Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Muthukumar21366 (talk | contribs) at 13:33, 4 July 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category — List (sorting)		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply — By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


June 27

00:33:23, 27 June 2019 review of submission by 148.75.165.78


Found and referenced additional significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject

148.75.165.78 (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@148.75.165.78: - hi there, as this was, it should have been declined, not by rejected by your reviewer.
In any case, I've reviewed it again and passed it - very impressive to find reviews that good for a film over a century old! Nosebagbear (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

01:55:14, 27 June 2019 review of draft by Joshua at mixi Inc


Hi there! I requested the creation of a COI article to be made in my stead, but it was declined because there were insufficient reliable sources, and also for the reason that it read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia.

We are now attempting another request on the Japanese Wikipedia, hoping that we can provide more reliable sources in Japanese. However, we are unsure if the addition of links to the app's awards will help increase the number or reliable resources, or instead make it read more like an advertisement. I would be very grateful if you could give me your opinion as an experienced editor!

Thank you very much for your time, and I look forward to your reply. Joshua @ mixi

Joshua at mixi Inc (talk) 01:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joshua at mixi Inc if you can find good sources in Japanese, or any other language, you can cite them here too. The English Wikipedia accepts sources in any language. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:20:21, 27 June 2019 review of submission by PilotSuggs

The article has been updated to reflect the recent extreme adventure that Paul Suggitt has completed, a first on the actual route he took. It also draws note on the firsts he has completed over the last few years that are documented in the media. Any help / tweaks to get this published will be so gratefully received.

PilotSuggs (talk) 12:20, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PilotSuggs, the draft currently relies almost entirely on local sources. If you can reference good sources from outside the Hartlepool area it might improve the chance of acceptance. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:23:35, 27 June 2019 review of draft by 2600:1700:93B0:1350:B5F7:9119:E9C9:92FB

so a poster surfaced on the web and it could mean that Ash will be in Galar and will travel with Gloria but there was no confirmation from ShoPro or TV Tokyo.

2600:1700:93B0:1350:B5F7:9119:E9C9:92FB (talk) 15:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:27:59, 27 June 2019 review of draft by PamMusic


Thank you for the initial review. The reviewer's comment was to add headings. Is this all I need to do? Is there also a problem with essay vs encyclopedic tone, as described in the introductory text?

I realize I still have some more work to do, including an external link to the ensemble's website and adding links for text items that refer to entities with their own Wikipedia articles.

PamMusic (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:34:14, 27 June 2019 review of draft by Coffeeandsmoke


Hi! I recently submitted an article for re-review Draft:Queens Night Market. I'd love to add some pictures, assuming the article is reviewed and ultimately accepted. Should I wait until a decision is made in order to upload pictures? Also, since I have a COI, are there special guidelines I should follow with respect to which images I submit for the article? I suppose the pictures should also somehow be neutral in tone, but not sure how to accomplish that as easily with pictures. Would love to get your advice. Thanks! Coffeeandsmoke (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coffeeandsmoke (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Coffeeandsmoke. There's no rush, the presence or absence of pictures will have no effect on whether the draft is accepted. For an article of this length, a single image would be enough, and any more would be excessive with the current text. But you may upload more than you can display immediately, in the expectation that the article will eventually grow and be able to accommodate more images. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images gives some pointers.
With respect to COI, let other editors choose which image to use from among those uploaded. There are many excellent photographers in New York who will donate images. So consider what you can contribute that would be unique. That might be historical photos, photos of non-public parts of the facility, or photos for which you had to make special arrangements (a view of the market from a private area of an adjacent building, for example). --Worldbruce (talk) 03:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:39:46, 27 June 2019 review of draft by WillRowActor


Hi, I received an email that an edit had occurred. I am unsure what the edit was or how it aleffexts my pqge? Will Rowlands 17:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

@WillRowActor: - if you click "view history" on your draft (move the dots on the left to select which versions you'd like to compare) you can see. The three edits made on the page since you last altered it are:
1) Moving it from your sandbox to a draft 2) Adding a couple of tags 3) A different editor declining it from AfC - as Wikipedia can't self-cite. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 28

03:47:52, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Soundwavepulseblaster

I'm requesting a re-review because this rapper needs an article on Wikipedia. I hope I followed the terms this time as well.

Soundwavepulseblaster (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Soundwavepulseblaster: - the reviewer was correct to decline, as the draft needs more sources. Please take a look at the musician notability list of criteria. Fragmentationous would need to meet at least one of those, usually criterion 1 (multiple sources). Currently the only source doesn't appear to be about him so doesn't count. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:22:52, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Farhinvohra07


Farhinvohra07 (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Why my article is rejected? Can you please help me out finding my answer?Farhinvohra07 (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Farhinvohra07 (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Farhinvohra07: As the big pink box at the top of Draft:Sajid Mirza 07 - Sensation TikTok Star says, the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). --Worldbruce (talk) 02:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What if I change the topic of article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhinvohra07 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:08:39, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Guru1313


how do i submit the original draft, it appears am submitting a duplicate draft. Please i need some help. thanks

Guru1313 (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Guru1313: - I've submitted the original draft found here to AfC for you. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:35:52, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Shantiwong

My review said my article was contrary to the purposes of Wikipedia. Some explanation of why this is would be helpful. Shantiwong (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shantiwong: - it's not clear what the draft is intending to talk about. It links to a couple of pre-existing articles and has a few weblinks, so doesn't appear to attempt to be an article. If you want to add those links to those articles then you can go there to do so (if they're appropriate)
If there's something we're missing than please let me know on my talk page (see the "talk" button in my signature) Nosebagbear (talk) 12:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:01:28, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Kendoma


Hello guys I don’t know why that article was denied. All i wrote about that person is real. He is a new rocking teenager in uganda so there is no that much references about him so I request your help Kendoma (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kendoma: See the large pink box at the top of the draft. Wikipedia aims to cover people who are notable, who have attracted significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, as demonstrated by significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. A second reason the draft was declined is that it makes statements that cite no source(s). If there is "no that much references about him", then he is not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:41:33, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Kendoma


Hello Am asking for assistance on that article because all i wrote in the article is true. I got everything from the main source when he was interviewed. This person i wrote about is a new fashion rocking teenager In uganda so he doesn’t have that much references online about him because he just made his breakthrough. This person was discovered on instagram. Thanks for your assistance Kendoma (talk) 10:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kendoma: I don't understand why you linked G. K. W. Perera in your question. Are you asking about User:Kendoma/sandbox (Ssentongo Faizo, better known as Fai Styles)? What do you mean by "got everything from the main source when he was interviewed"? Do you mean Faizo told you personally? Do you mean an interview with Faizo was published somewhere, and you drew your information from there? The draft is unacceptable because it cites no published, reliable, secondary sources independent of Faizo, that contain significant coverage of him. If he "just made his breakthrough", there may be no such sources, or too few such sources, in which case he unsuitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:13:30, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Sucharita Sen

My article has been cancelled by the reviewer and the reason showing is lack of references. But I have given IMdb website and a person's personal website for reference. But it's not acceptable according to wikipedia rules. This is a Script Writer's biography so please help me ehich type reference or citations will be accepted?? Sucharita Sen (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sucharita Sen: - hi there. Notability in Wikipedia is demonstrated by the use of sources that are: secondary (newspapers, books etc); reliable (good editorial control, trustworthy); independent (no reason to be biased, which means most interviews are out) & have significant coverage (at least a few paragraphs about the individual).
best thing to do is take a look at a few good articles in Wikipedia to see the sources there. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:10:11, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Moonsoftwizz


Moonsoftwizz (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:40:56, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Hosseini.1991


I would like to know what changes I need to make exactly in order to have this article accepted. I do not understand why it is contradictory to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Thank you for your help.


Hosseini.1991 (talk) 12:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:44:40, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Samrt tech

Hosseini.1991, I consider the article possibly acceptable as is , but it would more clearly show notability by WP:PROF with a list of his 4 or 5 most widely cited papers, giving citation counts.The moresignificant problem is a promotional tone: It should avoid statements such as "Raunser commits himself to the development and understanding of the molecular ... " and the adjectives in "The Raunser group provided the first high-resolution structure of an actin-tropomyosin-myosin complex, bringing about new insights into this important macromolecular complex." need to be omitted. (And note that we can claim "first" only if there is a reliable Third Party source that justifies that claim Its usually better to rewrite to avoid the explicit claim). DGG ( talk ) 09:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:44:40, 28 June 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Samrt tech



Samrt tech (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:34:27, 28 June 2019 review of submission by BigBigL


BigBigL (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother with a service like this if you're going to allow incapable reviewers to make assumptions about COI. My article was declined because of COI so I reviewed the COI rules and fail to understand how I have a personal conflict with this listing. I'm just trying to enrich your community of info but if your site is so slanted to not easily allow actual real contributions then perhaps I should stop using wiki altogether. I'm out here trying to contribute meaningful info and some hack declines it. This is beyond ridiculous, considering I just spent over 2 hours making a listing that should have already existed on this site.

 Comment: Entirely aside from any concern regarding COI; given it appears sections of the article have been copied directly from the organisation's website [1] [2] [3] [4], in addition to the complete lack of reliable secondary sources, leads me to concur with the decision of User:Jeff G. to decline the article. --Jack Frost (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:54:15, 28 June 2019 review of draft by Pgk707


As you suggested, I have merged both versions in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ERCIM Is there any possibility to delete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:European_Research_Consortium_for_Informatics_and_Mathematics and resubmit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ERCIM ? thanks for your help

Pgk707 (talk) 15:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pgk707: You are not the only substantial contributor to Draft:European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, so you may not delete it, but if it is abandoned it will be deleted after 6 months. To submit Draft:ERCIM, add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:27:55, 28 June 2019 review of draft by Superbrickbro


What would I need to add to this page to make it notable? I am just a beginner, so can someone tell me specific things I need to add to this document to make it able to be notable for and article status? Superbrickbro (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Superbrickbro: At least three reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject and contain significant coverage (not mere passing mentions) of the subject are needed to demonstrate notability. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 29

10:03:01, 29 June 2019 review of submission by Pratiwicitra12

hello. I wrote my article as neutral as I can. I didn't write to promote that person.

Pratiwicitra12 (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:51:50, 29 June 2019 review of submission by XernonnE.L.

This article clearly meets the notability requirements in multiple places for both the Composer,songwriter..librettist as well as musician group. Please review the criteria for both with regards to the revised article:

Composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists, may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria: 

   Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.
   Has written musical theatre of some sort (includes musicals, operas, etc.) that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run as such things are judged in their particular situation and time.
   Has had a work used as the basis for a later composition by a songwriter, composer or lyricist who meets the above criteria.
   Has written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers.
   Has been listed as a major influence or teacher of a composer, songwriter or lyricist that meets the above criteria.
   Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on his or her genre of music.

Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria. 

   Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1]
       This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following:
           Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3]
           Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.
           Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.
   Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
   Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
   Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.[note 4]
   Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).
   Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 5] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. Note that this criterion needs to be interpreted with caution, as there have been instances where this criterion was cited in a circular manner to create a self-fulfilling notability loop (e.g. musicians who were "notable" only for having been in two bands, of which one or both were "notable" only because those musicians had been in them.)
   Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
   Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
   Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.
   Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications).
   Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
   Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.


XernonnE.L. (talk) 10:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:54:39, 29 June 2019 review of submission by Keleperkins

I submitted a new article (on Patty Carreto) which was rejected on false grounds that I did not include any references. I did include a reference to a Los Angeles Times article from May 1987. The reviewer falsely claimed that no reference was included. Keleperkins (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Keleperkins: - hi there. The reviewer was indeed incorrect to say that it had no sources - and yours is a good one. Unlike many sports, swimming doesn't have a specific "if you did this, you're notable" set of guidelines, so we default to the BASIC/GNG requirements. In short, that requires a 2nd good source, which is not yet met. I had a look for another source myself, and couldn't find any with more than 2 lines. However if you can find one with a couple of paragraphs that would be enough to demonstrate notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The LA times article is available online. I took a quick glance from that article and already found the information. The reviewer not only incorrectly said there's no source, but also incorrectly failed it per WP:NSPORTS. The subject passes notability per WP:NOLYMPICS. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:49:43, 29 June 2019 review of submission by 213.205.241.131

Article has been reviewed and passed through. There's never any worry about articles being forgotten - they work their way up in our list as they age. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:02:41, 29 June 2019 review of draft by Bonniedust


I'm requesting help because I do not understand in what way the article violets wikipedia's standards for referencing, and even more so, how it "needs more secondary sources". Every statement in this article is backed up with a source that meets journalistic standards. It would be helpful if the reviewer could point out which parts specifically he or she deems insufficient. Thank you! Bonniedust (talk) 17:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Mjs1991: - I would say that while a couple might have issues, there's relatively little content that would violate the bare minimum standards of inline citations and I think they are covered. Their comment however is probably more legitimate (in terms of content that meets all 4 requirements of secondary/significant coverage/independent/reliable). I was unsure about the clash however, so hopefully they can clarify.
For future note, the easiest route is to go to their talk page (see the linked username above the resubmit button) and ask there. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Bonniedust and Nosebagbear:, the reason i declined the article was the fact that most of the articles only relatively focus on Dan Bodan's albums, rather than himself. It's a fairly good article, but if there were more secondary sources that focused on him and gave it significant coverage then I'd gladly accept it. Have a read of WP:THREE--Mjs1991 (talk) 04:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Mjs1991 and Nosebagbear:. I added two more secondary sources with information on Bodan's life and activities that are not music-related. I would like to make sure that it now meets wikipedia's/your criteria?

17:38:53, 29 June 2019 review of draft by Nautiluscreed


Dear WikiProject Help Desk,

I would be very thankful, if you could give some pointers on speeding up the approval for the posting of this page. The image used for the profile was tagged as a potential copyright violation, however the owner of the image gave permission via OTRS. Could this be the reason for delays in approval?

Kind regards! Nautiluscreed (talk) 17:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nautiluscreed. The image has nothing to do with how long it takes to be reviewed. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for one week. The current backlog is four months. The best thing that you can do for the draft is to make it as good as possible, so that if it's approved (probably 80% of submissions never are), it's approved the first time it's reviewed. To do that, study Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and gain experience by editing existing articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:27:28, 29 June 2019 review of draft by Uipmonline2019


Uipmonline2019 (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC) "Uipmonline2019, her notability depends primarily on her published books. There is one substantial published book by U. Oklahoma Press, FireLight. There need to be added references to substantial 3rd party published reviews in reliable sources. She is apparently about to publish another book at the publisher, and the article would be much more likely to be acepted once it has been published and also gotten such substantial 3rd party reviews ( and do not use Amazon or book jacket tributes or anything from the publisher's site for such reviews--they aren ot independent). , I;d suggest withdrawing this now, and trying after that 2nd book has attractedsubstantial notice. DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC) .[reply]

June 30

08:27:47, 30 June 2019 review of submission by Mariferchis


I have followed the advise of the reviewer and enlarged the contribution in order to show the relevance of defining a new art move that is emerging in France.

Best regards,

Mariferchis (talk) 08:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariferchis: With no substantive changes since your question was answered on 22 June, the draft remains unacceptable. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:34:08, 30 June 2019 review of draft by The Greek FISHERMAN


The Greek FISHERMAN (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is currently in the pool of drafts awaiting review. The backlog is currently about 4 months, so please be patient. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 14:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
but I doubt it will be accepted. This is too early in his career. "Youth ambassador" is not a notable position. DGG ( talk ) 09:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:02:00, 30 June 2019 review of submission by Arsa123


Arsa123 (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello, why is the creation of the Appa group page not sufficient for Wikipedia? are there certain guidelines I forgot to include or did I break certain laws? Please let me know.
See below. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:04:28, 30 June 2019 review of submission by Arsa123


Arsa123 (talk) 11:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Het david, What would make this sufficient for Wikipedia? Is there not enough info?

I see some problems here:

21:36:16, 30 June 2019 review of draft by Mercer5089


I have added a source which is a paper map of the county. Is this a reliable enough reference? I could add a Wisconsin Highway Map as a reference as well.

Mercer5089 (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mercer5089 yes you can reference a published map. There is even a {{Cite map}} template that you can use. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 1

Request on 05:02:54, 1 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Nilomimehta



Nilomimehta (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please find that we have not used any copyrighted material illegally or unethically. The website IAGD has granted us rights to use the information published on their page. Please help us get this article published.

Who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts cannot be shared by multiple people. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:14, 1 July 2019 review of submission by 77.247.249.172


77.247.249.172 (talk) 08:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 09:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:49:09, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Gopal jha bjp


Gopal jha bjp (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 12:13:59, 1 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by 65.242.187.146


Thanks for the note. I’m sorry the page came across as promotional. We modeled it after the UCaaS wiki page. Can you be more specific regarding what was promotional about it? We’re more than happy to add/delete/edit with your guidance. Thank you.


65.242.187.146 (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

who is "we"? If you are getting paid to edit Wikipedia, you must disclose it. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:18:31, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Mohammadk97


The reason for the rejection, which was "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia", was not very clear. I don't see any reason for it not being accepted, even after reviewing all the rules of submission. The person of the titled article is well known in the automobiles business in Lebanon, and is looked upon by so many people interested in the industry. I've edited the intro and added his Guinness Word Record breaking.

Mohammadk97 (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

we do not consider Guinness as evidence for notability , especially when its for as minor and specialized a matter as here.There are just not sufficient accomplishements, which accounts for the lack of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources DGG ( talk ) 09:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:16:06, 1 July 2019 review of submission by HillsOne


HillsOne (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:29:09, 1 July 2019 review of draft by 2600:1700:93B0:1350:30AC:F6D2:572C:63BC

So there was going to be a announcement during September and we have to wait.

2600:1700:93B0:1350:30AC:F6D2:572C:63BC (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:03, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Farhinvohra07


I am sking for re-review because i have written this content by myself. And for the person i am writing is famous person he is a creator of 07 team a famous tiktok team which has million of followers in India as well as worldwide.

If there is any mistake in content or title is not suitable please advice me I will change the content and title. Farhinvohra07 (talk) 15:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:01:42, 1 July 2019 review of submission by O'Hagan22


Hi, This is my first time publishing a page so I have a lot to learn, my recent attempt to publish the above page was declined and I am unsure what I should do in order to move forward. My recent note was 'references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage' The page I'm trying to create is information on a novel which has been published in several countries and languages, has been reviewed by a number of notable newspapers and magazines, NY Times, Guardian, Telegraph and so on and It was published by a well known and reputable publishers Faber & Faber and is sold in most high street book stores. The author in question has a number of novels some of which are on schools curriculums. Having looked at other contemporary authors and their novels pages I can't see any notable difference in my content. Could you please advise? Thank you :)


O'Hagan22 (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:49:52, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Vishnubharathan002

vishnu bharathan is a notable person in malayalam short films , his works are famous beacuse of its humour . it was widley got critical and audience appreciation , so here request you to please re think about this decison Vishnubharathan002 (talk) 16:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


19:01:45, 1 July 2019 review of draft by Pi314m


It could very well be that the publication itself (HRO Today) is not notable, in which case I can easily understand that it has no place in Wikipedia, _BUT_

the awards they put out, (Baker's dozen, Top RPO (Recruitment process outsourcing) Provider, and other CapitaLized AcroNyms), get attention.
  • HRO Today is cited both in Wiki articles and in NYTimes articles that follow awardees of HRO Today's awards
Question: Should the article be flipped- named something like HRO Today award series and then just have a minor section about the magazine, which still does seem notable for-
an article titled "Insourcing, Outsourcing? How about Self-sourcing?" that
  • mined Wikipedia's history of a pair of banks that merged decades ago as Standard Chartered and, after September 11, rebuilt its personnel department in an innovative way.
as for a pair of words, "selfsourcing" or "self-sourcing" : I have no source that they were first, so I wrote that the article was an "early user of."

To repeat and summarize: Am I better off "flipping" the orientation to awards - since that's what gets attention? Pi314m (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pi314m (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:36:52, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Beth A. Farrell


Beth A. Farrell (talk) 22:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page Name: Beth Farrell

User Name: Beth A. Farrell

Hi! I was notified that my submission was declined because it appeared to be a "test article". I don't understand what that means. I'm trying to submit my information/article as a legitimate, recognized and published artist. Any advice on how I can do that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Beth Farrell

Beth A. Farrell I wouldn't of denied it as a test edit. However I do see two problems here. First off it seems to be a autobiography which are strongly discouraged here on Wikipedia. Secondly you only have a link to your personal website for a reference which is a primary source. Wikipedia requires several secondary sources for inclusion on Wikipedia. Whispering(t) 22:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


July 2

Request on 02:38:22, 2 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Adwerd



Adwerd (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC) I have been trying to wite an article bit is being rejected for some reasons can you help me with that please[reply]

04:06:13, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Fans of samrat


News article is given as reference. Twitter and IMDB are in a external link. To prove anything, news article reference is enough. Kindly recheck once again. I've write very basic information about person with news reference. Hope this will be publish soon.

Fans of samrat (talk) 04:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05:01:51, 2 July 2019 review of submission by 61.69.125.170

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Jacob is a professional footballer playing in Cyprus, as a professional footballer. There are far more insignificant athletes with profiles then Jacob. ie Bai Antoniou

61.69.125.170 (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05:45:38, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Jani.rik


Hi,

I made a few changes to the article. I added more credible references to the text for example from Nasdaq. I also re-write more articulate text about the company's services.

Br, Jani

Jani.rik (talk) 05:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:06:14, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Nilomimehta


Nilomimehta (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Hi I need your help. My article has been declined for copyright infringement but the website from which the content is clashing has given us full authority to use the same. Kindly help me with the same.[reply]

Nilomimehta Pls provide link of the page where it stated such claimed. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:19:06, 2 July 2019 review of submission by 21805hp

Hunter is a Political Activist and a Youtuber, he has done amazing things for someone of his age, his Wikipedia page is a great place for people who don't know alot about him to find out. Please approve it 21805hp (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any affiliation with him? I'm unwilling to approve this, because Wikipedia isn't a vehicle for promoting something or somebody. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 17:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:25:51, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Mikedc73

Please give help in how to get this published. Mikedc73 (talk) 07:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:49:06, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Swampcygnet


Could you check over the article for The The Youth? Have made some changes. Thanks.

Swampcygnet (talk) 07:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


08:16:21, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott


hi hi the article of Jeffrey Feinman had been updated by adding more references.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

Pls review and see if it is acceptable for publishing.

If any further enhancement is needed, pls advise what should be done.

thx Jordi Scott (talk) 08:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft still has no inline citations and the tone is totally unacceptable "Dr. Jeff and his wonderful wife Amy live in Weston", "highly successful practice", "homeopathy’s remarkable successes", "prestigious Proceedings". for example! Theroadislong (talk) 08:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:32, 2 July 2019 review of draft by Paulmil


Paulmil (talk) 09:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have made the revisions to Henry Moss page 6 months ago and am still waiting for approval. I understand this can take up to 8 weeks but 6 months seems to be an unduly long time. Please advise. Thank you.

Hi Paulmil. The draft was submitted on 24 March, so it hasn't been quite 6 months yet. The current backlog (advertised as "8 weeks or more") is actually about 4 months right now. So the draft likely will be reviewed later this month. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:13:04, 2 July 2019 review of submission by SuperSwift

The original page for Bella Disu has been blocked for reasons of putting up promotional content and as such I cannot move the draft. I've written this article from a NPOV and have done so with the aim of promoting notable women through the Women in Red Project. I need this article to be reviewed so that Deb can unblock the page. Thanks

SuperSwift (talk) 09:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SuperSwift. To have the draft reviewed, add {{subst|submit}} to the top of the draft. The current reviewing backlog is roughly four months. If that doesn't seem super swift, you (and Deb) are welcome to sign up to join the reviewing team. It isn't the done thing to review your own submission, but you could nudge it along by helping reduce the backlog. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Under no circumstances should User:SuperSwift review his own draft. Deb (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure Deb, that wouldn't be right at all. I'll wait for the review while I work on other articles. Gracias.

SuperSwift (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:24:31, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott


article of Jeffrey Feinman was edited based on given comment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

Pls see if it will be acceptable or further editing is required.

Thks and regards

Jordi Scott (talk) 11:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:58:22, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Saeedr2000


Saeedr2000 (talk) 11:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


hello what sources are required until accept this wiki page ? Fataneh is a famous iranin singer but she have not website thanks

Saeedr2000 The reviewer had given the answer on the comment section and in the grey panel atop of the page. We need independent, reliable sources such as from major newspapers for verification. Sources can be in any languages. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:10:01, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Novembersummer


Novembersummer (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Have shared details of a novel that was published in 2014 along with ten web links, including the book launch event in Mumbai. The book is available on Amazon and Flipkart apart from having a proper ISBN listing code on goodreads. Despite that the article has been rejected. Kindly help on what proof is needed to show notability.[reply]

no Declined with further explanation on User:Novembersummer/sandbox of notability for books. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:52:01, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Mpampismate


Hello,

there is a page for Pix4D but not for its major product "pix4dmapper". The article is edited with a neutral point of view like "3DF Zephyr", "IMAGINE Photogrammetry", "Metashape" etc. Those pages were taken as a template in order for the article to be as neutral and unbiased as possible. Mpampismate (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The existence of one article doesn't necessarily mean that another does too, see WP:OSE. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:14:19, 2 July 2019 review of submission by QuantumBinary


QuantumBinary (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told numerous times that the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:45:34, 2 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mercer5089


I'm confused about why my added source - the paper map - is not verifiable. Are you asking me to literally show you the map? How would you like me to verify it?

Mercer5089 (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:55:33, 2 July 2019 review of draft by Alightjones


I am working on adding an article about Veronica Kirin and my submission was rejected due to not enough citations regarding her awards. I have photos of each of her awards (from the source). How can these be submitted or should I leave awards off altogether? I am having trouble finding how to include citations for these items as news coverage was limited or out of print.

Here is a Dropbox folder with all the images: Dropbox link w award images for citation.


Alightjones (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, one book is not enough. The awards are relatively minor. It's probably too early in her career for a successful article. DGG ( talk ) 09:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:56:34, 2 July 2019 review of draft by Keothere


Hi, I want an article for my fine comic series, COLLEGE BUDDIES, but it was rejected on the grounds that there are not enough "Reliable, secondary" sources for it. Please explain what this means and what I can do. Keothere (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keothere (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Keothere: Please return to the Teahouse. 331dot (talk) 23:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, certainly! Keothere (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 3

01:36:06, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Arman-BCSEA

I am seeing that the page is rejected due to being "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." BCSEA has been cited on the Climate change mitigation page where a dedicated article is missing and BCSEA is also mentioned in the History of green policies in Vancouver. I am confused about the decision. A dedicated article can help complete the two pages. Also, organizations of the same type that we have worked with frequently in the past like the Sierra Club Canada have a page. Can you please Re-Review or let me know if there is anything I can do about this decision?

(disclaimer as my account says: I am a volunteer for the organization). Arman-BCSEA (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

02:49:59, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Gipsyblues


Gipsyblues (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Draft writer/editor: Gipsyblues Draft: DVEO This question or request is for advice is for a page I am writing for DVEO which was rejected by DGG on June 9, 2019,as looking more like an ad than a wikipedia article Unfortunately that remark is NOT helpful because there is no definition about the ad characteristics which the draft has which makes it look more like a commercial.[reply]

I hope that experienced editors will help newer editors by not only describing an article is looking like a commercial but explain why an article looks like a commercial.

I am writing about a DVEO - a company which has contributed to the success of NASA's efforts to educate the general public as to what is happening in the Space program by supplying a key component to the video production section of the airborne equipment to help NASA send very high quality video streams from Space to the NASA facility on earth to re broadcast those images and activities to the general public on earth.

I have since then done a number of re edits . In the History of company section, I have re-written the first part as prose as opposed to using a bullet format to explain activities in specified dates. I have intentionally left the second half of the History using the bulleted date format. Please comments will be very helpful

I had a section for key products which I have deleted completely and retained at the end of the draft, a list of awards DVEO has received. I could use some help in that section too

I would also welcome other advice and how to organize this draft to make it look or meet the conditions of a wikipedia article

Sincerely

Gipsyblues

04:56:53, 3 July 2019 review of draft by GouravSWS


May I know is there any changes required in this page and I want to know how much time it takes for verification. I am waiting for your response.. Thanks in Advance GouravSWS (talk) 04:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GouravSWS: the review backlog is currently about 3 to 4 months. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:39:34, 3 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Craig-SG-Wright


Hello. I have had an article about a product called Paligo rejected. I have been given the codes for the reasons why, but I am unsure what parts I need to change or remove in order to get the article accepted. Is it possible to get more detailed information on what parts are deemed unacceptable?

Thanks Craig-SG-Wright (talk) 06:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is an almost total absence of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. Yhe only substanial refernces is a interview where the head of the firmjust says whatever they want to . This is PR, not an trully independent source. If the product is truly important, there should be better sources. DGG ( talk ) 09:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:13, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott


for page of Jeffrey Feinman, the list of external links was edited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

pls review and advise if it is acceptable.

thx Jordi Scott (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hopelessly promotional article on a homeopathic veterinarian, described epeatedly in hearticle as "Dr. Jeff.", just asit would be in his advertising. If he isnotable, which I doubt, atotal rewrite would be needed by a editor with a neutral point of view. DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:37:09, 3 July 2019 review of submission by 95.185.199.156


95.185.199.156 (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was approved and has been moved to mainspace. If you created it, Congratulations! Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:23:31, 3 July 2019 review of submission by S4satishverma


S4satishverma (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:28:00, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Kbradley26


Please provide me with assistance and what I can do to get my submission approved. What do I need to change and do differently?

Kbradley26 (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:29:32, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Rgb326

As you can tell from my article. Rory Diamond is very notable for his work as CEO of K9s for Warriors (the nations largest service dog provider for veterans who suffer from PTSD). Rory is also a city councilman for Jacksonville and serves as the vice chairman for the rules committee. Rory has appeared on many news stations including Fox News, CSPAN, and Washington Post. Rory Diamond also received a distinguished service award in 2001 from President George Bush for his work in the White house during 9/11. As you can can tell, Rory is a very notable person. If you need any more information please feel free to reach out. Thank you for your reconsideration. Rgb326 (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:42:50, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Sarahmpalmer.0

This is my first time posting to Wiki. I did not intend to advertise my topic but recieved a rejection based on that. Was there something specific that was unacceptable about my post? I understand that my links need to be from other sources other than the creator of my topic.... is that correct? Sarahmpalmer.0 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Sarahmpalmer.0 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:03:31, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Texacomexico


Texacomexico (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


July 4

Request on 04:51:30, 4 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mercer5089


I resubmitted the article with an additional citation. I'm unsure how to make the paper map verifiable, but the new citation contains the correct information and includes a digital map. Please let me know if I need to add additional citations, and thanks for your help.

Mercer5089 (talk) 04:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:07:35, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Rosster montreal


To whom it may concern,

Months ago, i added an album from the band The Atomic Bitchwax, and I was sent a message, "Stub created, hope that helps. All the best.": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitron_(album)

i am now trying to add an album from the band Madball, and it is being rejected. I don't understand why? Is it because I tried to create a page (a standalone article) instead of a "stub"? Or it is something else?

Could some one give me some advice. :-)

Thanks

Ross

Rosster montreal (talk) 05:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:24:08, 4 July 2019 review of draft by Banquo92

{{SAFESUBST:Void|



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Integrated_Management_Concept Please review the latest comment (from the 1st of July) in the article draft (a response to a question I posted on the reviewers talk page). Seems like there is no reason for the article being rejected. Please advise.


Banquo92 (talk) 06:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:26:56, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Ferdig75


Ferdig75 (talk) 06:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I added the reference of the main italian economic newspaper (Il Sole 24 Ore)

06:36:27, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Ngugi Muiruri

1.Since this my first article i would appreciate assistance on the content that need to be inserted or deleted to meet wikipedia main purpose. 2.Would appreciate assistance on changes that i ought do made on the article to reflect wikipedia main purpose 3.Would like the article to be informative i.e History of Catholic Men Association at Holy Family Minor Basilica to be known and easily accessible. Ngugi Muiruri (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:38:53, 4 July 2019 review of draft by Shalini suresh mwrt


I need to publish an article on madras west round table india.I need to know on what criteria does a web site be provided for citations and notablity? Shalini suresh mwrt (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:25:27, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Abbycarroll


Couldn't draft Dujuan Thomas be considered a WP:ENT ? with his large following, contributions to the modeling and fashion industry with works including celebrities, and his role in film and modeling for websites. Abbycarroll (talk) 08:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


08:55:07, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Sindysparkles

Just wondering what I have done wrong for the article to be rejected if anyone could please help. Sindysparkles (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:55:37, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Marshmallowmabel

I have added a reliable source that backs up information on Cierra Cinti's early life and career. The source is from a published magazine, called Tyler Neighbors South. Cinti covered the magazine and a full article was written about her music career. This article is cited as reference 2. I feel this new reference should be enough to satisfy the necessity of an outside publishing of a musician. Marshmallowmabel (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:27:17, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Sindysparkles

I have added more references and wondering if the article could please be reviewed? Thanks! Sindysparkles (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:55:09, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Muralidhar kurni


My recent article submission has been rejected. Let me know the reason for rejection. My user name is "Muralidhar kurni"

Muralidhar kurni (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:15:42, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Muthukumar21366


Muthukumar21366 (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:24:31, 4 July 2019 review of submission by EgohunterRecordings

Hello, I see an article for Psysex was rejected before because it was not notable enough (the person who uploaded it did not put any references in the past). I fixed the article for Psysex, adding reference links and taking out some lines that seemed subjective. I belive the article is now objective and referenced correctly. Can you review it again? why is it still declined? EgohunterRecordings (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:57:35, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Peaksofmind

I am requesting a re-review because we believe this article is relevant based on evidence from the official Explorer's Grand Slam page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorers_Grand_Slam#cite_note-pancoe-43 Alex is #49 on the official list of individuals who have completed this challenge. Pancoe is the first brain tumor survivor to complete the grand slam.

Peaksofmind (talk) 12:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:33:05, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Muthukumar21366


Muthukumar21366 (talk) 13:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=904778355"