Talk:Fiona Onasanya: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:46, 2 February 2019

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

East Anglia Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

African diaspora Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British crime Unassessed (defunct)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

England Stub‑class Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics of the United Kingdom Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pre-emptive protection

Can we pre-emptively protect this article from IPs given the court proceedings? Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait for the storm first. I think the proceedings have been fairly low-profile thusfar, so I wouldn't expect too much vandalism to come. MB190417 (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Low-profile has surely ended. E.g., BBC Fiona Onasanya: Peterborough MP 'to stay in Parliament'. JDAWiseman (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True, but so far only one outbreak which was annoying but copeable-with. I do agree that it is likely to need protection sooner or later ... continue to wait a little and see? I'm just not sure yet. It has had edits from IPs and registered users and most have been reasonable so far. DBaK (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parking a reference

Association, Press (28 December 2018). "Convicted MP Fiona Onasanya intends to stay in parliament". The Guardian.

That picture

That picture of Onasanya is ugly beyond words, to a degree of being borderline racist. Don't we have a better one? I've seen many better pictures of her on the net... Wefa (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it makes her look like something out of a B-movie about a tribe of cannibals. PatGallacher (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Presuming he's still alive, maybe you should take it up with Chris McAndrew? She seems happy enough. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Well it’s her official portrait on the UK parliament website, so she must have approved it. But if anyone has any free alternatives, let’s see them.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wefa: Could you elaborate as to how the image is "borderline racist"? I'm genuinely curious. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's part of the set of official photos of MPs taken after the June 2017 General Election (you can tell by the grey background). Many of these photos aren't very good, but it is her "official" portrait and the infobox photo has to be CC. The full set of photos is here, and to give another example, Diane Abbott isn't a masterpiece either.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the photo is so bad I would be happier to see no photo until another CC one is found. (Just done a google image search, and no other "Labeled for reuse" ones,) Rwendland (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it's good enough for the UK Parliament website, and therefore presumably good enough for Onasanya herself, then it's good enough for us. Bondegezou (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Borderline racist"?!? What an astonishing assertion! It's certainly ugly, I'll grant you that. Nonetheless it is an undoctored picture. That IS (for better or worse) what she looks like. How can the claim possibly be made that it's "racist"? If I didn't know better, I'd guess that the quest to find a "better" photo of her is an attempt to make her more "media-friendly"...perhaps someone's trying to "smooth" her image after "recent events"?

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 :::I think the photo is so bad I would be happier to see no photo until another CC one is found. (Just done a google image search, and no other "Labeled for reuse" ones,) [[User:Rwendland|Rwendland]] ([[User talk:Rwendland|talk]]) 12:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 ::::If it's good enough for the UK Parliament website, and therefore presumably good enough for Onasanya herself, then it's good enough for us. [[User:Bondegezou|Bondegezou]] ([[User talk:Bondegezou|talk]]) 13:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
+"Borderline racist"?!? What an astonishing assertion! It's certainly '''''ugly''''', I'll grant you that. Nonetheless it is an undoctored picture. That IS (for better or worse) what she looks like. How can the claim possibly be made that it's "racist"? If I didn't know better, I'd guess that the quest to find a "better" photo of her is an attempt to make her more "media-friendly"...perhaps someone's trying to "smooth" her image after "recent events"?