Jump to content

Talk:United Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 88.106.107.115 (talk) at 15:35, 26 April 2010 (→‎UK is not a nation, GB is). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:VA Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Former good articleUnited Kingdom was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 3, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 22, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 30, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 11, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 3, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 22, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:FAOL


Poll on Ireland article names

Sikh population

User:American1991 keeps adding in figures about the Sikh population of the UK. I doubt that these are reliable source but rather than get into an edit war, I'll raise it here for others to resolve. NtheP (talk) 17:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a case of WP:CIRCULAR, you are quite right to revert.--Pondle (talk) 17:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most populous cities

1. What figures are these based on, from what year? 2. Manchester is definitely bigger than Bristol. Stratman07 (talk) 01:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Mrmadcat, 17 April 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} The UK is not also knows as Britain as stated. Britain or Great Britiain refers to England, Scotland and Wales. Northern Ireland is seperate from Britain. It is however part of the UK. Please could someone remove Britian as an AKA for the UK?

Thanks

Mrmadcat (talk) 21:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. It sounds like this may be a controversial change, so please discuss it here first and see what the consensus is. --Darkwind (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Minister

I think that Gordon Brown should be removed from the PM position. My reasoning for this is that the government he was leading has been dissolved by The Queen and so officially he is not head of governement anymore because untill May 7th there is no government to be head of and so should be taken out of the article as it is misleading currently. He should be re-added when the Queen has asked him to form another governement (if he wins). (I'm not making this edit myself without editors assent as I think it's too contraversial to do without reason and agreement.) The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 17:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation sounds reasonable to me, although it's a good idea to wait for a few more opinions. Nev1 (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No. He remains PM (and the government remains the government) until he submits his resignation to HM, which won't be before 7 May. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Even though the MP's aren't getting their salaries and the House of Commons are not meeting with which no laws are suggested there?
The House of Commons is a legislature, not the government. It just happens that MPs make up most of the ministers.--SabreBD (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)He's still PM- if there was a national crisis between now and 6 May, it would be him and his cabinet who'd handle it so it shouldn't be changed unless he loses the election. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although Parliament has been dissolved and there are currently no MPs, the government remain in office (see this). Therefore, Gordon Brown remains PM until (at least) the general election has concluded. Daicaregos (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But Brown himself is an MP and since there are no MPs then why does the page currently keep the MP at the end of his name? According to your source he is just a member of the general public again until 7th May and is not a member of Parliament. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He is currently PM, but not an MP - all MPs' terms ended with the dissolution of Parliament. Technically, the ref to him as an MP should be corrected - but see also the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom#End of MPs' terms. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is Parliament that was dissolved not the Government. The government will change in practice when it is clear Brown can no longer hold a majority in the Commons. --Michael Johnson (talk) 08:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The prime minister can ONLY be removed by resignation or a successful vote of no confidence; though obviously a certain amount of pressure can be bought to bear. He can theoretically remain prime minister even if he isn't elected to the commons in May, though he'd lose the vote of no confidence. talk tospy on Kae 20:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Special Relationship - in Foreign relations

The UK's most notable alliance is its "Special Relationship" with the United States

Is un-referenced, POV and reads as if it's been tacked in there. Notability is open to dispute - the EU and Treaty of Windsor being just as notable. Anyone object if I delete? talk tospy on Kae 21:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there is a whole article on the relationship and its importance, with 245 refs at the last count, it should not be deleted. But, I would favour a slight rewording along the lines of: "Since the 19th century, the UK's most notable alliance has been its "Special Relationship" with the United States". Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's the 'most' I'm disputing; it assumes notability is based solely on concordant military adventures. The Treaty of Windsor is extremely notable, being in it's 624th year and the EU is arguably far more important. How about the entente cordiale? Which is more than the stub-like article says. Would you agree with: "Since the 1946, the phrase "Special Relationship" has been used to desribe the UK's close alliance with the United States" or something on those lines?

UK is not a nation, GB is

This is all wrong. It is the United Kingdom OF GREAT BRITAIN. When someone asks the nationality no one will say United Kingdom, they are British. UK was a term used mostly by the forces when living abroad. The two entries United Kingdom and Great Britain should be combined.

The full nation title is as stated "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" - 92.24.228.231

lol Great Britain is an island made up of England, Wales and Scotland, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a country made up of both Britain and Northern Ireland. The clue is in the title. Pro66 (talk) 00:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


British Isles

Editors may be interested in a discussion underway on the British Isles article regarding the name of the island of Great Britain. 88.106.107.115 (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]