User talk:J.delanoy

Archives

User warnings

The warnings on the article creators' talk pages aren't meaningless -- they need to be there (1) to warn the user not to do it again; (2) to make it easy to see if they're creating multiple bad pages. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How

How do you put that status box? Can you put it in for me? Please and Thank you!Mooncrest (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Mooncrest (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tit for tat

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. :) Malinaccier (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malinaccier (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orangutan Article

Hi, I've noticed your edits on this article, and I was wondering if you could clarify what exactly it was that you meant 86.141.33.252 (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help With TEMPLATES

Hello. I am DRfubar. I am new. I was wondering if there is a long and full list of templates anywhere with the tags you need to activate them. I thought i could ask you as you have many them! Thank for help of much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfubar (talk • contribs) 21:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Instranet

Could you provide any help with this pressing problem? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is your responses to my enquiries? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 13:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is extreme vandalism on many monitored pages. Please can you semi-protect 86.135.195.87 (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I try doing this in past, but mostly fail. They don't listen to my warnings. Is there no other way? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 14:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But can you tell me how to semi-protect, so that I can ensure factual accuracy? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism from Finland

Hello there.

Notice you gave user Kreegah several warnings. Thank g-d, finally!

New vandalism has occurred in "List of North European Jews", "List of Canadian Jews" and "List of Manitobans", checked "Canadian Who's Who" and "Who`s who in the world" all show that the edit was bogus, so I reverted, am not a regular user here, though so it was just a fluke, also vandalism seems to be race-related. There have been several major vandalism sprees of this type, most originating in Finland, Sweden and Czeck. Thanks again for noticing it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.209.4 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism IV

Just because you're paranoid. Don't mean they're not after you. 86.135.132.147 (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's right you know 86.145.151.85 (talk) 15:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He just made a huge breakthrough in particle Physics!!! 86.163.86.45 (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come on you U's!!!!! 86.163.86.45 (talk) 19:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know much about rangeblocking, but it sounds hideous. 86.163.86.45 (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I wouldn't bother nuking Derby, because it won't make much difference 86.163.86.45 (talk) 19:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help With TEMPLATES

I love TEMPLATES. They convey short, simple message (plural) ratehr than lots of words. This is good as it is far easy to see a sign and understand the message than to read extensive TEXT and get the message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfubar (talk • contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BS

		The Original Barnstar
		For the completion of 10000 edits at the time of the giving of this Barnstar, you deserve this. Marlith (Talk) 23:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my mistake. Sorry. Marlith (Talk) 00:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming

Sorry about that. Also, if you use twinkle, it fixes the edit conflict. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 02:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Twin article

My recent edit to the Twin article does not at all constitute vandalism. I made a legitimate edit: one which improves the article by rewriting (or in this case, omitting) redundant phrases. Wikipedia's definition of vandalism is "any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." I have not done any of this. I made a constructive edit and described my changes in the edit summary. 75.27.41.134 (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to South Texas College of Law article

Hi, J.delanoy --

Your definition of constructive differs from mine; I will revert your deletion of my edits. Feel free to delete them again if you are able to prove them to be erroneous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.153.228.2 (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies!!

Thank you very much for the cookie. After this weird week this has been, it is greatly appreciated. MMMMMMMM (talk) 01:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help With TEMPLATES

It is OK. Someone helped me find a FULL list of templates. The list only includes article templates. Do. You know where i could find little templates? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfubar (talk • contribs) 16:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COOKIE MONSTeR

Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi, just to make sure you're not hungry - keep up the good work! Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 01:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DFW Meetup

~~Hi!~~ ~~Hello!~~ Howdy! You've been invited to the Dallas/Fort Worth meetup (part of Wikipedia:Meetup). If you are interested, visit our page and sign up and suggest something, or help us decide where and when the next meeting will be. Cheers!

Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} at 01:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Beghe

Thank you for your help at this article, removing info that was sourced only to photobucket. The info has now been reinserted, not by an IP but by XtremeNL (talk · contribs). This time it is sourced to an internet messageboard forum, forums.enturbulation.org. Would appreciate your advice and/or input, and also would appreciate a clarification/comment on the article's talk page if you get a chance please. Cirt (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: article on Mark Smeaton

I am currently going through this page. I have marked where I am adding the references and will be working on this for the next couple of hours. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

		The Original Barnstar
		I want to wish you a "Happy Halloween" and award you this barnstar for your stunning revisions. Thank You! Buddha24 (talk) 23:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say hai

Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 11:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Award ! :D -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 15:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Deletion

Your U1 request has been taken care of. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 19:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Header Added

I'm not fucking vandalizing any page, I'm adding new information based on this site. http://www.netvasco.com.br/mauroprais/futbr/braxarg.html

If you continue to revert my edits, I'm going to report you to an administrator.

Have you really read the section I tried to remove? It didn't cite any reference, and in fact the only reference that section cites was inserted by me (reference 10). Some users complained about the bias in the section and it was flagged as probably "non neutral".Guinsberg (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes?

ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.175.184 (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well it seems more logical to remove something that is incorrect than to keep it there until it has been modified. I did actually say what the name of the stadium was and i didn't think i would have to say it's location because there is only one stadium of light. Also there is a marker for a stadium in north wales when it should be in liverpool.

here is the link being used over wikipedia http://pictures.footymad.net/upload/247/284217-1.pdf

You asked me to provide a link to show the ratings, but can you show me a link for a list of all the stadium ratings? I don't think footymad.net should be enough, the images have been uploaded by users and could easily be fake. additionally it can't be recent because old trafford's capacity has been larger than that for some time and i don't believe 67,400 was ever it's capacity, suggesting that this file is unofficial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.175.184 (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for recommending rollback to me! I promise to use this new power for good! Ejosse1 (talk) 17:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WBOSITG's RfA

Hello J.delanoy, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you! weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi J.delanoy, I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 23:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By far the best support I've seen! Thanks for participating. :) PeterSymonds | talk 23:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Natural resource has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Perfect Proposal ^{Speak Out!} 00:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Whoops!

Hey there,

Sorry about that. I accidentally reverted it (using huggle) before I saw your revision.

Cheers,

Perfect Proposal ^{Speak Out!} 01:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

"Hi, the recent edit you made to Inflatable boat has been reverted, as it appears to be
unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you
provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.
J.delanoygabsadds 00:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)"

It wasn't unconstructive, I was moving the sentence structure because the end of a paragraph was cut off by three [Edit] buttons. --70.15.4.226 (talk) 01:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

S'okay --70.15.4.226 (talk) 02:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Unprotecting PlayStation 3

No offense taken. We do not protect articles for longer than necessary. There was no reason not to try unprotection after being semi protected for 7 months. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parasite, Disturbed Indestructible

Hello, I'm the guy you helped earlier with vandalism on the page Indestructible. You warned the person who kept re-adding the song "Parasite" without citing sources, he's completely stopped editing, for which I thank you. But now we have a new user, Disturbed92893, having an edit war with me about the song. I've told him to stop editing, unless he has a source to cite, but he continues editing, without a source, and has told me he will not stop editing because he "knows" (AKA speculates) that it is on this album, although, clearly, there's no official statement. I was wondering if you could warn this user please, and possibly place a protection on the page Indestructible. Thank you, tell me what happens please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude527 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 20	12 May 2008	About the Signpost

Explicit sexual content draws fire	Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia
Foundation receives copyright claim from church	Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy
Update on Citizendium	Board candidacies open through May 22
Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area	New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks
WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton"	News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Blue (B

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Royal Blue (B, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Royal Blue (B&O train). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psedohistory

Explain to me why a Psuedohistory hypothesis should not go on the article for Psuedohistory, the hypothesis is considered debunked by academica --George127 (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is also very popular amongst atheists (not majority of course) and is very popular on the internet, despite this, it is considered debunked by historians --George127 (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

So instead of reverting I'll just do regular edits now. Sound good? That way I won't violate.Dude527 (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I didn't take it as a threat, no worries, no hard feelings, I merely saw it as a warning, and I thank you for warning me. Dude527 (talk) 02:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

All track lists for the album have "Facade" spelled without an accented C. I was simply reverting the wrong information to the previous correct information. If you would like I could just edit instead of reverting. hav0xx (talk) 22:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, no problem. I actually just discovered on the iTunes track list that it is spelled with the accented C. Which is probably the more likely spelling as it would be spelled that way in your iTunes library. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hav0xx (talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. I appreciate your thoughts about some of the oppose !votes, although I’d like to think most of them were based on something important to the person voting; whether or not it was actually me is another question, but one that I will leave with them to decide. Best, Risker (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acetone Award

Slakr's Acetone Award

For excellent effort in reverting vandalism, you are hereby awarded some acetone to help scrub out the toughest of attempts at turning articles to mush. Plus, if you ever need to get nail polish off, it'll help with that too. :P

Thanks for helping out. =) --slakr^\ talk / 17:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All-cap edit sums

You have every right to note that I may have inadvertently breached WP:CIVIL. I would have to note in turn, however, that any editor who automatically reverts an edit without reading the content of the edit is guilty of WP:VANDALISM. No hard feelings; we're all imperfect, and the fact we can all work together and for the most part get along despite this is a tribute to our community. --69.22.254.108 (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the same time, wouldn't it be appropriate to also leave a note on the talk page of the editor who claimed he doesn't have to give citations for where last names come from (when the network itself isn't giving them)? Thanks. --69.22.254.108 (talk) 17:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reginald Earl Clinton.

It's all coming from one person, who is now up to a level 4 warning. If he posts it again, he'll get blocked. I generally like to reserve page protections for when more than 1 account is reposting a page. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting annoying

This stupid constant posting of Indestructible is getting annoying. People keep re-posting Parasite (not constantly, like before, but I got home and I think 3 people edited it back up). They even deleted your tag saying that Parasite should not be kept up, they changed it to something like "Keep Parasite up because it was on Inside the Fire single CD, so it belongs on this list". Sorry to bother you again, but are you sure we can't get at least some type of protection? Dude527 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like your style, I'm pretty sure that will stop people. Sorry to bug you so much about all this, you're the only person on Wikipedia who has ever really helped me like that though, so, well you know. Thanks again. Dude527 (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found some proof against Parasite being on Indestructible. The only website that lists it as anything, says "Non-Album Track" right next to the song. Hah. Dude527 (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahah well, the only reason I mentioned that is because the user who kept reverting told me that "I don't have any proof AGAINST the song, so I shouldn't touch it". So much for that. The song does exist though, I've heard it, it's just unknown if it's a b-side to Indestructible, it'd be nice if it was though, it's a very good song. Dude527 (talk) 01:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure "very" isn't an understatement? I'm surprised at some people, for how surprisingly dumb they can be. I mean that level isn't in my capacity unless you get me drunk... Dude527 (talk) 01:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my, now people keep re-adding Parasite to Disturbed Discography under "B-sides to Indestructible". It never ends, why do I even try to keep Wikipedia factual anymore? Oh and the user who you gave a formal level four warning, said if we block him, he will create a new account. Dude527 (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess it's ok, many people tend to skipthe "discography" and go to the track listings for the individual albums, the best we could do is keep Parasite off of there as much as possible, and hope people overlook it when it is there. Dude527 (talk) 02:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eps...

The troll was finally blocked [1]. Cheers. —C'est moi ^Parlez 01:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andean Development Corporation.

The ADC despite "Corporation" in its name appears to be a UN-connected not-for-profit organisation defined as follows:

Andean Development Corporation (Corporación Andina de Fomento, CAF)

A multilaterial financial institution that reaffirms its commitment to sustainable development and integration through initiatives promoting the Andean region's cultural values

It is not therefore a for-profit corporation, which for a moment you tagged as "for quick deletion".

Tabletop (talk) 03:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your tip! — The Final Chronicler (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Barnstar!

Thank you for the Barnstar! I love it! :) Captain panda 04:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Other Place (book)

Do you think this article meets WP:BK? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thank-spam

J.delanoy, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Header Added

why did you revert my corrections to the article on Linear B? why did you allege vandalism for the correction of various errors of fact?wakan (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Other Place (book)

One problem: instead of using {{afdtop}} and {{afdbottom}}, you should have substituted the templates. I fixed that for you, so don't worry about it! Otherwise the closing was well done. Happy editing, Malinaccier (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again

Pointless. :) Malinaccier (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this edit's summary. Some guy was switching IPs to vandalize our userpages. :P Malinaccier (talk) 22:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, ok. Malinaccier (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

I noticed your comment on Milk's Favorite Cookie's talk page and just wanted to let you know I could send Huggle to you if I had your email address... - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 23:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

- Diligent Terrier (and friends) 00:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Interactive Architecture

Hello mister wiki-champion. I started a very poor stub on interactive architecture, but instead of deleting you might want to write about it using the super powers of your brain. Simple suggestion. --cesarharada (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

..... EDIT BEGIN: hay i am sorry (THIS IS TITLE)

HEY, guys, i am making edits today, becos i am at currantly disabled. for example, my wheelchair is not movin, they make wheel out, no fixed, just sit, parents gooing away they said look after myself. but i have special condishion when i am autistism! i am. so i edit wikipedia it is free. compact i am trying difecultly, my changes go away. so please leave me alone, leAVE ME ALONE, YOU Cant edit what i say, otherwsie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.91.44 (talk) 00:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why did you delete the record for most popped collars?

I don't understand, why was the World Reocrd for Most Popped Collars deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindycrockpot (talk • contribs) 01:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you consider my edits to the paper folding page vandalism?

How could my edit on paper folding could possibly be considered vandalism? Not only did I remove a mysterious sounding term which would mean nothing to 90 percent of Wikipedia users, but I also added the number of times she folded the paper, and explained that she did nothing more than calculate how long a piece of paper has to be, to be folded in half 12 times then fold a sheet of that length. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.94.101 (talk) 04:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Pledge of Allegiance

My change to the article on the US Pledge of Allegiance was NOT vandalism. Upon checking the source, of the content I changed, "Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 4, US Code," I discovered that the correct words are "render the military salute" rather than "stand at the position of attention." This amendment was added in 2002 and should be reflected in the article. I made the edit again and posted a comment about it on the discussion page for that article.

--24.27.110.167 (talk) 05:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

		RfA: Many thanks
		Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 05:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indestructible (Disturbed album)

I've done good. I've requested semi-protection until release date (June 3rd) and it's been granted. That means no more IP troubles. Yay right? Dude527 (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just thought, for all the trouble, I'd like to inform you, that song did indeed leak, and under "Album" it says "Indestructible". Of course the track name is "Parasite (Non-Album Track)". Anyways, here's a link if you want to know what all the fuss was about on that wikipage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ob3eN-CLh0 Enjoy... or not? I really don't know what type of music you like. Dude527 (talk) 17:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

Hi. I have been doing some research and have found that perhaps you have a certain past...and more disturbingly present on the community you are not revealing. The wikipedia community does not approve of 'good cop-bad cop' accounts. I think you really need to consider what your long term plans are, because sooner or later people will find out. It will be best for you if you just admit your alter ego's existence now rather than later in front of the panel. I hope you make the correct choice.

Zippycup (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So your a 'best form of defence is offence' types are you sir? All i have done is gone over your contribs with a fine toothcomb. We both know the truth, threatening me will change nothing. This is the last i shall say on the matter, you have done nothing to hurt me so i shall not present my case to a panel. I was just giving you a friendly warning. Cheers and loads of wikilove.

Zippycup (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also what is the relevance of points 5 and 6 you posted on my talk page? Have you not heard of 'you'll never walk alone?'

Zippycup (talk) 19:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

here's my suggestion to him to reconsider his actions. He has promptly removed it (not questioned) but his arcane talk page statements seem to continue. Prashanthns (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^I responded to your suggestions Prashanthnson on my talk page. J.delanoy, i am going to give you one last chance to back off. We both know what you have really been up to. I don't want to bring this out in the open because you for the most part a good post, who seems to want the best for wiki. This is why i find some of your less obvious actions confusing. I hope you now choose to climb out of the hole you are digging whilst i am giving you the chance. I suggest you sit down, have a cup of hot choc or the like and be honest with yourself; what is your motive behind editing wiki? You seem have three to me and they don't go together.

Cheers and much wikilove.

Zippycup (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]