Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/February 2009 election/Oversight/MBisanz

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee‎ | CheckUser and Oversight‎ | February 2009 election

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Giggy (talk | contribs) at 14:07, 6 February 2009 (→‎Comments and questions for MBisanz). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

MBisanz

MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Hi, my name is Matt and I've been a Wikipedian since 2004/2005, an active contibutor since 2007, and an admin since Feb. 2008. I'm very active on-wiki, via email, IRC, and even Skype from time to time. In my time, I've requested Oversight, usually by email, for personal information I run across and have been very active in deleting private information in the File talk: namespace.
I understand that many times the people seeking oversight may not be familiar with Wikipedia or may be in under a significant amount of stress. Being able to kindly explain what information I need from them (page name, etc) and relate to their concerns is as important a part of the job as clicking the HideRev button.
I have a firm understanding of the oversight policy an its purpose on Wikipedia (to redact non-public personal information). I further pledge to not use oversight in situations I am involved in (such as an RFA I commented in or a content RFC I filed) and to report misuse of the tool to the appropriate people (Arbcom).
For those interested, I have OTRS access, have identified to the Wikimedia Foundation, and am an admin on Commons.
Thank you for taking the time to participate in this process, and feel free to talk page, email, or smoke signal me with any questions you prefer not to place on this page. MBisanz talk 17:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments and questions for MBisanz

  • I like that some people are making an attempt to explain their opposition, since comments in the voting sections are restricted, but if you're going to comment up here can you try to provide something that other people would find useful? A simple "I don't trust him" doesn't help anyone understand your thinking. Avruch T 13:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not trying to make others understand my thinking, I'm just making a note on each case where I vote as to why this vote was made. In this case I opposed because I don't trust Matt. Giggy (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes in support of MBisanz

  2. Support--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 00:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Willking1979 (talk) 00:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support - Tiptoety talk 00:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support — Gavia immer (talk) 00:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support -- Euryalus (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. -- Avi (talk) 00:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support —Locke Cole • t • c 01:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. BJTalk 01:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 01:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Master&Expert (Talk) 02:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support - Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. — neuro(talk) 01:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mr.Z-man 01:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Khoikhoi 01:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kuru talk 01:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. LeaveSleaves 02:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. rootology (C)(T) 02:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. J.delanoygabsadds 02:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Explodicle (T/C) 02:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Bidgee (talk) 02:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. DGG (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. John Reaves 07:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Orpheus (talk) 07:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support.AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 08:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support -- Tinu Cherian - 08:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Strong support —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 09:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Strongest Support - user can be trusted with this role Fritzpoll (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Trust him Pattont/c 12:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Jack Merridew 12:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. — Jake Wartenberg 13:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. — Aitias // discussion 13:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. WilyD 14:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes in opposition to MBisanz

  2. Gurch (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RMHED. 01:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Chick Bowen 01:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. THE GROOVE 01:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Everyking (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Noroton (talk) 02:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Joe 03:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. JayHenry (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Grace Note (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Davewild (talk) 08:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Giggy (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/CheckUser_and_Oversight/February_2009_election/Oversight/MBisanz&oldid=268915931"