Jump to content

User talk:Vaza12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vaza12 (talk | contribs) at 19:54, 2 September 2016 (→SPI notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Agreed

Ok, I agree. Thanks for being somewhat reasonable. Can you help in construction a page for Ganesha dynasty? Since you want to take the individuals out, you might want to put it back by creating a page with dynasty. Cheers (2600:1001:B12A:7F40:7497:4CF5:F10D:28CD (talk) 20:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bengali Muslims (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Dravidian, Indo-Aryan, Awami Muslim League and Arakan
Bengal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Arakan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Osmani and Ouderland.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Osmani and Ouderland.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 21:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Information icon Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. As you did here. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 21:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TripWire: You accused me of stuff as well. Let it go, please. There is nothing to be gained from undermining these articles. I am on Wikpedia to create notable content. I try my best to avoid controversy in South Asia pages.--Vaza12 (talk) 21:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You should avoid attacking other editors basing your misconceived belief about their nationality. You have no idea who I am. For the record, instead of patronizing me, please see to the queries being raised regarding your contentious and POV edits and address them at the respective talkpages. Also, WP takes copyrights very seriously and as an editor, I take it as my duty to see WP's policies are upheld at all times. There's nothing personal here as you are repeatedly trying to imply.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 21:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:1971 Bangladesh refugees.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:1971 Bangladesh refugees.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 21:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Homecoming.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Homecoming.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 21:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mukti Bahini.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mukti Bahini.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 21:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bengali Muslim architecture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Canopies, National, Juma, Niche and Katra
Bangladesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nuclear energy
List of medieval great powers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Turkic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali Muslims


Hello, Vaza12 -- I enjoyed reading this article. It was fairly well written as it was; you'll see that I made several small copy-edits. I have some questions. I'll post them on the article's talk page. I look forward to your answers and ideas.  – Corinne (talk) 01:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi Vaza, please be sure to give full citations to books and articles you cite. The Citation tool in the template below gives you an easy way to make them. More information in the template below Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: I did give full citations earlier.

Edit warring on Mukti Bahini

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Mukti Bahini shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
When you find your addition being reverted, engage with the other editor or take your dispute to a WP:DR venue. Engaging in an edit war is not a good way to go about the editing process.--regentspark (comment) 19:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: I've been incredibly patient. I reverted only twice today. And I've discussed on the talk page.--Vaza12 (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just keep in mind that WP:BRD suggests discussing sooner rather than later. Also, edit warring doesn't have to be at 3RR so be careful. --regentspark (comment) 19:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notice

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bazaan. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Vaza12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is totally misplaced. I am not a sock puppet of Bazaan. And I haven't engaged in meat puppetry either. Plenty of people have used my IP. Can I be unblocked if I promise to stay clear of Bangladesh Liberation War articles since they are so contentious? Because I want to continue working in other areas

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is totally misplaced. I am not a sock puppet of Bazaan. And I haven't engaged in meat puppetry either. Plenty of people have used my IP. Can I be unblocked if I promise to stay clear of Bangladesh Liberation War articles since they are so contentious? Because I want to continue working in other areas |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is totally misplaced. I am not a sock puppet of Bazaan. And I haven't engaged in meat puppetry either. Plenty of people have used my IP. Can I be unblocked if I promise to stay clear of Bangladesh Liberation War articles since they are so contentious? Because I want to continue working in other areas |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is totally misplaced. I am not a sock puppet of Bazaan. And I haven't engaged in meat puppetry either. Plenty of people have used my IP. Can I be unblocked if I promise to stay clear of Bangladesh Liberation War articles since they are so contentious? Because I want to continue working in other areas |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vaza12&oldid=737438910"