Talk:Las Vegas Raiders
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Las Vegas Raiders article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1 |
![]() | Las Vegas Raiders was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Ga review
I quickly failed it because no work was being done after two days and there is so much work that it was a automatic fail anyways. Talk:Oakland Raiders/GA2 is the link for advise. Thanks Secret account 17:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Introduction
The current version of the introduction is quite shoddy. I've tried to fix it twice now, but have been reverted by an editor. As a few examples of what needs improvement, the first sentence says they are a "team in the NFL", but there's no explanation of what the NFL is. The second sentence explains they're in the "National Football League (NFL)". This is redundant. Additionally, the paragraph moves right into the history of the franchise, with a very unclear account of how Oakland got the spot originally intended for Minneapolis. This needs to be rewritten to make it clear why it's important. Then, we're greeted with a bunch of random information about the team's struggles in its first years and how it turned itself around, but there is no mention whatsoever of the twelve years they spent in LA, or the very big news of how they returned to Oakland. Lead sections are intended to summarize the whole article; that's something that clearly needs to be there. That's enough for a start.--Cúchullain t/c 01:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- If it would help, when the New England Patriots article was the April 3, 2006 featured article on the Main Page, the first sentence lacked "team in the NFL". Here's the version of the Patriots article just before it went live on the Main Page that you could use as a model (but please note that the guidelines on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section) were a bit different four years ago). Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Yes, standards have evolved a bit, but it's still a good starting point. (The Good Article version of this article is also quite old, too, but worth a look). I'd say we're getting to a good place now.--Cúchullain t/c 13:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Retired numbers
In the Retired numbers section, there's this: The number 00, worn by Jim Otto for his entire career, is no longer allowed by the NFL.[69] It was originally permitted for him only by the AFL as a marketing gimmick since his jersey number 00 is a homophone pun of his name (aught-O), which I don't believe is correct, as other players (Ken Burroughs) wore 00. It probably is correct that it was an AFL thing and possibly that he was the first to have the number, but it can't be that it was permitted "for him" (alone). - 74.162.148.39 (talk) 04:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Ted Hendricks photo
Let's look for a consensus - should the Ted Hendricks photo be included? Does a photo of him in particular, and in street clothes specifically, add substance to this article? SixFourThree (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)SixFourThree
Raiders owners
The SF Chronicle only says "The team will remain in the Davis family." It does not say if that means Al's wife and son, or only one. The NFL.com article, which says it is based off the Chronicle article, somehow assumed that meant both Carol and Mark. While that is likely, we should not speculate and just say "Davis family" for now.—Bagumba (talk) 02:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
first team in NFL history to lose at least 11 games in seven straight seasons?
I am looking for some verification of the information in the Oakland Raiders wikipedia article.
In that article it says ". At the end of their 2009 campaign, the Raiders became the first team in NFL history to lose at least 11 games in seven straight seasons."
This sentence can be found at the bottom of the second to last paragraph in the section entitled: "Coaching carousel 2004 to present."
I don't believe this is a true record and I would like to see the documentation and/or a link to the verification of
this so called "record" please.
Therefore I have added a [citation needed] Thank you, Skullpatrol (talk) 11:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Rob
Possibly inaccurate information
"At the end of their 2009 campaign, the Raiders became the first team in NFL history to lose at least 11 games in seven straight seasons."
skullpatrol doesn't think this is true.
Once you find a reference, be bold and edit the article yourself, citing your reference.
Enjoy your editing! Someone out there will appreciate more accurate information.
Entwhiz (talk) 11:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Former Rivalry Between LA Raiders and Seahawks.
I don't know how to add this, or even if I should, but when the Raiders were in LA there was a rivalry between them and the Seahawks where they even played each other in the playoffs twice, once for the AFC championship. This rivalry was huge until the Raiders moved back to Oakland and the Seahawks moved back to the NFC. 142.179.70.179 (talk) 19:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Broncos–Raiders rivalry article
The Broncos–Raiders rivalry article has just been created, though it includes an "under construction" template. DPH1110 (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)DPH1110
New stadium proposals
Previously there was a small mention of the Raiders' stadium situation under the Home Fields section. I created an entirely new section titled New Stadium Proposals as I believe that with the Raiders being linked to the Santa Clara project, Farmers Field and Oakland's own ambitious Coliseum City requires more info than just a single sentence about Santa Clara. The Raiders' lease at the Coliseum ends in 2013, as does the A's, so I think we'll be seeing an increased amount of chatter with regards to the Raiders relocating, either within the city limits or elsewhere in the state. Thesmartstag (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Information missing
A reader noted that the section Oakland_Raiders#1979:_the_Tom_Flores_era_begins goes through 1979, while the next section Oakland_Raiders#The_Los_Angeles_era_.281982.E2.80.931994.29_and_third_world_championship starts in 1982.
What happened in between?--S Philbrick(Talk) 03:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Introductory Summary section completely messed up.
Recently there was vandalism on this article with an addition of "Raiders suck" added in bold. It looks like there was some effort to undo/remove this but it appears that as a result the entire introductory section of this wikipedia article has been corrupted and broken.
Can someone fix it and get it back to the way it was before?
Xmbecker (talk) 19:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Intro so screwed up.
Someone completely vandalized the last 2 paragraphs of the intro please fix this... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.253.144.19 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
"No" Championships despite 3 Superbowls ?
There is an obvious inconsistence between text and sidebar: The three (3) Superbowls won by the Raiders are ignored by the sidebar, which says "Championships won: 0 (zero)." I am experiencing technical difficulties to add that information to the sidebar. Would somebody with more HTML expertise please add that vital information. --92.75.241.182 (talk) 13:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on Oakland Raiders
Cyberbot II has detected links on Oakland Raiders which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- https://www.change.org/petitions/john-kitzhaber-actively-explore-bringing-an-nfl-team-to-oregon?recruiter=84358141&utm_campaign=mailto_link&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition
- Triggered by
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Oakland Raiders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050828205427/http://www.sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=c/a/2003/01/24/MN64531.DTL to http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=c/a/2003/01/24/MN64531.DTL
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071013150625/http://stltoday.com:80/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/rams/story/241242A52193ACF98625724600217A92?OpenDocument to http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/rams/story/241242A52193ACF98625724600217A92?OpenDocument
- Attempted to fix sourcing for www.nfl.com/news/story/6805404
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071013213254/http://sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2006/11/25/SPG19MJJS01.DTL to http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2006/11/25/SPG19MJJS01.DTL
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060510210127/http://sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/11/03/MNGU4FIB741.DTL to http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/11/03/MNGU4FIB741.DTL
- Attempted to fix sourcing for www.nfl.com/news/story/8222230
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060510210127/http://sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/11/03/MNGU4FIB741.DTL to http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/11/03/MNGU4FIB741.DTL
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Request
Please fix the box with a summary of the team at the start of the page. I accidentally messed it up. And maybe restrict who can edit that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.222.77 (talk) 03:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
First Hispanic Head Coach
Tom_Fears was the first Hispanic/Latino Head coach in the NFL, not Tom Flores.
Bill King's Super Bowl Rings
The article says the raiders awarded radio announcer Bill King all three Super Bowl rings. I don't doubt this is the case, but I feel like this statement needs a citation. I looked around and couldn't find any sources. Does anyone else know of one? Thanks.Pistongrinder (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oakland Raiders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140812061719/http://www.mysanantonio.com/default/article/Raiders-owner-confirms-talks-with-San-Antonio-5656927.php to http://www.mysanantonio.com/default/article/Raiders-owner-confirms-talks-with-San-Antonio-5656927.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Raiders move
They're not moving to Vegas for at least two years. Changing their name to the Las Vegas Raiders is incorrect.
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class National Football League articles
- Top-importance National Football League articles
- WikiProject National Football League articles