Jump to content

Talk:The Beatles: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 4 edits by 220.233.197.251 (talk) to last revision by Pawnkingthree (TW)
Line 125: Line 125:
:::Sounds good to me. The point I was making (in the linked discussion) about the Guinness figure is that, as wildly optimistic as it may be, at least it's recognised by a notable third-party source. But as far as what we state as fact, especially in the lead – yes, it should be the same figure that appears at List of best-selling music artists. [[User:JG66|JG66]] ([[User talk:JG66|talk]]) 14:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
:::Sounds good to me. The point I was making (in the linked discussion) about the Guinness figure is that, as wildly optimistic as it may be, at least it's recognised by a notable third-party source. But as far as what we state as fact, especially in the lead – yes, it should be the same figure that appears at List of best-selling music artists. [[User:JG66|JG66]] ([[User talk:JG66|talk]]) 14:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
::::I've changed it to 600 million, using the BBC source.-- [[User:Pawnkingthree|P-K3]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 13:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
::::I've changed it to 600 million, using the BBC source.-- [[User:Pawnkingthree|P-K3]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 13:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

== Michael Jackson give back ==

I recall Michael Jackson gave the catalogue he owned back, free of charge, to the remaining 2 Beatles just before his death.

[[Special:Contributions/98.164.71.229|98.164.71.229]] ([[User talk:98.164.71.229|talk]]) 10:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:52, 8 September 2020

Template:Vital article

Featured articleThe Beatles is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 18, 2004, and on July 7, 2017.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 30, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
August 29, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
August 29, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 5, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
April 26, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 9, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
November 16, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 3, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
September 26, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 3, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 26, 2009, and September 26, 2010.
Current status: Featured article

Template:Find sources notice


Further reading

Jarniewicz, Jerzy; Alina Kwiatkowska (eds.) (2010). Fifty Years with the Beatles. The Impact of the Beatles on Contemporary Culture. Lodz: Lodz University Press. ISBN 978-83-7525-465-5

Logos problem

Official “Drop-T” logo from thebeatles.com
Version currently used in the article created by Inductiveload

The logo currently used in this article is not accurate. I offer replacing it with the official version.--Libron (talk) 05:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... at least it's an upper case T. lol. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC) [reply]

800 million sales figure

Surely we can do better than a press release for this figure? I'm minded to delete it as it's not an independent source.-- P-K3 (talk) 13:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you said that, P-K3. Mixed in with the recent changes (and reverts), I'd tried to raise divert attention to a past discussion on this: Talk:The Beatles/Archive 34#Estimated world sales (again). Looking further back in the archives, there should be part one of the discussion, if I remember right.
Perhaps the lead can mention the range of estimates, rather than committing to one, and most importantly, attribute the figure each time – that is, unless there is something approaching a confirmed sales figure. I've always thought we should follow the estimated total given at List of best-selling music artists, or at least ensure it's given prime place if we provide other, higher figures. JG66 (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for linking to that discussion, a shame it didn't get more of a response. My view is that we should revert to the 600 million figure if that is the one that appears most often in reliable sources. Apple Corps and Universal Music Group are not independent sources and cannot be used. This would also match the figure at List_of_best-selling_music_artists#250_million_or_more_records. I'm familiar with the "1 billion" claim as it was repeated every year in the Guinness Book of Records, so no issue with including that as a footnote.-- P-K3 (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. The point I was making (in the linked discussion) about the Guinness figure is that, as wildly optimistic as it may be, at least it's recognised by a notable third-party source. But as far as what we state as fact, especially in the lead – yes, it should be the same figure that appears at List of best-selling music artists. JG66 (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed it to 600 million, using the BBC source.-- P-K3 (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson give back

I recall Michael Jackson gave the catalogue he owned back, free of charge, to the remaining 2 Beatles just before his death.

98.164.71.229 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]