Jump to content

Talk:Zionism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleZionism is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2003Featured article candidatePromoted
November 10, 2004Featured article reviewDemoted
July 26, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
August 28, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article

Template:WP1.0

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Zionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 December 2017

The Terminology section has an error that says "text has italic markup" in the first line. Please fix this. Every875 Talk to me 19:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Onceinawhile (talk) 21:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 March 2018

To avoid WP:Sandwich, could somebody move the "Arab offensive, at the beginning of the 1948 Arab-Israeli war" picture above the previous paragraph that starts with "On May 14, 1948, at the end of the British mandate..."? Thanks.--יניב הורון (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Moved to address this and also to place the illustrations closer to the text they illustrate Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:08, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 August 2018

The definition of Zionism is incorrectly written in the Wikipedia introductory paragraphs. It also presents Zionism as a fight for liberation, which it is not. I think it would be pertinent on such a controversial page to keep biases to a minimum. Please could you edit the introduction to truly capture the meaning of Zionism without invoking language that stirs patriotic emotions. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 23:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done That's not really a "change X to Y because Z" format as much as "change something I'm not specifying because of how I feel about it." Ian.thomson (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

addition of a subsection "neo nationalist" (request for comment on terminology) for the non-jewish support section

It would reason that section could be added under the non-jewish support section for nationalist support of zionism. for example, https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israeli-nation-state-law-backed-by-white-nationalist-richard-spencer-1.6295314 this article claims that the famous neo-nationalist (or neo-nazi if you want to be contentious) richard spencer's support for zionism. many neo nationalists believe that the state of israel should be a blueprint for european ethnostates, and a common argument I've heard made is that if it is 'politically correct to be pro zionism but politically incorrect to be for ethnonationalism, isn't that a contradiction in terms?' or something thereabouts. I think it is a sufficiently popular sentiment for neo-nationalists and deserves to have its own section under the support for zionism section, and seeing that the anti zionism section has a section for anti-semitism, which is often linked to neo-nationalism, I think this justifies the addition of such a section.

note, I'm quite new to wikipedia so I'm not sure how the process for editing a locked article like this is, so if I'm missing anything let me know please.Jamesthefrank (talk) 04:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]