User talk:Exploding Boy
please refrain from using extravagant signatures on this page
Article alerts exist for WikiProject LGBT studies — click "show" to view (Deletion discussions, peer reviews, featured article candidates, and other alerts) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Today's featured articles
Did you know
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions Categories for discussion
Featured article candidates
Good article nominees
Featured article reviews
Requests for comments
Peer reviews
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
Articles to be split
Articles for creation
|
Archives |
---|
re Hi
The username, combined with the contributions, led to conclusion of vandal-only account. Blocked as such. Cirt (talk) 02:25, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- You may wish to inquire further with the user that initially made the report. [1]. Cirt (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
The userpage left it highly ambiguous, in my opinion, as to whether this was the player Bulger or not; I felt it better to err on the side of caution due to BLP concerns. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
RfC for corporate usernames
I have created an RfC for a proposed change to the username policy in regards to corporate names. I invite your input. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 01:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Heads up
Wikipedia_talk:Username_policy/Blatant_Promotion_RfC#Proposal_5_--_Reflect_consensus_in_twinkle_and_templates Gigs (talk) 02:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You are mentioned in a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct
You are mentioned in a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. The Request for Comment page is here. Cirt (talk) 22:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Not being oncivil
"If you're not "some random new editor" then you know about the requirement to be civil. I see no reason for your incivility, and I'm asking you to stop it"
Again, go to the proper people to back up your false claims....You know you are not going to find those people to agree with you.....76.118.224.35 (talk) 06:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)