Jump to content

Talk:Klamath River: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1)
WillKanz (talk | contribs)
Update ENVS 135 assignment details
Line 22: Line 22:


{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]]}}
{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]]}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Sacramento/ENVS_135_(Spring_2019) | assignments = [[User:WillKanz|WillKanz]] | start_date = 2019-01-23 | end_date = 2019-05-08 }}


== Arthur Snoke "Geological Studies" ==
== Arthur Snoke "Geological Studies" ==

Revision as of 04:45, 24 March 2019

Good articleKlamath River has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 29, 2011Good article nomineeListed

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WillKanz (article contribs).

Arthur Snoke "Geological Studies"

A reference to a collective volume with two editors preferably needs author and chapter title for the text cited, not just general title and page no. as in earlier version of citation 25.--Felix folio secundus 20:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Dick Cheney

Hi, While browsing on a different subject, I came across this interesting article in The Washington Post [1], going into detail about how Dick Cheney exerted power to reverse the environmental flow decision. I've put it into the text, but being new to all this editing stuff, it shows up as a link not a reference as I don't yet know how to put a reference in! If someone could teach me how to do this it would be a nice thing to do! Thanks, Mondegreen de plume (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in the river and for your input. If you look at the article in edit mode, you'll see how the "cite" templates work. You can simply imitate the form of the two citations directly below that of the one you are trying to add. A more complete explanation of the templates is at WP:CIT. In this article, be sure to stick with the "cite" family rather than using the "citation" family or other formats since the "cite" family is used for all of the other refs in this article. Hope this helps. Finetooth (talk) 01:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding GAN

Jsayre, little note – as I was the main writer of this article – I'll probably be participating in the GAN, though I'm sure it'll be a while before it starts... Shannon+º! 02:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already knew that, no doubt about it! --Jsayre64 (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh haha how could I forget to use that? Just looking at the first page of history wouldn't suggest it though. Shannon+º! 17:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love to see more coverage of the Klamath Basin water rights dispute aka the Salmon controversy (I've always thought it merited a separate article), see Klamath Tribes#Water rights dispute for more cited info. I know, I know {{sofixit}}. I can't promise I'll do the necessary research, but you can always hope... Valfontis (talk) 20:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOFIXIT (just kidding). I beat you to this, although there may be more to add. Jsayre64 (talk) 22:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finetooth has said that there are some problems in this article to address. Shannon, do you have any ideas? Jsayre64 (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmph, I'd hazard a guess that those problems are mostly in the natural history section, which I didn't edit. I'll take a look at those right now. I worked on this page a while back without seriously considering putting it up to GA or FA, so I agree, it might need some work. Shannon+º! 17:48, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Klamath River

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Klamath River's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Ashley":

  • From Trinity River (California): The Ashley-Smith explorations and the discovery of a central route to the Pacific. p. 246. Retrieved 2011-07-31. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  • From California Fur Rush: The Ashley-Smith explorations and the discovery of a central route to the Pacific. p. 246. Retrieved 2011-07-31. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 07:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Klamath River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klamath River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Klamath River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]