User talk:E4024

Hello, E4024, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Cyprus dispute

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyprus dispute. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 23x2 _φ —Preceding undated comment added 18:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC).

May 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cyprus, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 20:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/United Republic of Cyprus.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Cyprus. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 16:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Cyprus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 16:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Athenean (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Final Warning

In response to the ANI thread raised against you...the people complaining are right. Your comments are absolutely unacceptable; I am particularly concerned with the edit summaries on [1], [2], and [3]. Furthermore, you say in ANI,"I understand I will have to be less passionate in talk pages...." That is an extreme understatement--you need to take your comments (see the ANI for examples) and dial them back 90%. You clearly seem to view this topic as a WP:BATTLEGROUND, and that your responsibility here is to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS; if you read those links, however, you'll see that neither is allowed on Wikipedia. If you can contribute civilly on the topic and provide good information that is neutral and verified in reliable sources, you're welcome to stay. But if you make any more comments of this nature, I will block you; continued bad behavior will eventually result in you being blocked indefinitely. If you want a fight, you've got the wrong website. For all I know, you may be 100% right with regards to the actual content, but you cannot use uncivil means to achieve editorial change. If you have questions, post them here and I'll see them. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

I understand your concerns at Talk:Greece, but given the recent problems that led you being brought to ANI, it's very hard for other editors to take any edit or comment you make with respect to Greek, Turkish, Cypriot, etc. history/politics in a non-judgmental way. I wonder if you might be willing to voluntarily stay away from the topic area for a month or so? Do some solid, non-controversial editing before worrying about nationalist nightmares. Please note that this is not a directive--if you really think that you can now edit those areas with due respect to our policies (both editing and behaviorial), you are welcome to do so; I'm merely trying to see if such a plan might make the whole problem cool down. The idea came from Dr. K, who responded to some criticism I left for Athenean regarding Athenean's comments on Talk:Greece. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

I am contributing to this discussion at the Talk Page of Athenean and hope not to be obliged to enter similar interaction again. All the best, --E4024 (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

See who makes edit wars or is an "agressive..." what was that again...?--E4024 (talk) 20:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry user, with Greece's current crises, I don't think they'll have money to keep presenting nationalist claims everywhere. P.S. There are loads of 'Greek' users on here colluding with other nationalists, so be warned. Ottomanist (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

And, hoop (Turkish saying) in a 2-step operation Cyprus is part of Greece again. Bravo to our "not nationalist" user, he achieved ENOSIS! Dear Administrator, Dr.K. who was supposed to stay away from some topics, me? --E4024 (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

He included Cyprus as historically part of the "Greek speaking world". Now, I don't know much about European history, but I was pretty sure that that is a widely held fact. He's not claiming Cyprus is currently a part of Greece. This is another why I'm saying that it might be best if you avoided this area--you seem to see bias where there is none. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

I have to agree with Qwyrxian here. These look like pretty innocuous edits to me, yet you started making sarcastic allegations about Athenean as if he were some type of nationalist and saying "Bravo" etc. Yet on this edit on Athenean's talkpage you said: In the meantime I will devote myself to other activities, if not provoked. I thought this meant that you would react to personal provocation. It seems that merely not agreeing with the edits of Greek editors provokes you. Is it possible that you could assume good faith a little more of certain Greek editors? Or is this too much to ask? Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Qwyrxian, this is what I was trying to say when I said 2-step. He first wrote "Greek speaking world" (for you) then changed it again -in less than an hour- in order to make it impossible to show (at least for me, a newcomer) or see the two edits together. This way he changed what no one had touched (my last edit) in almost three days. When you read the article as it is now, yes, Cyprus looks like it is part of Greece. Dr. K. my "bravo" was not sarcastic. I am sure that if not you other Greek editors (or at least Athenean himself) said bravo to his intelligence...

Not admitting that your remark: Bravo to our "not nationalist" user, he achieved ENOSIS! is sarcastic, is disingenuous to say the least. Also your vision of "nationalist" editors secretly self-congratulating themselves for their purportedly mischievous edits betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works. The tragic thing is not only you continue along your faulty path but that you also try to defend it. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 18:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

On the other hand, I began writing here basicly to write about articles related to the Turks. Cyprus is a main concern for me. I will certainly continue to observe the edits (content, not contributor) of "certain" Greek editors, I know not all of them are what Athenean called me. Best regards to both. --E4024 (talk) 07:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

What on earth are you talking about I "changed it again -in less than an hour in order to make it impossible..."? The article still says "Greek-speaking world". FYI there was no country called "Greece" back then, only a Greek-speaking world, so yes, I stand by my edit. "When you read the article as it is now, yes, Cyprus looks like it is part of Greece. "? Are you serious? This is really becoming ridiculous, I'm starting to think it might be best if you took an involuntary break from editing Cyprus-related topics. Athenean (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

@Athenean: Cyprus is in the previous sentence and will stay there only until people have enough time to see what you are trying to do: understate other people's intelligence... --E4024 (talk) 08:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

The only thing I am "trying to do" is help build a better online encyclopedia. I really don't care about what you think I am trying to do, but it's probably in your best interest to keep it to yourself. Athenean (talk) 19:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Enginardolma.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Enginardolma.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:19MayTurkey.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:19MayTurkey.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Everything in order now. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to File:19MayTR.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)