User talk:Eustress
Some falafel for you!
![]() |
For withdrawing the Salman Khan RM, not specifically that I have any stake for that RM, just nice to see editors who can change their minds with good grace. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
POTD notification
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/John_F_Kennedy_Official_Portrait.jpg/100px-John_F_Kennedy_Official_Portrait.jpg)
Hi Eustress,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:John F Kennedy Official Portrait.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 22, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-11-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Bangladesh Air Force ranks
Hi I Fuad from Bangladesh Air Force. If it necessary to confirm Wikipedia authority, I can submit my proof. I want to inform Wikipedia about the RANK OF AIRMEN OF BANGLADESH AIR FORCE. Before my work This ranks photo's not yet uploaded in Internet. For why you cannot realize the fact of Uploading our rank in Wikipedia. Hope you help me to upload AIRMENS RANK OF BANGLADESH AIR FORCE. Al Fuaduzzaman Sohan (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2013
- Fuad, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and sorry you're having a hard time getting started. It appears that your edits to Bangladesh Air Force are being reverted because the images you have uploaded and referenced in the article (see, for instance, [1]) are being disputed as copyright violations. Please consult Wikipedia:Media copyright questions if you have questions about this policy, or engage editors on Talk:Bangladesh Air Force. —Eustress 18:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
A personalized New Year greeting
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/The_sun1.jpg/220px-The_sun1.jpg)
Hi Eustress, Happy New Year! I hope that you're well. :) Best. Acalamari 12:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for thinking of me, Acalamari. Best wishes to you as well! —Eustress 15:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
AfD on ALD
Thanks for your AfD comment. But why did you remove the notability template? My thought was the template might draw some interest by itself. In any event, I've seen articles rescued via the AfD process. (E.g., the inclusionists get going and fix things.) Maybe this one will do the same. – S. Rich (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
WP:RFPP Thanks
Hey Eustress,
I'm not sure if I've interacted with you before, but I'd like to take a moment to say hello and thank you for your work at Requests for Page Protection today. You single-handedly and tastefully responded to a slew of requests. So thanks! Airplaneman ✈ 14:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, happy to help! —Eustress 17:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- No, he made errors in responding to requests. You responded to the Katy Perry discography rfp saying user talk pages are exempted from prot. Its an article, not a talk page. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- You're right, thanks —Eustress 17:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Beauty and the Beast (franchise)
Hi, Eustress, I'm appreciate of your recent assist at Beauty and the Beast (franchise), but I don't think the current level of protection is sufficient to hand the problem I reported, though I did appreciate the duration! The article is being hit primarily by IPs from Vietnam, which, as far as I know, can't be rangeblocked successfully, and as I'd mentioned in my RPP, the grand majority of IP edits at the page have been from Vietnam-based IPs who are intent on promoting this hoax. The current protection requires that IP edits be checked through our reviewer system, but the reviewer system (as I know from my experience with reviewer permissions) only requires that reviewers revert what is obvious vandalism. If they don't know that there is a history of hoax editing at this article, or that any sort of future 2015 Beauty and the Beast project is bogus, then most of the bollox IP edits can still sneak through. I was hopefully wondering if you might consider elevating the protection to exclude IPs and non-autoconfirmed users without the review process. It's difficult to paint the complete picture for every admin who happens by, but Disney Junior (Asia) is another affected article with a litany of disruptive edits from these 123 and 113 IPs, and if it helps, I've called the Vietnam edits out in my edit summaries, for example here. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- I understand your concern. Is it all right if we wait and see if the Feedback Protection helps? It's possible that may deter the vandals, and that would be preferred to semi-protection, which would prevent altruistic anons and new users from contributing to the page. —Eustress 15:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. In the interim, may I also request that the protection at Hercules (2014 film) be taken down a notch? There isn't so much an editor content dispute as there is just one disruptive IP user who is trying to assert his personal opinions of the movie. Please see this rambling talk page diatribe to understand what we had going on. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Done... Good luck, and please continue to do your best to be welcoming to new contributors. —Eustress 20:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, much obliged. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Done... Good luck, and please continue to do your best to be welcoming to new contributors. —Eustress 20:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. In the interim, may I also request that the protection at Hercules (2014 film) be taken down a notch? There isn't so much an editor content dispute as there is just one disruptive IP user who is trying to assert his personal opinions of the movie. Please see this rambling talk page diatribe to understand what we had going on. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Rich Constable
Despite having tried to engage any of the anonymous IPs regarding their edits to the Rich Constable article, none have chosen to enter a discussion about how to proceed with writing it. I do not know if the anonymous IPs are one and the same person, though I'm inclined to think so. I do not wish to become involved in edit war, but am unsure as to how to proceed when dealing with a situation where there's no engagement, references are continually removed, original research is added, article structure is manipulated, and accusations of bad faith and vandalism are being made. You blocked the article based on edit warring, but have not addressed the fact that IP users are not following any protocol. Therefore, with that in mind, and the fact the the block will expire shortly, I wonder what you would suggest as to how to proceed. Below is the list of IP editors thus far involved.Djflem (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- 2607:FB90:1506:76ED:2159:80B4:EA3D:F423
- 208.54.87.141 (whose previous work this Fábio_Coentrão edit
- User:Ibot6789
- 2607:FB90:1506:76ED:2050:EA7C:52C7:299F
- User:Jasonspivack
- 2607:FB90:313:1054:CCA5:47C8:F69D:8CF9
- 2607:FB90:A1C:17B5:4E1:263D:A6EF:67FB
- [2607:FB90:2404:9C56:E0D2:2EEF:422E:EC5
Djflem (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- I instituted full protection of the article because it appeared all editors have been engaged in edit warring. Please beware of issues of WP:ownership on your part; and be sure to notify IPs on their talk pages of your attempts at discussion, and issue vandalism warnings if discussion goes ignored. —Eustress 20:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Your kind advice to that editor not being heeded
Hi Eustress; From the notice you left for Editor Chealer regarding the "Wikipedia" page, I have noticed that he/she has ignored your fair warning on 6 August informing Chealer that ignoring guidelines and essays just because they are "policies" is unproductive and disruptive. User:Chealer has instead decided today on 10 August to switch back to the same dissent against WP:BRD and WP:Lede and now put it into boldface with Chealer stating,
- WP:Lede is not a policy.
- WP:Lede does not "require" such a thing anyway. --Chealer (talk) 18:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Three of us have engaged on Talk page on "Wikipedia" for days and there has been not even a budge in the discussion by Chealer. My attempt to post the RFC for this was foreshortened by an editor who did not realize that the RFC was very short term. The results which were posted appear to be 4 to Support continuing Full Protection, 2 editors supporting a Topic ban with ANI against Chealer with no further full protection, and no-one supporting Chealer. This is the grouping of the 100 disruptive edits of User:Chealer from the last month collected into one place. If you would like me to post the links and diffs for one dozen or two dozen of the most harsh edit warring by Chealer for review, then let me know and I'll try to fill them in if the ANI is needed to help support a Topic ban. The 4 of us trying to help are getting pretty exhausted and may need more time of full protection to continue to try to reason further with Chealer:
Partial list of content dispute by User:Chealer |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
(cur | prev) 01:35, 6 August 2014 Eustress (talk | contribs) m . . (214,963 bytes) (0) . . (Changed protection level of Wikipedia: Edit warring / content dispute: as reported at RFPP ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (expires 01:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) (cur | prev) 12:42, 5 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,213 bytes) (+425) . . (Undid revision 619916164 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) As explained many times before, WP:Lede does not require such a thing) (cur | prev) 02:53, 5 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,277 bytes) (+54) . . (→Criticism: restore request to specify the kind of regulations alluded to) (cur | prev) 04:39, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,610 bytes) (+30) . . (→Dispute resolution and arbitration: Dispute resolution != Arbitration Committee) (cur | prev) 04:30, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,580 bytes) (-6) . . (→Nature: move Community and Dispute resolution sections out of Nature) (cur | prev) 04:00, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,586 bytes) (-108) . . (→Administrators: the number or new administrators and the selection process's selectivity are not directly proportional) (cur | prev) 03:40, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,694 bytes) (+25) . . (→Community: split paragraph on administrators to a subsection) (cur | prev) 03:01, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (215,669 bytes) (+5) . . (→Language editions: balance media layout moving User - demography.svg left) (cur | prev) 02:58, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,664 bytes) (-125) . . (→Language editions: remove Largest Wikipedias/graph (unclear, redundant).) (cur | prev) 00:28, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,772 bytes) (+8) . . (→Hardware operations and support: request reference about ZFS) (cur | prev) 00:23, 4 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (215,764 bytes) (0) . . (→Hardware operations and support: data server -> data center) (cur | prev) 07:03, 3 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,764 bytes) (-258) . . (Undid revision 619282485 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) see your Talk page) (cur | prev) 00:50, 3 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,022 bytes) (-328) . . (Undid revision 619226216 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) the sequence was *already* "Seigenthaler incident first", then BLP improved) (cur | prev) 00:04, 3 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,350 bytes) (-207) . . (lead: restore content lost in 619455014 (per WP:AN3/LawrencePrincipe). fix typo) (cur | prev) 12:05, 1 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (215,944 bytes) (-2) . . (Fix Selfref) (cur | prev) 00:43, 1 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,367 bytes) (-561) . . (Undid revision 619225504 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) WP:Lede is no policy and does not require such a thing) (cur | prev) 00:40, 1 August 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,928 bytes) (-12) . . (Undid revision 619286714 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) ban enforcement != bot policy. this is a request for a *citation*) (cur | prev) 12:58, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,804 bytes) (+30) . . (lead: challenge "fifty policies for quality assurance") (cur | prev) 12:48, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (216,695 bytes) (-2) . . (→Rules and laws governing content and editor behavior: Dispute resolution is neither a rule nor a law) (cur | prev) 12:29, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,439 bytes) (+8) . . (→Automated editing: request reference and partially fix) (cur | prev) 12:27, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,431 bytes) (-54) . . (lead: collaboration and expertise are not exclusive. shorten) (cur | prev) 12:21, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,485 bytes) (-258) . . (Undid revision 619228137 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) duplication) (cur | prev) 01:56, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,266 bytes) (-21) . . (→Review of changes) (cur | prev) 00:16, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,287 bytes) (-561) . . (lead: restore definitions of "Wikipedia". the lead's content doesn't have to be repeated in the body.) (cur | prev) 00:05, 31 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,848 bytes) (-31) . . (Undid revision 619068822 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) the opposite of expert-driven is certainly not "consensus-driven") (cur | prev) 23:03, 30 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,879 bytes) (-93) . . (→Automated editing: structure) (cur | prev) 19:58, 30 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (217,045 bytes) (+28) . . (→Automation: restore request for reference for bots blocking accounts or IPs) (cur | prev) 19:52, 30 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (217,017 bytes) (-328) . . (→Vandalism: Seigenthaler: remove duplicate mention of year. remove duplicate mention of BLP.) (cur | prev) 02:26, 30 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,126 bytes) (+35) . . (lead: flag unreadable sentence) (cur | prev) 04:32, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,617 bytes) (-30) . . (→Editing: split subsection "Review of changes") (cur | prev) 04:23, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,647 bytes) (+3) . . (→Arbitration Committee: these statistics are old, and rates surely didn't stay precisely that way for long) (cur | prev) 02:42, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,644 bytes) (-442) . . (→Community: remove poorly sourced part on inexperienced editors) (cur | prev) 02:33, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,086 bytes) (+40) . . (move (and adapt) Talk page coverage from Editing to Community) (cur | prev) 02:05, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,046 bytes) (-225) . . (→Analysis of content: remove paragraph on WikiWarMonitor (off-topic, content-less, poor writing. possibly fits in See also)) (cur | prev) 01:36, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,256 bytes) (-14) . . (lead: fix sentence comparing article count with "Britannica") (cur | prev) 01:27, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,270 bytes) (+193) . . (lead: move size comparison back where "Britannica" has been introduced) (cur | prev) 01:23, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,077 bytes) (-1,364) . . (remove lead's last sentence (unreadable)) (cur | prev) 01:08, 29 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,441 bytes) (+35) . . (→Criticism: request clarification of "the majority “weight” of viewpoints") (cur | prev) 04:31, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,030 bytes) (-167) . . (→Nature) (cur | prev) 03:58, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,197 bytes) (-712) . . (merge paragraph on Signpost from "Open collaboration" section to "Internal news publications") (cur | prev) 03:36, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,909 bytes) (-39) . . (merge "Organization of article pages" section into "Analysis of content" and "Internal quality control and assessment of importance") (cur | prev) 03:31, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (215,948 bytes) (-121) . . (→Organization of article pages: split in 2 paragraphs) (cur | prev) 02:59, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,069 bytes) (+165) . . (move paragraph on wikiprojects from "Organization of article pages" to Operation) (cur | prev) 02:42, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,904 bytes) (-56) . . (specify that Wikipedia is a wiki in lead) (cur | prev) 02:32, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (215,960 bytes) (-25) . . (lead: remove reference to Alexa (broken)) (cur | prev) 02:28, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (215,985 bytes) (-945) . . (remove poorly sourced parts on Google fueling growth. remove redundant and poorly sourced sentence on popularity) (cur | prev) 02:16, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,930 bytes) (-254) . . (remove broken AlexaTop500. move anyone reference where it seems to belong) (cur | prev) 02:04, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (217,184 bytes) (+1) . . (move sentence about Time magazine from lead to "Cultural significance". not sure this deserves any treatment here) (cur | prev) 02:02, 28 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (217,183 bytes) (+4) . . (update URL for Time2006) (cur | prev) 22:24, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (216,547 bytes) (-7) . . (→Open collaboration) (cur | prev) 22:20, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,554 bytes) (+2) . . (→Nature: User-generated content is not specific to Wikipedia. move "Language editions" section out of Nature (whatever "Nature" means)) (cur | prev) 21:31, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,522 bytes) (+31) . . (mark num_users reference as failing verification and request new one) (cur | prev) 21:20, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,491 bytes) (+111) . . (lead: give example of usage as common noun. shorten first sentence) (cur | prev) 20:58, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,350 bytes) (0) . . (→Impact: move first paragraph from Cultural significance to Readership) (cur | prev) 20:56, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,350 bytes) (0) . . (→Impact: move Cultural significance just below Readership) (cur | prev) 20:45, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,350 bytes) (-64) . . (→Cultural significance: flag broken reference (freedom of panorama)) (cur | prev) 20:38, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,414 bytes) (+99) . . (→Cultural significance: flag BBC reference as broken) (cur | prev) 17:30, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,315 bytes) (-232) . . (→History: avoid misleading phrasing about February 2014 traffic) (cur | prev) 00:26, 27 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,547 bytes) (-415) . . (refactor references to Wikipedia vs the small screen) (cur | prev) 23:14, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,962 bytes) (+258) . . (lead: attempt to clear up "Wikipedia"'s ambiguity) (cur | prev) 22:25, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,689 bytes) (+18) . . (avoid contradiction on language count in lead, opting for vaguer language. request reference on contradictory language count) (cur | prev) 22:20, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,671 bytes) (-20) . . (remove outdated and misleading article count from lead. acknowledge existence of bans) (cur | prev) 22:07, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (216,691 bytes) (-10) . . (lead: clarify the kind of ranking in question) (cur | prev) 22:05, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,701 bytes) (-134) . . (shorten lead on popularity and avoid contradiction with the template on rank) (cur | prev) 18:11, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,820 bytes) (+80) . . (→Language editions: [clarification needed]) (cur | prev) 16:17, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (216,740 bytes) (-9) . . (→Internal quality control and assessment of importance: language. shorten) (cur | prev) 02:50, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,749 bytes) (-33) . . (→Analysis of content: move Citing Wikipedia inside Accuracy of content. is a subsection warranted?) (cur | prev) 02:45, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,782 bytes) (0) . . (→Analysis of content: move Medical information from Quality of writing to Accuracy of content. surely a better fit, if not a good one) (cur | prev) 02:15, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,707 bytes) (-89) . . (request reference for historical hardware and update) (cur | prev) 01:56, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,796 bytes) (-3) . . (→Criticism: request to specify regulations. more encyclopedic tone) (cur | prev) 01:48, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (216,799 bytes) (+5) . . (→Contributors: oops) (cur | prev) 01:45, 26 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,794 bytes) (+43) . . (→Contributors: there is more than one Goldman. request reference about edit-a-thons. request clarification of "top 2%-10%") (cur | prev) 02:36, 25 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (216,693 bytes) (+49) . . (disambiguate "Wales". flag broken reference. flag reference failing verification and request new one) (cur | prev) 04:04, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,499 bytes) (+146) . . (Undid revision 616859409 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) discussion of "weight" is not necessarily discussion of a "majority “weight” of viewpoints") (cur | prev) 03:59, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,353 bytes) (-45) . . (lead: remove reference contradicting its statement) (cur | prev) 03:55, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (220,398 bytes) (+76) . . (→Vandalism) (cur | prev) 02:57, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,277 bytes) (+14) . . (→Mobile access: request to clarify "enumerative approach") (cur | prev) 02:41, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,263 bytes) (+72) . . (lead: restore request to specify standards for quality assurance) (cur | prev) 02:31, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,191 bytes) (-61) . . (→Vandalism: Seigenthaler: clarify. assistant and assassination are not exclusive.) (cur | prev) 02:28, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (220,252 bytes) (+12) . . (→Vandalism: Seigenthaler) (cur | prev) 02:15, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (220,240 bytes) (-15) . . (→Vandalism: avoid redirect to Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident. simplify) (cur | prev) 02:05, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,255 bytes) (+17) . . (→Dispute resolution and arbitration: Dispute resolution != Arbitration Committee) (cur | prev) 01:59, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (220,238 bytes) (-11) . . (→Readership: remove confusing "however") (cur | prev) 01:53, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (220,249 bytes) (-913) . . (→Automation: request reference about bots blocking edits. shorten by replacing poor and lengthy coverage of so-called incident with expanded description of bot roles) (cur | prev) 01:46, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (221,162 bytes) (+64) . . (→Automation: fix WP edit warning bots 1) (cur | prev) 01:35, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (221,098 bytes) (+6) . . (→Automation: oops) (cur | prev) 00:37, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (221,092 bytes) (-226) . . (→Automation: shorten (Lih)) (cur | prev) 00:31, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (221,318 bytes) (+35) . . (→Editing: structure) (cur | prev) 00:28, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (221,283 bytes) (+17) . . (→Editing: fix caption) (cur | prev) 00:24, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (221,266 bytes) (-194) . . (→Editing: compact) (cur | prev) 00:18, 24 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (221,460 bytes) (+22) . . (→Editing: miscellaneous reverts/further improvements) (cur | prev) 01:58, 14 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,664 bytes) (+74) . . (→Vandalism: change image caption to describe image) (cur | prev) 23:25, 13 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,590 bytes) (+146) . . (→Criticism: mark references as failing verification) (cur | prev) 23:23, 13 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,444 bytes) (+42) . . (→Criticism: mark "Wikipedia experience sparks national debate" reference as dead) (cur | prev) 18:54, 13 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (214,372 bytes) (-20) . . (avoid redundant "large body of rules and regulations for editing") (cur | prev) 18:51, 13 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,392 bytes) (+73) . . (request to specify vague addition to lead on body of standards for quality assurance) (cur | prev) 18:48, 13 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,319 bytes) (+30) . . (→Mobile access: request reference about ""All of the above" approach") (cur | prev) 18:38, 13 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (214,289 bytes) (-2) . . (Undid revision 615902054 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) restore "similar rate of "serious errors"" instead of merely "comparable") (cur | prev) 20:34, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (213,154 bytes) (+23) . . (→Criticism: challenge definition of "majority “weight” of viewpoints") (cur | prev) 20:25, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (213,131 bytes) (-612) . . (Undid revision 615838303 by TakuyaMurata (talk) broken reference, missing context) (cur | prev) 20:20, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (213,743 bytes) (-3) . . (lead: simplify "edited articles". language) (cur | prev) 20:17, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (213,746 bytes) (-64) . . (lead: don't treat NPOV, already covered in body. everyone claims to be "neutral" anyway) (cur | prev) 20:12, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (213,810 bytes) (+1) (cur | prev) 20:09, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (213,809 bytes) (-1) . . (fix parenthesis missing parent sentence) (cur | prev) 20:06, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (213,810 bytes) (+50) . . (lead: clarify comparison with Britannica) (cur | prev) 18:32, 6 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (213,760 bytes) (0) . . (typo) (cur | prev) 02:49, 1 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (212,834 bytes) (-800) . . (→Criticism: move paragraph on Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia to Criticism of Wikipedia) (cur | prev) 02:43, 1 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) m . . (213,634 bytes) (-22) . . (→Criticism: shorten further) (cur | prev) 02:38, 1 July 2014 Chealer (talk | contribs) . . (213,656 bytes) (-198) . . (→Criticism: shorten new paragraph - few organizations have a size limit on rules, particularly when they're being told to implement one) |
If you would like us to continue to try to reason again with that user, then let me know and we can try again. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 00:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to hear the edit warring persists. You might consider initiating a report at WP:AN3. —Eustress 03:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I have reported both users on ANI at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Prolonged_edit_warring_and_content_dispute_on_Wikipedia EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:51, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
invalid links in deletion notices
When you posted deletion notices about the navboxes of university presidents, you linked to Oct 17 here, here, here and here, instead of Oct 15 where the deletion discussion is. That makes it more difficult for the authors to find your TfD. --rogerd (talk) 04:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- thanks for fixing —Eustress 03:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Barnstar awarded
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar | |
for prompt action on what ought not to be included. ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 12:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
Groan
Remember protecting that page on Direct Hit (band)? I was wondering how an obscure band suddenly became the target of so much vandalism—apparently the band asked on Facebook (Google cache, might be gone by the time you see it) to have their page vandalized. Sounds like somebody has too much time on their hands... Altamel (talk) 06:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- No worries, thx —Eustress 19:09, 19 December 2014 (UTC)