User talk:ArglebargleIV

Permanent link archiving :

• Archive 1, through January 31, 2007
• Archive 2, through June 10, 2007
• Archive 3, through September 24, 2007
• Archive 4, through December 17, 2007
• Archive 5, through July 6, 2008
• Archive 6, through December 29, 2008
• Archive 7, through March 22, 2009
• Archive 8, through July 21, 2009

Please add new comments at the bottom of this page, and sign them.
Although Wikipedia itself is not censored, I reserve the right to delete offensive obscenity and deliberately disruptive edits. If you're just complaining about me, though, I'll leave it on here, I've nothing to hide. (Except my real name, of course.) -- ArglebargleIV 22:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Evolution of Chinese from Homo Erectus

Dear ArglebargleIV,

Thank you for your good faith edits!

But unfortunately, the reality of human evolution during the past 4 billions of life on our planet Earth is not as clear cut as the "out of Africa" theory attempts to address it. The "out of Africa" theory tries to say that ALL humans are descended from the same group of anatomically modern "Cro Magnon" or Homo Sapien Sapiens and while some of the older previous studies did initially seem to support that theory, those studies were not all inclusive and did not test many aspects of human genetics. But within the last few years, new genetic evidence have been discovered as a result of numerous scientific studies that have been conducted which lend a strong support that the modern Chinese people, or conservatively, a subpopulation of the Chinese gene pool are descended NOT from an anatomically modern African Homo Sapien like other humans on Earth, but rather that they are the product of an indigenous evolutionary lineage going back at least 1.8 million- 2 million years ago to Homo Erectus in East Asia. And that the modern Chinese people today are a more evolved anatomically modern form of Homo Erectus.

I am a scientist and I would like to introduce to you the peer reviewed scientific evidence supporting a separate independent evolution of the modern Chinese people from an archaic form of Homo Erectus.

Please watch this: 1.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJnuMx8KD84&feature=related

Below I have provided the results of scientific DNA studies that provide strong irrefutable support for an independent origin of the Chinese from Homo Erectus. These scientific studies have both been published in peer reviewed scientific journals and are well received by the scientific community. Please take some time to read them and feel free to ask me any questions regarding human evolution.

1.)Genetics Society of America's Genetics Journal, "Testing for Archaic Hominin Admixture on the X Chromosome: Model Likelihoods for the Modern Human RRM2P4 Region From Summaries of Genealogical Topology Under the Structured Coalescent" by Murray P. Cox, Fernando L. Mendez, Tatiana M. Karafet, Maya Metni Pilkington, Sarah B. Kingan, Giovanni Destro-Bisol, Beverly I. Strassmann and Michael F. Hammer.

2.)Oxford University's Oxford Journals, Evidence for Archaic Asian Ancestry on the Human X Chromosome by Daniel Garrigan, Zahra Mobasher, Tesa Severson, Jason A. Wilder and Michael F. Hammer

Thank you!

Prod2 for Khumalo Derivative

I was actually writing that as a prod, you just beat me to the Save button! eaolson (talk) 00:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Concerning Seiken Densetsu 3 (What would've been Secret of Mana 2) in the Emulation article

It's funny, there is already a detailed article about the game on Wikipedia, but it seems like talking about it in the SNES or Emulation articles is forbidden because everytime I try to add it, it gets erased. That's kinda lame... and yeah, I am kind of a n00b when it comes to editing at Wikipedia (more used to ED), but thanks for atleast trying to help, though some snoot will probably end up deleting it again... - Kitsune_Baka —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.20.160.94 (talk) 14:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

From an anonymous editor

You seem to be an expert on everything, wow smart guy I wish I had your intelliegence, from Mormons, to science, to masturbating, to physics, to philosophy, good lord, everybody wished they where as smart as you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.61.204 (talk) 16:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

From User:Hendaj

I don't know who you are, and I don't care. I'm doing what the Wikipedia Bot told me to do. Take it up with them/it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hendaj (talk • contribs) 02:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Britney Spears Songs

Why you removed the content on List of Britney Spears songs?? The discography page doesn't mention existence of some b-sides or leaked songs and much of the songs aren't mentioned anywhere, not even on the albums page, so why??! PlatinumFire (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Blobble

Hello, ArglebargleIV. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TDAS

Total Drama Action Scandal... don't delete it... just give me a good name for it instead of scandal.

--Delfino12 (talk) 21:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC) ->

Morefar Back O’Beyond

I object to deletion. My reasons are on the talk page of the article. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Ivica Bednjanec page?

"17:50, 18 January 2009 Jimfbleak (talk | contribs) deleted "Ivica Bednjanec" ‎ (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)"

"A page you created, Ivica Bednjanec, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)"

Can you explain me why did you delete mentioned page?

For your information, Ivica Bednjanec is one of the greatest (if not the greatest) Croatian comic author. Mr. Bednjanec is also one of the greatest designers at Croatia, and so on. He is complete author of (scenario, drawing and color) of most (99%) of his works, and here we are talking about of thousands (!) of original artwork "sheets". This is impressive in world measures...

I was not the author of that page; I think team of Croatian Wikipedia did that. I just made some factographic corrections to page. However, I demand explanation of your act. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BornDark (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

• Responding on your talk page. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from IABF

Hello ArglebargleIV, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to IABF has been removed. It was removed by 72.147.206.82 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 72.147.206.82 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to take part in the article's current AfD. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Removal of PROD from Contractor combatant

Hello ArglebargleIV, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Contractor combatant has been removed. It was removed by Gingerbreadman7 with the following edit summary '(This is not test material. This is the actual encyclopedia article. There is NOT supposed to be a duplicate @ Transwiki:Contractor combatant .)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Gingerbreadman7 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

POV problems, Soapbox-ing at Death panel

The lead section of Death panel, which you have contributed to, currently contains content that misrepresents the origin of the term "Death panel", and provides a misleading summary of an article by Nangia and Wilson in Foreign Policy. Most of the problematic content appears to have been added by an editor or editors at IP 209.6.238.201, possibly in violation of WP:SOAP. I am calling on contributors to the page to revisit this issue and either come to a consensus on the proper content, or propose it for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Carly Fiorina

Thank you for stepping into the breach at Carly Fiorina earlier. I've made a request for comment here, utilizing your sourcing, and I'm hoping you'll consider sharing your thoughts, again, there. Thanks, in advance. user:J aka justen (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Ramanujan

I understand that you are an Indian and that you are proud of it, but please keep your ego out of wikipedia, putting other indians' biased and egocentric views on another indian is pointless, your pride only hinders you here in a place of knowledge. We do not need biased opinions from nobody's and neverwas' like your self and the nobody's you quote. The truth is Ramanujan was a nobody who contributed very little to the field of mathematics and had almost no natural talent for mathematics other than his extensive knowledge of continued fractions, and the only reason you know of him is because of a movie written by two americans called 'good will hunting'. I suggest you take ramanujan's balls out of your mouth and realize he accomplished nothing just like you and most indians. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.179.25.154 (talk) 15:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

• I have responded at your talk page. --- ArglebargleIV (talk) 16:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Your edits were reverted

Hi, I thought I'd let you know that your edits to Vokkaliga were reverted by someone else. I considered undoing them, but thought I should let you know about this first. BashBrannigan (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ArglebargleIV. You have new messages at Drilnoth's talk page.
Message added 22:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Help

ArglebargleIV, could you please help me with the table in List of Martha Speaks episodes, i have no clue what went wrong. _{TCK| chat} 14:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, thanks, i haven't had time in my busy schedule to edit Wikipedia for months and i'm starting to forget how the site works. _{TCK| chat} 13:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Judith Keppel

You recently reverted my edits to the page I cite in the above title, stating that I introduced "negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source". How does one actually provide a reliable source regarding broadcast media? Since to do so one would have to provide hours worth of video, the only realistic way is via the observations of the audience. It's blatantly obvious to anyone that watches this show that what I wrote was accurate, not only from her success ratio in challenge rounds and the lack of conference from other team members when she's in the final round, but also from the frequent looks of exasperation on the faces of the rest of the team when she gets easy questions wrong! To construe what I wrote as negative or controversial is therefore ridiculous, as it is obviously true via observation. CrackDragon (talk) 23:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

As an addendum to my above comments, I serendipitously watched this show again this evening, and all my observations were once again borne out. This leaves me with severe misgivings about Wikipedia's policy on disallowing material that can't be cited from other sources. All free thought and original material is therefore taboo. If Issac Newton had published his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, the most brilliant scientific work ever formulated by an individual, on Wikipedia, it would have been deleted due to lack of references. All material derived from first principles is therefore garbage as far as this site is concerned.

Whilst I'm ranting, have you ever thought about becoming a Traffic Warden in the UK? That would hand you even more of the pedantic power to antagonise others you appear to crave, allowing you to realise your full officious, bureaucratic potential! CrackDragon (talk) 19:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

• "I'm not trying to antagonize you, I'm just telling you what the situation is. And please cut the insults"

Simmer down, I was only kidding! Since you claim to be a "punctuation stickler" I'd have thought the exclamation mark at the end of my leg-pull would have alluded to the playful nature of my comment. CrackDragon (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Awards

If you really feel that way then you should take down all the Wikipedia awards on your user page -- kind of a double standard, and you are not a decorated military veteran. Think about it. 166.70.238.46 (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

• Responded on your talk page. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Complaint retracted. 166.70.238.46 (talk) 01:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Both complaints have been retracted. 166.70.238.46 (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Greenbelt attempted robbery

Look at those subtopics in the Glorietta article. They're about BOMBINGS, EXPLOSIONS, FIRES!! An attempted robbery, with a SHOOTOUT at a similar mall, is pretty much a SIMILAR incident that SHOULD be included in the article! The first time you deleted my section, you noted it was merely an UNREFERENCED NEWS STORY, and I already put a damn reference for it, and now you're telling me that it's a fucking MINOR news event?! C'mon! -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.239.96 (talk • contribs)

• Responding at your talk page. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Harvest Tradings-Pakistan

i creat this page due to uplift and contribute the role in econmoy of pakistan. kindly remove speedy deleltion tag and help me how the make this page better in the light of wikipedia policies.AhmadJawad (talk) 06:30, 04 November 2009 (UTC)

Joe Duffy

I would like to know what grounds you felt you had to delete my piece. My information is completely accurate. ~~PublicGasur~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by PublicGasur (talk • contribs) 13:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Carrie Prejean

Hello. Would you dispute that the video that Carrie Prejean says she made when she was 17 would fit the legal definition of child pornography by U.S. federal law and that she made and distributed it by her own admission? Would you accept it if I wrote that the video meets the legal definition of child pornography and cited the relevant federal code? That would be a factual & documented assertion. If you would object to it, please explain why. I'm willing to work with you on this, but I do feel it is a very relevant point to the article on Ms. Prejean. Luitgard (talk) 23:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Added legal opinion from credible source on the question of whether Prejean's creation & distribution of the video violates child porn laws. Luitgard (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Dartford Living resize =

many thanks for your assistance, appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.61.18.11 (talk) 17:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Kim Chiu

I laughed at the revision that you undid in that article:

Kim Chiu is currently a partnered with Erich Gonzales, and the World Rally Championship driver Colin McRae.

Colin McRae? He's dead, right? Man, I guess PMDrive was right; what passes for pop culture nowadays is tantamount to a collective reduction of the world's IQ on a grand scale. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:30, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Janelle Pierzina

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Janelle Pierzina. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janelle Pierzina 3. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Moon landing conspiracy theories

Hello, ArglebargleIV. You have new messages at Alarics's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Alarics (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Private placement platform

Hello ArglebargleIV, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Private placement platform has been removed. It was removed by Janus303 with the following edit summary 'Doing some Googling you can find news stories about this topic. But the article is horrendous and needs major surgery, no doubt about that.'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Janus303 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 19:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Stalking me

[1] Thanks. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Message from user:Chrandeep

Sir, would you please explain what's wrong with this page?- anonymous ( although you can guess who I am) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrandeep (talk • contribs) 23:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

• Uh, since I have no clue who you are, and no idea what you are talking about, if you don't mind, I'll just ignore this message by a blocked sockpuppet. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Listverse

Hi - thanks for your message. I have added a keep message to your delete request and included citations for why the article should stay. May I ask why a month after you made an edit to the article, you decided it should be deleted? What changed that made you feel that way? 121.73.151.5 (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Greetings ArglebargleIV,

I have been a fan of Wikipedia for years. Thank you for the message of welcome. I see you've sent me links to some more learning tools and look forward to examining them soon. Thanks again. Wikipedia has been a valuable resource to me as a journalist. Only yesterday did I feel compelled to register, log in for the first time and attempt to create a Biltmore Beacon page. It feels a little awkward at the moment -- new language, new operating system. {{helpme}} When I read that the page was tagged for lacking a reference, I placed one in the form of a sentence at the end of the page because I didn't understand the tutorial's instructions on how to do it properly. Quill-ink (talk) 22:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please only use {{helpme}} on your own talk page. Thank you. Intelligentsium 22:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Mines and Associates

Hi! I noticed that you were the first to tag the MINES and Associates page for deletion. I was particularly wondering why? When I created it I made sure that it wasn't an advertisement and that it contained factual information about a company. It was written by someone outside of the MINES and Associates company specifically to be for a third party view. Please explain to me how you chose the page for deletion so I may make the changes necessary to the page for it to be acceptable for Wikipedia.

Thank you, Namiller8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Namiller8 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Killing of The Night (Book) Deletion

Why have you nominated my article for deletion? There are many articles about books on this website and I don't see why mine is any different. I should not be deleted, it is a worthy article and just because it is not a famous book, you should not delete it. Also, you have no right stating that I am the author. I am a great fan of this book and have been for years. But you have no evidence to state I am the author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebethseesall (talk • contribs) 21:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

• Responded on your talk page. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Killing of the Night

I'm not sure if it is a vanity press, afterall, I'm not the author. I did not at any point state that there have been only 50 copies. Somebody else did. There may be only 50 copies, I'm not sure. I am only an passionate reader who cares for the book, which was after all passed on by a friend. And, as for the Bethany Hawkins Article, all I was doing was trying to publish an article on my favourite author. I don not know if she has any other books but I adore this one, and for that reason only I made the article. I did get the information wrong about her though, it appears. She is not a child. She is, in fact, 19. It turns out that she does not live in England either. The information I read was false. But by that assumption alone, you don't really have a ligit reason to delete my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebethseesall (talk • contribs) 22:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello ArglebargleIV,

Now that there is a reference on the Biltmore Beacon page, would you feel comfortable removing the tag placed there that says it lacks one? Quill-ink (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Not Voting

I restored something, not because it was a personal attack, but because it is not right to delete comments by other people, as my comment was also deleted. Also, I am not voting as there is a tag saying this is not a vote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebethseesall (talk • contribs) 22:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Fark question

Hey, I've always wanted to ask you this - are you the same person who has an account ArgleBargle on Fark.com? Tan | 39 03:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• Nope, that's not me -- I don't think I've even looked at Fark in the past several months. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm sorry. --190.53.143.141 (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

About Zedo

Hi ArglebargleIV,

I am working on fixing the Zedo Wiki page and I see that you actively monitor that page for discrepancies and non-compliance. There is a false notion that Zedo engages in spyware. I was wondering if you could be so kind as to work with me on getting the facts right and fixing the page. I am new to this and was hoping that you could guide me as to what proof is needed to remedy the false claims made by wikipedia users about Zedo. Any help from you would be really appreciated. I am learning as I move along and am really hoping that you'll be patient enough to work with me :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sskamath (talk • contribs) 06:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi !!

Hi and Happy New Year !! This is my first time on Wikipedia and I'm just wondering why ?? and for what reason ?? your comment " 03:39, 9 January 2010 ArglebargleIV (talk | contribs) (1,747 bytes) (removing peacock terms) " was tweeted onto the internet to appear immediately after a search ?? Is this normal and common for each wikipedia correction or opinions to be tweeted and to stay on the internet forever ?? If that is true than it seems like a very invasive process ... If this is not true than I'm hoping that you can remove this tweet as it is an unfair item to come up at the top of any internet search !!! Thanks !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkyellow (talk • contribs)

• I'm not quite sure what you're talking about. I don't use twitter, and I don't know what search you are using that would show that -- can you tell me? -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 12:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure!! Good Morning!! if you do a search through google of "it girls documentary" your comment comes up immediately almost at the top so if you are not tweeting your comments might it be possible someone else is ?? I was really surprised to see an internet comment and felt like it was an invasion of privacy ... but not really sure how wikipedia works. am not really having a good experience of wikipedia - there were and are so many great writeups of this documentary and the 2 chosen were the 2 most NEGATIVE possible ... seems a little unfair and unbalanced to me to portray in wikipedia a very positive independent film with the 2 most negative write-ups or interviews in existence. The other editor suggested I add a different link from a good source and I did some research and did from cnn.com..!! Thanks so much !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkyellow (talk • contribs) 12:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• It appears that somebody at "tweetmeme.com" is automatically tweeting changes on Wikipedia with a delay -- I have no control over that.
  What you found on cnn.com isn't a review of the documentary, it's a snippet of an interview with the producer of the documentary, and you posting it in a way to replace, not add to, the critical response section. Find a good, reliable review and point me to it, I can show you how it's done if you wish. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your offer!! Actually It Girls was shown on television seven years ago and there were not really reviews as it was a tv event on cable and not a film for the movie theatres ... there were mostly interviews, gossip, and thoughts. The chosen writeups you have are not by reviewers but by gossip columnists ( Roger Friedman was an entertaiment gossip columnist at Fox online ) and the NY Times writer is a onetime article because her sister was considered an "it girl" ... there were many thoughts in all directions at that time because although the film was shot before Sept 11 it was released just after and the people's consciousness at that time was heightened ... most articles were light and funny and gossipy about It Girls ... the two chosen just happen to be quite meanspirited and not indicative of that moment or spirit of the film and therefore show a light that didn't exist then The CNN transcript is the complete interview ... Also I believe that there were also many articles in print and not on the internet ... Thanks so much!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkyellow (talk • contribs) 13:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Can that tweet be removed ?? Seems like an invasion of privacy ?? Thanks !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkyellow (talk • contribs) 13:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• No, it cannot, because neither I nor Wikipedia made it. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

I disagree the Boost comment wasn't constructive. In fact it could save a lot of time to users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.42.67.165 (talk) 16:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

MRTV

In Myanmar is MTV and in Thailand is MRTV. You didn't know this.--125.25.76.202 (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

That article is only for us Asians.--125.25.76.202 (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip on not to restore using cut and paste. Vandalism is still continuing. What's the proper next step? Hybernator (talk) 12:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

...

Yes, but MRTV doesn't exist in Myanmar, but MTV does. So, wait for few days. and Tw3435 isn't me. I am from Thailand and I watch MRTV everyday, and it is in Thai--125.25.76.202 (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

OK but please don't move back.--125.25.76.202 (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

But "Radio"

In Myanmar it is called Myanmar Television, or Myanmar TV. "Myanmar Radio Television" never exist in Myanmar or other vountries in the world.--125.25.76.202 (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I see "Chiang Mai"

Chiang Mai is in Thailand, and I think that is take from Wikipedia--125.25.76.202 (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Discovery Net Page

Hi you added a speedy delete request to a page Discovery Net I had just created and was in the process of editing. I have updated teh page since. I am not sure about the etiquette here, would you be the right person to remove the request if this page now fits the criteria, if not your advise is much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.169.4.190 (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi

I am not the same as previous one who said that he watch MRTV in Thailand everyday. But I am from the same country (Thailand). It is seperated in Myanmar Radio (MR) and Myanmar Television (MTV). But sometimes MRTV contains many Burmese programs (Because Burmeses always move to Thailand to work) and makes foreign people confuse of it. But this doesn't happen on NBN and other networks of Thailand.--125.25.235.62 (talk) 21:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

In Thailand have like 200 channels but only few is free to air--125.25.235.62 (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you on yor kind words, but I made article Neferetnebty and somebody wrote on talk page that I must link "queen" remove to link "queen consort". Now when I did that, I think that we should remove contents of Talk:Nefertenebty. --Mychele Trempetich (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Moon landing page

Arkle, I don't think I broke anything with the template. However, I'll be more observant in the future. KoshVorlonNaluboutes,Aeria Gloris 16:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Motto of the Day

Hi there, ArglebargleIV! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Change reversal

Sorry for not noting my reasons, I hope the new revision is a bit better. I want to improve the entry to make it less of an article at some point, just happened to read it and that last paragraph was insulting. I'll be sure to follow the rules better next time. --68.192.37.8 (talk) 04:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Erich Gonzales Transport

I've already reported the user to UAA, but feel free to report him to AIV too. His user page contains the same material, so you might want to also tag it for deletion. Netalarm^talk 05:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

• Will do, and thanks. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Grand Unified Theory

Since you and Dougweller were interacting with Dale Ritter at Talk:Grand Unified Theory, can I trouble you to look at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Request for Clarification of 'Grand Unified Theory' Page Content Policy? It's beyond me, a mere mathematician. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)