Jump to content

Talk:Jennifer Turner (cricketer): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
TGSTINT (talk | contribs)
TGSTINT (talk | contribs)
Line 32: Line 32:
{{requested move/dated|Jennifer Turner (cricketer)}}
{{requested move/dated|Jennifer Turner (cricketer)}}


[[:Jennifer Turner]] → {{no redirect|Jennifer Turner (cricketer)}} – Second request for moving: Now that all of opposing arguments from the last request are no longer valid - as a Jennifer Turner (musician) page is 1. available 2.much more frequently visited than Jennifer Turner page (nearly 10 times as much after onyl a few months) 3.has gone up in google to first rank when searching that name. Contrary to the comment by In ictu oculi (which was nonsense anyway as In ictu oculi refers to a draft by a different author... the draft became an article.. Also the article even got more than myself as contributor already. I think that a lot of those landing on the current Jennifer Turner page actually are searching for the musician - not the cricketeer - so a move of that page to Jennifer Turner (cricketer) seems more than valid to me - even it is a "one-liner" - as due to the current status probably a lot of people land on the cricketeer page and then went on to the musicians. The currents page should either be the most searched and popular - which is the musician - or namespace pages like Jennifer Turner should be reserved for disambugation [[User:TGSTINT|TGSTINT]] ([[User talk:TGSTINT|talk]]) 13:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
[[:Jennifer Turner]] → {{no redirect|Jennifer Turner (cricketer)}} – Second request for moving: Now that all of opposing arguments from the last request are no longer valid - as a Jennifer Turner (musician) page is 1. available 2.much more frequently visited than Jennifer Turner page (nearly 10 times as much after onyl a few months) 3.has gone up in google to first rank when searching that name. Contrary to the comment by In ictu oculi (which was nonsense anyway as In ictu oculi refers to a draft by a different author... the draft became an article.. Also the article even got more than myself as contributor already. I think that a lot of those landing on the current Jennifer Turner page actually are searching for the musician - not the cricketeer - so a move of that page to Jennifer Turner (cricketer) seems more than valid to me - even it is a "one-liner" - as due to the current status probably a lot of people land on the cricketeer page and then went on to the musicians. The article should not have been moved from (cricketeer) to name-only in the first place.... The currents page should either be the most searched and popular - which is the musician - or namespace pages like Jennifer Turner should be reserved for disambugation [[User:TGSTINT|TGSTINT]] ([[User talk:TGSTINT|talk]]) 13:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:54, 25 August 2017

Requested move 19 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 10:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Jennifer TurnerJennifer Turner (cricketer) – Was in that namespace before - moved with reason "no other article with this title". There are 2 musicians (one american (currently in draft, already available on several other musician pages (collaborations)) one new zealand), an author and several scientist - all more common names in search engine searches. common namespace pages like Jennifer Turner should be reserved for disambugation page  — TGSTINT (talk) 09:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 10:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So a hatnote on a micro-stub would be enough to point to a band for a non-existant biography. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lugnuts: in this case yes. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 25 August 2017

Jennifer TurnerJennifer Turner (cricketer) – Second request for moving: Now that all of opposing arguments from the last request are no longer valid - as a Jennifer Turner (musician) page is 1. available 2.much more frequently visited than Jennifer Turner page (nearly 10 times as much after onyl a few months) 3.has gone up in google to first rank when searching that name. Contrary to the comment by In ictu oculi (which was nonsense anyway as In ictu oculi refers to a draft by a different author... the draft became an article.. Also the article even got more than myself as contributor already. I think that a lot of those landing on the current Jennifer Turner page actually are searching for the musician - not the cricketeer - so a move of that page to Jennifer Turner (cricketer) seems more than valid to me - even it is a "one-liner" - as due to the current status probably a lot of people land on the cricketeer page and then went on to the musicians. The article should not have been moved from (cricketeer) to name-only in the first place.... The currents page should either be the most searched and popular - which is the musician - or namespace pages like Jennifer Turner should be reserved for disambugation TGSTINT (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]