User talk:Serial Number 54129

Hello

PS: I note that that German town article was only ONE LINE LONG!!! -but, purely coincidentally, has now been nicely expanded to at least Stub-class in the last few hours. A CSD nomination certainly seems to focus the mind around here

_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Mohammad Jamshidi

Cheers! -although it might be worth actually making this a decent article rather than.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.103.230.26 (talk) 20:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please remain civil with your edits and edit summaries. This edit summary was not called for. --Michig (talk) 19:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You do your job properly and then it won't be called for :) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS I notice that your only interest in the article is tags. So never EVER call yourself an Editor here again. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Michig (talk) 19:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please desist from threatening me and justify your conduct in not referencing that article. You may have noticed that the reason the PROD template was still there was because I f'ed to do anything about it- HAVING BY THEN ADDED FOURTEEN REFERENCES AND JUSTIFIED THE ARTICLE'S EXISTENCE HERE. Something you singularly failed to do. Is that a personal attack? Or is that simply a SUMMARY OF YOUR INACTION. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW I note your (mis)use of the word 'troll': THAT is a personal attack. The bottom line here is that, having done something wrong, and get called out over it, you attack me instead. Pretty obvious. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper delete

Hello, Im Adepane, have you ever come to Medan? Medan have many news papers, and the big one is that link your delete, I'm not promoted, but you attack me, Please take a look Medan City, Come here, and you will know it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adepane (talk • contribs) 19:43, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmm... street noodles

_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I thread about Orestes1984

Just a quick not to let you know I mentioned you in passing on this thread. - Nick Thorne ^talk 22:31, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I think that was a good post.

Maybe you misunderstood

I see you posted a red link on my page. I am assuming you are talking about the user who has again filed something against me. As the comments relate to the issue of edit warring, they are certainly not an attack. They are critical information about the former Ip now called Shwan God. The user has a TRACK RECORD of edit warring not only against me but against all the editors who contribute to Moors. even reverting adminsTake time to review the remarks, and I will listen to your advice on keeping cool. --Inayity (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Henry VI, Berwick, Warkworth and Battle of Northampton

James Harrington (Yorkist knight) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Affinity, Hiatus and Battle of Northampton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland

The article Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fortuna, just checking all's okay with the review. Do you need some more time to address the issues? Hchc2009 (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal article

I know it became a bit frustrationg with all the attack going on this page but maybe you can find a solution to this. I have already made my case to neutral point of view noticeboard 10 days ago (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) and waiting a response. As I stated there this article lacks a neutral point of view and that is why some editors are attacking the article, I know their way is not the right way to do things and as you can see from here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:93.115.94.149 I am trying to make things right. Please, help me about this.Rivaner (talk) 14:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can also check my first edit's case here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LardoBalsamico#2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article Rivaner (talk) 14:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTFORUM

No, this is not what I am doing. For example just look at the articles last paragraph I have stated some names who were involved with this "scandal" from day 1 and that is the first time their names are mentinoted. That is why I am telling you this article lacks neutral point of view.Rivaner (talk) 14:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah.

I see. Thanks for your time then.Rivaner (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.

Well, back to patiently waiting then :)Rivaner (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cos of them IPs, you mean? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is up with them? Do you think it has something do with LardoBalsamico's semi-protection request for the article denied on the grounds that both me and him are autoconfirmed users and also the editor or admin stated that there is not enough vandalism to make it fully protected. Is it just a coincidience or have I read to many conspiricay theories these days? :)Rivaner (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "2011 Turkish sports corruption article". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 15:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at DRN

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal article is what you're looking for, I think. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciateed, thanks. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page revert

Hi, I am not going to edit war over your this edit but I believe talk page posters do have the right to redact their own comment if it is unreplied. Also I am unsure if you were trying to undo my redaction why you deleted the content of my this edit. Solomon 7968 09:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you mean. Is {{shortcut|WP:NOBAN}} a reply to me? I haven't reverted any banned editor, I reverted myself! Solomon 7968 10:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcut

WP:NOBAN

lol Solomon, I have no idea why they call it "WP:NOBAN", as it doesn't even mention bans!!! I just meant the bit about talk pages _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I also didn't opened the link and guessed 9wrongly) the meaning. But I am still not sure why you reverted my edit, Paul may do so but you may not. Solomon 7968 10:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because: "it is usual to avoid substantially editing another's user and user talk pages" _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to revert or not? Solomon 7968 10:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*sigh* Are we still talking about this? I think it's pretty clear that I will not; and, as per etiquette, neither should you. Let him deal with his own Talkpage and let's all get on with something useful. Ta ta. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have reverted you. Also please refrain from making this type of edits on any random editor's talk page in future. Solomon 7968 10:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you against such behaviour. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The conversation then moved to Solomon7968's Talkpage, and continued in a similar vein. Here it will be recorded for posterity.

Hmm, well, I would not lose any sleep over this one. I can't really see an issue. I would try to forget about it if I were you. (Let's face it, there are far worse things happening around the place.) Let me know if you notice any other strange activity and I'll also keep an eye out. Deb (talk) 16:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right, although would not want my TP treated in such a fashion, but as you say. Probably merely OCD anyway. BTW- just to let you know? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC) ‎[reply]

Possible Rfc

See my latest addition to User talk:PrivateWiddle. I'm assuming you would support this course of action if it becomes necessary? Deb (talk) 10:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done That is to say, of course. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at 3941e402's talk page.

Hmm.. what you mean?

Mad In India had no templates, topic is quiet notable. OccultZone (Talk) 08:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it had no templates- how would you know there is a question of notability.... _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi}

Template? "Template:Unrefenced"? Or speedy deletion. Speedy deletion, yes, but editor included the requirement of reliable sources. There are few. OccultZone (Talk) 09:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was an XfD template which should not be removed until the discussion is resolved at AfD. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi}

AFD? It was WP:PROD, read "PROD must only be used if no opposition is to be expected. The article is marked for at least seven days; if nobody objects, it is deleted by an uninvolved admin, who reviews the article and may delete it or may remove the PROD tag." OccultZone (Talk) 10:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc on PrivateWiddle

Is now posted here and requires your certification: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/PrivateWiddle Deb (talk) 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A pointless nightmare

Your monumental waste of everyone's time at BeerXML is now concluded - Talk:BeerXML#Status_Resolved.

And if you are in any doubt of what the community think of your unpleasant tactics - Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/PrivateWiddle#Views.

Other users should not back down in the face of the intimidation and threats that this user and their friend Deb will adopt if you stand up to their arbitrary attacks. BeerXML Devils In Skirts! (talk) 00:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Courtenay, 15th Earl of Devon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beheaded (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to University Challenge, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 930913(Congratulate) 12:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blooming templates. Just trying to put that stuff about context.... In context! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]