User talk:EdwinCasadoBaez

A tag has been placed on The Human Abstract, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great work so far on all the Dominican articles! I've just started but I hope to contribute as much as possible to wikipedia in general... Recuerda amigo, todavia falta mucho por hacer EYDrevista 19:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Archive 1 -- May 2007}}

Aster(Cable)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Aster(Cable), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. John Reaves 00:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alcazarsd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alcazarsd.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:TPro.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TPro.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Alcazarsd.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alcazarsd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:3-alstom-metropolis.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:3-alstom-metropolis.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 08:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado EdwinCasadoBaez, any way to get that image legally up and running again?! we need a good image, how about first class construction site photos?! – Moebiusuibeom 17:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santo Domingo Metro

EdwinCasadoBaez; you have added very valuable info and images but, "with all due respect", you have to improve on the English and the way the article is expressed, remember that this is for an international viewer and we must place Santo Domingo high on top, you must have a native English speaking friend around!, and believe me, i myself go to great lengths to have my articles in either, Español or English (or other languages) be polished and professional! Un compatriota latinoamericano _ Moebiusuibeom 15:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, every place on earth that has an efficient public transportation system thrives, this metro will definitely jump start Santo Domingo into the future, believe me, when Chicago, Buenos Aires, London or Berlin put their systems to work, those cities had a chaotic transport system witch prevented progress, many people where unemployed, slums where around, an efficient transport system will change the fisionomy of the city for betterment, new jobs will come, change will be inevitable, Santo Domingo is prime for this type of transport system, Alstom and Siemens have been installing metro systems for over 100 years, they are pioneers, they know what they are doing.

The negatives of certain paragraphs in article could be canalized as Pros and Cons, please revise or symplfy, I may be able to polish it up later in week if you like. me podes contestarme en español, saludos _ Moebiusuibeom 15:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado Edwin, aqui de vuelta, me tome la libertad y te hize los ajustes, espero estes de acuerdo, cualquier duda comunicate, la verdad que se ve como un mega articulo, a proposito, hizistes el plano de la ciudad, te quedo muy bien, sos Diseñador Gráfico? Saludos Cordiales – Moebiusuibeom 02:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin, gracias por los elogios, casi nadie tampoco es perfecto en ingles y todavia falta pulirlo, ¡en cualquier momento te ayudo! greetings – Moebiusuibeom 03:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola compatriota. Has hecho muy buen trabajo y de manera extensa. Yo he creado varios articulos, pero ni una fraccion de los que tu: me desespero o me da pereza. Una cosa, solo para mejorarlo, el artículo del metro debería tener claras las fuentes. Cuando lo lei, me parecia todo tan optimista y bonito que pense que lo habria escrito uno de los contratistas que alli trabajan o de los funcionarios responsables. En se momento fue que entre al history y vi que tu eras el principal contribuyente. Incluye las referencias y fuentes antes de que los demas te crucifiquen. Cuyaya 09:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, he visto que tanto artículos de periódicos como de revistas son usados, asi que mejor eso que nada. Cuyaya 08:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heroes Del Silencio

Sorry about the quick speedy, but I'm not psychic. I base these things on what's there, not what's going to be there. What was there in the intial version was speedy-able due to language. After is was modified, it was okay, and I withdrew the tag immediately with no problems. Thanks again. Finngall 05:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have A Quick Question For you!

hey. Do you know about "heroes Del Silencio"???if you do, can you help me out in their discography section and Albums?User:EdwinCasadoBaez

Sorry, no I don't. I just randomly came across some of those articles and made some minor edits. timrem 01:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Boguslavsky

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Alan Boguslavsky, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.130.159.15 11:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lapiz Conciente

A tag has been placed on Lapiz Conciente, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santo Domingo Metro

Estimado EdwinCasadoBaez, muy bueno el Infobox Public transit aunque le haria los siguientes cambios:

Began operation significa que ya funciona, lo cambiaria a "Inauguration" Villa Melia no creo que sea necesario para un publico internacional y Daily Ridership le pondria "200.000 (projected)"

Y la categoria "Rapid transit in the Dominican Republic" no es necesario, la quitaria, la veo como vandalismo, esta persona ya hizo cambios en otras paginas ferroviarias en cuales algunos son inaceptables, la remplazaria con "Transportation in the Dominican Republic" como estaba antes, yo la coloque mientras tanto en See also – Moebiusuibeom-en 12:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey; Disactivated the Copyedit (See Discussion Santo Domingo Metro discussion: Copyedit). Tengamos cuidado entrando data mal escrita porque sino reactivan:

y no queremos esto si deseamos que nos categoricen eventualmente (¿?) como un "Good Article". Ver nota que deje en discussion Santo Domingo Metro: Copyedit – Moebiusuibeom-en 21:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Santo Domingo

Estimado EdwinCasadoBaez; SI, le voy a dar un vistazo al articulo de Santo Domingo, como te dije me interesan temas de índole urbanística, ferroviaria y ambiental.

En el Metro de Santo Domingo agregastes For Metropolitan Santo Domingo See Santo Domingo, NO ES NECESARIO, debajo de esa linea hay un link a Santo Domingo, ademas es un tema ferroviario. Lo mejor es dejar los articulos tranquilitos hasta que halla info concreta, las páginas ganadoras son las que menos interferencias tienen, las páginas minimalistas tambien obtienen credito, yo se que todos tenemos el impulso de estar modificando los articulos pero no se ve bien al menos que sean cambios concretos y de significancia, y a propósito, el mes que viene me doy una vueltita por tu patria, Saludos – Moebiusuibeom-en 01:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santiago

EdwinCasadoBaez; en articulo de Santiago no combiene incluir Demographics y Government si no hay info disponible, ademas Demographics por lo general aplica a naciones, te puli un poco la data nuevamente. Voy a fucionar New and planned projects con Growth and Development si estas de acuerdo, es masomenos el mismo tema. Porque no incluir nuevas secciones como Culture: Music, Monuments, Festivals, Theatres y Night life y Arquitecture ya que hay algunas construcciones sobresalientes tengo entendido – y por ultimo, el "Infobox City" esta descuadrado, vos sabés corregir esto? Moebiusuibeom-en 20:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edwin I saw your post on my comment page. I appreciate your compliments, but they don't belong to me. I have done some minor work on the Santiago de los Caballeros article, but far from a "great work". Those compliments belong to someone else. Anyway, I'm willing to strive for a "great work" of my own :-). Do you have anything in mind? I have a few pictures I took a couple of months ago... we could use some of those. We'll keep in touch on that topic. I'd really love to see a better article about "La Hidalga de los 30 Caballeros". Dominican 18:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santo Domingo Article

Hola Edwin, article is well written, done extensive small corrections, I believe you should merge Ciudad Trujillo into article so we can eliminate infobox, the map of Santo Domingo Metro should be eliminated and used exclusively with the Santo Domingo Metro article, we may need a better image for (UNESCO Box) "Colonial City of Santo Domingo" and image: "A view of Santo Domingo" is terrible, I would eliminate this one, we need some additional high quality photos! Also a section on Music; “Merengue or Bachata” would not be a bad idea, witch is where internationally known by Juan Luis Guerra was born.

You may question changes I've done, let me know your thoughs! It still may need some polishing up!, Cheers – Moebiusuibeom-en 18:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciudad Colonial versus Zona Colonial District Article

Hey, did some "tweaking" here too, tried to fusion together Ciudad Colonial with Zona Colonial District since Ciudad Colonial is Articles Name and it's also UNESCO's name but apparently to the masses its known as Zona Colonial District, please clear me up on this subject and if changes i did don't make sense let me know, I've also re-rated articles since I believe they where truly underrated – Moebiusuibeom-en 03:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado EdwinCasadoBaez, hize un "TEST" con un nuevo look para Zona Colonial District, es totalmenete Wikipedia legal, es controversial y atrevido, no se si me gusta pero tiene potencial, voz decis ya que comensastes este artículo, este estilito se aplicaria a casos muy especiales como es Ciudad Colonial , podemos volver pa'tras si no estas de acuerdo, esto es solo un TEST, ¡comentarios por favor! – Moebiusuibeom-en 04:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replies:

Re-Rating??

um!!by the way did you re-rated the Articles of Zona Colonial (Ciudad Colonial) and Santo Domingo??? they seen to have the same rating as before because they had Start Class Already and i believe that the Santo Domingo article should be rated B-Class? shouldn't it?

Sorry, undid changes by User:Jwillbur, he re-assess ratings without consulting and underrated it, maybe vandalism or a simple mistake, ¡OjO!, have to be on the look out, didn't know that this occurred, check Talk:Ciudad Colonial (Santo Domingo).

I'm gladd you like Ciudad Colonial (Santo Domingo), now after polishing it up I think it looks superb, I really like it. I may be visiting this magnificent place soon!

I'll get back shortly – Moebiusuibeom-en 15:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santiago light rail

EdwinCasadoBaez; hola, the hize un "copyedit" y como no hay suficiente info sobre el largo del sistema o las estaciones, simplifique un poquito el articulo para que no salga el Indice y crear un articulo que resalte de los otros con un look minimilista, agregue unos buenos links. Espero estes de acuerdo, comunicate con FEVE (en español) y pideles unas imagenes en alta res., si no estas seguro como hacerlo comunicate conmigo. Aqui un articulo que escribi, San Juan-Caguas Rail fijate como a quedado tranquilito por varia semanas, demuestra estabilidad, ademas estoy esperando que me lo suban de categoria – Moebiusuibeom-en 19:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, "Proposed Stations" significa que ya las estaciones estan designadas, por eso lo elimine temporalmente, esto no significa que el articulo tendra menos impacto, al contrario, y aunque estamos bien entusiasmados con el progreso de vuestros pueblos, debemos controlar nuestros impulsos a exponer detalles que no tengan suficiente respaldo, necesitamos pruebas, eso de los "rumores" los anglosajones, angloparlantes, la comunidad del primer mundo y la comunidad internacional no lo traga, de todas forma te felicito por tu perseverancia un gran saludo – Moebiusuibeom-en 23:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Removed

Okay, so I removed the warning on the talk page of Jonathanmbaez, no problem. Coolv(Talk • Contribs) 20:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Republic

please cite information if you insert it. if there is information that is already cited and you dispute it, bring it to the talk section. 64.131.205.111 01:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for placing in information that can't be inferred from a cite. [1]. The population statistic is unfounded and based on opinion. [2]. Opinion with unsourced information. [3]. Removing citations [4]. Placing in NPOV wording to fit an agenda [5] . Please make constructive edits, also please utilize the talk section. 64.131.205.111 03:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:64.131.205.111

With regards to your comments on User talk:64.131.205.111: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 01:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:64.131.205.111. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 01:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editors may mistake your change for vandalism since it was unreferenced. To avoid this problem from happening again, please read WP:REF. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 01:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Sorry for the inconvienience! Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 02:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Republic article

Hello, Edwin I've seen that the DR article doesn't have a neutral point of view, but worst of all, that several editors (which I think it is only one, two at most) make it look like we are vandals if we try to correct anything! It's going to take a loooong time to correct, but I think it can be done. We just need to do our homework, find better references than "hispaniola.com" and "stay cool", because if we don't, we might be considered the vandals. I suggest we start with the History section. What do you think? Dominican 05:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. Let's try to get this article more balanced. I'll start searching for information in places other than the internet and at least a few references in Spanish. I'm thinking that the fact that none of the information is taken from sources written in Spanish (and, therefore, most probably not written in the DR) is biasing the article. Dominican 12:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DDP

going by that train of thought you shouldn't mention dominicans who live in washington heights. 64.131.205.111 09:56, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harrassment

I'm going to ask you to stop speaking to me on my talk page because of the previous abuses that you have done on my talk page. If you have to speak to me make it at an article of concern. 64.131.205.111 02:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I am not the author of "La trinitaria was a Racist secret union" . La Trinitaria was a secret society, but it has at no point been proven to be racist. 90% of dominican are african ancestry is different from 90% of dominicans have african ancestry. 64.131.205.111 02:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Dominican_Republic. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 64.131.205.111 may not be being reasonable and it will take a lot of effort to turn the article around, but that is no excuse for your unacceptable behaviour. Thanks. -- LeCour^T:C 04:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Dominican_Republic [6] . If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 64.131.205.111 05:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Dominican_Republic [7] . If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 64.131.205.111 05:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Dominican_Republic [8] . If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is your final warning! 64.131.205.111 07:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your information...

This incident was posted to the Wikipedia Administrators' Noticeboard for incidents.

On review, I think you clearly have violated WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA several times in the last several days. However, it also appears that you realized that, and have stopped on your own. I would like to commend you for realizing that and restraining yourself. Please be aware that our policies on discussion (see links above) staying polite are policy, and if you cause abuses in the future you will be warned, and possibly blocked if you do more serious abuses on a repeated basis. I don't see any reason to do anything right now, as long as you realize that you were going too far and don't do it again. Georgewilliamherbert 20:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to have gotten the message, so I have blocked you for a week. Please try to contribute constructively and avoid namecalling people in the future. If you have issues with a ban that was enacted, you can bring them up on the community noticeboard to be discussed in a civil manner. You can contest this block by using {{unblock}} on your talk page, which you can still edit. Grand master ka 05:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bunbury.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bunbury.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here one Idea

By the way your right, why not try the English version as much as possible as the Spanish version of DR. It much more develop, and all we doing is reinventing the wheel. Thought should run this first by you see what you think.

Sockpuppet case

I've removed the sock tags from the userpages. The case itself has to stay as a record that it was filed, but it's not going to count against anyone since the CheckUser came up dry.--Rosicrucian 03:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:El Espiritu Del Vino.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:El Espiritu Del Vino.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:00249161 31431f8eb6 b.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:00249161 31431f8eb6 b.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Liftarn 13:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Radical Sonora USA.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Radical Sonora USA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Parasiempre.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parasiempre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFCU

Hi, I moved your RFCU request to WP:RFCU, as I specified in the edit summary, we've just changed the system for technical reasons and hadn't put up the notice yet, please don't add it to WP:RFCU/P again. Thanks, ST47 23:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppets

[9] that where you report sock puppets...but don't do it wait till that user actually break a rule, if you do now then might seem like you out get that user. Welcome back, remember keep you cool and we will make the Dominican Republic the best we can. Hey I survives many block that ip 64...tried, make sure you do the same let follow the rules, and let make it the best we can. If you have any question all you need do is ask, like I will ask you. You can't help me if you get block, so don't get block. AvFnx 03:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the same way but remember this all a word game is not what you say it how you say it. And haven't you notice that in the talk page the argument go to be something else at them end, remember keep a cool head, keep on to the point...if you going lose it, sleep on it and when you ready write. You done some very good work on the article, and there more work to be done.... nice work on the geography. One thing i have learn from the whole IP 64... is that the truth will always come out. I don't know if you notice but s/he tried block me over and over again till i fire back and as you can see s/he is block. I really didn't wanted do that...that a little kid game, but I didn't wanted to get block. So now i really don't want deal w/ that, im about making the article better. So let get to work. AvFnx 06:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hi Edwin, someone suggested an “Infobox” for Ciudad Colonial, (check discussion there) we don't really need an “Infobox” here, Ciudad Colonial is a special place, lets be a little more candid and informal, it'll create contrast with other articles. ~ Moebiusuibeom-en 18:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TPro.jpg

I have tagged Image:TPro.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:METRO-RUTA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:METRO-RUTA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:2ndFloorPlan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2ndFloorPlan.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Request

Mi hermano Dominicano,

I am inviting you to participate in the following conversation: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/EdwinCasadoBaez. I want to see if an end can be put to the uncivil manner in which you and other users have acted and I also want to put an end to the use of sockpuppets. This will be a conversation carried out in a civil and cordial manner. Gracias Tony the Marine 05:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin, I have come to a conclussion and I would like to know if you accept my agreement. Tony the Marine 01:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking of Tomas Alvarez

Hi, why did you blank Tomas Alvarez ? Blanking is almost never the right thing to do (especially when no reason for the blanking is given). You can ask for deletion of the article if you think that it should not be here, but please do not simply blank it. Schutz 13:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hi

Could you please check over the article of Santo Domingo Metro. I edited a couple of things and added a few images..could you reply your opinion please?EdwinCasadoBaez 06:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EdwinCasadoBaez, fixed "station location" section nomenclature amongst others, please revise changes i've made, somewhere its mentioned "Alma Matter Station" but does not appear on Station Locations, please, can you get me official "Station Names"?!! @ Moebiusuibeom-en 18:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

QUESTION ABOUT THE METRO

will the metro have separate north and south bound trains or is it just one train that goes back and forth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward77x (talk • contribs) 05:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HDS3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HDS3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

El Metro

Oye ta jevi, eso lo que me gustaria ser para Dominican articulo. yo no tengo mucho tiempo para estar en esto pero, si nececita ayuda como buscar referencia me deja saber. Tu esta siendo un buen trabajo en esto. A mi me gustaria hacer mejor el articulo de Duarte, Sanchez, y Mella mejor. Otra cosa me gustaria con siguer mas informacion de La Trinitaria, y hacer un articulo subre eso. y yo se lo que tu dice, pero es que en verdad esas selecion no deverian exsitir, son opiniones. Suvir varios atento en Julio de boquiarme, creo que puedo suvir. Yo no voy que llegue ata ese punto. AvFnx 03:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup

The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there! --Pharos 20:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Radical Sonora.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Radical Sonora.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EDMHDS.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EDMHDS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NYC meetup change of schedule

You've expressed an interest in the upcoming New York City Meetup for Saturday, November 3. I'd like to update you on an important change of schedule.

It's been agreed that we should have a 2-hour formal meeting period to start organizing meta:Wikimedia New York City, and this will be held at the Pacific Library (note this is different from the Brooklyn Central Library, which was discussed earlier) from 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM.

This will be in addition to the previously scheduled roving activities at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (this activity has also been cut short a bit) and at the Brooklyn Museum. For full details, see Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC. Ask any questions at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/NYC. Thank you.--Pharos 21:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FlamingosA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FlamingosA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:30 de mayo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:30 de mayo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- STBotI (talk) 17:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FlamingosA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FlamingosA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pequeno.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pequeno.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Alstom Metro.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.transport.alstom.com:80/_eLibrary/picture/workshopwarsawmetro,0.zip. As a copyright violation, Image:Alstom Metro.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Alstom Metro.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Alstom Metro.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Alstom Metro.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Alstom Metro.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. David Arthur 00:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cap Cana

A tag has been placed on Cap Cana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 200.88.101.105 (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]