Jump to content

Talk:Senkaku Islands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 220.147.88.128 (talk) at 17:53, 7 June 2019 (The lighthouse is much older: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Senkaku Islands sanctions

Template:Copied multi

Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2018

How can I edit the "Senkaku Islands",Because I find some words are contrary to facts,and I have been edited 10 times.Crablking (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Crablking (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: you should be able to edit it now. I looked at your user groups, and you are a member of "autoconfirmed" --DannyS712 (talk) 08:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I still can't edit it.And there is not [edit]2001:DA8:8005:B102:2945:B0D4:B8AA:46F6 (talk) 12:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC) It's work,thanks14:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanru P (talkcontribs) [reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2018

I still can't edit it.Why?2001:DA8:8005:B102:2945:B0D4:B8AA:46F6 (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC) 2001:DA8:8005:B102:2945:B0D4:B8AA:46F6 (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you're the same person who posted above, you'll need to log in to your Crablking account, as this article is protected from editing by new and unregistered contributors. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 13:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HELP:How to view the list of administrators for this entry? Yanru P (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Chinese edict - a forgery?

In the article it is written: "Permission for collecting herbs on three of the islands was recorded in an Imperial Chinese edict of 1893." I thought this was an important fact concerning the islands, however untill I found an analysis in a paper of Han-yi Shaw, THE DIAOYUTAI/SENKAKU ISLANDS· DISPUTE: ITS HISTORY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE OWNERSHIP CLAIMS OF THE P.R.C., R.O.C., AND JAPAN. p.62. Excerpt: "Perhaps it may be also suggested that while the imperial edict per se is not a genuine one and was possibly used merely as a commercial advertisement for Sheng's pharmaceutical house, evidently it was "fabricated" based on the common understanding of the Chinese public that the islands were Chinese territory [...]" Therefore I suggest that questions about the authenticity of the edict schould be mentioned in the article.

Section on the documentary is biased

The section states opinions rather than facts and should be flagged Martropolis (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2019

Change "In the 1470s( early Ming Dynasty), . . ." to "In the 1470s (early Ming Dynasty), . . ." 202.246.252.97 (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done NiciVampireHeart 01:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The lighthouse is much older

The lighthouse on Uotsuri was built by a nationalist group in 1978 and nationalized in 2005. see ja: 魚釣島灯台.220.147.88.128 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]