Jump to content

User talk:Muboshgu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 45.62.219.78 (talk) at 23:08, 23 August 2018 (→‎Reverting edits: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


A cake just for thee!

Something going on at their talk page, maybe you'd want to go ahead and revoke access. Also two other socks: ThatAwesomeGuyyy, PoKeMoNza. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 20:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PlyrStar93: Thanks for bringing them to my attention. All dealt with. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you too. I fixed the ping BTW. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 20:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. I should've copy-pasted. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for working through AIV tonight. It's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Hope you're having a good evening. --Policy Reformer(c) 01:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! We all do our shifts. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,732 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Lil Miquela (talk) Add sources
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Ethan Allen boating accident (talk) Add sources
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub The Great Debate (U.S. TV series) (talk) Add sources
2,150 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C James Burke (gangster) (talk) Add sources
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub White House National Trade Council (talk) Add sources
5,825 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Donald Trump Jr. (talk) Add sources
1,157 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Michael Flynn (talk) Cleanup
38,002 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C QAnon (talk) Cleanup
1,382 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal (talk) Cleanup
37,967 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Donald Trump (talk) Expand
478 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Katrina Pierson (talk) Expand
1,013 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 (talk) Expand
123 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Ronen Bergman (talk) Unencyclopaedic
520 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Loretta Lynch (talk) Unencyclopaedic
210 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B WFAN (AM) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
60 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Miracle-Gro (talk) Merge
159 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (talk) Merge
171 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Service Employees International Union (talk) Merge
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Lake Mary High School (talk) Wikify
490 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Links between Trump associates and Russian officials (talk) Wikify
92 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B United States Senate election in Connecticut, 2006 (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start John I. Pray (talk) Orphan
114 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Chris Mattei (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Psychotherapy discontinuation (talk) Orphan
101 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hogan Gidley (talk) Stub
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Brandon Woodruff (talk) Stub
36 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lindsay Reynolds (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Al Harazin (talk) Stub
31 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Vallie Brown (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pat Friday (baseball executive) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Aretha Franklin

On 16 August 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aretha Franklin, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. StrikerforceTalk 16:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks? I'm not looking for any credit for this one. All I did was make some minor edits. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christine Hallquist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christine Hallquist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Hallquist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 05:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Muboshgu, you said that you'd be providing a QPQ review for this nomination that same day back on August 7. Pinging you since it appears to have slipped your mind; if you don't expect to have it done by the end of the weekend, please let us know how soon you think you can finish a review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! It slipped my mind. I'll do it now and ping you when it's done. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 NCAA Division I Baseball Tournament

I Was Trying To Finish An Article but you had to stop me because of a Edit Conflict stop this why did you do this is it too soon. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Harder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in checking whether we mentioned that the uniforms are debuted at the MLB Little League Classic (we did), I looked up MLB Little League Classic and found that it is divided into 3 pages: 2017 MLB Little League Classic, 2018 MLB Little League Classic, and 2019 MLB Little League Classic. I left a note on the 2017 talk page asking why this was so; and alternately, whether Players Weekend should also be spun off by year? What do you think? Personally, I think that when MLB debuted these new schemes last year, it may have looked like a one-time thing and was worthy of a specific article. But now that these have been established as annual programs, I think both MLB Little League Classic and Players Weekend should be stand-alone articles, with each year's event listed at the bottom of the page. This point has also been made by a post at Talk:2017 MLB Little League Classic. Thanks for your feedback. Yoninah (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'll go comment on talk pages. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Unhinged (book)

Hello! Your submission of Unhinged (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Reidgreg (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really interesting but there may be a neutrality issue with the hook and the picture doesn't appear in the article. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Penzone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Penzone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Penzone (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Please refrain from reverting well-sourced edits for no reason as you did for Robert Reich. Thank you. 45.62.219.78 (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]