical aspects of the career history as they led to the books. Without the career section, then the subject didn't have the expertise to write the books. Thank you.
14:16:05, 10 February 2017 review of submission by Tammyleighkahn
Hi there -- this is my first time doing this, so I would appreciate any help you can give me! David is a regular on news media, from CNBC, to BNN, to Bloomberg, even the NY Times... i'm not sure how to craft a bio that ties all that in? Are there any examples of media people you can show me so I get it right?
09:00:01, 11 February 2017 review of submission by Webjectives
- Webjectives (talk · contribs)
Hi
Thanks for your feedback. I spent ages trying to cite everything on the page and thought it was on the right lines. I wonder if you would be so kind as to assist
I have added some references found on the web from Independent sources - is this the kind of thing I need to do to prove importance of the article ?
Sorry as a first attempt - I just need to get my head around this
From Van Morrisons Twitter page : https://twitter.com/vanmorrison/status/198010764987088896
Review of last years concert -http://entertainmenttoday.net/music/17341/2016/01/van-morrison-in-2016/
Passing Strangers - Tony Hadley[6] Article here : http://inter-jazz.com/web/artists/tony-hadley/
Paul is a Hi Profile musician and needs a page
Best wishes and thanks in advance
John
23:23:47, 11 February 2017 review of submission by Stephanie.sanz1932
I have added articles from the New York Daily and Time Out New York.
22:02:50, 14 February 2017 review of submission by Hammerheadman
Hello,
Just wanted to check why this article was rejected? We are starting to create Articles about Pool Players in Canberra, and this was a test account.
We would like to get it right before we proceed with others. Your assistance is much appreciated.
References
04:00:06, 17 February 2017 review of submission by Wilwyg
Could you explain what you're looking for?
08:08:13, 18 February 2017 review of submission by Calgarytech
- Calgarytech (talk · contribs)
I have read the Golden Rule and the requirements for significant comment from reliable sources but I do not understand what is missing to prove the notoriety of the one of the most controversial people in Alberta politics, the Mayor of Alberta's 14th largest city (Chestermere) Patricia Matthews: see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Patricia_Matthews_(politician)#cite_note-77 . Just today she was cleared of wrong doing in a year long Provincial investigation (see the last line AND the two cited independent media sources).
Is it that there are some references to 'smaller' sources like The Anchor (local newspaper) and if so should those references be removed? CBC, The Calgary Herald, The SUN, Global TV, 660 News and others are all very large scale media outlets that operate regionally or nationally with large well paid editorial staff. The article contains dozens of such references over controversies driven by Mayor Matthews and the "smaller' references help fill in the story so I would hate to remove them.
Your comments as to what is missing would be appreciated.
02:50:38, 19 February 2017 review of submission by Rknolton1
What would be the best way to fulfill the qualifications to get the article approved? After I have read your suggestions I still do not understand the rejection. I have added reference links to other pages for the notable entities. My links and references are from a university, a campaign webpage, as well as a major area newspaper. Please advise any possible solutions as this is my first submission.
Thank you
20:47:08, 19 February 2017 review of submission by 82.132.243.54
Requested addition by Council of Europe, project mention seen as notable in accordance with other similar listings, linked to other approved Wikipedia subjects and provides further explanation and insight for readers on international and regional projects. Please provide specification of defects requested or areas of further information,
05:58:44, 20 February 2017 review of submission by Coffeebagel
- Coffeebagel (talk · contribs)
Hello! I am new to editing Wikipedia (I have always been a regular user of course!). Thank you very much for all that you've contributed to the project. I am surprised that Susto the band is not notable enough for a page. They have two albums, were recently featured on CBS News, have been reviewed by local newspapers and music websites, and are about to go on tour with the Lumineers. I have seen them play at at packed venues twice. It seems odd to me that they would not have a page at this point.
10:02:56, 20 February 2017 review of submission by Nicholas Croucher
Hey Swister. Thanks for reviewing my page. I'm just wondering if you can help with a little more advice. I've asked in the live chat for some more advice (as I'm new to this) and been advised that the main reason is our page sounding like and advertisement (as you've suggested as well that it seem like a business listing). I've done my best to avoid that by only stating facts etc. but if this isn't the case (and if you have a chance) would you be able to help me understand if there was a specific section that is still in the wrong tone?
I only ask as there are two pages for competitor businesses that are similar (with the CD Baby one in particular even referencing their prices etc.)
I understand it's not a case of "They have a page so you get one too", just wondering if there is something I'm missing that makes theirs okay and the RouteNote one require changes. Apologies if this sounds argumentative (it's genuinely not written that way, but tone is hard to convey in text!).
Also, just in case you see this message before I manage to fix my user page, I am about to attempt to declare that I work for RouteNote (in case it wasn't already clear).
Thanks again.
Nick
14:09:41, 20 February 2017 review of submission by Nicholas Croucher
Hey Swister, Thanks again for taking the time to answer my questions and help me with this article. I see what you mean regarding the sources being merely mentions within articles. Do you think it would help if I removed the majority of the sources with the exception of the West Briton one (which is a specific article about RouteNote) and maybe the PC Mag one (as that is a guide for other aspiring musicians on how to upload music, one where the reviewer happens to use RouteNote)?
Also, if this would help, can we still keep the references to the websites that have reviewed us without specifically using the sources? Again, really appreciate your help with this. It's my first article submission for Wiki and want to get it right!
Nick
11:13:12, 21 February 2017 review of submission by Amitpandeys0281
Hi SwisterTwister
Could you please review my submission again.
Regards,
Decline of Draft:Ewald Arenz
Dear Swister Twister, thanks for having a look at the new article about Ewald Arenz. I can see that there is a problem with German and Italian sources, but those are partly printed and online encyclopaedia articles, secondary literature on the person and partly reviews by German TV and Radio stations. Since his works are increasingly published in other languages an English wikipedia site seems reasonable. Besides, there are already two articles on Ewald Arenz in the German and Arab Wikipedia. I have already and will add some more references if necessary.
18:45:49, 21 February 2017 review of submission by Jacksonpais
- Jacksonpais (talk · contribs)
Thank you for reviewing my article. I would like some help as to what I am missing. Thank you in advance
02:51:53, 22 February 2017 review of submission by MarkBarton
- MarkBarton (talk · contribs)
Thanks for the prompt review! I've added about 8 more references. I'll watch to see whether you feel that is adequate, or whether more are needed.
20:26:02, 23 February 2017 review of submission by CelticsFan203
I finished making the changes you talked about. I was wondering if you could take another look at my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ESA_Talent_Agency
03:00:04, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
What more information do I need to add for this page?
All of the sources are independent
03:06:37, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
Example of a major review please
03:12:46, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
Valley24 is the entertainment section if the Youngstown Vindicator newspaper and the Jambar is from Youngstown State University. Should I dig up reviews from the various cites from around the country the band has played? Any help is appreciated, Thanks!
03:16:40, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
FMMF is a major music festival. The announcement is from their website.
Should I include record labels?
03:27:35, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
I believe the rust belt chronicles is a verified news source in Ohio. The Jambar is THE news paper for YOungstown State University in Ohio and Valley 24 is the entertainment publication for the YOungstown Vindicator newspaper in Youngstown ohio. The Fashion Meets Music Festival lineup is an Official lineup with major acts on the bill. Please help
09:28:41, 27 February 2017 review of submission by Yingyi6
12:24:07, 28 February 2017 review of submission by Sabrinah75
- Sabrinah75 (talk · contribs)
Hi Swister Twister,
I have re-submitted my article few weeks ago and it is still pending. Would you have some time to spare and maybe look at the article and tell me if it looks good?
I am wondering why it is taking so long as this is my first publishing.
Thank you in advance! Sabrina
13:19:07, 28 February 2017 review of submission by 49.207.184.34
I have created a draft in the name of "Suresh Manickavelu". Please understand, I haven't created an article in the name of "Suresh Manickavelu", it is just a draft. Also I haven't submitted it for the review. Then why did you review it and declined. Anyone can have the wiki rights to create a draft. It is just a draft not article.
16:36:18, 28 February 2017 review of submission by Chukwuda
Hey Swister Twister, Kindly let me know what I'm doing wrong. I have updated the references many times as required.
Wikipedia:Article Submission declined
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the the information mentioned was somewhere looking like a advertisement. as per your instructions, i have remove all that information and updated my article. i have resubmit my article for your valuable review.
I would also like to inform you that i have provided the all required details and links to verify my article. i request you to please review it and accept it for wikipedia.
Looking for your responce
/* Wikipedia:Article Submission declined/Ghsimr1995 */
Wikipedia:Article Submission declined/Ghsimr1995
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the the information mentioned was somewhere looking like a advertisement. as per your instructions, i have remove all that information and updated my article. i have resubmit my article for your valuable review.
I would also like to inform you that i have provided the all required details and links to verify my article. i request you to please review it and accept it for wikipedia.
Looking for your responce
20:35:51, 1 March 2017 review of submission by CelticsFan203
Hello, I'm ready to be re-reviewed. I added more reliable sources to the page.
I'm curious how other talent agencies like "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICM_Partners" are able to have to have a page but I can not get this talent agency published?
01:26:38, 2 March 2017 review of submission by Elliecash89
- Elliecash89 (talk · contribs)
HI There, I'm just wondering which sources aren't reliable? All of them? I would have thought industry publications like these are OK: http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/news/2016-udia-nsw-awards-for-excellence-winners-announ
Thank you :)
01:34:11, 2 March 2017 review of submission by Elliecash89
- Elliecash89 (talk · contribs)
Ok thank you, understood. If i can't find any sources to back up certain points of this article, can I just remove the sections completely? :)
05:02:31, 2 March 2017 review of submission by DonioHinsley
- DonioHinsley (talk · contribs)
I was writing this request as to why you declined my article so I can personally know what corrections I can make to have my article posted for readers like my self can read.
14:05:13, 2 March 2017 review of submission by ElCaminoB
Hi
Thanks for taking the time to review this again, we'll get there eventually!
I understand what you say regarding the Custom Step sentence being too suggestive as an advertisement and have removed this sentence with the latest edit.
However, I'm not entirely clear on what you mean regarding your "starting company of the year" comment. El Camino Bracelets are not seeking funding or support, however, it'd be great to start with a basic Wikipedia page now, upon which can be added over time. The most similar company to El Camino Bracelets appears to be Pura Vida (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pura_Vida_Bracelets). If my latest edit does not pass, please could you give me a couple of pointers as to why the proposed El Camino Bracelets Wikipedia page would differ from their Wikipedia page, I am far from an expert in this area, however, when I compared the two, the basic principles appear to be very similar.
Thanks for your time,
David
22:42:28, 2 March 2017 review of submission by The1Fr33m4n
- The1Fr33m4n (talk · contribs)
Can you please explain in detail what I might need to add, as I am trying to expand upon the Mythos of the Saw Franchise, I don't see how this is unimportant, please I would really like to post this article for the people looking to find more information about the Saw characters.
17:25:20, 3 March 2017 review of submission by Pratham bhagudia
Hello
I would like to have this re reviewed as i think matthew is a very important individual who is very noteworthy and his band has a lot of influence. I am sorry if my references aren't good.
20:31:24, 4 March 2017 review of submission by 176.199.114.13
Hello
I am surprised that the article has been delined. This is a very specific aspect on postage stamps, namely their withdrawal. This is nowhere being mentioned or explained on the postage stamps wikipedia page. On the German Wikipedia, there is lots of specific stamp topics accepted beside a mainstream postage stamp article.
Didibebe
10:47:13, 5 March 2017 review of submission by 88.95.141.156
Added citations from multiple notable sources, including references to subject in USA Today, Vanity Fair, Yahoo! News, Entertainment Weekly, NPR, Perez Hilton, Vulture and more.
New Min-on edit
all reliable independent sources.
21:44:34, 5 March 2017 review of submission by Sharon Holdstock
Hi there,
I have stripped the article of anything which could be construed of opinion or unsubstantiated facts. Would you mind reviewing it please.
Regards, Sharon
21:57:33, 5 March 2017 review of submission by Sharon Holdstock
Hi again.
I am unable to find any "news" related information to support the article. I have however checked with governing bodies such as the Intellectual Property Office which is a government body https://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmcase/Results/1/UK00003135353 and Companies House https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08638142 which are both verifiable government bodies. Does that help? I would have thought if the source was verifiable like a government agency (i.e. IRS, FBI etc), that would supersede news publications. Is that not correct?
Regards, Sharon
17:28:50, 6 March 2017 review of submission by Shellnyce635
- Shellnyce635 (talk · contribs)
Hi SwisterTwister,
Thank you very much for reviewing the article.
The references I used are all from external media, not press announcements. We used similar references for the Wiki pages for Arie Belldegrun (Kite Pharma) and Jeremy Levin (Ovid Therapeutics). Are additional sources still required?
Looking forward to hearing back from you.
Thanks!
18:28:56, 6 March 2017 review of submission by Epone
Good afternoon, David! I am requesting a re-review of this article because I added the National and International tournaments that Ryan Gruhn fought in as requested, as well as some documentaries that he was featured in. Thank you for your time, I know you are really swamped!
05:53:53, 7 March 2017 review of submission by JulianAdams
- JulianAdams (talk · contribs)
I'm just not really sure what more notable reviews or write ups you are looking for. The Village Voice, Pazz and Jop, AllMusic, and Popmatters are some of the largest music publications in the business besides Rolling Stone and Spin. "We need all majorly published reviews" What does that mean? You need MORE of them, or you don't like the sources? Because the sources are very high profile and reliable sources- all of which were referenced in the references section.
12:35:45, 7 March 2017 review of submission by TMCornwell
- TMCornwell (talk · contribs)
---I wanted to make sure that I am on the correct path in creating the page for Woody Cornwell. There are many other articles (more recent) that I still need to add. But I wanted to know if I am on the right track with proving Woody's notability, influence, and achievements.
If you have any suggestions for improving the entry please let me know.
Thank you, ---Mark
23:53:33, 7 March 2017 review of submission by JohnWright877
Hi there, could you please give me further information how I can improve the page I submitted to increase the chance of it getting successfully approved. Thankyou
00:16:06, 8 March 2017 review of submission by E.balante
Can I ask why it is read as to advertising? I based it off of numerous other wikipedia articles. The sources include notable press coverage, university collaborations, and community outreach. I am trying to figure out what needs to be taken out in order to make it able to submit. If you could offer some insight that would be wonderful.
9 March 2017 review of submission by Karin Jam
Hello [SwisterTwister]]
Many Thanks for your comments on my draft article proposal on RL360°. I have updated the page and removed most of the content but I have to say I am very confused as to how my page was rejected even though my sources were from credible publications such as the FT, Bloomberg, Independent and the New York Times. What's more puzzling is that I based my article on other pages that are on Wikipedia. I can't understand how pages with very little content, citations and notability are approved, and the one I created was not. The company I am writing about has a long history in Life Assurance / Insurance and origins from the biggest players in the business who even note the company in their on wiki pages.
Can you please check my new draft and if you are still not happy can you provide more details about which sections are not sufficient? Really apprreciate your guideance. Karin Jam(talk) 09:57 8 March 2017
15:26:23, 9 March 2017 review of submission by 75.148.8.45
- 75.148.8.45 (talk · contribs)
Thanks so much for the review of this article - I really appreciate the quick turnaround, and your comments make sense. I have made several edits to the article, largely by removing content that seemed overly editorialized or advertisement-like; does this come closer to the appropriate level of objectivity?
Please let me know if there are any specific pieces of feedback that might be helpful to consider.
Lastly, and in the interest of full disclosure, I want to alert you to the fact that I am an outside consultant working with MedSkl.com to support their outreach efforts, and am developing this Wikipedia page as a part of that work. If the page should be submitted, or otherwise verified, by a third-party validator instead of by me or by the MedSkl.com team, please let me know and I will take the appropriate measures.
And thanks again!
22:21:16, 9 March 2017 review of submission by Dchaissejohnsier
Can you please review my article that you left feedback on
22:51:52, 9 March 2017 review of submission by Nagarajan08
- Nagarajan08 (talk · contribs)
The biographical article is about a permanent civil servant in India, of a level equivalent to a Brigadier-General in the armed forces or Senior Executive Service in the US. Most of thee references are from The_Times_of_India, The_Hindu which are the largest and 2nd largest selling English newspapers in India which are independent of the person, and official sources available on the Internet. He is particularly notable for winning India's award for excellence in Public Administration which only 5-10 people from over 8 million civil servants get each year. Please reconsider.
04:20:41, 11 March 2017 review of submission by Bartholomewjojosimpson
Hello SwisterTwister - just wanted to clarify the reason for the submission being decline - the reason stated "What establishes notability is museum collections or major art reviews." makes sense for someone who is solely artist, my question is how does one prove notability as an art blogger/personality? Thanks for the help, I am new to Wikipedia.
20:56:00, 12 March 2017 review of submission by Icosan6
I don't know how much more independent evidence of a person's notability you can have than the awards received, with citations and reference s to the awarding organization's websites, including the U.S. National Academy of Engineering and patents issued as independently verifiable on the USPTO website. Nevertheless, I've added further documentation with references to two published histories of the laser, from the National Academy Press and the Optical Society of America. If these are not independent evidence of notability, I must request a different reviewer.
23:28:50, 13 March 2017 review of submission by OIBUR0802
Could I submit this as a stub?
Thanks oibur0802
03:33:10, 14 March 2017 review of submission by 184.161.114.110
It's the real article
21:09:13, 14 March 2017 review of submission by John Vazquez
- John Vazquez (talk · contribs)
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Our article follows closely the set up for another Advertising notable - Lee Garfinkel, who's wiki entry has 13 references vs 18 for Gary.
Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. The sources we have quoted are reliable and independent of Gary - they are The New York Times, AdWeek, The Wall Street Journal, among others. They fall in line with the references that Lee Garfinkel's entry uses, and are organizations of note, and the information they support is verifiable.
If there are questions about the content within the entry, please elaborate, and if you have any suggestions to make it more robust, I would love to hear them.
Thanks!
22:09:03, 14 March 2017 review of submission by Jperrylo
Hi there. Please note that I did include newspaper articles and other reliable sources and I have added them below. Please advise if these are acceptable.
https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/2015/10/31/arts-awards-celebrate-peter-herrndorfs-legacy.html https://www.rcmusic.ca/connecting/rcm-blog/conservatory-students-excel-radio-canada-music-competition http://www.cmcnational.com/en/select/nouv/index.php?id=7759 http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/arts/chroniques/richard-therrien/201601/11/01-4938721-pas-de-juge-mechant-a-virtuose.php http://www.mississauga.com/whatson-story/4577379-music-prodigies-advance-to-national-finals/ http://www.cbcmusic.ca/posts/11704/30-hot-canadian-classical-under-30-2016 https://www.caledonenterprise.com/news-story/6132659-young-musicians-rally-to-raise-funds-to-help-peers/
I also have the magazine that she was published in.
Magazine is "ON THE UP", and the publisher is Winkreative located in Toronto. www.winkreative.com. She was featured in their Spring 2016 edition.
20:50:36, 15 March 2017 review of submission by Layre035
I am requesting a re-review as the band I made the page for is not internationally known, but are quite notable in Canada. They get a lot of air time, and I believe the references do show this.
22:02:38, 15 March 2017 review of submission by ChrisSimandl
- ChrisSimandl (talk · contribs)
Hello SwisterTwister(?)
I'm having a hard time understanding what you mean by: "I'm willing to accept".... and "but it specifically needs all additional significant independent sourcing; notability cannot be inherited from others."...
I've personally been through a couple of Fintech (& other (ie: Insurtech)) accelerators. These (& consulting companies (ie: PwC, KPMG, Accenture, Deloite Touche, etc.)) have referred to other such tech groups as retailTech, RegTech (Regulatory), PeerTech, and others.
My difficulty is in finding veritable references that specific expression... but it will emerge.
Please let me know if still "willing to accept" my explanation.
regards, Chris
10:59:58, 16 March 2017 review of submission by JinJeongHan
- JinJeongHan (talk · contribs)
Can you explain to me how the page "[is] too suggestive of an advertised business profile for clients, not an encyclopedia article and notability cannot be inherited" for me please?
18:28:09, 16 March 2017 review of submission by Sophocles1
- Sophocles1 (talk · contribs)
Hello, the original decline feedback was warranted and I took it into account in this draft. I found more relevant and notable sources, as well as significantly restructured the article to primarily focus on the development/growth timelines rather than the offerings/structure.
19:09:57, 16 March 2017 review of submission by Ciretyp
Requesting a re-review as Hive has gained notability by way of user reviews and integration platform launches.
21:10:43, 16 March 2017 review of submission by Iblotter
Do I need to add more references? What do I need to get this page live?
16:47:38, 17 March 2017 review of submission by Franboard90
- Franboard90 (talk · contribs)
Thank you for taking the time to review my article about Julian Treasure. It’s a shame that you feel the article is unacceptable, and I’d like to discover how I can address the issues that you’ve raised.
Notability
There is significant interest in Julian’s work (such as decreasing crime rates in cities). This is represented by features in the world’s press - publications such as TIME Magazine, The BBC, The Economist, The Guardian, CNN, The Daily Mail, Vogue and The New York Times. His work has even been written about in a dedicated article on the front page of The Wall Street Journal.
I cannot understand how the article has been rejected partly on the grounds that “Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject” given that these are some of the biggest publications in the world.
Julian is also a recognised public speaker and educator. He has trained thousands of people in-person all over the world about sound and communication, and an estimated 40 million people have watched his online videos. One of Julian’s TED talks is in the 10th most watched of all time, and he’s also one of only nine people who have five talks on TED.com - others are Bill Gates, Thomas Dolby and Hans Rosling.
Whilst I appreciate that success at TED alone may not warrant a Wikipedia page, it is a strong demonstration of the popularity of his teaching and the innovation of his ideas.
“PR advertising” It was not the intention that this article read as a PR piece. Perhaps this came about partly from the fact that Julian’s company is marketing based - it’s potentially hard to highlight the significant fact that a company has increased sales, however innovative the nature of the work, without sounding like a PR article.
Secondly, as this is my first attempt at writing a Wikipedia article, it was focussed solely on facts and figures and this may have led to a lack of narrative and relevance to the piece.
Most importantly, Julian’s mission that runs throughout all his work is to “make the world sound beautiful”, and I intend to focus on this in subsequent edits.
Suggestions
I hope that this message has explained how Julian and his work is notable. I therefore suggest the following:
- I will re-write the article with more focus on narrative and relevance (see above) to tie everything together. Should I create a separate article about The Sound Agency including clients, awards etc?
- Should I remove or keep information about Julian's publishing career? He founded a notable company and received multiple recognised awards during that period; this article for those who are interested to check him out, so his background is surely relevant?
- Should I remove or keep information about his music career? This is always of interest to people who want to know from Julian “how did you get into sound?”
- I will remove reference to him being an author in the main summary. I understand that he is not widely recognised for this, and will instead mention his book only briefly. (He is currently working on a new book to be published late in 2017 and aimed at a much wider consumer audience, so this will probably change in time.)
- I can include more on the training work and workshops that Julian has done at conferences and events internationally. A lot of these are notable.
- How do I ensure 'high quality' references to publications? What are the standards? Surely major media like The Times and the BBC are high quality? Are there specific references that are degrading the standard and should be removed?
- I can add more detail about his work... how it is innovative - techniques and technology, core ideas etc, if this is useful.
I look forward to receiving your feedback, along with anything else that you think will make the article acceptable.
Many thanks.
Question on article on Brigadier General Norman L. Cooling
I fleshed out the references as requested.
The subject Marine is mentioned in another Wiki article on the war in Afganistan. I would assume that the link to this article can't be made until it is approved?
23:25:08, 19 March 2017 review of submission by Zingasvryka
- Zingasvryka (talk · contribs)
I believed that IMDB records are a significant enough independent listing, and the extensive list of professional publications that Mr. Glenn has sold to.
As a writer he's written and sold a number of novels. As a stunt choreographer he has an extensive list of file credits. I'm not sure I understand how these are not significant?
02:32:04, 20 March 2017 review of submission by Cwtyler
Request for reconsideration: The rejection of this article does not take account of the fact that this artist is already the subject of a Wikipedia page in Bulgarian: https://bg.wikipedia.org/Иван Вукадинов. This was not previously cited, but the English page under consideration is essentially mirroring the existing Bulgarian page. It is therefore inappropriate to dismiss the English page as not meeting the criteria for significance.
In response to the comments about the reliability and independence of the sources of this article, this article was sourced by no fewer than four independent Bulgarian and one Italian author, publishing in English, German, Italian and Bulgarian, all of which describe the artist in glowing terms. Moreover, he is the subject of not one but two individual artist biographical surveys by the National Gallery of Art in Sofia, the central authority on Bulgarian art. By dismissing these as reliable sources, the reviewer is essentially dismissing the entire country of Bulgaria as a reputable and independent assessor of artistic merit and applying a narrow, Anglo-American definition of source relevance to the Wikipedia selection procedure. The number of referenced sources has now been nearly doubled.
I should point out that the primary source that is cited is an extremely reputable book about the artist by the doyenne of art critics in Bulgaria, Distinguished Professor Aksinia Dzhurova, who is completely independent of the artist in question. This art authority is Director of the Bulgarian Center for Slavic and Byzantine Studies, a positon she has held for four decades since 1986, and has an international reputation as indicated by her visiting professorships at the universities of Yale (USA), Jerusalem (Israel), the Sorbonne (France) and the Institute for Eurasian Studies (Italy). She has also been honored as a Foreign Member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU). She is the author of 25 books and hundreds of publications and on Medieval culture, Slavic and Byzantine art, Slavic codicology and Modern art. She is therefore unquestionably an established, reliable authority on the standing of Eastern European artists, and is completely independent of the artist (as am I).
A revised version of the page has been prepared, itemizing further activities and world recognition of this important artist.
17:01:14, 20 March 2017 review of submission by WilHutton
Hello,
I'm writing this current Wikipedia article as there is a lack of knowledge regarding the AMAR foundation. I understand that Wikipedia has strict guidelines regarding writing, however, I was wondering if there is any information (specific) that I should omit in order to write a successful article?
Additionally, while the notability Wikipedia page was really helpful, I still fail to understand which source would be useful? In the UK, news papers like the Sun/the Mirror are considered tabloid and should not be noteworthy news, but would Wikipedia consider these papers worthy of reference?
Thank you in advance,
WH
04:42:24, 21 March 2017 review of submission by JoeySylerJush
Request assistance for help regarding Terence Tan's draft.
Good Afternoon, I have been rejected twice and would like to find out from you which part seems very advertising. Is there any parts that requires urgent changes, so as to be accepted? Do let me know. ThankYou!
08:17:29, 21 March 2017 review of submission by Marthalewis
- Marthalewis (talk · contribs)
Hi!
I understand there were some sources "close" to the artist. I've put other sources, all independent from him and left the "problematic" ones out (iTunes listings, blogs, etc.).
Basically there would be two reasons to include him:
- He's been #1 on an International Independent Music chart, compiled with radio airplay of more than 90 countries.
- He's been nominated for the "independent Grammys" in Spain with his album.
He also has a long discography but I understand that's not reason enough to include him here.
Please let me know your thoughts! This is my first article and I'd like to write more after this one :)
Thank you!
How to decline and accept a draft
Hi, I know you've been declining and accepting drafts for a very long time. I've read on the Wikipedia page on how to accept and decline drafts but I still don't understand it. I was hoping you could help me understand in your own words. Thanks
17:36:41, 21 March 2017 review of submission by TTRECORDS
Hi I'm getting in touch to see what other information I can provide for my artist to be considered for Wikipedia. I do have more press reviews and quotes from promo reports from Dj's etc
We included local newspaper articles about his radio station KIK RADIO links to other Wikipedia pages of the artists he produced for example promise has credited our producer on the album credits of an album that was released on e 1 entertainment / duck down music.
Thanks Andrew gribbon
22:14:35, 21 March 2017 review of submission by Shimitron
I would like to know if the additional LA Times citations provide sufficient independent evidence of Maria's noteworthiness. Apologies, clearly I am new to this. -Simon Fraser
01:15:52, 22 March 2017 review of submission by E.balante
Hey swister I Made several new edits and solved the notability with new references from several reputable publications. If you could take a look at it and let me know what you think that would be great. Also if it is still not good enough can you please tell me what it needs? I have looked at other space wiki pages such as SpaceX and Deep Space Industries and I followed their formatting and the content that they have in their pages is the same as the content in the Saber Page just with more intellectual property.
Request on 15:30:30, 22 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by WGH Schmitt
- WGH Schmitt (talk · contribs)
<To reviewer’s talk page
Hallo Swister Twister
Your comment on my submission: Carl Simon Fried
I would like to continue working on the submission. Resubmission will be much shorter and changed substantially.
First, I will study the “golden rule” and the “guidelines on the notability of people”. I was not aware of the fact that it was necessary to speak about the notability of Carl Fried as a scientist. Subsequently I did not provide enough information about his Textbook from 1941 and all the medical authorities who noted where Fried had worked as a pioneer. My text focused on the political circumstances, which had interrupt his scientific activities
Thanks for help
WGH Schmitt
>
WGHS
07:11:45, 24 March 2017 review of submission by Adharmaha
Hi,
I am writing on behalf of the Rekhta Foundation. Our draft has been rejected thrice now despite edits being made on our end. Please throw some light on exactly where we are going wrong so we can get this page up. As for the concern that we are only three years old, we would request you to let us know what kind of sources would make us look more credible. We have been covered by a major section of the media as well academic journals, kindly suggest on what you think are the best sources to be listed.
Thank you!
11:38:44, 24 March 2017 review of submission by I.lebediev
- I.lebediev (talk · contribs)
24 March, 3.23 pm → Concerning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johannes_Susen
Hello SisterTwister,
thanks for your helpful contributions.
Today I removed the blog links and put in a link to the website of the Germen news-tv-station n-tv.
Iam still working to get more Wikipedia-relevat links and also for some pictures and sourches which underline the international aspects of Susen's work. I think, I will need some days more ... if that's okay! So far I will remove the blog links at first and continue later!
Have a nice weekend! (:o)
18:31:54, 24 March 2017 review of submission by Stevedr83
We're going to be completing the Carousel in June 2017, I was hoping to start a new wiki page. Any suggestions would be helpful. Here is our website. www.albanycarousel.com
23:08:38, 24 March 2017 review of submission by 186.179.182.222
Please allow my article on the Suriname Standards Bureau? I have added new references...
23:14:04, 24 March 2017 review of submission by Mahraandbushra
I really want this article to go be published, i just want you to make it more clear to me that what did i do wrong is it the way i did the citation? can you tell me please specifically what i need to do. Because some of the information i have i got from the actual director via email is that possible? please i need to know what to do exactly thank you.
07:34:41, 26 March 2017 review of submission by 2A02:C7D:8495:B100:E14F:2CCC:2428:571
I have compiled a list of references to notable people using thortspace.
https://medium.com/thortspace/articles-and-mentions-of-thortspace-by-independent-writers-and-reviewers-edc006ebcd3d#.4dvwpof9o
Could you say if this will be enough to pass if I resubmit?
18:42:53, 26 March 2017 review of submission by Bluetele
I'm such a newbie and Wikipedia is complicated for me, that I don't know if I'm communicating correctly. Your latest comment asked that "major independent news" organizations be used in references. However, we are a small 501 (c)3 organization in a small town, barely surviving on donations. Our local newspaper has 1 1/2 pages of local news each day, so the chances of getting "major independent news" references are just about non-existent. Do have any suggestions?
We put this page together since we found several Wikipedia pages that reference our organization, but a click on those links took a reader nowhere. We thought we were helping Wikipedia be more comprehensive and could get our story referenced too. If you think our submission is going nowhere, I'm willing to withdraw it.
Thanks.
12:43:09, 27 March 2017 review of submission by 106.208.190.208
Sir, I have updated the draft of "Thomas Kuzhinapurath" pls consider it.
13:30:22, 27 March 2017 review of submission by 106.208.190.208
01:49:16, 29 March 2017 review of submission by Josephgalasso
Dear SwisterTwister (is it David?) my current (today's) submission of Prof. <Andrew Radford> has been denied based on notability. Could we please use the same criterion which was used and passed for his accepted Spanish-Wiki page? The question is : why his Spanish notability should outrank his English notability? This second attempt of Andrew Radford should only be seen in the light of a translation from Spanish to English (the dominant language of his scholarly works), and to add updated materials.
thanks so much. joseph
Request 30 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Rdigiglio
Hi, hope I'm doing this right. You had left feedback on my submission, OvO, to add more sources/reviews. I have since added more and am hoping this will be sufficient, but welcome any further suggestion. Thank you!
23:40:10, 29 March 2017 review of submission by Lubumbashimedia
I'm requesting a re revieW because there is everything you asked for and there is a fact you shoud understand that because there is no news papers businesses in Congo, it doesn't mean thinks are not happening. I feel like because my country is poor no body cares about what we living or what we have representing the real street art in lubumbashi/katanga/R.D Congo but you only focus on the guys that has opportunity to make it in europ. While there are hero out here that are not recognize because you choose not to. I believe the article is perfect, but since you know what is wrong is there a way of fixing it for US? Because you have all the infos necessary in the article.. thank you
20:56:53, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Yonikasz
I believe that I used a selection of sources independent of the company. I only used press releases to find exact dates of openings and other figures for the company, I never used it for public reception, or rankings. I primarily used business journals and independent news. I would like to understand in more detail what I need for more high quality sources.
23:25:43, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Added a few more news articles. 14 probably enough, but many more will be added once it is public
23:31:56, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Sorry, but isn't it a work in progress? Others will add. I picked afew of the main ones, but really cannot see myself putting in all news articles. There are probably 500 or 1000
23:42:27, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Added two more articles. It is now up to 16. Tell me what is enough
00:36:27, 1 April 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Ok thete are how 19 articles and a few added and very significant. Hope it works. Thanks
09:33:11, 1 April 2017 review of submission by TGSTINT
How are sources from world-famous and established newspapers as nytimes, theguardian or music-relevant pages like mtv or discogs are NOT reliable. What more reliable sources about a musician can there be than from newspapers everyone has heard from and world famous music pages?? I used well know newspapers or music papers for the general information and well know music databases or the music label/musician websites themself for the discography. Most of these pages even have a wikipedia article themselves... I am sorry - but when i compare this to the pages that the reviewer wrote himself - they are much less and proper referenced. There is also an artist in the list where the reviewer used exactly the same unreliable sources (mtv etc.). I may have not been writing about very well known artist - In fact i think this is the main reason.. But i wrote about one who worked with artist on albums and with producers who achieved Platinum status (often several times) - and i spend a lot of time viewing, comparing and chossing references. And to make the decline even more funny: there is a wikipedia article with a cricketeer of the same name which goes like" Jennifer Turner (born 5 September 1969) is a New Zealand former cricketer." Then one reference. And that was it. So - if i shorten my article to its first sentence "Jennifer Turner is a singer/songwriter musician and producer." and link to one "reliable source" (instead of several...) - guess it is ok and can be approved?
I may agree that the general look can be polished - but sources not reliable?? If so the reviewer himself used those unreliable sources and should decline some of the articles he has on his userpage...
So to recap: it would be kind to point out which sources are the ones who are supposed to be unreliable.
11:56:20, 1 April 2017 review of submission by I.lebediev
- I.lebediev (talk · contribs)
Hello.Thank you for your comment to my article.Actually all links in this articleAre independent reviews from popular Ukrainian internet resources. Could you be so kind to mark those which you considered not reliable. Thank you.
20:40:47, 1 April 2017 review of submission by TGSTINT
As comment to my improvments you wrote:
"The same listed guideline also says that the listed profiles such as MTV, Bandcamp, Discogs, etc. must be removed as they are not independent or significant; while there are now headlines for the journalists, those alone are simply not enough to satisfy WP:Notability (music). Basically these profile-like sources only exist to confirm it exists, but not notability, and especially since anyone can make their own profile, it wouldn't be notable. "
No it does not!
First: MTV is already removed before the second review as mtv updated their page and i couldnt find the artist page anymore. Which tells me the commentor didnt really check the links.
Second: All the links i did not comment further so far are ONLY related to the discography - so mainly Databases LIKE Discogs. The link you refer to refers to creating a WHOLE ARTICLE of an Album, song or whatnot - not a discography INSIDE and as part of an article in which the NOTABILITY or the artist is already proven by 17 references.
Also Discogs - cleary fulfills the criteria of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Recordings - as it is not related to the musician, label or whatever. You can even see on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discogs. Significance is a word easily thrown - What makes That it is one of the biggest sources available. To underline this: in articles that probably are reviewed numerous times - like those of a small band called the Beatles Discogs CAN BE FOUND as reference.
So - the person itself is already shown to be notable by 17 references spanning the musical carrer. Also no guidline disproves Discogs and other used sources for beeing wrong for the usage on the discography inside this article - even more you can find sources like these in discographys of some of the worlds most famous artists. Just to be sure i gave the Discography of Elvis Presley a try: and again - discogs can be found. 2 out of 2. So either everyone reviewing this articles is wrong. Or i am right in using those references. So please accept my well researched article.
SwisterTwister talk 20:4011, 1 April 2017 (UTC)}}
18:35:39, 1 April 2017 review of submission by Arni27q
~I have some difficulties finding the right sources. What I could find I've already cited. I'd happily recieve some tips what sources I could cite furthermore (like seasons or episodes of the series?).~
Request on 21:00:35, 1 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Abigailwise
- Abigailwise (talk · contribs)
Thank you very much for explaining. I have, however, added several additional sources from local and national publications.
01:00:49, 3 April 2017 review of submission by Edenmeyer11
- Edenmeyer11 (talk · contribs)
There seems to be a request for verifiable articles on the topic. I am soooooo very new to this! This is an original script. I am trying to create this page to surprise my high school students who were the original cast in this production. This script is not, as of yet, published. I simply want to create a minor gift for those seniors who will be graduating soon. This is my script, my production, in my high school. Not sure how to verify beyond that. Any help is appreciated.
Request on 05:33:30, 4 April 2017 for assistance on AfC
Hello SwisterTwister,
thanks for the speedy evaluation. Could you please elaborate more on the reason for rejection? I would like to work on it and resubmit it.
Is the reason for rejection:
- You do not consider him a notable person although his has collaborated with other notable persons and has received medals, or
- The sources that are mentioned are not considered reliable?
Your reply would be appreciated.
Thank you
00:28:55, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Eugenious monk
I have added major independent sources; for example Optics.org. That Thomas Furness is considered the inventor of VR and VRD is an important historical milestone. The company's history dates back twenty years. Since then, the company's technology and it's significance has become part of our current vocabulary.
12:32:02, 5 April 2017 review of Unigma Draft by CorbuleacM
- CorbuleacM (talk · contribs)
Hello SwisterTwister,
I've included more relevant information about Unigma LLC and created this Draft. I want to publish it. What do you think?
Thank you very much,
20:40:02, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Vinmeister
- Vinmeister (talk · contribs)
Hi! Just wondering if you could offer some advice n how I can improve my article. I removed some of the less reputable sources, and added a section on film reviews from more reputable publications (Village Voice, Criterion, Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, etc.) Is there anything else I can contribute or edit to the article to help get it approved? Thanks!
22:21:12, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Massive1111
- Massive1111 (talk · contribs)
More than a miliiom plays is not notoriety? Ok. Delete the article please. Thank you.
08:27:11, 6 April 2017 review of submission by Lisybil
Hi SwisterTwister, I have re-edited the draft and re-submitted for review. Would you please check and let me know if you have any other question?
Mr. Wu is a legendary entrepreneur and businessman in Hong Kong, also a famous investor within the film and entertainment industry in the US. He has an approved Wikipedia page in Traditional Chinese (link) and I am now helping to create an English page for him.
Thanks.
16:08:38, 6 April 2017 review of submission by DayanaFabiche
Dear SwisterTwister, I saw your comment, I think I have addressed the source issue, I used sources that are not related or link back to the company in any way, but going off on your comment about the 5000 list, the link provided doesn't link to the full list, it links to what the company's standing is on that list (for the most current year and all previous years). If you could take a look at the sources again, I would greatly appreciate it (I have changed almost all of them, I evidently had to leave the ones where I got the most basic company information, everything else I changed)
Thanks again
20:25:57, 6 April 2017 review of submission by Jensen.evan
- Jensen.evan (talk · contribs)
Help me out here. How is this submission really any different than this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedBrick_Health Includes outside sources to verify and substantiate any claims and contributions Dr. Hall has made to public health.
23:17:28, 7 April 2017 review of submission by Robbieboy123
- Robbieboy123 (talk · contribs)
Hi there, I have reviewed your rejection comments and have revised the page and now provided better (notable) sources for the information detailed. I'm sure this should now satisfy your requirements. Many thanks.
06:47:32, 9 April 2017 review of submission by Sharyn Finnegan
The reviewer said I did not indicate major reviews which was not correct as I indicated Kramer had reviews in the NY Times, ARTnews, and Art in America, in addition to being in a major anthology of feminist artists. I have added some of the museums her work has been shown in. I wondered if the reviewer noted that Kramer peers, the people she worked on and often led, as feminist artist pioneers all have Wikipedia websites already. Pesilikis showed less than she has.
Second opinion on Draft:Hannah Grace
Hi, it's me again 
. I was wondering your opinion on Draft:Hannah Grace? I think that having references from the BBC and (lesser so) the daily star definitely make it interesting and, barring a copyvio check (which I can't do easily on mobile but will when I am at my PC) returning that it is in violation/plagiarized, I would be tempted to accept it personally. It has some grammar issues/typos but are quite minor and I would be tempted to just fix myself and would not consider a deal breaker acceptance wise. What are your thoughts on it?
Thanks as always for your time --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor Yes, I see the sources but additional ones would certainly help too. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- So would you decline it for the time being saying to add more reliable references etc or? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor Currently declining to allow additional sources would be good. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 03:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your time! Is your opinion the same for the one below? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion on Draft:Subterfuge (game)
What do you think of Draft:Subterfuge (game)? I am thinking that it is possibly acceptable and the having Polygon (and to a lesser extent, Gamasutra) as a references does seem to indicate at least some notability to the game. Would like to see more on the level of Polygon as well though. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- In this case TheSandDoctor it's not enough major news coverage. Cheers,
SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response! Hope you dont mind my asking you these sorts of questions when I come across them and am unsure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion on Draft:Rosenbaum Contemporary
What is your opinion on Draft:Rosenbaum Contemporary? I am thinking it possibly notable but am unsure as to if Art of the Times is a reputable source or which sources might be. Your thoughts are welcome. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor Yes, I wasn't sure about that one, but I think because of the article weight, there's enough to accept but, first additional significant sources would especially help. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- I left an AFC comment on it and marked it as no longer under review. I might work on it myself as the editor appears inactive. It depends what I can dig up (although I can't do it tonight as it is getting pretty late here). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion request on Draft:Adam Armstrong
On my talk page the editor who created the draft has brought it to my attention that the essay-like wording has been addressed and I said that I would get a second reviewer to take a look at it and get their opinion on it. I was wondering what you think of Draft:Adam Armstrong? I also said in my response that more/additional noteworthy citations tend to be a good way to go. The draft is interesting and does appear to have some good references behind it, although only one is digital. Copyvio isn't loading the page for me so I am not sure on its results at this time. Discussion on my talk page: User_talk:TheSandDoctor#Adam_Armstrong_pioneer_settler_Dalkeith_Western_Australia --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor Yes, and I agree, so it's currently unacceptable. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input. What is your exact reasoning though (so I can better explain to the IP user who brought this up and for my own curiousity)? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor No claims of notability and no signs of a formatted encyclopedia article. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks once again for the input! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion request on Draft:Ty J. Young
Hi again, I was wondering if I could get your input on Draft:Ty J. Young? I think that it would benefit from all additional sourcing however am 'on the fence' as to if it should be accepted or declined. What is your take on it? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input - based on your recommendation I declined the page as an ad with a comment to refer to the below AFC comments/messages. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion request on Draft:Darez Ahamed
Hi again, I was just wondering if I could get your input on Draft:Darez Ahamed? They left a message on my talk page asking why it is not notable pointing to other articles that exist on Wikipedia of similar stature. Thanks again for your time! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion request on Draft:Sheeba Ameer
What do you think of Draft:Sheeba Ameer? The user who created it has posted on my talk page asking for another opinion on the draft and any pointers to improve it in the event that it is not ready. Some of the citations/references do appear interesting but I am not sure if they are enough. Apparently for the books section they were unable to find any references either (see this section). What are your thoughts on it? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor It's unlikely from that page she's notable, because the sources are simply not significant. SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your input on the draft. I have linked the creator to this thread as well so they can ask anything that they may be wondering in connection to this should they choose. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Second opinion request on Draft:Gargoyle (band)
Hi there, I was wondering what you thought of Draft:Gargoyle (band)? It is translated by the draft creator from the Japanese Wikipedia. I am thinking that it is potentially good enough to accept however more independent/notable/reliable sources are typically always a good thing to add. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor Ah yes, it would need additional significant news since some of the sources are simply listed discographies or notices. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 03:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- That was a quick response! Thanks as always for your help! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- That was a quick response! Thanks as always for your help!
Second opinion request on Draft:Guenter Mokulys
Hi again, I was wondering what your thoughts are on Draft:Guenter Mokulys? Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- TheSandDoctor Hello again and, yes, I remember this one; the sources are simply not significant enough. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
05:49:24, 10 April 2017 review of submission by 181.47.215.190
I don't understand what you mean by "notability can not be inherited". Could you explain? This is my first article ever and I'm writing it because it was weird to find that there was only a spanish article in Wikipedia regarding Gonzalez.
Please bear in mind that in my submission: There are references to articles regarding González' work in cultural supplements of all major Argentinean written press: Clarin, Pagina 12, La Nacion. There is a link to a video interview from the Argentinean national TV network (Encuentro is a public signal from the Ministry of Culture: http://encuentro.gob.ar/) There are links to interviews in two highly renowned radio broadcasts in Argentina (Radio Metro, Radio Vorterix). There is a link to a disclosure by Argentinean Embassy in Germany regarding Gonzalez' visit to Berlin to show his work.
Certainly he is not internationally renowned, but his local renown is comparable to many other countercultural artists that do have a profile in Wikipedia. As an example, and for the sake of their similarities, take the case of the Brazilian writer Ferrez.
According to Wikipedia's guidelines for notability (in bold those criteria met by Gonzalez):
Basic criteria: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7] Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
Criteria for authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:
The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
request for Marcello Aliprandi Article submission by stefanianj
Hi, I am kind of new to wiki. My Article for Marcello Aliprandi, you decliened, is a translation from an original article in the italian wiki (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcello_Aliprandi). Translations of the article already exist in many other languages such as spanish, french and german. I thought it would be a nice thing to have it in English as well since Aliprandi had directed english speaking actors such as academy award winner Martin Balsam and Orson Wells and he certainly meets notability criteria. I did not know how to place the tags on top of the article to show that it was a translation. There are many articles on the interent and books referencing Aliprandi but I was not trying to write an original article but just post a translation of the original Italian article. The original article reference for example a work by Tullio Kezich who is a very noted italian film critic. I still need to add the filmography and the imdb reference. Please help. I look forward to your input. Stefanianj 09:42 04/11/2017 UTC
14:15:57, 11 April 2017 review of submission by Bapo224
Hi SwisterTwister,
A couple of days ago you rejected our draft of a page about Chris Lovasz, and we have since improved the draft. We have added a lot of information and third party sources including (but not limited to) the Telegraph, PCGamesN and TenEighty magazine. We are of the belief that Chris Lovasz is quite notable as he has a large fanbase and a large amount of self produced content. he is, in our humble opinions, much more notable than a bunch of youtubers that do already have a wikipedia page such as a number of SourceFed hosts like William Haynes just to name an example. And equally notable as fellow Yogscast members Hat Films.
We hope that you will look at the draft again from a fair and just view and possibly provide us with feedback to improve our page. Thank you in advance,
The community from /r/sips on Reddit.
15:24:27, 11 April 2017 review of submission by Failingtoad
- Failingtoad (talk · contribs)
Iron Chef Gauntlet is just an notable as other Iron Chef shows which already have Wikipedia articles. What further information is needed? Thank you.
19:23:01, 11 April 2017 review of submission by Jonatanmiller
Are these ones supportive and sufficient to show the organization is notable? Would I just include them in the footnotes?
https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/2013/02/04/star_gets_action_health_canada_announces_new_standard_for_reporting_side_effects.html http://www.muskokaregion.com/news-story/6240910-string-of-surprise-inspections-at-nursing-home-in-huntsville/ http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/time-to-lead/falling-seniors-a-preventable-problem-a-huge-health-burden/article581344/
13:43:06, 12 April 2017 review of submission by Jonatanmiller
Ok, thanks - I can start with those as basis of the content. When you say we would need all additional news - can you please clarify? Searching Google News for "Accreditation Canada" returns over 600 results. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=ca&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q="accreditation+canada"
Thank you in advance for the clairifation!
19:43:34, 12 April 2017 review of submission by Gmmgarro12
- Gmmgarro12 (talk · contribs)
Hi! I was wondering if you could give me some pointers on how best to find relevant source material for my topic which was rejected, the Downtown Lincoln Association. I have lots of newspaper mentions and stories from modern times, but most of the history of the organization (which is linked with the history of the city itself) is in newspaper archives behind a paywall. I'm a total wiki newbie here so I'm just trying to figure out what exactly I should be aiming for here. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much!
05:10:01, 13 April 2017 review of submission by Nirajjvyas
- Nirajjvyas (talk · contribs)
The page Christine Merline was not accepted due to a lack of 'notability.' Christine Merlin is a relatively young scientist but has made some monumental discoveries in monarch butterfly circadian rhythms and migration patterns, which is outlined on the page. The references cited to support that information is not from Merlin herself but from primary review sources of her materials.
Following this justification, I believe this page has been incorrectly declined.
13:39:54, 13 April 2017 review of submission by Asemtei
The page Doctor Leandro Herrero was not accepted due to a lack of 'notability.'
He is a world renowned speaker with the sources of very important events independently referenced in the text. Further, he is currently leading a nation-wide health executive service revamp across all Ireland, also referenced.
Also, googling Leandro Herrero redirects to this other Mr. Herrero, who has beed dead for a while, possible confusing many out there, including myself. ( https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leandro_%C3%81ngel_Herrero )
Following this double justification, I believe this page has been incorrectly declined.
14:57:05, 13 April 2017 review of submission by Jbrunoii
Article in Rolling Stone Magazine
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/inside-disneys-attempt-to-go-metal-on-new-covers-compilation-w472108
This is a major release with a major label, please let us know further why this was rejected. Thank you
11:07:45, 15 April 2017 review of submission by 36.12.104.59
- 36.12.104.59 (talk · contribs)
The page "Naohiro Totsuka" already exist on "Wikidata". Why this draft page doesn't link?
05:34:30, 16 April 2017 review of submission by Piyushdeswal12
The individual that we are creating an article for is a successful theater artist and director and we feel that she must be aptly recognized and thus efforts are made to create an article about her. She is very well known in the field throughout the country and has received the local coverage in printed media from time to time and their online portals as well. She seems appropriate to write an article about however my being new to the field of article writing on wikipedia and being just an acquaintance with referencing and tags must have given the idea that the personality is not a well recognised one. Please Help!
15:31:13, 17 April 2017 review of submission by MulhollandF
- MulhollandF (talk · contribs)
I was hoping to have this page re-reviewed as I have now included the theory behind the Law.
07:22:58, 18 April 2017 review of submission by Hankthetank78
I have dozens and dozens of notable references and podcasts by people with wikipedia pages and companies how do you want me to show this
20:22:32, 19 April 2017 review of submission by 64.207.226.28
21:07:21, 19 April 2017 review of submission by 123.126.249.170
How is a QUT press release as to the prestigious China Australia Award not reliable and independent? Also if you Google the subject's name along with MMLC (the law firm he works for and which I work for) or arbitrator, hundreds of articles, news items, scholarly works can be seen.
21:26:04, 19 April 2017 review of submission by 123.126.249.170
I'm sorry. I do not understand your comments. And how about all of the World Bank, book articles, Uan reports referring to the subject, that you can see if you Google the subject name and the law firm he founded? Still not notable? Or the judgments he had issued in relation to many of the world's leading brands and companies, that haven written up. And widely reported - all can be seen on a quick search.
21:34:59, 19 April 2017 review of submission by 123.126.249.170
I don't want to add in all of the books he has written, UN projects he has done and judgments he has issued as it would take months. It was also make this entry look very spammy indeed. However, simple searches reveal notability, without a shadow of a doubt.
16:12:51, 20 April 2017 review of submission by Mdcash
Hi i made this article for a course and need to have it up soon, i understood that i needed more sources but where do i stop. I found several interviews red carpet pictures and other media content. I believe i've shown that he has accomplished a lot and is a rising producer in the industry with a growing fan base. He wrote the scripts for biggest movies of the last few years and has been invited to work with bigger organisations like dreamworks on future movies. I believe this entitles him to some notability, I only say this because he wrote many of these scripts and for him to receive no credit is a little cruel, if not i can keep adding articles till you are satisfied just let me know, how many sources you think is reasonable. Thanks for the help
18:49:41, 20 April 2017 review of submission by Mdcash
Hi thanks for the feedback i believe i fulfilled your request, i just ask that you keep in mind he wrote these movies so articles praise him but as usual focus on the big stars that act in his movies, i added magazine and news articles from around the world mostly america and the UK which talk about him and his work, all the movies listed where either written by him or co-authored . I have resubmitted my article,with updated references that portray notability. thanks for the help
16:46:35, 21 April 2017 review of submission by Mdcash
Hey I accidentally moved my draft so I'm not sure if it's still in for review my a wiki stub so forgive my idiocy. It moved from my sandbox to drafts, would that cause it to get kicked from the review line up . Thanks for the help
05:28:15, 23 April 2017 review of submission by 50.136.161.139
What kind of sources do I need to validate my Wikipedia page?
All of the sources I provided I have not created myself.
Please let mr know
15:05:41, 25 April 2017 review of submission by LannaM
Hi! I'd like to know more information about why my submissions have been declined. I'm new on creating pages on wikipedia. Thanks a lot!
15:13:02, 25 April 2017 review of submission by Tralfam
I have completely rewritten and sourced this article in line with recommendations; I would welcome any comments.
Two things I was not sure about;
a) for his career I have used the same source (Who's Who) and referenced it repeatedly. This is inelegant but I wasn't sure the correct way when multiple items have the same source b) I wasn't sure that quotes are formatted correctly but couldn't find how to do that.
Thanks
18:12:42, 25 April 2017 review of submission by Thakkart
Hi Swister,
Thanks for your feedback. To make a case for JetPrivilege I would like to let you know that it is the primary frequent flyer program of India's second largest airlinesJet Airways.It has also been covered on India's popular news websites such as Economic Times,Business Wire and also western media such as USA Today and many more websites. It is also a legitimate corporation and has its listing on many corporate directories. Are not the sources listed in the reference enough to establish notability? They have been retrieved from popular websites in India.
Also on the issue of advertising, I have referred to many frequent flyer pages present on Wikipedia such as EuroBonus,KrisFlyer,Velocity Frequent Flyer & MileagePlus. They too have included similar topics like history, partners, program changes that were negative to customers and a little information about the program structure.
It would be very helpful if you could guide me on where am I going wrong here and what changes to make in order to conform to Wikipedia's policies.
Thanks in advance
03:32:09, 27 April 2017 review of submission by Ashalily91
- Ashalily91 (talk · contribs)
Hello, do you have any suggestions on what sources would be considered more reliable, or is it a quantity issue? Mark Middleton is a well known Australian business men and international speaker.
04:04:04, 27 April 2017 review of submission by Ashalily91
- Ashalily91 (talk · contribs)
Thanks for your advice. Would it be more appropriate to focus on his research advancements and include references to publications advancing the field of radiation therapy, rather than primarily his business profile to avoid being considered a business profile? Although they are somewhat hand in hand.
09:02:18, 27 April 2017 review of submission by Timopomer
I have tried to made this article as objective/advertising free and factual as possible, could i know which lines pose an issue for the articles creation? Thank you very much
David Morgan Pozzo53
Hi SisterTwister,
Thanks for the review and the edit of a new article on "David Morgan".
I have resubmitted with a few reviews of his very important textbook. finding 'notable sources' seems to be an arbitrary requirement from Wikipedia. Does the sheer volume of work this man has produced not make him notable in his own right? Thus, worthy of a Wiki page? Genuinely curious as to what constitutes a 'notable source' considering some of the Wiki pages I've read.
Thanks again, you guys do great work.
Baron
13:37:11, 29 April 2017 review of submission by HiveBeenThere
Petrovich-Cheney is currently at the Fuller Craft Museum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuller_Craft_Museum) with a solo show -http://fullercraft.org/event/what-remains-wooden-quilt-sculptures-of-laura-petrovich-cheney/
She one of the artists selected to represent New JErsey at the Delaware Art Museum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware_Art_Museum for its Centennial Show -http://www.delart.org/exhibits/centennial-juried-exhibition/
Her solo exhibit at Kean University https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kean_University was so well receieved that it appeared on and appeared on TV News 12 -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kofkg7be1E&feature=youtu.be and the Weather Channel - https://vimeo.com/144004504 and was in print - https://njmonthly.com/articles/jersey-living/creating-art-from-sandys-wreckage/
The show Databodies (Moore College of Art) was listed as a must see exhibit in Philadelphia - http://www.phillyvoice.com/five-philly-art-shows-see-june/
She was at the James A Michener Museum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._Michener_Art_Museum) http://www.michenerartmuseum.org/exhibition/pattern-pieces-can-you-make-a-quilt-out-of-wood/ and the show was extended -and http://www.michenerartmuseum.org/article/476/pattern-pieces-has-been-extended/
I am wondering why these places are not considered museums?
AfC notification: Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales has a new comment
I've written a reply to your previous comment, which can be viewed at Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales. Thanks! Salomėja Nėris (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- FYI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Request on 05:57:33, 30 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Preciouse.gross
Hello, I have tried countless times to upload a Wikipedia page based on the criteria provided, editing, and referencing and the page will still not be published. I am now requesting assistance from someone within Wikipedia that can write the page on my behalf in order to have it published. Please let me know how to move forward with this request.
Thank you. Preciouse.gross (talk) 05:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
@Zppix: Hello, After countless attempts to edit, reference and re-write the page I am trying to get published, I am now requesting a Wikipedia expert to write it on my behalf. Can someone please contact me regarding a write-up of the page. Thank you Preciouse Preciouse.gross (talk) 06:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
10:06:54, 30 April 2017 review of submission by Yuvaltassa
- Yuvaltassa (talk · contribs)
Hello! You're right I forgot two important bits!
1) A New York Times article where the subject is interviewed. 2) A a counter-arguing publication, by an academic opponent (Friston), whose first line is literally "Optimal control theory is currently the dominant paradigm for understanding motor behavior in formal or computational terms.", i.e. he acknowledges the impact of the subject's theory.
21:54:12, 30 April 2017 review of submission by Ej 0181
Hi, I hope that you are doing well.
Are there any specific reasons this was rejected and is there anything that I can do to improve it? This is my first full page and I want to make sure I do it right. Thank you so much.
K.M.Govt.College Narwana
Can you please better explain your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.M.Govt.College Narwana? They're type of comments I expect to see from a new editor, not one with as much experience as you. Perhaps if you further elaborate on what you mean I'll better understand what you mean and I might even change my mind. JDDJS (talk) 23:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- JDDJS If you see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, no one has ever formed a good argument for getting schools deleted because exactly how no one would ever get universities Cornell, Harvard or Yale. There's never been a policy-basis for deleted and it's no different here. WP:N is not applicable as it never says it automatically applies to schools and exactly how no one would succeed in deleting Harvard or Yale.SwisterTwister talk 03:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
07:50:59, 1 May 2017 review of submission by Dwmcduff
I realise that more references are required in this article, but as a near-beginner in Wikipedia editing I am not yet confident that the references I am currently providing are appropriate in terms of Wikipedia's style.
Regarding notability: the subject of the article, the Icelandic author Ólafur Gunnarsson, is an established and internationally known novelist whose work has been translated into several languages. There are already Wikipedia articles about him in Icelandic and German, but so far there is not an article about him written in English. I have added a section in paragraph 4 with links to reference works and other source material where Gunnarsson's work is cited. Please indicate if this is the kind of improvement that is required - if it is, then I can add some more references, but obviously do not want to do this if I am somehow going astray from the editorial line.
20:21:10, 1 May 2017 review of submission by Jonathan A. Coles
I wish to defend the need for an entry on 'Animal Reflectors'.
Who needs an entry 'animal reflectors':
1. Opticists making broad-band reflecting photonic crystals. Physicists are commendably interested in biological analogs of what they make. But they tend to study tissues that don't decay rapidly (beetle elytra, for example) and have rather missed out on animals like silvery fish and on cats' eyes, which do not keep well on the bench top.
2. Anybody wondering why and how fish have silvery sides.
3. Anybody wanting a better explanation of how eyeshine works in the eyeshine/tapetum lucidum entry.
Need for a new entry. I don't see how this information could be put conveniently in other entries. Animal reflectors all work on basically the same principle, whether they are fish scales, the fundus of the scallop eye, or tapeta lucida, and the mathematics was developed for the first two of these, and for some kinds of tapetum lucidum (in lower primates). The entry for fish scales is almost entirely zoological classification. The entry for tapetum lucidum hardly attempts to explain the optics (perhaps rightly, as there appears to be no full analysis of the optics of the cat tapetum). But the cat tapetum is of considerable interest to physicists constructing photonic crystals. There is also 'dielectric reflector', which relates to animal reflectors by the optical principles, but not by the materials. It would be silly to put animal reflectors in all these entries.
What would make sense is to have cross-references, so one can go: eyeshine > tapetum > animal reflectors. Or photonic crystal > animal reflectors > tapetum. Or dielectric reflector > animal reflectors> animal coloration. Or fish scales > animal reflectors. Or animal reflectors > fish scales.
Style Half the point of Wikipedia is that users improve entries. But they can only improve an entry if the entry exists.
I am impressed by the speed of the editors' replies.
Regards
Jonathan Coles
Request on 00:39:17, 2 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Drolsson
Drolsson (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello> Just a query why this was not allowed as other politicians at the same levels of government have been permitted for example Cr Ryan Murphy, Cr Adrian Schrinner and Cr Andrew Wines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wines). Thank you for your help.Drolsson (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
01:20:38, 2 May 2017 review of submission by DavidConrad
- DavidConrad (talk · contribs)
I'm not sure I understand the review reason. Doesn't the fact that it's already on Wikipedia mean that notability
has already been established per WP:NOTE (de:WP:Relevanzkriterien)?
Also, you say, "Would need all additional news," but I included news references from the BBC, the Miami Herald, The Independent, and Hurriyet Daily News (a major Turkish source). There are others, like the Telegraph, the Daily Mail, and MSN, which I could add, but they mostly duplicate what's already there. The Telegraph, in particular, doesn't seem to have done separate reporting, stating "the BBC reports" in the body of their article, I don't consider the Daily Mail to be a very reputable source, and the MSN article is a straight write-through of the Independent's article. I could add sites like BoredPanda but I don't think that would contribute to the noteworthiness or gravitas of the article.
I've added another reference, NYMag.com. Please let me know what else you mean by "all additional news." I would note my article is already more complete than de:Tombili since the German WP article doesn't cover the theft and subsequent return of the statue. -- DavidConrad (talk) 01:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Do you plan on answering these questions? -- DavidConrad (talk) 03:00, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- David Conrad Weighing this, it would simply not be enough for a convincing notable article, wherever it was published. SwisterTwister talk 03:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi SwisterTwister, I just wanted to thank you for your help and good work! HenryDorian (talk) 04:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Peace Revolution
Draft:Peace Revolution (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) was created at Peace Revolution (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by the same editor. Is it any better than when you declined it? — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for notifying me, JJMC89 as it still seems promotional and this considering the past AfD in 2009, so it certainly will need one again and I'll plan one. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi David, Wanted to check with you if following sources are good for this article to be reviewed. You have commented that there is no significant coverage about the subject. Kindly check if these can be considered as Indian news about the organization usually cover this only. [1][2][3][4][5]Raghavhere (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
07:41:55, 2 May 2017 review of submission by UrbindraK
Hello
This is not a re-review appeal. My writing on Swarnali Kanjilal was declined due to some valid reasons but she is a very popular lady in the city of Kolkata and all over West Bengal. I have found out some YouTube links from the respective authorized media channels. Will those links be acceptable as references? If you want I can show you some examples of those links.
Please look into the matter and any suggestion from you will be immensely helpful.
10:18:23, 2 May 2017 review of submission by Brentvans
Hello! I've added three refs to pertinent critical reviews (all three with wide circulation) to the novel, thus meeting your request for "majorly reviewed" status. Thanks!
Brentvans (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
If I am right...
According to this query that I have modified from a similar one (but not double checked), you should be the most active users on the Article for Deletion pages of enwiki. Well, it was a pleasure to have discovered you this way. I hope you enjoy the anectode. Bye.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
12:41:23, 2 May 2017 review of submission by Miasiad
I have this problem: the creation of the page about SIAD was declined. In fact, it is just a translation of the page that exhists on the italian wikipedia. I am not a wikipedia expert but was told to translate the page in English as I work for the company, therefore I do not know how to move here. Reading the instructions, I understood that the page has to be created on the English wikipedia in order to have a translation. What can I do to publish the page? Thank you. Miasiad (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft of "European Mentoring and Coaching Council"
Hi,
My past experience of EMCC is that it does not try to get into the media. I do know that this association has no full-time staff nor budgets (e.g. to pay for PR/media coverage). However within Europe's Human Resources community, the EMCC is extremely significant and well known.
Skim reading the website references on this draft page, the following are already listed but maybe not as clearly stated as the following:
- The UK's Chartered Institute of Personnel Development ("CIPD") acknowledges the EMCC as one of the main bodies in the coaching and mentoring field (they mention in one reference: one of 4 bodies);
- Various cited Universities recognise the EMCC e.g. offer courses accredited by the EMCC, have internal coaching and mentoring trained staff (accredited by the EMCC) or follow the EMCC's code of ethics;
- Likewise for various organisations e.g. Flanders state government (Belgium) and the UK's National Health Service;
- Last but not least, the EMCC has been recognised by the European Union ("EU") has a lead body in the professionalisation of coaching and mentoring in the EU.
I do feel that this does reflect acceptable notability. Another main body in the field (e.g. jointly presented with the EMCC to the EU) is the International Coach Federation, which has its own Wikipedia page. Both bodies are very similar (ICF more US focused and EMCC more Europe focused).
I wonder, how I might help with the drafting of this page - so that you would be able to confirm it is no longer in draft form?
I am new to Wikipedia but a friend of mine is showing me how to edit pages and am happy to try this out on this particular page.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards
"56sfm" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 56sfm (talk • contribs) 14:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Draft of "European Mentoring and Coaching Council"
Hi,
My past experience of EMCC is that it does not try to get into the media. I do know that this association has no full-time staff nor budgets (e.g. to pay for PR/media coverage). However within Europe's Human Resources community, the EMCC is extremely significant and well known.
Skim reading the website references on this draft page, the following are already listed but maybe not as clearly stated as the following:
- The UK's Chartered Institute of Personnel Development ("CIPD") acknowledges the EMCC as one of the main bodies in the coaching and mentoring field (they mention in one reference: one of 4 bodies);
- Various cited Universities recognise the EMCC e.g. offer courses accredited by the EMCC, have internal coaching and mentoring trained staff (accredited by the EMCC) or follow the EMCC's code of ethics;
- Likewise for various organisations e.g. Flanders state government (Belgium) and the UK's National Health Service;
- Last but not least, the EMCC has been recognised by the European Union ("EU") has a lead body in the professionalisation of coaching and mentoring in the EU.
I do feel that this does reflect acceptable notability. Another main body in the field (e.g. jointly presented with the EMCC to the EU) is the International Coach Federation, which has its own Wikipedia page. Both bodies are very similar (ICF more US focused and EMCC more Europe focused).
I wonder, how I might help with the drafting of this page - so that you would be able to confirm it is no longer in draft form?
I am new to Wikipedia but a friend of mine is showing me how to edit pages and am happy to try this out on this particular page.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards
"56sfm" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 56sfm (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
18:44:31, 2 May 2017 review of submission by Hoglundandy
- Hoglundandy (talk · contribs)
Hi, how many sources do I need? I've included references to profile they've received in the New York Times, in addition to local outlets and musical trades. I've also hyperlinked to other relevant Wiki articles.
About the page Paul-Gilbert Langevin
Hi, sorry my english is not so good. Maybe you can correct the page I created about my father, Paul-Gilbert Langevin. I would not be able to correct it myself.
Thanks, Paul-Eric.
Glosten Inc. draft updated
Hello, I have added any additional relevant news I could find for Glosten, Inc. Topics include the appointment of a new president, research and development in the areas of offshore wind and ballast water treatment, participation on a winning X prize team, and ferry design work. I hope this will be sufficient, but please do let me know if there are additional gaps to fill. A reminder, in the interest of full disclosure - I am a Glosten employee.
Recieving Message
Hello, I received the below message from you and was wondering if you could clarify a few things for me?
User talk:DRainwater From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising.
I am a current employee of Precor and we have been trying to establish an active Wikipedia page with our business information but every time we have tried our draft gets deleted or account is blocked. The reasonings that we are provided with are:
1. Using Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. 2. Unambiguous advertising or promotion)
Is there a specific line or word that is triggering this? Any information/feedback you could provide would be great.
Thank you!
Danielle (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC) Danielle
Thank you for your response. Would you be able to verify which part of our content was considered "promotionalism?" we would like to know for future knowledge.
Thank you, Danielle (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2017 (UTC) DRainwater
- As I happen to be here, perhaps I can help. Your draft contained multiple sentences like " Precor sets the standard for quality, innovation, and performance in exercise equipment. " "and they have been supporting the natural movement of the human body ever since." . This is pure puffery, not appropriate outside advertising. The article contains numerous claims of "first" without any documentation--there has to be a specific third party published reference for every claim, not just a general link to you own web site--with a "history of innovation" page that also contains puffery. The draft use trademark symbols--the encyclopedia does not.
- From experience over many years, it is extremely difficult for an employee of the company to write a page about the company. The company is indeed well known, and probably there are good 3rd party sources that are usable for an article. I suggest you list it at Wikipedia:Requested articles. It's likely that someone interested in the subject will write a proper article. DGG ( talk ) 17:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Request on 06:30:46, 3 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Suniltx
Hi SwisterTwister, I came across few company/organization articles on Wikipedia, where they have added their own organization links as reliable sources and confirmed notability, So I thought my article will also be accepted with the kind of links I have listed for reference. I have made few changes to my article. Suniltx (talk) 06:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- the article was resubmitted; I declined it as a different reviewer, but for the same reasons--see user talk for the reasons. DGG ( talk ) 18:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Shri Jai Narain Post Graduate College
this article is copy pasted so i nominated for deletion... review it again ... i provided link on talk page... if possible talk with editor to write in his own lang.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by India1277 (talk • contribs) 07:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
India1277 (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Request on 10:40:22, 3 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Cassandrajohnsonpr
Hi! Thank you for reviewing my page. Can you specifically state why this article should be deleted?
I saw that the article may not have been significant but that can kind of seem like an opinion of sorts.
Why do you think this article isn't significant?
I appreciate your insight.
Cassandrajohnsonpr (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Request on 10:42:57, 3 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Cassandrajohnsonpr
Hi! Thank you for reviewing my page. Can you specifically state why this article should be deleted?
I saw that the article may not have been significant but that can kind of seem like an opinion of sorts.
Why do you think this article isn't significant?
I appreciate your insight.cassandrajohnsonprCassandrajohnsonpr (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Cassandrajohnsonpr (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
11:32:44, 3 May 2017 review of submission by MKantorStitch
Hi! I saw that my article on Stephen Janis was rejected because my sources lacked notability. I want to try to improve on that front before I try again, and I was hoping you could tell me which sources you think are my weak links. Any other advice you have would be much appreciated as well. Thank you so much!
16:58:53, 3 May 2017 review of submission by Cassandrajohnsonpr
I would like to understand why you think the page isn't notable? $K is a respected music producer who has a notable amount of work, check out the discography table on the page. Cassandrajohnsonpr (talk) 16:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into your local language via meta
|
The 2016 Cure Award |
| In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Regards to the resubmission with the articles Keep Victoria Beautiful
Dear SwisterTwister,
Last time, you have left a reivew to improve my article at [[6]] as "We would need a better focus in adding all additional major independent news, and not simply announcements or notices." After a week, I tried my best to find more references about Keep Victoria Beautiful on more sources of information. Please kindly note that Keep Victoria Beautiful is a non-profit-organisation that worked closely with the Australian government and city councils, most of existing references are from trusted government websites with .gov.au domain.
Also there was an article of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keep_Australia_Beautiful that was online long time ago. I have tried my best to make my new articles improved in quality with infromation from trusted government websites.
I would like to give you a ping. Hoping that you are online before I resubmit the article in a few hours. I really appriciate your help to make the Wikipedia stable. I am more than happy if the article would be approved so that Keep Victoria Beautiful could contribute more for the Victorian environment and people. Cenakhoa (talk) 01:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Regards, Khoa
Request on 06:20:07, 4 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by 103.211.54.93
hi why has the Pragun akhil jindal
article been rejected.
the author triggered deomnitsation with his book in the country
and what does inform author mean ?
103.211.54.93 (talk) 06:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
11:13:49, 4 May 2017 review of submission by 103.211.55.230
Dear Reviewer The author has done some incredible work in the sphere of black money. The book on blackmoney is a first on its kind and led to major outbreak in the black money scenario I request you to approve the article.
14:08:22, 4 May 2017 review of submission by 173.14.168.121
Okay, thank you! I added sources from the likes of NYTimes, LA Times, AP, etc. Let me know if that suffices.
New Page Draft Declined Draft:Good World Solutions, 4 May 2017
Thank you for reviewing my submission on Draft:Good World Solutions. Can you please help me understand why you have rejected it as an advertisement when I have used news sources from the Huffington Post, the Harvard Business Review, DU Press, ProPublica, Gesi and others. I know some of the information I received from the company itself but I verified with outside sources. I have also added some more outside sources which talk both directly about Good World Solutions and also about the problem which they are addressing. I did this for a college project and it is not an advertisement for a business but a factual page on what they do and how the operate. Please help me remedy this problem. Thank you for your time. Econ-5470 Spring 2017 Group 6 (talk) 16:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Old Draft
So I am looking at this 13yo draft: Draft:Valerie Sutton The bots never pick it up for deletion since it gets an edit here or there. The author has not been on for a year now. My thought is that she seems notable enough to just move the page over to mainspace or do a AFC request myself and let a few others take a look. Thoughts? GtstrickyTalk or C 20:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Resubmission
Re: Draft:Stephen Maitland-Lewis, can you please clarify your comment regarding announcements/notices? Are you referencing the "Louie Award" references by Broadway World and Queens Tribune? Can you please explain why they are not acceptable? Thank you for any information you may have in guiding me to getting the article approved. Pokerdealer123 (talk) 03:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Pokerdealer123
Page of Madhubanti Bagchi
Hi SwisterTwister can you review the page of Indian vocalist Madhubanti Bagchi you rejected earlier. Can you point out the issues with the article? Thank you! Taurus 27 (talk) 15:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
18:42:50, 8 May 2017 review of submission by Alexhanno04
- Alexhanno04 (talk · contribs)
Hi there, I'm not requesting a re-review of this article, I would just like to know how I can improved the draft I've submitted to ensure it's approved next time. The reason for it being declined was a lack of sufficient and/or strong enough sources. I can certainly include other sources, I guess my only question is what requires a source and what doesn't. Furthermore, what qualifies as a legitimate source as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Thank you for your helpAlexhanno04 (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
01:55:43, 9 May 2017 review of submission by Kate.laolu.nyc
The person I created a page on is a notable person. His art is in several major museums, he has had a TED talk (not TED X), he was on Beyonce's Lemonade and is mentioned in her wikipedia page about it, has worked with over 7 international brands, he's had several articles about himself and his art in every major news source (some of them several times). When you google his first name he's the person who comes up for the first 4 pages. He's the most influential African artist currently alive at this moment. This is not a matter of opinion. This is why Yale, Harvard, Google, Facebook, Spotify, and Instagram have all had him come and speak to their employees. So I am asking for a you to reconsider your reasoning that this person is not notable. Thank you. Kate.laolu.nyc (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
02:33:13, 9 May 2017 review of submission by Xrisj
Greetings. The subject of the page was a pretty significant guitarist in the bay area, and for a short time in LA. Recommended by Janis Leibhart for an audition with Bob Seger's band (audition granted) Johnson was an well know to other celebrity guitarists like Danny Chauncey (38 special) and Brad Gillis (Night Ranger). Although certainly less famous, he's sure worth of a simple mention on Wikipedia for his amazing chops and voice. What do you require to validate this page please?
Off-wiki harassment campaign possible
SwisterTwister, I'm messaging you because you're (or were) aware of some of the problems brought up at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shawwal/Archive. Basically, members of a certain religious cult constantly create sock/meatpuppets to push their POV in an organized fashion (see here too). Well, recently I noticed this and then this, followed by a coverup here.<ref> Now, I'm not asking you to get involved because I know you're busy. What I am asking for, though, is an opinion, and please know that there's no pressure to answer. My question is: where should I take this? Organized campaigns of POV-pushing by this same cult has been going on for years, and numerous sock/meat accounts have been blocked along the way. In your experience, would you view AN as an appropriate avenue to bring this to the attention of admins? Or is there a more fitting avenue for this? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- MezzoMezzo Although possible connections aside, there's simply not enough weight to put a serious case in here, especially given that not only has Samsparky been cleared as being a Shawwal sock, but even what's above is simply not blatant enough for an IP block or CU there since it's simply an apparent email suggestion and an apparent response to it. However, if there's worse later especially something violating policy, then that may be different. SwisterTwister talk 03:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for being honest. I suppose that I'll just keep the above in mind in case it's needed, but silently hope that it isn't. All the best! MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
16:36:35, 10 May 2017 review of submission by Karma Yoga
- Karma Yoga (talk · contribs)
Hello Swister Twister,
I'm not ready for the article to be reviewed again, but I do have a question. In looking at what is notable about this Buddhist group, the one important thing is how many of their teachings are published in books and audio sets. Is it acceptable to put a list of publications in the article?
Thank you, Karma Yoga
- Karma Yoga Yes, but this alone won't establish a convincing article in notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
has been deleted for the second time since it's AfC was accepted. Was it really accepted w/o relaible sources? I have deleted partly due to lack of sources. There was an AFD which raised serious questions.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
20:18:18, 10 May 2017 review of submission by Automotiveguy
I tried adding the information as requested to the "Vehicle Registration Plate" page. However, it has been taken down twice now with no explanation as to why. How do we add it and make it stick.
You've got mail!
Message added 12:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Per IRC Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 12:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with the Article The Republic of East Florida
I just wanted to personally write "Thank You" to you. EastFloridaHistorian (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Re-submission of article
Hello @SwisterTwister,
I appreciate your inputs on my proposed article, Draft:Shiv_Darshan on April 05, 2017. In line with your expectation and recommendation, I have provided additional references for article re-submission. Although I respect your viewpoint, I wish to share my observations. Shiv Darshan has three films to his credit already. You may like to check Shiv Darshan at IMDb to verify. There are several actors who have made debut in a single film, yet they have a peer-reviewed Wikipedia page; I believe it's fair to give Shiv Darshan due consideration. Thanks a ton for reading; and hoping to receive your best support! Cheers. Amishah78 (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
User:Engr33armalik
I hate to come across as heavy handed and bitey, but that seemed egregiously WP:Nothere to me.Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)