User talk:Bentheswimmer11

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bentheswimmer11. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Ytoyoda (talk) 06:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm Leventio. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Washington Capitals have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Leventio (talk) 21:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Washington Capitals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Erik Haula, you may be blocked from editing. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’m a Canes fan and when he was on the team, we called him “Mr Bo-time” because he scored powerplay goals for us and as a food promo for PPG, we would say “I’m a Caniac and it’s Bo-time” in a partnership with Bojangles for a free biscuit Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 00:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carolina Hurricanes attendance

Just letting you know that we don't add percentages for attendance in the regular season game log. If the attendance percentage really matters to you, you can update the "Attendance =" parameter in the info box. But we don't add percentages for every single home game that the Hurricanes play. Yowashi (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware. I just felt like putting it there and at the moment, I was bored. Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Bentheswimmer11! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 18:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canes Storm Squad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canes Storm Squad, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.nhl.com/hurricanes/fans/storm-squad. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is in our own words as a currently do work for the Carolina Hurricanes’ fan development and promotions team. Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 06:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bentheswimmer11. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Delta Air Lines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-and-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bentheswimmer11! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should stay. The Boston Bruins Ice Girls and Oilers Octane are on Wikipedia but makes no sense the Storm Squad isn’t. The storm squad is more popular than them. If you’d like, you can add more info from their social platforms or Website to make is sufficient. NFL squads have teams and the page is much larger than other pages I’ve seen in general Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Delta Air Lines, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. –DMartin 06:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dallas Stars Ice Girls

The article Dallas Stars Ice Girls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failing of notability per WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 09:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dallas Stars Ice Girls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dallas Stars Ice Girls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Stars Ice Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Norfolk Southern–Gregson Street Overpass, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 03:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Edinburgh Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not delete material without quoting a reliable source. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 12:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The route I removed does not show as a destination from Boston according to Delta’s route map and is not scheduled to fly at any time throughout the next year Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mesa Airlines / United Express

Nice work Ben! you beat me to the news lol Have an even better than expected day. AirOpsExecnPlt (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Ben, the order is for a total of (100) aircraft, financed by UAL debt but managed on a wet-lease by Mesa, so just 100 rather than 200 for the United Express page. AirOpsExecnPlt (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reference says: “ United Airlines has conditionally agreed to purchase 100 ES-19 aircraft, once the aircraft meet United's safety, business and operating requirements. Mesa Airlines, United's key strategic partner in bringing electric aircraft into commercial service, has also agreed to add 100 ES-19 aircraft to its fleet, subject to similar requirements.” Key word is “ALSO” Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC) I think I was wrong, and always willing to accept that. What a new beginning for EAS route service, almost back to the late 80's when my family traveled in B1900Ds before all the regionals went to jets.We'll see how the ES-19s and Tecnam 9 place Volts perform. Thanks Ben AirOpsExecnPlt (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unied Express

your math is incorrect, see the Negative numbers or fleet Reduction numbers within your equation!