User talk:HKT3593

Welcome!

Hello HKT3593! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hummer HX has been reverted.
Your edit here to Hummer HX was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz5Y8Ayc6CY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm RenatUK. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Freedom of speech, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Renat 03:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Freedom of speech. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Freedom of speech, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found the information in the book Zuo Zhuan and I translate the Chinese reference HKT3593 (talk) 05:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The materials are not only from the research institutes of many scholars, but also the original texts and translations of ancient books. HKT3593 (talk) 15:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient chinese books HKT3593 (talk) 15:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HKT3593, Placing quotations from ancient books along with your self-made translation and your self-made interpretation of how they relate to the article topic is original research. You must stick to the points made in secondary sources. - MrOllie (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HKT3593! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Renat 16:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zuo zhuan and freedom of speech I use the Chinese research, if you can read Chinese(use google translate may have some error because it doesn't support ancient chinese grammer) HKT3593 (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Democracy. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Freedom of speech. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 17:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Presumption of innocence, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 17:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zuo zhuan and freedom of speech I use the Chinese research, if you can read Chinese(use google translate may have some error because it doesn't support ancient chinese grammer) HKT3593 (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the need to attribute content to reliable sources, you must not plagiarize them or violate their copyrights. Rewriting source material in your own words, while substantially retaining the meaning of the references, is not considered to be original research.I do this in democracy article. HKT3593 (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have still failed to cite reliable sources for the interpretation, making your contributions original research regardless of the quality of your translation. General Ization ^Talk 17:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further, you are failing to discuss the contributions on the articles' Talk pages after reversion in each case by multiple other editors, making your repeated assertions of essentially the same content the conduct of several simultaneous edit wars. You are at or approaching WP:3RR at all of them, so I suggest you start discussing the edits on the articles' Talk pages (not here) as you have been invited to do, rather than reasserting them. General Ization ^Talk 17:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Verifiability

In the presumption of innocence pages, just copy the chinese original text and you will find the article. This sentence is really straightforward about the concept of the presumption of innocence. I did not pierce through it. This is verifiable. HKT3593 (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Democratic Potential of Confucian Minben Thought - Viren Murthy Still original research in democracy?

第肆章先秦儒家思想中可作為人權內涵的思索 Although this is chinese paper(Zuo zhuan about freedom of speech) , you can still translate it(it maybe wrong in Google because it doesn't support ancient chinese grammer). HKT3593 (talk) 18:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"just copy the chinese original text and you will find the article" is not what is called for at Wikipedia:Verifiability and insufficient to satisfy our policies. As I explained above, at this point you should discuss your proposed edits at each article on that article's Talk page, not here. General Ization ^Talk 18:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just reply in democracy talk page, can you explain? HKT3593 (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will leave that to the other editors of that article who previously reverted your edits, and who better know its content. My purpose was to urgently call your attention to policies that apply throughout Wikipedia, and to warn you that the situation was rapidly approaching the point at which a block from editing would be warranted. General Ization ^Talk 18:49, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Trying to be as sincere (and friendly) as I can be about this, I sense that your skill at expressing yourself in English is quite limited. I mention this not to insult you, but to explain why you should probably abandon your efforts to make relatively complex and controversial edits to key articles in the English version of Wikipedia. My concern is that, even if you feel your reasoning is valid (though I can't say that I see any reason to agree with it so far), your ability to understand what other editors are trying to tell you and for you to make clear and strong arguments in defense of your edits on the Talk pages of the articles is likewise limited by your skill with the language. This makes it very probable that you will be blocked from editing before you succeed in communicating your viewpoint. This is just my advice to you, not a warning, per se, but please give it some thought. General Ization ^Talk 23:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In chinese wiki this is not a problem for me because everyone know Chinese and know how to find the original ancient chinese text(modern chinese grammer is not same as ancient chinese) but in Eng page, I have to admit this become a problem but I want to let more people to know the pride of ancient china(not CCP). Thats why I am here. HKT3593 (talk) 00:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, and I applaud you for your pride and your efforts to share it with our readers. That's why it will be better for you to take some additional time to understand our policies, and perhaps edit less highly visible articles for a while to gain some experience and confidence, so that you will be able to edit here for a long time and be successful at achieving your goal. Good wishes to you. General Ization ^Talk 00:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NSX(GT500) in JGTC and Super GT

Hello HKT3593,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NSX(GT500) in JGTC and Super GT for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hey man im josh (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2008 Super GT Series

added links pointing to Motul and Takata

Honda NSX (first generation)

added a link pointing to Mugen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NSX GT500 in JGTC and Super GT moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NSX GT500 in JGTC and Super GT, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yu Jie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Yi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NSX GT500 in JGTC and Super GT

Hello, HKT3593. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NSX GT500 in JGTC and Super GT, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NSX GT500 in JGTC and Super GT

Hello, HKT3593. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NSX GT500 in JGTC and Super GT".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shangjunshu

You can read Pines Book of Lord Shang to make progress in locating the kind of commentaries you are looking for. I am more concerned with the thrust of history, though will ultimately make the effort to do complete a reading of Pines commentaries, for a more well rounded well rounded background in the Shangjunshu. Please contact me if you can locate articles on the shangjunshu as opposed to unsourced vandalistic efforts. If you dedicate yourself to vandalizing the shangjunshu but can locate suitable references to do so, that will be helpful.FourLights (talk) 04:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your edit to Porsche 936 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]