Jump to content

Talk:Imran Khan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mohanabhil (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
{{TOC_limit|4}}
{{TOC_limit|4}}


==Minor edit in the controversy section required==

Rather than calling Osama bin Laden leader of Al-Qaeda. Refer to him as former leader of Al-Qaeda.


== Imran Khan is Muhajir ==
== Imran Khan is Muhajir ==

Revision as of 23:01, 25 June 2020

    Template:Vital article

    Minor edit in the controversy section required

    Rather than calling Osama bin Laden leader of Al-Qaeda. Refer to him as former leader of Al-Qaeda.

    Imran Khan is Muhajir

    Imran Khan is also Muhajir from his maternal family youtube.com/dGZGM0CZSYU, please Muhajir people's category also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.32.197 (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Signature

    I am wondering what's the source of the signature present in the Infobox. It looks quite different from the one in this official document. Bigfoot Yeti (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2020

    Link the Mianwali, an area in Mianwali district Amr2jm (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. I saw multiple links for Mianwali and variants already in the article. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    April 2020

    Hi, I reverted your (edit) manually. If you removed cited content once again, it will be undone without being reverted manually. You are requested to explain the reason for removing cited content on the article Imran Khan. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @TheBirdsShedTears: You are using a 8 years old source and a 9 year old source(about his book) to claim "popularity" and that is grossly non-neutral, as well as WP:UNDUE. Your other edit is also violating WP:NPOV and looks irrelevant because you are giving undue weight to a politician (see WP:SOAPBOX) and discussing about a different topic, about a pilot's release, but not his reaction to the terrorist attack. You should revert both of your edits. Mohanabhil (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    As far as WP:V is concerned, it is discouraged to remove cited content. Editors can improve existing article or part of a page (section) rather than removing. Your (this edit) looks puffery as per the sources you added. Imran Khan has been criticized for claiming he has "no knowledge": In fact, it shouldn't be written like this. "Not much knowledge" is the correct phrase as per sources. Furthermore, i didn't see "he has been criticized" in any of the reliable sources. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    That is your disbelief that content only needs to meet WP:V for inclusion. That is wrong. You can remove blatant WP:UNDUE and WP:POV, and that is what I was doing. WSJ source calls him "deeply hypocritical", how that is not criticism in your book? You need to understand that "puffery" means "exaggerated or false praise". Mohanabhil (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    You didn't understand me. The content you added only focuses on his criticism rather than making a neutral contribution. You have not mentioned "Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has since accused the Indian government of ethnic cleansing of the Muslim-majority region." (relevant to your edits and also mentioned in sources you added "puffery"). I don't think you are trying to stay a neutral editor. If editors do not add "what their native politicians have done with minorities", it is same as whitewashing their politics. What is left to add on Wikipedia? only growing praise for their native politicians and criticism for neighboring countries? See WP:NPOV, WP:CRIT and WP:CRV TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    What Narendra Modi does has nothing to do with this page, because this page is not to be used as a WP:SOAPBOX for Imran Khan. It would be "puffery" only if I add something overly positive and never saw that happening in my history of editing. I have removed the disputed content now because either way, all of them sounds WP:UNDUE. Mohanabhil (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]