Jump to content

Talk:Anglo American plc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RDAngloAmerican (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 21 August 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconCompanies Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconGemology and Jewelry: Business Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Business subpage.
WikiProject iconLondon Unassessed Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Shouldn't it be Anglo American plc ?

Yes, but there is a large amount of resistance to giving company articles their formal names. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Companies and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies) for policy and guidelines. I would prefer the name under which the company is registered to be used, but the preference seems to be to use the trading name, as with Abbey (bank). Noisy | Talk 11:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tarmac

Does the Tarmac company deserve it's own page, or should links come here - or to Tarmac ?

-- Beardo 01:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links should be to Tarmac plc, which obviously doesn't exist yet. Noisy | Talk 11:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An article on Tarmac plc does now exist Dormskirk 14:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additions from Anglo American

Hi, my name is Robyn and I work in the Communications team at Anglo American. I’m new to Wikipedia, but understand and respect the rules of maintaining NPOV and making sure that items posted are verifiable and not original research. Additionally, I recognize that since I work for Anglo American I have a clear conflict of interest and will utilize the talk pages to discuss comments regarding the page.
My aim for participating is not to transform the article into a glowing review, but to transparently assist with any information requests or address factual clarifications that might help continue to evolve the article so that it provides a thorough overview of the company that reflects general consensus.
With that in mind, I have followed the gradual evolution of this page and noticed a few points that I wanted to suggest that might help as the page continues to develop out of its Stub-Class quality rating:

RDAngloAmerican (talk) 12:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information to the Anglo American plc page

My name is Robyn and I work on the Communications team at Anglo American. Two months ago I posted a comment regarding some points that might help as the page continues to develop out of its Stub-Class quality rating. Since we haven’t heard anything back from the community I’m planning on making the previously suggested updates in the next few days. I recognize that because I work for Anglo American I have a clear conflict of interest, but since the suggested updates reflect similar items posted in articles of other FTSE 100 companies, we believe these are appropriate additions to the article. I understand that this might be changed by various editors and that is why I have attempted to include language that maintains NPOV and is verifiable online. My aim for these updates is not to make this article a glowing review of the company, but to make sure it includes some basic background information that reflects general consensus. RDAngloAmerican (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additions from Anglo American

Hi, my name is Robyn and I work in the Communications group at Anglo American. I recently noticed some small errors in the article that require edits and included those below for consideration. Additionally, I wanted to suggest some verifiable updates to the article for consideration to help present NPOV coverage of all aspects of the criticism section. I understand my clear conflict of interest by working with Anglo American, but thought these items were beneficial to the article and consistent with other mining companies of Anglo American’s size.

  • The introductory/summary section mislabels Anglo American as “a world-wide group of companies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation)” when it is really a “multi-national mining company.” Small edit suggestions here, but I thought it would be appropriate to present to the community.

RDAngloAmerican (talk) 10:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additions from Anglo American

Hi, Robyn again from the Communications group at Anglo American. I understand and respect the rules of maintaining NPOV and making sure that items posted are verifiable and not original research. Additionally, I recognize that since I work for Anglo American I have a clear conflict of interest and will utilize the talk pages to discuss comments regarding the page. I recently noticed some small errors in the article that require edits and included those below for consideration.

RDAngloAmerican (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information to the Anglo American plc page

My name is Robyn and I work on the Communications team at Anglo American. Recently I posted some comments regarding some points that might help as the page continues to develop out of its Stub-Class quality rating. Since we haven’t heard anything back from the community I’m planning on making the previously suggested updates in the next few days. I recognize that because I work for Anglo American I have a clear conflict of interest, but since the suggested updates reflect similar items posted in articles of other FTSE 100 companies, we believe these are appropriate additions to the article. I understand that this might be changed by various editors and that is why I have attempted to include language that maintains NPOV and is verifiable online. My aim for these updates is not to make this article a glowing review of the company, but to make sure it includes some basic background information that reflects general consensus. RDAngloAmerican (talk) 12:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]