Jump to content

User talk:Girlwithgreeneyes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Girlwithgreeneyes (talk | contribs) at 21:09, 18 September 2013 (→Rollback question: Thank you). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Girlwithgreeneyes! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Mitchell

I've tried to answer some of your questions over in Talk:Brian_D._Mitchell , can you take a look?

Also, is it alright with you if I borrow your template 'Welcomeg' for me talk page with a few modifications? Cheers Wombat24 (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Fiddler

Hello. Another editor much expanded the already too long plot summary at Fiddler on the Roof. I have reverted. If you think the other editor did anything useful, please leave a note at the Fiddler talk page, and we can discuss what ought to be added, if anything, but we need to try to make the plot summaries in these musicals articles as efficient as we can; readers of the encyclopedia need a short summary that they can get through easily. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll take a look. It was not just Fiddler on the Roof, but also Fiddler on the Roof (film). Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 16:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green eyes

Are those actually your eyes? Jpcohen (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was just a picture I found in the article Eye color. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHERUB

Hi Girlwithgreeneyes,

I notice that you've been doing some great work regarding CHERUB and Henderson's Boys. Please consider joining the CHERUB and Henderson's Boys task force, an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of CHERUB and Henderson's Boys. If you would like to participate please pop over to the project page where you can join the project and see an open list of tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time.

Regards, Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 16:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation, but I don't recall editing those articles. If I did, it was probably just fixing some typos. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Book

Thanks for your input on Classic book. I thought you'd like to know that Mr. Twain's quote is there in the 'Quotes' section, right before 'References'. I might need to tweak the names and make the font a little bigger. Shearonink (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, I see that now. Sorry I missed it at the time. (I still think that quote is a more catchy one than the one suggested for DYK, though!) Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem, you helped because your post pointed out a weakness in the layout. So I tweaked the quotes section, made the font larger, etc. "Did You Know" (like on the Main Page lol) that the Twain quote often gets misattributed to Will Rogers? I think the nominator picked the Alan Bennett quote because I caught a mistake in the quote's wording as most people know it, which is “Definition of a classic: a book everyone is assumed to have read and often thinks they have.”. The correct full-sentence quote is "Definition of a classic: a book everyone is assumed to have read and often thinks they have read themselves." Shearonink (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User page

That's not you, is it? In noticing the striking similarity between our usernames (I just changed mine, I'm keeping the old sig for a couple weeks), I thought I'd check out your userpage. And the pic is fantastic, I'd love to "swipe" it for myself. A 'course, if that's you, I wouldn't really feel right about it. Just curious. Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 01:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no those eyes are not mine. I came across the photo in the article Eye color. I don't see any reason why you shouldn't use it too. Cheers. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, I don't know why I didn't think to look there. Well, thanks. Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 22:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Copiapó mining accident copy edit slavery!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
In sincere appreciation for your hard work and patience fixing things, correcting sentence construction, gramar grammer grammar and style on a sometimes bi-lingual, hugely popular breaking news article about teh the recent 2010 Copiapó mining accident‎. ¡Muchas gracias! Veriss (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Much appreciated! Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 10:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's raining thanks spam!

  • Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
  • There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
  • If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me how to convert the bare urls on Alexander McQueen (brand) without having to through them one by one?Reqluce (talk) 22:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I have no idea. It's true I did recently edit Wikipedia:Link rot, but that was just to revert vandalism. I had no part in writing the content of that page. I hope you find someone else who can help you. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enoc's edits

I just noticed that you left a message on the page re "experimenting". I don't think this new editor is experimenting. I think it's a young person editting. The same editor made similarly simple edits to Sistine Chapel ceiling. I would rather encourage than shoo away, if possible. He will almost certainly show up on the Leonardo da Vinci pages! Amandajm (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to it

Thanks for this; I noticed the problem but you fixed it before I could. --John (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Girlwithgreeneyes. You have new messages at Elonka's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Scheunemann.Joshua

hey this Seles add to the artless how that was a ref to a important book of the time and lnking someone to the main character could be done to any celiberty but, this was made easier by the lawyer actuall quotting the scarlet letter --Scheunemann.joshua (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scheunemann.Joshua

hey this Seles add to the artless how that was a ref to a important book of the time and lnking someone to the main character could be done to any celiberty but, this was made easier by the lawyer actuall quotting the scarlet letter --Scheunemann.joshua (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tea processing

Yup, slight editing error in that section for content move to black tea. Fixed! -- Sjschen (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools Day

I noticed the prank you put on Jimbo's user page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientific Alan 2 (talk • contribs) 02:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I just noticed you didn't play the prank on April Fools day, you just reverted vandalism on the page during April fools day. Scientific Alan 2 (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is a difference! Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am about 9 months late replying, but yes, there is a difference, which I already noticed. Or maybe I didn't notice it. I have no idea, it has been 9 months, so I really don't know if I noticed the difference at the time... All I know is that I didn't expect to reply to this 9 months later... Scientific Alan 2 (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

C.S. Lewis

Hi, I made the original alteration as a reflection that although LW&W was written first, Lewis wrote the Magician's Nephew as a prequel and intended it to be the first book read in the series.

From the page you linked:

In the 2005 Harper Collins adult editions of the books, the publisher cites this letter to assert Lewis' preference for the numbering they adopted by including this notice on the copyright page: Although The Magician's Nephew was written several years after C. S. Lewis first began The Chronicles of Narnia, he wanted it to be read as the first book in the series. Harper Collins is happy to present these books in the order which Professor Lewis preferred.
The "publisher's alteration" you cite is the intention of the author.KroSha (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My oops in Assay Office

I thought the whole book was an advert. You probably know far more than I on silverware so it is good that you reverted my edit to include useful information.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware I had reverted anyone - I hadn't checked the history. I'm still not sure the book should be mentioned in the references when it's not used as a reference. (But maybe I'll add something that does use it.) Thanks for your note, anyway. Nice to see people working in that area. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I arrived there on a tangent from a question in reference desk and noticed a lovely described book in wikipedia. I also noticed there are hallmark and silver hallmark pages. I linked them in see also sections, but should silver be merged to hallmarks generic? Merges can be tedious, so with the links they may be fine for a few more decades.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I personally don't like merges very much as I think some useful information can get swallowed up. Not sure what Wikipedia policy is, though. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I came across some very stale merge tags on two articles earlier. I don't think they need merge at all. They were tagged, one person agreed, then they were too lazy to merge them. I may just go rem the tags to clear merge backlog.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share. I found your username from the Highbeam application list.

I'd very much like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know anyone with whom I should speak.

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 00:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback question

Hi Girlwithgreeneyes, I noticed that you occasionally revert vandalism. Would you be interested in having rollback rights granted to you account? Let me know what you think. Best. Acalamari 20:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, that would be very helpful. Thank you. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rollback granted! While I'm sure you'll be okay, be advised that rollback should be used to revert obvious vandalism/spam and that using it for anything else can lead the right being removed; unfortunately, some admins don't even bother warning a user who is misusing the tool and opt to remove it outright. If you'd like to test the tool in a safe environment before using it against vandals, Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback is the place to go. Now that all that's out of the way, happy rollbacking! :) Let me know if you need anything else. Best. Acalamari 21:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. :) Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 21:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girlwithgreeneyes&oldid=573555186"