Jump to content

User talk:Exploding Boy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.118.224.35 (talk) at 06:08, 27 June 2009 (Not being oncivil: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Please post new comments at the bottom of the page, and
please refrain from using extravagant signatures on this page

日本語

Archive
Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6

re Hi

The username, combined with the contributions, led to conclusion of vandal-only account. Blocked as such. Cirt (talk) 02:25, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to inquire further with the user that initially made the report. [1]. Cirt (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The userpage left it highly ambiguous, in my opinion, as to whether this was the player Bulger or not; I felt it better to err on the side of caution due to BLP concerns. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfC for corporate usernames

I have created an RfC for a proposed change to the username policy in regards to corporate names. I invite your input. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 01:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Wikipedia_talk:Username_policy/Blatant_Promotion_RfC#Proposal_5_--_Reflect_consensus_in_twinkle_and_templates Gigs (talk) 02:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are mentioned in a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct

You are mentioned in a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. The Request for Comment page is here. Cirt (talk) 22:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not being oncivil

"If you're not "some random new editor" then you know about the requirement to be civil. I see no reason for your incivility, and I'm asking you to stop it"

Again, go to the proper people to back up your false claims....You know you are not going to find those people to agree with you.....76.118.224.35 (talk) 06:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]