User talk:Trade

Welcome!

Hello, Trade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moxy (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Handball

Hey. I saw you edited some handball articles. Pleas visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Handball and Portal:Handball. You can also add you to the handball members list. When you edit handball article pleas add an assessment to the talk like: {{WikiProject Handball|class=stub|importance=low}}. --Malo95 (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sims 4: Parenthood, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mediator and Insensitive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Handball Federation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bulgarian Handball Federation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bulgarian Handball Federation (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hewhoamareismyself was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoam areismyself 05:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! hewhoam areismyself 05:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Rescuing"

I appreciate your work in creating Internet Archive links, but I do question the word "rescuing", in this edit, since all the original links were in fact functional. Is that word yours, or is it something that is standard with IABot? I ask because I think that "protecting" is a much better word when it comes to currently functioning links. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 05:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation

Hello, Trade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bulgarian Handball Federation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab request finished

Hi Trade,

Please check out Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Game_Rating_and_Administration_Committee_contentent_descriptor_pictograms. I hope the results are satisfactory! If not, please let me know what needs to be fixed. --Slashme (talk) 22:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work!--Trade (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)@Slashme:[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IABot when it's not needed

I see you're doing a lot of IABot-related edits, but in articles that don't seem to need it. My understanding is current consensus is not to "rescue" sources unnecessarily as it bloats the page. If we decide to include the archive links for every page, a bot should do it. Note that "rescuing" doesn't actually do any archiving -- that's already done by the bot behind the scenes. It just moves the archive link that already exists in the bot's database into the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any easy way to see which references are archived in the Wayback Machine and which are not. It's either archive them all or risk the reference becoming rotten sometime in the future. Which, considering the age on many of these references, are likely to happen soon. @Rhododendrites: --Trade (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that the main purpose of IABot is automatically archiving links that are added as references. It maintains a database off-wiki. The idea is that by the time someone notices a link is dead, if it hadn't yet been archived it's too late. So it does it automatically, but doesn't add them to the article unless prompted to do so. I think it also periodically crawls to look for deadlinks and adds archive links to those, but I don't know how frequently. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for inputs

A Peer review request has been made for article Islamic marriage contract to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for 4chan

I have nominated 4chan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 22:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need to Switch from CC0 to Fair Use images.

I know I have problems of uploading images from Wikimedia Commons to insert into the page, but the copyright is very difficult and I don't see "fair use" copyright anywhere. So, I use it CC0 instead. Later, it went bad minutes ago about copyright images because CC0 is not possibly acquired for the images or just a public domain. I'm no help for uploading for images anymore. In case, it is possible to redo the license from CC0 into "fair use" again? If not, I'd appreciated you at lot about that. Fortunewriter (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to upload a fair use image it has to be done on Wikipedia only. Fair use images should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Just do the same as you did with File:Epidemic FilmPoster.jpeg User:Trade--Trade (talk) 19:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A positive news update

The article about Artist and poet Ashraf Fayadh to which you seem to have contributed previously may be due for a positive news update of release. This just for info if you wish to cross check and update. Bookku (talk) 14:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Yeen3002

You cannot withdraw a legal threat made by another user, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to. I was trying to help him with setting up the unblock request since it's clear he wants to be unblocked Trade (talk) 23:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but they need to follow the instructions they've been given. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As they don't seem capable of following instructions, I left a note on blocking admin's talk. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A more interesting question is whether or not a reasonable person would take the "legal" part seriously. Considering it was one remark out of a larger rant/shitpost(?) Trade (talk) 23:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We block legal threats on sight, whether I personally agree or not -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled by this talk page by accident and saw the exchange above. A few hours ago, I left this message for a blocked user who was confused:

"FYI, Wikipedia has still another policy, WP:NLT - "No Legal Threats". I read at an off-Wikipedia site that you're thinking of involving a lawyer. If someone makes a legal threat, our policy is to block them. This policy's purpose is less about silencing critics and discouraging them from exercising their legal rights than simplifying the legal process. This policy protects the Wikimedia Foundation from having a bunch of amateur editors complicating a potential lawsuit by saying all sorts of unhelpful things. As you have seen by now, our community includes a wide range of personalities; some are problematic. If you're taking the legal route, Wikimedia wants their lawyers talking to you and your lawyers -- professionals talking to professionals."

In other words, this is less about punishment than legal process, although many editors and even many admin think of it as a punitive tool to be wielded. When in doubt, block. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 23:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Schloss Pertenstein

Hello, Trade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schloss Pertenstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of YouTubers

Do not add references or citation needed tags. Per the consensus reached in a June 2018 request for comment (permanent link), there is no need to add references to this list solely to verify that the artist is indeed a notable YouTuber. Those references are in the articles or should be added to there. When you edit the list, there is an edit notice. Follow what it says. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that was stupid of me Trade (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rayman Redemption

Hello, Trade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rayman Redemption".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Violence against nonbinary people

A tag has been placed on Category:Violence against nonbinary people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 00:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 04:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it counts as an "introduction" when i already received the same template two weeks ago imho. My guess is that users are only supposed to receive this once to avoid spam Trade (talk) 04:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once per topic -- it's an area where the policy isn't super well written (there are individual articles that are covered by 3+ contentious topics, for instance). But from a process standpoint, they're technically correct. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 04:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given your WP:ASPERSION casting in article talk space you should pay attention to the contents of the notice. TarnishedPath^talk 09:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]