User talk:Olickal Peter Thomas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:45, 18 May 2020

Welcome!

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Rajamudy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 03:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The IPC Church.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:The IPC Church.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Rajamudy CR Church.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rajamudy CR Church.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Neriamangalam bridge.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Neriamangalam bridge.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I am really new to Wikipedia, not reading, but writing one. I have seen many pages with wrong and simply with two or three lines. It is to show that "I am an Article writer", by many. I really fed up with such people and so I wrote firstly "Rajamudy" and then "Pazhampillichal" with credentials and evidences, trying to avoid any type of errors. It is a humble effort to show how one has to create a page or article. Of course articles are edited and Wikipedia is a collective one, contributed by many. But I do not know much of the Wikipedia editing, image adding, use of talk pages etc. Hence it is my humble request that kindly help me in my mistakes. Recently R'n'B corrected me of using link to "English" that not to use "English" instead "English language". Thank You

And how to delete the wrong or unwanted 'images' uploaded, please tell me. Thanking You.

17:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Peter Thomas Olickal

Hello, Peter Thomas Olickal, and thank you for joining us in building Wikipedia. From looking at your two impressive articles, I can see that you have gained a good understanding of both the conventions used on Wikipedia and the markup used to achieve the necessary formatting and layout. I've made a few minor changes to the articles, which I hope you are happy with. When I first started editing, I learnt a lot from looking at the code behind existing pages, and I guess you have done the same. I'm happy to help you if you have specific questions – just leave a question at the bottom of my talk page. I usually login to Wikipedia at least twice each week, so I will respond within a few days.

With regard to getting things deleted, it's my understanding that you just edit the page and put {{Db-author}} on there (see this section entitled "G7. Author requests deletion" for more details). I know this works for articles, and I expect it would work for images too.

Best wishes, and thank you :) Regards — Hebrides (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Pulayan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Pulayan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheramar Christians

Hi, I'm sorry but there is so much wrong with Cheramar Christians that I really do not know where to start in explaining the issues. Things such as What a humiliation and violation of Human Rights – cow dung is more pure than fellow-human beings and the same the harvest of these human beings’ hard-work can be eaten no “untouchables” in it – incongruous, and delusory practices!!!, however, are completely inappropriate and it also looks to me as if you may have copied chunks of the text from other places. You are using sources that are not reliable, such as Logan's Malabar Manual, and you had entire sections for things that really are better covered elsewhere, in articles such as Dalit.

I doubt very much there will be much left of your article by the time I have fixed it, so please do not be surprised if it ends up pointing to Pulayar (which is in fact what most of your sources call them anyway). - Sitush (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas. You have new messages at Hebrides's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Peter Thomas 08:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sri Gowthami Degree and PG College

added links pointing to National, Civil, Prakasam, Intermediate and Junior

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC in Social Work.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC in Social Work.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC Disaster Relief.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC Disaster Relief.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peter T.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Peter T.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC College.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC College.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cheramar.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cheramar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC Campus.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC Campus.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rajamudy

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rajamudy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

page already exists at Rajamudy

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vin09 (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coastal Voluntary Network

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coastal Voluntary Network for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bensci54 (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be specific, you have repeatedly uploaded images which are copyright violations, created inappropriately promotional articles, and otherwise been editing inappropriately. It appears that you are either unable or unwilling to learn how to follow the policies which apply to editing Wikipedia. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help I have been blocked

Dear All,

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Olickal Peter Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked due to repeated image uploading, as the reasons stated; to say disruptive editing. Actually after creating the article i tried to upload a logo (Image), but it was not visible on the page; and the first two time the "target file name" and the original file name of the image were different. And even after correcting the name, the image did not appear on the page and so I have uploaded again the image. ACTUALLY I did not know it would create such a "vandalism" to the standard guidelines of Wikipedia! And I am a learner and new to Wikipedia. And you all may teach and correct me generously so that I may also be with you in this World's Largest Online Source of unique information! And so I hereby humbly beg and plead your magnanimity and benevolence to unblock me with an assurance that I will never be so again in the future. Peter Thomas (talk) 04:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am blocked due to repeated image uploading, as the reasons stated; to say disruptive editing. Actually after creating the article i tried to upload a logo (Image), but it was not visible on the page; and the first two time the "target file name" and the original file name of the image were different. And even after correcting the name, the image did not appear on the page and so I have uploaded again the image. ACTUALLY I did not know it would create such a "vandalism" to the standard guidelines of Wikipedia! And I am a learner and new to Wikipedia. And you all may teach and correct me generously so that I may also be with you in this World's Largest Online Source of unique information! And so I hereby humbly beg and plead your magnanimity and benevolence to unblock me with an assurance that I will never be so again in the future. [[User:Olickal Peter Thomas|Peter Thomas]] ([[User talk:Olickal Peter Thomas#top|talk]]) 04:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am blocked due to repeated image uploading, as the reasons stated; to say disruptive editing. Actually after creating the article i tried to upload a logo (Image), but it was not visible on the page; and the first two time the "target file name" and the original file name of the image were different. And even after correcting the name, the image did not appear on the page and so I have uploaded again the image. ACTUALLY I did not know it would create such a "vandalism" to the standard guidelines of Wikipedia! And I am a learner and new to Wikipedia. And you all may teach and correct me generously so that I may also be with you in this World's Largest Online Source of unique information! And so I hereby humbly beg and plead your magnanimity and benevolence to unblock me with an assurance that I will never be so again in the future. [[User:Olickal Peter Thomas|Peter Thomas]] ([[User talk:Olickal Peter Thomas#top|talk]]) 04:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am blocked due to repeated image uploading, as the reasons stated; to say disruptive editing. Actually after creating the article i tried to upload a logo (Image), but it was not visible on the page; and the first two time the "target file name" and the original file name of the image were different. And even after correcting the name, the image did not appear on the page and so I have uploaded again the image. ACTUALLY I did not know it would create such a "vandalism" to the standard guidelines of Wikipedia! And I am a learner and new to Wikipedia. And you all may teach and correct me generously so that I may also be with you in this World's Largest Online Source of unique information! And so I hereby humbly beg and plead your magnanimity and benevolence to unblock me with an assurance that I will never be so again in the future. [[User:Olickal Peter Thomas|Peter Thomas]] ([[User talk:Olickal Peter Thomas#top|talk]]) 04:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 153: / Line 153: @@
 <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]].   </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 17:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
 :To be specific, you have repeatedly uploaded images which are [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violations]], created inappropriately [[WP:SOAP|promotional]] articles, and otherwise been editing inappropriately. It appears that you are either unable or unwilling to learn how to follow the policies which apply to editing Wikipedia. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 17:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
+== Help I have been blocked ==
+Dear All,
+{{unblock|I am blocked due to repeated image uploading, as the reasons stated; to say disruptive editing. Actually after creating the article i tried to upload a logo (Image), but it was not visible on the page; and the first two time the "target file name" and the original file name of the image were different. And even after correcting the name, the image did not appear on the page and so I have uploaded again the image. ACTUALLY I did not know it would create such a "vandalism" to the standard guidelines of Wikipedia! And I am a learner and new to Wikipedia. And you all may teach and correct me generously so that I may also be with you in this World's Largest Online Source of unique information! And so I hereby humbly beg and plead your magnanimity and benevolence to unblock me with an assurance that I will never be so again in the future. [[User:Olickal Peter Thomas|Peter Thomas]] ([[User talk:Olickal Peter Thomas#top|talk]]) 04:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)}}