Jump to content

User talk:Nightstallion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CrazyRepublican (talk | contribs) at 06:58, 29 October 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Notes

Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to discuss my actions, my personality, my lifestyle and whatever else you can think of here; critical comments are, of course, appreciated. If you just want to chat, that's fine, too!

Add a new comment!
Archive α (19 Dec 2004—22 Dec 2005) Archive β (24 Dec 2005—25 Jan 2006) Archive γ (1 Feb—9 Mar 2006)
Archive δ (10 Mar—28 Apr 2006) Archive ε (29 Apr—13 Jun 2006) Archive ζ (14 Jun—25 July 2006)
Archive η (26 Jul—1 Oct 2006) Archive θ (1 Oct—27 Dec 2006) Archive ι (27 Dec 2006—1 Mar 2007)
Archive κ (2 Mar—17 Apr 2007) Archive λ (18 Apr—15 Jun 2007) Archive μ (13 Jun—3 Sep 2007)
Archive ν (3 Sep—18 Oct 2007) Archive ξ (18 Oct—27 Nov 2007) Archive ο (28 Nov 2007—18 Jan 2008)
Archive π (17 Jan—23 Mar 2008) Archive ρ (23 Mar—19 May 2008) Archive σ (19 May—27 Jul 2008)
Archive τ (27 Jul—21 Dec 2008) Archive υ (20 Dec 2008—1 Jun 2009) Archive φ (4 Jun 2009—17 Jan 2010)
Archive χ (18 Jan–21 Dec 2010)



OECD map

Estonia is now a full member of the OECD. This map should reflect that. Just letting you know in case you feel like updating it. Cheers. Pristino (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but I can't edit SVG maps... —Nightstallion 08:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

national electoral calendar

I see your point about the cook is., but you didnt respond about the american "colony" election from nov 7. I removed them to the local as its not a state by any stretch. are you okay with it?(Lihaas (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Our usual standard for inclusion was "if it's got an ISO 3166 code, it's on the list". Why do you want to change that? —Nightstallion 14:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EU listing/ranking

I know that in the past there were multiple discussion about whether the EU should be mentioned (with an — instead of number) in "List of countries by GDP/area/population" and in other similar cases (infoboxes, templates, etc.) that deal with states, territories, etc. The arguments against that I remember were mostly around "EU is not a country/state" and "If we list EU, then we should list AU and other organizations" (referring to continental unions or trade blocs or international organizations in general).

Recently I had some related discussions (point 2 here, here) and also the related issue here about the "total number of entities conducting diplomatic relations/recognition".

Basically here I tried to summarize the arguments in favor of listing it (and setting a criteria for listing other organizations/unions).

I write to you, because I think that this issue should be addressed at some central place - for all lists/rankings, so that we don't have to go over the same discussion separately at each place. Could you arrange such discussion or point me where to raise the issue? Alinor (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mh. Some relevant WikiProject, like WP Countries? —Nightstallion 11:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I filed it here. Alinor (talk) 14:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

Nomination for deletion of Template:People's Republic of China elections

Template:People's Republic of China elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you didn't PROD it, you just posted it here and on the template site. Besides, I'm against deletion, as it is part of a standardised series of election templates. —Nightstallion 14:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

Democracy is Freedom – The Daisy

Dear Nightstallion, after more than three months with no answer (see Talk:Democracy Is Freedom – The Daisy#Article move), could we (in fact, you) move the article to its previous (and correct) title, Democracy is Freedom – The Daisy? --Checco (talk) 17:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. --Checco (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010



To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List_of_armed_conflicts_and_attacks,_2011#new_criteria_NEED_OTHER_OPINIONS

as a common political editor, youre welcome and encourages to express your view on the page.(Lihaas (talk) 08:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

Nomination of Qatari legislative election, 2013 for deletion

The article Qatari legislative election, 2013 is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qatari legislative election, 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rob (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your message

Just got your message now, thank you. Will keep you posted. Gryffindor (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

Notes 3.3.2.1

Hey Nightstallion. I think your paragraphs around secession etc. may need updating/editing:

"Southern Sudan is allowed to hold a referendum on independence from Sudan in 2011, according to the Comprehensive Peace Treaty signed on 9 January 2005. Simultaneously, status referenda will be held. These include Abyei (North Kurdufan-Northern Sudan with special administrative status or North Bahr el Ghazal-Southern Sudan), South Kurdufan (join Northern Sudan or Southern Sudan) and Blue Nile (join Northern Sudan or Southern Sudan). (cf. Image:Regions of Sudan.png)"

doktorb wordsdeeds 21:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know, but I was gonna wait until a.) we have final results and b.) Abyei and the two states have been allowed to decide what they are going to do. —Nightstallion 22:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah fair do's. Sorry, I think the only times I write on here is to point out trivial corrections when I should be filling your page with praise for what is my usual first port of call every time I log in ;) doktorb wordsdeeds 00:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great to hear that! :) I'm all for corrections and suggestions, so if you have any ideas on what I should be including or phrasing differently, be sure to tell me. —Nightstallion 10:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

re: articles titles

i agree with you completely. the egypt one was unilaterally moved by someone to what tickles his fancy even though most agreed tro revolution but not the proper noun one he chose.

although, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS also negates the similarity.Lihaas (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

as an aside, are you updating referendums too? im just about to go through the swioss one. can we nominate for ITN then?Lihaas (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am in principle, though I'm not sure whether I'll get to it today... Can we try to get the Egypt article to the right place? —Nightstallion 18:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

Protection of Freedoms Bill

Hey. I noticed in your notes section a red-link to Freedom (Great Repeal) Bill. If I get my guess right, this is a link to Protection of Freedoms Bill that I have just created :) doktorb wordsdeeds 09:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! —Nightstallion 16:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

Libyan Revolution Flag

It should be changed to a tricolor with the bands of equal width, and a 3:5 ratio to better reflect the makeshift flags being flown, also nearly every flag hoisted have crudely drawn crescents and stars including the massive one raised in Benghazi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.169.239 (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Revolution

Thanks for your moving Tunisian revolution to Tunisian Revolution. Please also move Talk:Tunisian revolution to Talk:Tunisian Revolution. Thanks. --Pengyanan (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your moving! --Pengyanan (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gladly! —Nightstallion 17:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

International Criminal Court

Hello, the article International Criminal Court has been suggested to me by an IP editor for GA reassessment. Since you are one of the editors listed as actively involved in it, you might be interested in the Discussion.--Obsidi♠nSoul 23:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2011


April, 12th - Day of Rage in Swaziland (In waiting of new Republics)

Hello, Nightstallion! I think, that it's interesting for you: [1] CrazyRepublican (talk) 23:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's hope they're successful... —Nightstallion 00:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Once more about Swaziland's uprising: [2], [3] - CrazyRepublican (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UK House of Commons boundary process

Hey Nightstallion, hope you are well. I have created Sixth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies in an attempt to follow all four Boundary Commissions as they do their duties. I think you've a link for this at your Notes page but if not, and you want it, here it is :) doktorb wordsdeeds 10:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! I had recently read about it at BBC, but not yet seen the article here. —Nightstallion 10:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

Zawiyah

It looks like the situation is just like in Fallujah or Vukovar where most of the fighting will be over, but sporadic pockets of resistance will still put up a fight for another few weeks before they are all cleared.EkoGraf (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's the case, actually. From what I've read, the fight is still not over and the democrats still hold the city centre. —Nightstallion 00:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, you didn't get what I was saying, I ment was - Yes there is still ongoing fighting but it will probably be over in a day or so but after that there will be clean-up operations house-to-house, and so the battle will probably not compleatly end for a few more weeks. And they're royalists actualy not democrats. :) EkoGraf (talk) 02:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay.
I don't think so; not one of the revolutionaries has even mentioned the former king... —Nightstallion 09:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actualy they have been waving his picture quite a lot and the flag they are using is the old monarchy flag. :) I personaly think they themselves don't know what kind of government they want if they manage to get rid of Gaddafi, because they are made up of different opposition factions with different political aggendas. EkoGraf (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The old monarchy flag is used because it isn't Qaddafi's, and the TNC has stated it wants a democratic republic. —Nightstallion 18:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ras Lanuf

What do you suggest we do? Since it looks like Gaddafi may retake Ras Lanuf in a day or so and there has been fighting there for the last four days, should we create an article named Second battle of Ras Lanuf or should we reopen the old one and say when the rebels took it it was phase one and now, two days later, it's phase two?EkoGraf (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reopen it. —Nightstallion 11:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's been a week since the discussion started on the renaming of the article, and a majority concenssus is to rename the article to Battle of Ra's Lanuf. Only two editors opposed. Could you move it, because I only nominaly know the procedure for doing that? EkoGraf (talk) 22:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'll do it. —Nightstallion 10:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tibetan PM in exile

Given the Dalai Lama's announcement to rescind his authority soon, I also stumbled upon these websites talking about a new PM in 10 days. I wondered if you new anything more about it. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, not really... —Nightstallion 11:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy belated new year

Hi Nightstallion,

I hope life is treating you well and that you have a prosperous 2011. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 23:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brega

Could you also move Battle of Brega to First Battle of Brega, since I created Second Battle of Brega today? Unlike Ra's Lanuf where it was only one day between phases these two battles don't warrant to be in the same article since it was 11 days between the two different battles or phases. EkoGraf (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it, no problem, Lothar von Richthofen moved it himself. :) EkoGraf (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Padania needs an admin

Hi Nightstallion. Since January, User:Enok has made huge changes to the Padania article. Some were good, others were not accepted by other users (at least four: Filippo83, Keith 64, Dans and I, plus one or two IP users). We had a long time appeasing Enok and accepting his advices, as the article's history and the talk testify. For some strange reason he continues to remove the material he doesn't like from the article. Filippo83 and I started to rollback him, but nobody of us wants an edit war. Keith 64 showed up in talk page to urge him to stop. In the last case Enok removed opinion polls and the Padanian flag proposed by Lega Nord. I rollbacked him, but things can't go on like this. The discussion is too long and I don't want you to read it all, but can you show up and calm down Enok? --Checco (talk) 04:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

Constituent Assemblies and Conventions

In contrast, I am very strongly against stating it - I think it makes the templates look odd. The reason I have always included them without a note is because in almost every case I know about the Constituent Assembly acted as a parliament once elected. Nevertheless, if they are to be marked, perhaps using an asterix and the |below bar would be a nicer solution? Number 57 20:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mh, yes, I could live with that; I, on the contrary, know mostly of Constituent Assemblies and Conventions who did *only* the constitution drafting while the regular parliament existed side-by-side, but I suppose back in the days when new nations were founded it was the way you described it.
So, marking them with an asterisk? Would you make the necessary changes? —Nightstallion 08:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem - I'll do it in the coming week. Cheers, Number 57 08:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Left (Italy) logo.jpg

⚠
⚠
 Thanks for uploading File:The Left (Italy) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

interview request

Hello, My name is Natalia Olaru and I am a final year master student in the Corporate Communication programme at the Aarhus School of Business in Denmark. I am currently working on my final paper on the topic of the motivation of users to create content on collaborative media websites, the focus being Wikipedia. As a sample I chose the English and Danish portals. I would like to invite you for an online interview on the topic of what motivates you, as a user, to participate in editing and creating articles for this platform. Your real identity, and wikipedia account will be kept confidential through the paper. I plan on doing the actual interviews in the period between 6st and the 15th of May via Skype, MSN, Google Talk or Yahoo Messenger. I am, however, open to other channels of communication too. Please let me know if you would like to participate in this interview and the preferred channel. Thank you, Natalia Olaru Email: natalia.ioana.olaru@gmail.com --MulgaEscu (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure, why not; I don't use any IM, though, so it would have to be by e-mail, if that is good enough for you. —Nightstallion 12:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry for the late reply but I am still having a bit of trouble with Wikipedia since I am a new user myself. Email sounds good too, do you have an email address I could use or should I send it through wikipedia email?--MulgaEscu (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Send it to nightstallion AT web DOT de. —Nightstallion 20:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scottish Parliament general election, 2011

Could you please undo your move on this page, this template is used in all the Scottish Parliament elections. --Barryob (Contribs) (Talk) 15:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stub election articles

Whats with all these stub election 1-line articles (most of which stay that till the addition of results) we need to expand it on content not the 1 election article. Im willing to help if you are. Know anyone else on wikipedia with broad electoral intersts as us not limited to parts of the world? Anwyays, at the moment im trying to expand the Cypriot legislative election, 2011 (general) article due imminently. we need issues and parties. You post the parties, ill do the issues? (and background if need be)(Lihaas (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

all these people turned out to see 1 line? ;)
anyhoo, we need to srt the infobox not remove it.
ps- incidentyally, a call for recognition for kosovo? why not Abkhazia and South Ossetia...democracy...?(Lihaas (talk) 03:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you mean? Yes, I'd love to have all of these articles expanded beyond the "will take place on" and the adding of results afterwards, but my time is limited... What do you mean by "srt"? And let's just say I don't agree that Abkhazia&South Ossetia are the same situation as Kosovo. —Nightstallion 12:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Unrecognized countries userbox

Hi, Nightstallion! Express your interest in unrecognized countries by placing {{User:Presidentman/Ubx/URC}} on your userpage. - [[::User:Presidentman|Presidentman]] (talk · contribs) (Talkback) Random Picture of the Day 13:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Your opinion would be appreciated

As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at List of sovereign states. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the Discussion of criteria. Best regards, Nightw 06:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response! Could you answer either "yes" or "no" in the survey section? This is for the reference of participants to identify whether or not there is a problem with the arrangement of Kosovo in the list. Thanks, Nightw 16:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Naming discussion

As you were involved in the previous discussion about naming of the articles on Template talk:Yugoslavian elections, you should be aware that there is a new proposal on Talk:Yugoslavian parliamentary election, May 1992. Cheers, Number 57 17:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Notice of RfC pertaining to List of sovereign states

Please join a preference survey on how to divide our List of sovereign states. All responses are appreciated. Thanks, Nightw 13:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last one is up! If you haven't already done so, please leave a statement of reasoning with your preference. Nightw 14:37, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Zambian general election, 2011

Just a heads up that we need the table for the result (since you usually make these). the EC should finish counting in a day or 2. then were set for ITN. (i might be offline for a bit)

Also can you check on the infobox? the parties dont work, so i hid them.Lihaas (talk) 06:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Orphaned non-free image File:DieChristenLogo.png

⚠
⚠
 Thanks for uploading File:DieChristenLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

Poland election

Polish parliamentary election, 2011 result should be out inside 12 hours. I may be asleep at that point so can you tablise it for ITN?Lihaas (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source for the table? right ow there is only 1 specific one ad ot broadly. THE OLD Table had a source.Lihaas (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there are sources, but as I have my final university exams in a few hours, I'll trust you'll find them. They should be somewhere on http://wybory2011.pkw.gov.pl . —Nightstallion 07:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Nightstallion! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Equal primogenture in Great Britain & dominions

Hello Nightstallion! Britain & dominions decided to exchange primogenture rules: [4] CrazyRepublican (talk) 06:58, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightstallion&oldid=457936115"