Jump to content

User talk:CVDX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Liz (talk | contribs) at 23:04, 5 May 2024 (Notification: speedy deletion of User:CVDX/sandbox.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Vandergay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August Kubizek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor, German and Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yoñlu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Allegro and Alias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juscelino Kubitschek bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asymmetric (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luiz Felipe Scolari, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch, Brazilian and Intercontinental Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sim City (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alfaia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Technique
Espírito Santo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Italian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfaia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Technique (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quipu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thread and Ancient Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Equal temperament, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Western music and Multiple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vandergay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 99Vidas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Artifact and Combo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ficha Limpa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmen Lucia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eastern world, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counterpart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note these special sanctions for American politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  Bishonen | talk 17:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brazil nut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Embraer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estado Novo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devanagari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurzgesagt, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grant, Artificial meat and Carbon capture.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources and Synthesis

I refer to your edit here: [1]. Please read WP:RS. The YouTube video you are trying to add is clearly not from an established reliable source. Please don't add such low-quality material as references to this article or any other.

Please also read WP:SYNTH. A paragraph you added (which I have since removed here [2]) is a clear violation of this guideline, in the sense that none of the sources you have added actually criticise the subject, rather, you're just joining the dots yourself. You also cannot cite this to an unreliable source, such as that YouTube video, even if the connection is indeed accurate. The connections needs to be made by a reliable source in order to be cited. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 03:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply and explanations, Damien. I appreciate the later edits condensing the info from sources I added and removing the unsourced material. I didn't know much about the guideline you cited and have since read up on it.
I've now re-added a bit with the info from Kurzgesagt's statement where they detail their sources of funding into the section you created, as I feel it is relevant and after reading the applicable guidelines, I believe it counts as an acceptable source since they self-published info about themselves, though I was on the fence as to whether it might be considered "self-serving" as per WP:SYNTH. If you feel that it is please do remove it.
Though, just as a sidebar here because I'm curious as to what the consensus and practices about this are in the WP community, I find it funny that the video is considered inadequate for Wikipedia because it's self-published on YouTube, but if any freelance journalist (like myself) were to synthesize these same references with the same conclusions into a hit piece and post it on a news site it would be acceptable.
The policy seems quite outdated in assuming integrity from any journalistic source while presuming unreliability from self-published sources, when in fact the accuracy of the "synthesizing" would be exactly the same -- the video was very sensationalistic in tone (as a journalistic piece could also be) and I tried to counterbalance that in my editing. As a seemingly way more experienced Wikipedian than me, I'd appreciate it if you indulged me on how this contradiction (if it is even considered one) is dealt with in talk pages.
Also, putting the question of reliability aside, in 2023 self-published sources such as these elicit comparable (or even greater) community reactions to journalistic pieces, especially since the subject matter is also a YouTube channel. It received millions upon millions of views and was popular enough to cause a response by Kurzgesagt themselves, so I am curious as to whether it would be anathema to even mention this video (as opposed to using it as a source), as in context its impact was huge.
I don't want to be combative or anything, I was just genuinely curious because I'm passionate about Wikipedia.
Vandergay (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The main issue here is actually WP:SELFPUB. As that guideline points out, anybody can self-publish anything. By comparison, a freelance journalist (at least one who is published in a reputable source), cannot say whatever they like. They can submit whatever they like, but their work is subjected to an editorial and fact-checking process. I have worked as a freelance journalist at times in the past. Sometimes things I submitted were modified by my editor prior to publication for a number of reasons. Of course it's not a perfect process, but it's certainly a lot more solid than allowing things to be cited just because they are popular. Donald Trump got millions of views for suggesting you could kill COVID by injecting bleach; the number of views his comments generated obviously has no bearing on their validity. Neither does the fact his statement was popular enough to cause a response by medical organisations all around the world who disagreed with his theory. Anyway, that's just my take on why this guideline is a good idea. I didn't come up with the guideline and have no power to modify it, but I do think enforcing it is in the best interest of Wikipedia.
Thanks for your friendly response. It's always good to ask questions. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 10:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note these special sanctions for American politics

Information icon You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. --Hipal (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Administrative regions of the Federal District (Brazil)
added a link pointing to Sobradinho
Michael Biggs (singer)
added a link pointing to Santa Teresa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 00:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:CVDX/sandbox

Hello, CVDX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CVDX&oldid=1222438742"