Talk:Senkaku Islands
This talk page is for discussion of the Senkaku Islands article; any discussion of the dispute over ownership of the islands should be taken to Talk:Senkaku Islands dispute. Thank you for your cooperation. |
Template:Senkaku Islands sanctions
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page has previously undergone mediation under the guidance of the Mediation Committee in regards to the title of this article. |
A news item involving Senkaku Islands was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 June 2008. |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Category | The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
How can I edit the "Senkaku Islands",Because I find some words are contrary to facts,and I have been edited 10 times.Crablking (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Crablking (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: you should be able to edit it now. I looked at your user groups, and you are a member of "autoconfirmed" --DannyS712 (talk) 08:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
I still can't edit it.And there is not [edit]2001:DA8:8005:B102:2945:B0D4:B8AA:46F6 (talk) 12:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC) It's work,thanks14:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanru P (talk • contribs)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I still can't edit it.Why?2001:DA8:8005:B102:2945:B0D4:B8AA:46F6 (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC) 2001:DA8:8005:B102:2945:B0D4:B8AA:46F6 (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Assuming you're the same person who posted above, you'll need to log in to your Crablking account, as this article is protected from editing by new and unregistered contributors. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 13:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
HELP:How to view the list of administrators for this entry? Yanru P (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Imperial Chinese edict - a forgery?
In the article it is written: "Permission for collecting herbs on three of the islands was recorded in an Imperial Chinese edict of 1893." I thought this was an important fact concerning the islands, however untill I found an analysis in a paper of Han-yi Shaw, THE DIAOYUTAI/SENKAKU ISLANDS· DISPUTE: ITS HISTORY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE OWNERSHIP CLAIMS OF THE P.R.C., R.O.C., AND JAPAN. p.62. Excerpt: "Perhaps it may be also suggested that while the imperial edict per se is not a genuine one and was possibly used merely as a commercial advertisement for Sheng's pharmaceutical house, evidently it was "fabricated" based on the common understanding of the Chinese public that the islands were Chinese territory [...]" Therefore I suggest that questions about the authenticity of the edict schould be mentioned in the article.
Section on the documentary is biased
The section states opinions rather than facts and should be flagged Martropolis (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2019
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "In the 1470s( early Ming Dynasty), . . ." to "In the 1470s (early Ming Dynasty), . . ." 202.246.252.97 (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
The lighthouse is much older
The lighthouse on Uotsuri was built by a nationalist group in 1978 and nationalized in 2005. see ja: 魚釣島灯台.220.147.88.128 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class Taiwan articles
- Mid-importance Taiwan articles
- WikiProject Taiwan articles
- B-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Islands articles
- WikiProject Islands articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press