Jump to content

User talk:HinaBB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HinaBB (talk | contribs) at 08:20, 24 January 2020 (→Unblock Request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aryan Khan (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A bunch of the verbiage is biased towards promoting Khan or showing how famous he is because of his actor parents. Needs more focus on his own career and how he is notable on his own work.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, HinaBB! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Forty Rules Of Love

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Forty Rules Of Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://excellencereporter.com/2019/01/16/shams-of-tabriz-the-40-rules-of-love/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 11:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Forty Rules Of Love

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Forty Rules Of Love, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 09:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Forty Rules Of Love has been accepted

The Forty Rules Of Love, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 09:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello HinaBB, thank you for creating the article. I was really impressed that you addressed the issues raised yesterday, so quickly. I have tagged it with two more issues. Some of the sources seem to be unreliable sources like blogs and some sources seem to be mirrors of other sources already present. It's better to replace them with reliable sources if you can find them. Unreliable sources may be removed by someone else, and blogs may be seen as spam. If these sources get removed, the content that they cite are also likely to be removed. The second issue is minor. We need at least one other wikipedia page to link to this page, obvious one would be the author's wikipedia page. After you link to this article from at least one other page, you can remove the orphan tags. Good luck! And happy editing! Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 10:11, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aryan Khan (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources in here are far from reliable and I would strongly advise against resubmitting it unless it surpasses all of the previous 6+ deleted versions.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Gerard Lyons ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 11:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru, It would be just great if you can help me understand the matter. Thankyou! (HinaBB (talk) 04:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Removing referenced material

Hi HinaBB - just a quick note to ask you to please be careful when removing referenced material from articles, especially BLPs? Your edit at Elif Shafak removed material which referenced a source which included an excerpt from the subject's TED talk in which she stated she was bisexual. This would be considered a reliable source per WP:ABOUTSELF. Cheers! -- a consensus is queer oppression | argue | contribs 16:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alfie I am sorry for removing something that was right and backed up by a reliable source. Also, it was due to a misunderstanding as well. Anyways, i will be more careful. Thankyou for bringing this into my consideration. Happy Editing!! Cheers!! (HinaBB (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

hi, how are you doing? 
Zee2019 (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Daily Caller. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am very well aware with the three-revert rules. Dont worry! Happy editing|!!!

(HinaBB (talk) 05:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Thankyou So Much!

Hello HinaBB, Thankyou editor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Well as i am new, you have helped me enough. Your positive comments have raised my confidence. Thanks!!

(Xackadams (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Keep editing!! ♥ (HinaBB (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TNBC Live (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Almost all of of these references come from the press releases published by TNBC Live itself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jovanmilic97 Thankyou! I will for sure check everything that you have mentioned and will be careful about it on this artcile or anyother article in future. Thankyou, for your friendly response!!♥ (HinaBB (talk) 10:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Autoblocked- Unblock Request

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
HinaBB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "RichHenry". The reason given for RichHenry's block is: "Vandalism-only account: WP:CIR".

Accept reason: Lifted. Sorry about that, there's a vandal operating from your general area. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla Thankyou dear! ♥ (HinaBB (talk) 10:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclone Kyaar (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Cyclone Kyaar, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You so much for declining the article, i was looking for ways to delete it as i found out the article already exist. McMatter

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Fang (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Three Daughters Of Eve has been accepted

Three Daughters Of Eve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Taewangkorea (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aryan Khan (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dee03 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dee03 11:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Fang (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CaptainEek were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still written informally in places. Also, sourcing does not show that he is notable. A model who writes songs occasionally does not rise to the level of encyclopedic note.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan Junejo (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more external news sources from reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karachi Street Library (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is still promotional in tone and needs to be cleaned up. Also some of the references are the same article in different publications. That needs to be cleaned up as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet Charges

{{unblock |I have been blocked as I was marked a sockpuppet for some account as mentioned MNB9911. I am requesting to please double check this as I have absolutely no connection with this account. I have been loyally contributing to Wikipedia for more than 8 months. I only regulate this one account have no other connection to any other Wikipedia user. Especially, I am not paid to do anything on wikipedia. Kindly consider this request} (HinaBB (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Unblock Request

User:Bbb23 you blocked my account due to some sockpuppetry charges. The reason I am given is having my IP blacklisted for having multiple accounts. I have no connection with any other account neither I am paid for any edit. As you can see my edits and page creation are usually all about books. Please consider this. (HinaBB (talk) 06:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. I have your talk page on my watchlist from a previous discussion.
Please carefully review Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks.
After you have done that, please use Template:Unblock to request an unblock. Grayfell (talk) 07:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have and did all the appeals Grayfell. I seriously dont know how to get this done. (HinaBB (talk) 08:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HinaBB&oldid=937323488"