Talk:Senkaku Islands: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:47, 11 June 2020

Skip to table of contents

Template:Senkaku Islands sanctions

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Japan: Geography & environment / Ryukyu B‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:38, October 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Geography and environment task force.

This article is supported by the Ryukyu task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Taiwan B‑class Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

China B‑class Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Islands C‑class

	Islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

A news item involving Senkaku Islands was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 June 2008.

Wikipedia

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Pete Hunt (2013-02-05). "China and Japan's Wikipedia War". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 2013-02-12.
Carl Miller (2019-10-05). "China and Taiwan clash over Wikipedia edits". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2019-10-04. Retrieved 2019-10-05.

Template:Copied multi

Imperial Chinese edict - a forgery?

In the article it is written: "Permission for collecting herbs on three of the islands was recorded in an Imperial Chinese edict of 1893." I thought this was an important fact concerning the islands, however untill I found an analysis in a paper of Han-yi Shaw, THE DIAOYUTAI/SENKAKU ISLANDS· DISPUTE: ITS HISTORY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE OWNERSHIP CLAIMS OF THE P.R.C., R.O.C., AND JAPAN. p.62. Excerpt: "Perhaps it may be also suggested that while the imperial edict per se is not a genuine one and was possibly used merely as a commercial advertisement for Sheng's pharmaceutical house, evidently it was "fabricated" based on the common understanding of the Chinese public that the islands were Chinese territory [...]" Therefore I suggest that questions about the authenticity of the edict schould be mentioned in the article.

Section on the documentary is biased

The section states opinions rather than facts and should be flagged Martropolis (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "In the 1470s( early Ming Dynasty), . . ." to "In the 1470s (early Ming Dynasty), . . ." 202.246.252.97 (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done NiciVampireHeart 01:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The lighthouse is much older

The lighthouse on Uotsuri was built by a nationalist group in 1978 and nationalized in 2005. See ja: 魚釣島灯台. The nationalist group built another on Kita-kojima in 1996. 220.147.88.128 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about possible problems in this article

The same type of problem that exists on the Senkaku Islands dispute page also exists here. The China Coast Guard was mentioned in the lead section of this article despite not being mentioned in the source quoted. From these examples, I infer that this page too may have other problematic areas and I recommend that the article be thoroughly reviewed and checked by multiple experts at the earliest possible date, including the edits I made. I am not an expert in the specifics of this dispute, but the fact that I have seemingly discovered several major problems after a brief glance at the articles is not a good sign. Thanks for any help. Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinnacle Islands

These islands are in dispute, shouldn't we follow WP:NPOV by naming them the Pinnacle Islands instead? 2001:8003:9008:1301:BD1C:A878:DDEF:82DD (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 The same type of problem that exists on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Senkaku_Islands_dispute&diff=922155756&oldid=919755877 Senkaku Islands dispute] page also exists here. The China Coast Guard was mentioned in the lead section of this article despite not being mentioned in the source quoted.  From these examples, I infer that this page too may have other problematic areas and I recommend that the article be thoroughly reviewed and checked by multiple experts at the earliest possible date, including the edits I made. I am not an expert in the specifics of this dispute, but the fact that I have seemingly discovered several major problems after a brief glance at the articles is not a good sign. Thanks for any help. [[User:Geographyinitiative|Geographyinitiative]] ([[User talk:Geographyinitiative|talk]]) 12:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
+== Pinnacle Islands ==
+These islands are in dispute, shouldn't we follow [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|WP:NPOV]] by naming them the [[Pinnacle Islands]] instead? [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:9008:1301:BD1C:A878:DDEF:82DD|2001:8003:9008:1301:BD1C:A878:DDEF:82DD]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:9008:1301:BD1C:A878:DDEF:82DD|talk]]) 16:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)