User talk:Aaabbb11

Welcome!

Hello, Aaabbb11! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Aaabbb11, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aaabbb11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ethan Gutmann

i guess you got this worked out. i responded to your question on my user page. i see the gutmann article is already created—though it perhaps differs in style and approach than many other biographies ive seen on wikipedia. if i get some time later i will try to take a look at it.Happy monsoon day 21:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please leave me alone

I have no interest in watching videos you suggest on Youtube. I have not been participating in FLG articles and have no interest in wasting my time on that mess. I ask, politely, that you refrain from contacting me or from asking others to contact me on matters related to the Falun Gong articles on Wikipedia. 21:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Have you given up editing Organ Harvesting?

on 15:15, 20 March 2015‎ User_talk:Simonm223 you made this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=China&diff=652742474&oldid=652722944 If you have no interest in organ harvesting then I suggest you reverse that disruptive edit.

Definition of claims 1. state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.

Ethan Gutmann interviewed over 100 witnesses and published a 368 page book about organ harvesting, so he much more than make a claim. He made an estimate.

You should take responsibility for disruptive edits, rather wasting the time of other people who clean up your mess. If you reverse that edit there will be evidence that you have given up.

Thank you for providing me with valuable experience on wikipedia. Its very useful. Aaabbb11 (talk) 21:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aaabbb11

A tag has been placed on User:Aaabbb11 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bentogoa (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... WP:U5 Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of userspace.

I have made hundreds of edits on wiki in the last few months. Seems that the person nominating my page for deletion hasn't understood the above or checked how many edits I make.

My experience of wiki is that there are people who like to nominate pages for deletion, without realising what they are doing, discouraging people from participating in wiki.

--Aaabbb11 (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

FYI

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Falun Gong, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

JimRenge (talk) 11:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Organ harvesting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Tribune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive behaviour

Continuing to make controversial edits despite ongoing talkpage discussion, especially when the rules and policies of Wikipedia have been explained to you multiple times, constitutes disruptive editing, and you're slowly driving yourself to a block. When an issue is being discussed, it is not acceptable to ignore community output and continue on as if nothing happened.

This is your first formal warning. Wikipedia is not an experiment in anarchy, and there are consequences for editors who explicitly insist on breaking the rules. --benlisquare_T•C•E 14:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

You have also been cautioned on talk page as per this diff: [1] Simonm223 (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

The above warning was for this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=China&diff=654328050&oldid=654098606 so its not something that concerns me. Aaabbb11 (talk) 00:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Response

If you are really going to level complaints of disruptive editing against me, considering the talk and edit history between the two of us and my talk and edit history in general I'd strongly suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:BOOMERANG Simonm223 (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Its sad you think organ harvesting is nonsense. I posted this video

Killed for Organs: China's Secret State Transplant Business (2012) YouTube video, 8 minutes (which has a number medical professionals on it)

on your page in an attempt for you to realise the truth, but you weren't interested. Total comments by me on your page is 2. Publishers don't want to publish nonsense, because their reputations are at stake. Three books have been published on organ harvesting so far. Aaabbb11 (talk) 13:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

You misunderstand - what I meant is that I'm not a single-purpose user. In fact when I don't have Falun Gong POV pushers trying to shift the balance of China articles toward a flat-out endorsement of the investigatively weak Kilgour / Mattas report I generally don't even touch those darn articles as they are not my favourite things to deal with. My edits with you have generally been commented and while my temper may be short as a result of having had to deal with this many times before I have tried to make sure that they were generally not massive shifts to PoV. The K/M report is garbage, Gutmann is a propagandist. Does the Chinese government harvest organs? Yes, from death row inmates. That's not controversial (IE: it's well known, I find the practice morally repugnant in every way). But they're not butchering a silly alien cult from the 1990s for their organs. That's just not happening. China is a very complicated place with a lot of good and a lot of bad. What matters to me is that we have articles about China that reflect the realities of the place, not the biases of westerners who have never visited, or who have specific axes to grind. And usually that's a big enough challenge, without throwing on top of it the constant cries of oppression which an aging saucer cult uses to create a sense of greater in-group cohesion. My advice to you, one editor to another: stop. You're probably a returning user who is attempting to circumvent a topic ban. And, in that case, I doubt you will. But, if I'm wrong, (and I might be, suspect is different from know) and you're a NEW Falun Gong PoV pusher, look at what happened last time. Was I disciplined? Yes, a little bit. But the people I was disciplined for reverting got topic bans. All of them did. Because I generally know where to draw the line between constructive participation and disruptive participation, and while I'll be passionate in defense of my view of neutrality, I will not go over that line. Ok. Nobody likes text walls. And considering your fondness for the FLG I may have offended you by sharing my personal opinion of them here. If it's any consolation I am no more negative regarding the Falun Gong than I am regarding the Scientologists. It's just the Scientologists don't generally intrude on the articles I patrol. And I'm not writing this with the intention of offending you. But I think you need to understand that there are other very divergent understandings of what WP:NPOV means from the one you are subscribing to. Mine is largely influenced from spending a long time dealing with WP:FRINGE articles. And I'd suggest, if you really are what you claim to be - a new Wikipedia editor who isn't connected to those old editwarriors - you should step away from the Falun Gong articles entirely, leave them to people like Keihatsu, who is very reasonable. Simonm223 (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

I welcome discussion. User:Happy monsoon day doesn't seem interested in FG pages now. Asdfg12345 probably got bored with wiki.

Te Urewera National Park

Hey, I noticed you re-added Te Urewera National Park to the list of national parks. Its no longer a national park so I removed it again. -- haminoon (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Has its name changed? Its not clear to me what it is now. Maybe it could be listed with former in brackets, not sure. Thanks for info Aaabbb11 (talk) 03:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Looking at 1, 2 and 3 it appears to be just called Te Urewera. Do you think Te Urewera National Park and Te Urewera should be merged? Much of Te Urewera is out of date. -- haminoon (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Merge sounds like excellent idea. I think the same thing about Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park and Aoraki/Mount Cook. Aaabbb11 (talk) 04:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Aaabbb11

User:Aaabbb11, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aaabbb11 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Aaabbb11 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. STSC (talk) 06:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

As the wiki rules aren't clear your page could get deleted for having "This user supports Chelsea". But I don't waste my time trying to delete other people's pages or articles and think there should be more freedom on wiki and more people contributing to articles. How many articles have you created?

But while we are having a chat are you aware of or care about the Persecution of Christians in China? That section looks a bit out of date to me so maybe you would like to contribute to that page.Aaabbb11 (talk) 02:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

You can express your interests on user page but should not use it as a personal blog to discuss your interests. STSC (talk) 07:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Please let me know if you can find a rule that clearly states that. But I'm mainly discussing wiki things. Sure the last section is nothing to do with wiki, but I change what I'm doing all the time and am interested in contributing to subject areas I haven't edited yet. I find more subjects to get interested in all the time. I think constantly about what I'm doing and some people like me enjoy change.

The Mt Cook climbing info is a warning for other people rather than my personal interest, but should be on wiki if possible.

You don't seem to understand some of the things you are accusing me of.

You've had a caution about disruptive editing on 4 June 2014. I've seeing you doing that since then. Aaabbb11 (talk) 11:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Read WP:UP#GOALS carefully. If you modify or delete those materials not related to Wikipedia then I may withdraw my MfD nomination. STSC (talk) 12:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

If my user page gets deleted its not a big deal. As I will have found the limit and just adjust what I'm doing. Aaabbb11 (talk) 00:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gao Rongrong (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gao Rongrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gao Rongrong (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gao Rongrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CookieMonster755 (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gao Rongrong (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jaaron95 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gao Rongrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 06:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikilinks

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove any Wikilink per WP:LINK, as you did at Falun Gong. STSC (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)