User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 23

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

Hello you delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Baer/" because it wasn't usefull; however, I was not done editing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buenotaco55 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What just happened?

Professori Aarne Halmeen johtama automaatiotekniikan tutkimusryhmä on mukana tekniikan alan EXPO21XX-virtuaalimessuilla. Messuille on avattu uusi tutkimusta esittelevä halli automaation siipeen. Tutkimusryhmän virtuaaliständillä esitellään ryhmän kehittämiä robotteja. Ständiltä löytyy mm. videoesittely WorkPartner-robotista. Kutsu osallistumisesta tuli suoraan messujärjestäjiltä, jotka hoitivat myös ständin pystytyksen. Tutkimusständeistä ei aiheudu kuluja, vaan ne katetaan messujärjestäjien hankkimalla EU-rahoituksella. TKK:n lisäksi messuilla on mukana tutkimusryhmiä Englannista, Saksasta, Ruotsista, Yhdysvalloista ja Ranskasta.

I am wondering why you keep on deleting this particular platform, we have specifically designed for robotics departments world wide to showcase their research to potential students on one platform, all free of charge. If you take a look at this platform, you would notice that it has nothing to do with "blatant advertising" as you call it, but rather an information platform with contributions from some of the best brains in the field of robotics world wide. Now, tell me! If you accept the inclusion of the name KUKA, a top robotic production firm in the world, cannot it be termed as "blatant advertising?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squart (talk • contribs) 10:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC) disruptive edits? why not tell me str8 up what is wrong with the content when pages like[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_%28pornographic_film%29

are allowed but mine isnt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 17:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Epygi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Epygi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BJ^Talk 10:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re All My Goodness

Seeing as I have very recently indef blocked the (re)creator of the above article for... um... recreating the article after it being deleted twice, I should just like your confirmation that I should now unblock User:Leahpar and eat of some crow upon their talkpage. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am even now picking my teeth with a quill with black feathers... LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Bison

Hello, How come you deleted my article on the Web Series Jeremy Bison? From What I can tell it does not void the terms of use. It is informitive about this young man and gives good facts for wikipedia users looking for more information on Jeremy. I am not Jeremy himself, so therefor I am not advertising myself nor am I advertising him. I am plainly giving other facts about Jeremy and his web series.

Please contact me at jhberson@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumsruledaworld (talk • contribs) 23:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zdzisław Kaczmarczyk

Is there any specific reason why a non-controversial article such as this one cannot have a prod tag placed on it? (>O_o)> Something X <(^_^<) 14:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US Democrats Nominee

My Apologise, it will not happen again.

--Thomassampson (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Francis grave

Hi there. I was patrolling the new pages and this one popped up. While I was tagging it with the expansion template, I think it got deleted. Then by the time i completed the tagging, I seemed to have created the article with just the tag! If that now makes me the author of the page, as far as I'm concerned it can be speedily deleted! Ged UK (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Sorry to bother, but someone didn't quite take your warning seriously: [1]. Merci. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was fast! Thanks! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clonakilty AFC

Howdy, I think the article Clonakilty AFC did assert notability (recent championship, linked from Clonakilty I believe, but I can't see deleted contributions). Also I think the article was nominated for speedy and declined. Can you check? JackSchmidt (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Glad my memory was correct. I've been stub sorting a wide range of pitiful articles and usually check if they warrant speedy deletes or prods. I figure lots of these will eventually be deleted or merged by wikiprojects, but I like to let the subject experts decide what to do with the articles if they are not just obvious trash. At least for new math articles, I've been surprised at how many "good looking" articles were trash and how many dictionary definitions were notable and easy to fix to start class, so I figure soccer stubs must be just as weird. JackSchmidt (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson

I have done so by now. The move should not be controversial. A man should not be deprived of his first name. Str1977 ^(talk) 21:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that is so it's a shame. People have a right not to have their names mutilated by depriving them of a first name. Sure, Al Gore not filed under "Albert Gore Jr." but neither is he simply "Gore". Str1977 ^(talk) 21:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But Woodrow is not actual christian name but his mothers maiden name. The current president or his father are not filed under "Walker Bush". Str1977 ^(talk) 21:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll see whether anyone disagrees. Str1977 ^(talk) 21:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You cited your opinion that the policy supports Woodrow Wilson instead of his actual name including the first name. I base myself on no other policy but hold a different opinion.

PS. Your disagreement (posted on the talk page) is now noted as opposed to before, when I had not seen your comment there and only had your edit summary which didn't bring a substantial opposition but only talked about a lack of consensus.

BTW, any further discussion should be on the talk page and not on user talk pages. Str1977 ^(talk) 21:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi. Just a note: your userpage has been vandalised 24 times within the past 3 weeks (average - one every 21 hours). Would you like to semi-protect it, to lower the vandalism? Or, can it be reverted easily and quickly because many users are watching your userpage on their watchlist (myself included)? Thanks. ~A H 1^(TCU) 21:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're my hero

After a night of chasing down this guy's socks, you made my night with this edit. You're my new Wiki hero. hehe. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 02:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

d'oh - you beat me to it

User_talk:68.217.248.180 was going to be my first non-test blockee. Quick question though, since one of his vandalisms was to my user page, should I have let another admin do it? Or is it only a COI when there's been a good-faith editing dispute? xenocidic (talk) 15:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, no problem at all. After that last bit of racism, he definitely needed blocked asap. Thanks for the advice, and the welcome! xenocidic (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curious - that vandal added some random phone number on Gary King's page, I deleted the revision. I don't think oversight is necessary in this case, is it? xenocidic (talk) 17:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gyst article - deletion

Hi, you deleted an article I had heavily contributed to as well, (Gyst) and it was completely apposite for wikipedia - factual, unbiased, and informative about a small organisation (well i thought so at any rate) - why did you delete it? Do problems arise from having too many articles on wikipedia, or were you just being stingy? I've generally had good experiences with Wikipedia so I'm presuming its the former... willval123 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willval123 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, so an article must be centred on a significant item - is that just wikipedia's policy or is there a reason? this is just curiosity now, by the by, don't worry about replying if you're busy...

ok - apologies for wasting your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willval123 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - i wasnt talking about myself, just to clarify if you think i'm a complete goon... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willval123 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is this the sort of thing that you might be looking for notability wise? http://www.lfo.org.uk/html/twelfth_night.html (but with more references of course)--Willval123 (talk) 19:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

You delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AcmePlan".
Why pages of the similar companies/products are not removed?
Omniplan [[2]]
List of project management software [[3]]
Artemis [[4]]
Primavera [[5]]
Microsoft Project [[6]]
Merlin [[7]]
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.252.10.168 (talk) 18:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crannefo

He's requesting unblock, now posting an unblock request that seems to demonstrate an understanding of what he did wrong. I feel he was probably acting in good faith and considering an unblock (an indef block seems a little much for a first offense). Any thoughts from you? Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gamah Watch

Hello, I re-created the Gamah Watch page which you deleted earlier, and tried to add more information about its significance. Can I do anything to improve it? Though small currently, the owners do have contact with Nintendo, and are in the process of recieving games to try out and review, which would generate much more traffic, and also increase its significance. Sorry about the lack of quality in the original page, but there was a lack of time then and we have since improved it. Hopefully this one will suffice. Thanks, -Thebaldone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.15.140 (talk) 03:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

u deleted my article

dude. u could have jsut sent a message to me asking for why it was there. no need to go postal and delete it all together. it was a legitimate article.... u cant bring it back nby any chance and ill fil in the importance section?

Sully89 (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanx for understanding, im sorta new at thsi whole thing

Sully89 (talk) 10:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have 2 referances, is that enough?

Sully89 (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so wat do i need? the site has only been going for 1 year... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sully89 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wat about an idependant forum?

Sully89 (talk) 11:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

come on mate, throw me a bone.... its not my game personally, i just wanna get a decent wiki up for it.... u can see its legit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sully89 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so i need to find it mentioned on a third party website? just the one?

Sully89 (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

emailed the developer and got them. :D:D

Sully89 (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GPLpedia.com Open Source Software

GPLpedia.com is an Open SOurce Software System that lets users all over the world collaborate and contribute towards promoting Open Source Software. Agreed this is a new website, but I think the intent is absolutely genuine and quite novel. The quality of the website is great. I think it should be apart of wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.144.36.2 (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheInvisibleMachine11

The user you just blocked is almost assuredly a sock of User:GSNGuy. This individual has many socks with the "Machine" reference and targets User:Mrschimpf's page regularly. (Also mine, but I'm not on his happy list this week, I guess.) Thanks for getting rid of him...Should I file an SSP, a checkuser, or ??? Gladys J Cortez 19:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wOOt...thanks for tagging him! (One of these days we'll get him all rounded up under one sockmaster heading...I think he's listed under at least 2 or 3 masters right now, which offends my sense of neatness. However, my sense of neatness could fit in a very small teacup, so make of it what you will.) I'll be on the lookout for further incarnations....thanks again!Gladys J Cortez 19:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you stick a sockpuppet/Gsnguy tag on his page also since it's FP'ed? He also tried to get my password through a request email; I do have his IP from that. Nate • (chatter) 20:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

'..for fixing my stuff, after that lunatic swept through wikipedia like a tornado. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ditto the thanks. Wow, what a vandal.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 22:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Full-on loon – thanks heaps, Julia Rossi (talk) 01:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Avoidance

Hi, is there a page that decribes what constitutes advertising and what doesn't, my page Giancarlo Caldesi was just removed and I'd like to clean it up according to your criteria. It was meant to be factual. Cheers.

How to choose cordless drill

Hi, I've just prod'd it, however I then noticed that you have deleted it twice already. Feel free to do so again> Incidentally under what speedy criteria can I place this if it appears again? -- Roleplayer (talk) 12:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giancarlo Caldesi

Hi, I have revised the article should I just repost and see what happens or you could preview it here User:Uberginger/Giancarlo Caldesi. I have tried to keep it in keeping with a similar celebrity Gino D'Acampo. —Preceding comment was added at 13:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Found poetry

Hey. I noticed you reverted some vandalism on found poetry a while back, and wondered if you could please put on your watchlist, since it seems to go through spats of test edits sometimes. If not, that's cool, if so, thanks. --Justpassin (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block of 71.107.184.247

Thanks. It comes back as a Verizon account as did a similar block yesterday with the same MO. We may have an idiot kid with a bot on our hands. Thanks for clobbering him. I'll raise a beignet in your honor the next time I'm in Downtown Disney. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The litle freak is still at it on the talk page. Kids and computers just don't mix at times. :( Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came to the same conclusion after I thought about it a little longer. For all I know, the kid has no idea he's been blocked. Good call. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. What I'm thinking is that he's chomping down on a PB&J thinking all the while that his bot is wreaking havoc...when it isn't. Guess we get the last laugh after all! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You da man. Would you settle for a cookie until I can get to that Ralph Brennan's Jazz Kitchen beignet...? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Regarding a block

Looking at User talk:Ғгоѕтеԁ Ѡѕ; not sure what prompted the block. Get a feeling checkuser was involved, or there's a connection to other activity I haven't found quickly. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Had thought that was probably the case, but doesn't hurt to ask. Thanks. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shopit (should reconsider deletion)

I saw that you deleted the page for shopit and I wanted to discuss its notability. I looked over the previous version and agree that it was written as an advertisement but believe that meets the notability threshold. It is the leader in the profile e-commerce business, perhaps not a segment that is known to everyone, but one that has garnered substantial press recently. You can google them if you would like... Also, I know that they are one of the top facebook applications (as sad as it is this is a very good measurement) and they have inked substantial deals with netvibes and wyclef jean. Please let me know your thoughts - I would be happy to write a non-advertising description of the company for your approval. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjohn928 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked--Hu12 (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jimbo Wales

Currently someone is posting this everywhere on 4chan:

Please go to http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=B&action=edit&oldid=218337043 and click "Save page."

If you can get that edit expunged it might slow them down some, since they would have to switch to another URL. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 06:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RS?

Can you please tell if this article can be used as RS or not? I am confused. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ponticulus

i can under stand your deletion of ponticulus but i would like to know how to make it noteworthy to you you see it hasnt sought sessation from ireland and so there is nothing on it so i thought i would write something. Hisroyalhighnesskingy (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thats the problem there isnt any thing i could find on it...anywhere and it isnt mine im only a citizen there is there no way it can stay as THE referance instead of the referanced —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hisroyalhighnesskingy (talk • contribs) 11:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok then if i find something on it can i keep the page then, sorry about all this by the way. Hisroyalhighnesskingy (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On deletion of Fly Communications article

I'm trying to get the article on Fly Communications published.

I appreciate the idea that Wikipedia is not the place to advertise. However, how does one walk the fine line to report on progress in successful techniques of advertising. I think this kind of progress has important intellectual value, just as the recognition of how our individual tastes for "nostalgia" are cultivated ... yes, it only seems like advertisers use this "nostaglia" theory, but it does reflect something inherent in human nature. Likewise, the firm has successfully combined these two conflicting approaches (direct marketing, which involves a call-to-action, and branding, which involves an emotional connection). And I believe that Fly was one of the first firms to combine these successfully.

Thus, I believe it is worthy of publication.

Regarding, the idea that the article in question is "advertising" something, this is not the case. The article does not "advertise" any product or service, but the article is about the advertising industry and a company that has pioneered a particular approach.

An easy way to demonstrate that this article is NOT advertising is to pretend the article were about a firm that were to pioneer the combination of baking soda (used by bakers) and vinegar (used by salad chefs) to produce a chemical result that could be used with childrens' Science Fair projects illustrating volcanoes and their lava flow. The fact that is has become popular does not diminish the experimentation and success with combining features of separate disciplines (bakers vs. salad chefs).

Considering that the article is not intended to advertise, what kind of improvements do you suggest to make it suitable? Clearly, Wikipedia has articles on companies and other companies in the advertising industry ... maybe a little explanation of improvement would help me make the article suitable to Wikipedia standards.

Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help.

Farance (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of Fly Communications page

I'm trying to get the article on Fly Communications published.

I appreciate the idea that Wikipedia is not the place to advertise. However, how does one walk the fine line to report on progress in successful techniques of advertising. I think this kind of progress has important intellectual value, just as the recognition of how our individual tastes for "nostalgia" are cultivated ... yes, it only seems like advertisers use this "nostaglia" theory, but it does reflect something inherent in human nature. Likewise, the firm has successfully combined these two conflicting approaches (direct marketing, which involves a call-to-action, and branding, which involves an emotional connection). And I believe that Fly was one of the first firms to combine these successfully.

Thus, I believe it is worthy of publication.

Regarding, the idea that the article in question is "advertising" something, this is not the case. The article does not "advertise" any product or service, but the article is about the advertising industry and a company that has pioneered a particular approach.

An easy way to demonstrate that this article is NOT advertising is to pretend the article were about a firm that were to pioneer the combination of baking soda (used by bakers) and vinegar (used by salad chefs) to produce a chemical result that could be used with childrens' Science Fair projects illustrating volcanoes and their lava flow. The fact that is has become popular does not diminish the experimentation and success with combining features of separate disciplines (bakers vs. salad chefs).

Considering that the article is not intended to advertise, what kind of improvements do you suggest to make it suitable? Clearly, Wikipedia has articles on companies and other companies in the advertising industry ... maybe a little explanation of improvement would help me make the article suitable to Wikipedia standards.

Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help.

Farance (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nexxnow Inc.

Thanks for undeleting that page; I moved it to the user's userspace with a note on how to improve it. We'll see what ends up happening, but I appreciate the chance to fix it up. Thanks! UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 21:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Return of Ponticulus?

As you seem to have been involved in deleting what sounds like same thing in main namespace before. I don't suppose you know what should be done about User:Pontîculus page which is currently showing up as an orphan and has disambig page links. -Hunting dog (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crunchyroll

you deleted the thing while I was doing more research on it... Pyromania153 (talk) 03:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Justification...

Hi Just to say the edit on Barrack Obama's page was done by some pranksters who got hold of password. I've changed it and I only want to help. Thanks - magicman92 (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Partyvan Man, you are fast. Keep up the good work! Thingg^⊕^⊗ 17:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering why

Hello, Today you deleted a article I put up about Dakota Jackson..Im not quite sure why.I am a interior design student and was putting a page up about a designer I like and whose work I respect. He is well known in the design world and I am not working for him. I was also interested in putting up other well known designers wikipedia does not have. Please explain to me what I did wrong and how I can fix this I can be reached at Jessicaguttenburg@yahoo.com.

Thanks So Much, Jessica —Preceding unsigned comment added by JessicaGuttenburg1 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but how is someone supposed to get something printable on that topic? Everything about it is online. I mean does the internet not account for anything? Apparently not. But I mean are there any internet sources someone can use like blogs or something? Also don't write sarcastically to me, I don't like that. Thanks a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 17:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So if I have an idea as to make it reliable without it being whatever can I make another attempt at making the page without being blocked? Because it says I will be blocked if I try it again.Codyofga (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think my page is ready I forgot to copy a link to that test page thinggy you gave me but I think you may have it already.```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 17:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found a reliable source its online but its a news post check out the page now please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 18:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Their film brtherhood secrets is already out. and does it have to be multiple films why not just one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 18:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wouldnt they meet the 2nd standard being the 1st gay triplets in porn? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyofga (talk • contribs) 18:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Good catch!

Oh thanks! Can't take all the credit, because Richard0612 spotted it on IRC :) weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated recreation of Alexander Michael Smith by User:Thealexweb

User:Thealexweb has repeatedly recreated Alexander Michael Smith. S/he says that they want it left up because "our Head Teacher and the local MP requested it". Should this page be moved to this user's userspace or should it just be deleted? I'm asking you because you've deleted the page twice. Thanks for your advice, Cunard (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Types of Professional Wrestling Styles

Just bringing to your attention that the article you speedy deleted 05:29, 8 June 2008, Types of Professional Wrestling Styles had passed an AFD nomination with a conclusion to keep 18:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC), less than 24 hours before your speedy, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Types_of_Professional_Wrestling_Styles. It seems like someone might have been having a second bite at deletion by tagging the article for speedy after losing at AFD. Regardless, given the unanimous consensus outcome at AFD less than 24 hours earlier, if you believe that the material is questionable, perhaps it would be better to re-list it for AFD again? Thanks! Debate 木 01:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extra 31 hours

You tell 'em! :-) Tan | 39 03:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Block of Alexis49

The article history for Sheikh Abdullah shows that you reverted Alexis49 three times and then blocked them for edit warring. They have now requested an unblock and ask why sanctions were not taken against the persons edits warring with them. That's a good question given that the person edit warring with them did the blocking. On the face of it it appears that you were far too involved to issue any blocks here and I have certainly seen situations similar to this where both parties have been blocked. Please can you review your block and remove it if you feel that you were too involved to do the blocking? If you disagree with this, please can you explain why you do not consider that you were involved because a plain reading of the diffs really suggests to me that you were. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Little (non-notable)

Thank you. My splitting of the real article got the treatment it deserved, instant obliteration. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Glass Records

Please be so kind and do explain why the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Glass_Records has been deleted by you? I've put a tag to hold on for a while and added some reasons of importance on the article talk page as it was proposed in the warning I've received, though you did not reply to me on the talk page and just have erased it without further notice or explanation.I was hoping to discuss the reasons I've provided and I can provide you with more, if needed. I believe that your conduct does not follow Wikipedia Deletion Policy.I'm still hoping to get some explanations from you, or consult with someone who can judge our conflict and dispel my doubts on your level of proficiency. Please do not take it personally, but I've been on Wikipedia for more than 2 years and haven't experienced such perception yet. --Ritter (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented the brief answer I got from you on my Talk page, would you please respond or we really have to go into WP:DR?--Ritter (talk) 00:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Carell page Vandalised

The warning you had sent to the user who vandalised Steve Carell page went unheeded. I've reverted the change, but the user Codi14 needs to be blocked. Salilb (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priestley Riots

Since protection removed, it's been hit 6 times with anon vandalism. Just got blanked in an interesting way, with graphics that overwrite the usual wiki header menu. Points for creativity, but hoping it can become re-protected to slow the tide, please? Have requested at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection. Thank you, EBY3221 (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, so it's been temp, semi, at least while it's tfa. Thanks, signing off EBY3221 (talk) 23:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello you delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Dallara/" because it wasn't usefull; however, I was not done editing it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldallara (talk • contribs) 01:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Epygi

I have nominated Epygi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epygi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BJ^Talk 08:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam blacklist

Hello! You added anontalk (dot) com to the spam list but somehow spam bots are still managing to spam the link at the ref desks. Could you take a look over this discussion? Thanks :). Seraphim♥Whipp 12:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:HorrorMovieSeries200888888888, sockpuppet of User:Lyle123?

Hi
Can you have a look at User:HorrorMovieSeries200888888888 - since you blocked User:SpyglassEntertainmentWaldenMedianewmogvie20084444 yesterday I think you are familiar with the case?
Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non profit organization guidelines?

Hi
I recently created a page for Michigan Works, which is a non-profit employment agency in Michigan in which I work for. I created them a page, but it was speedily deleted. I know I had on there a lot about the company, but I tried to model it off the other business pages suggested in the tutorials, like Kleenex and Sharpie. So it is advertising... but we don't get money for it... So I guess I am wondering if there are specific guidelines for non profit organizations on Wikipedia?
Thank you! McGregorLove775 (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)McGregorLove775[reply]

Why did you delete actual gas prices?

Why did you delete actual gas prices? I'm very unhappy that this was deleted, you probably didnt even read it. Everything on it was true and reliable.